American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
January  2005, 1(1): 1-19. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.1

Advertising competition with market expansion for finite horizon firms

F. M. Bass 1, , A. Krishnamoorthy 2, , A. Prasad 1, and  Suresh P. Sethi 3,

1. 

School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083-0688, United States, United States
2. 

College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816-1400, United States
3. 

School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, 75083-0688, United States

Received  May 2004 Revised  December 2004 Published  January 2005

Firms that want to increase the sales of their brands through advertising have the choice of capturing market share from their competitors through brand advertising, or increasing primary demand for the category through generic advertising. In this paper, differential game theory is used to analyze the effects of the two types of advertising decisions made by firms offering a product in a dynamic duopoly. Each firm's sales depend not only on its own and its competitor's brand advertising strategies, but also on the generic advertising expenditures of the two firms. Closed-loop Nash equilibrium solutions are obtained for symmetric and asymmetric competitors in a finite-horizon setting. The analysis for the symmetric case results in explicit solutions, and numerical techniques are employed to solve the problem for asymmetric firms.
Keywords: Optimal control, Marketing, Advertising, Dynamic duopoly., Differential games.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 90B60, 49N70, 49N90, 49J20, 91A2.
Citation: F. M. Bass, A. Krishnamoorthy, A. Prasad, Suresh P. Sethi. Advertising competition with market expansion for finite horizon firms. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (1) : 1-19. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.1
[1]

Marcelo J. Villena, Mauricio Contreras. Global and local advertising strategies: A dynamic multi-market optimal control model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (3) : 1017-1048. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018084
[2]

Piernicola Bettiol. State constrained $L^\infty$ optimal control problems interpreted as differential games. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (9) : 3989-4017. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.3989
[3]

Fengjun Wang, Qingling Zhang, Bin Li, Wanquan Liu. Optimal investment strategy on advertisement in duopoly. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (2) : 625-636. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.625
[4]

Jingzhen Liu, Ka-Fai Cedric Yiu. Optimal stochastic differential games with VaR constraints. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (7) : 1889-1907. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1889
[5]

Rein Luus. Optimal control of oscillatory systems by iterative dynamic programming. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (1) : 1-15. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.1
[6]

Chloe A. Fletcher, Jason S. Howell. Dynamic modeling of nontargeted and targeted advertising strategies in an oligopoly. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2017, 4 (2) : 97-124. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2017007
[7]

Robert J. Kipka, Yuri S. Ledyaev. Optimal control of differential inclusions on manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (9) : 4455-4475. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4455
[8]

Wing Yan Lee, Fangda Liu. Analysis of a dynamic premium strategy: From theoretical and marketing perspectives. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (4) : 1545-1564. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018020
[9]

Haiying Liu, Xinxing Luo, Wenjie Bi, Yueming Man, Kok Lay Teo. Dynamic pricing of network goods in duopoly markets with boundedly rational consumers. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 429-447. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016025
[10]

Roberta Ghezzi, Benedetto Piccoli. Optimal control of a multi-level dynamic model for biofuel production. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (2) : 235-257. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017008
[11]

B. M. Adams, H. T. Banks, Hee-Dae Kwon, Hien T. Tran. Dynamic Multidrug Therapies for HIV: Optimal and STI Control Approaches. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2004, 1 (2) : 223-241. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2004.1.223
[12]

Simon Hoof. Cooperative dynamic advertising via state-dependent payoff weights. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2019, 6 (3) : 195-209. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2019014
[13]

Elimhan N. Mahmudov. Optimal control of evolution differential inclusions with polynomial linear differential operators. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2019, 8 (3) : 603-619. doi: 10.3934/eect.2019028
[14]

Alejandra Fonseca-Morales, Onésimo Hernández-Lerma. A note on differential games with Pareto-optimal NASH equilibria: Deterministic and stochastic models†. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2017, 4 (3) : 195-203. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2017012
[15]

Salah Eddine Choutri, Boualem Djehiche, Hamidou Tembine. Optimal control and zero-sum games for Markov chains of mean-field type. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2019, 9 (3) : 571-605. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019026
[16]

Lei Yang, Jingna Ji, Kebing Chen. Advertising games on national brand and store brand in a dual-channel supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (1) : 105-134. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017039
[17]

Eduardo Espinosa-Avila, Pablo Padilla Longoria, Francisco Hernández-Quiroz. Game theory and dynamic programming in alternate games. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2017, 4 (3) : 205-216. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2017013
[18]

Shihchung Chiang. Numerical optimal unbounded control with a singular integro-differential equation as a constraint. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 129-137. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.129
[19]

Lukáš Adam, Jiří Outrata. On optimal control of a sweeping process coupled with an ordinary differential equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (9) : 2709-2738. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2709
[20]

Ping Lin, Weihan Wang. Optimal control problems for some ordinary differential equations with behavior of blowup or quenching. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 809-828. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018036

2018 Impact Factor: 1.025

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (14)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (17)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences