January  2005, 1(1): 133-148. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.133

Airfoil design via optimal control theory

1. 

Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China, China

2. 

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia

Received  April 2004 Revised  October 2004 Published  January 2005

In airfoil design, one problem of great interest is to find the target airfoil profile to achieve a given target velocity distribution. It can be formulated as an optimal control problem, with the control being the airfoil profile and the governing equation being the full potential equation in the transonic regime. To discretize the problem, one approach is to employ the finite element method. In the discretized space, a direct relationship between the objective function and the unknown profile co-ordinates can be defined via the finite element basis functions. Moreover, it is advantageous to derive the gradient in the discretized space rather than the continuous space to avoid contamination by discretization errors. In this paper, this approach is studied. In particular, a new formulation is proposed. A novel decomposition of the discrete space for the potential function, the gradient is derived and an efficient algorithm using the quasi-Newton method is described. In generating and adjusting the mesh during iterations, the elliptic mesh generation technique is used.
Citation: K.F.C. Yiu, K.L. Mak, K. L. Teo. Airfoil design via optimal control theory. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (1) : 133-148. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.133
[1]

Tianliang Hou, Yanping Chen. Superconvergence for elliptic optimal control problems discretized by RT1 mixed finite elements and linear discontinuous elements. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (3) : 631-642. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.631

[2]

Thierry Horsin, Peter I. Kogut, Olivier Wilk. Optimal $L^2$-control problem in coefficients for a linear elliptic equation. II. Approximation of solutions and optimality conditions. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2016, 6 (4) : 595-628. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2016017

[3]

Thierry Horsin, Peter I. Kogut. Optimal $L^2$-control problem in coefficients for a linear elliptic equation. I. Existence result. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (1) : 73-96. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.73

[4]

Pavel I. Plotnikov, Jan Sokolowski. Optimal shape control of airfoil in compressible gas flow governed by Navier-Stokes equations. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2013, 2 (3) : 495-516. doi: 10.3934/eect.2013.2.495

[5]

Fredrik Hellman, Patrick Henning, Axel Målqvist. Multiscale mixed finite elements. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (5) : 1269-1298. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016051

[6]

Yannick Privat, Emmanuel Trélat. Optimal design of sensors for a damped wave equation. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 936-944. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0936

[7]

Bin Li, Kok Lay Teo, Cheng-Chew Lim, Guang Ren Duan. An optimal PID controller design for nonlinear constrained optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (4) : 1101-1117. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.1101

[8]

Simone Göttlich, Patrick Schindler. Optimal inflow control of production systems with finite buffers. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (1) : 107-127. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.107

[9]

Ruwu Xiao, Geng Li, Yuping Zhao. On the design of full duplex wireless system with chaotic sequences. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (4&5) : 783-793. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019052

[10]

Peter Monk, Jiguang Sun. Inverse scattering using finite elements and gap reciprocity. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2007, 1 (4) : 643-660. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2007.1.643

[11]

Pierluigi Colli, Gianni Gilardi, Gabriela Marinoschi, Elisabetta Rocca. Optimal control for a phase field system with a possibly singular potential. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2016, 6 (1) : 95-112. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2016.6.95

[12]

Pierluigi Colli, Gianni Gilardi, Gabriela Marinoschi, Elisabetta Rocca. Optimal control for a conserved phase field system with a possibly singular potential. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2018, 7 (1) : 95-116. doi: 10.3934/eect.2018006

[13]

Hai Huyen Dam, Wing-Kuen Ling. Optimal design of finite precision and infinite precision non-uniform cosine modulated filter bank. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (1) : 97-112. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018034

[14]

Philip Trautmann, Boris Vexler, Alexander Zlotnik. Finite element error analysis for measure-valued optimal control problems governed by a 1D wave equation with variable coefficients. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (2) : 411-449. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018017

[15]

Seda İǧret Araz, Murat Subașı. On the optimal coefficient control in a heat equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020124

[16]

Guy V. Norton, Robert D. Purrington. The Westervelt equation with a causal propagation operator coupled to the bioheat equation.. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2016, 5 (3) : 449-461. doi: 10.3934/eect.2016013

[17]

Fabio Bagagiolo. Optimal control of finite horizon type for a multidimensional delayed switching system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2005, 5 (2) : 239-264. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.239

[18]

Chunjuan Hou, Yanping Chen, Zuliang Lu. Superconvergence property of finite element methods for parabolic optimal control problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (4) : 927-945. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.927

[19]

Gang Chen, Zaiming Liu, Jinbiao Wu. Optimal threshold control of a retrial queueing system with finite buffer. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (3) : 1537-1552. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017006

[20]

Eric Dubach, Robert Luce, Jean-Marie Thomas. Pseudo-Conform Polynomial Lagrange Finite Elements on Quadrilaterals and Hexahedra. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (1) : 237-254. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.237

2018 Impact Factor: 1.025

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (10)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (4)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]