July  2005, 1(3): 405-414. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.405

The model of heat transfer of the arctic snow-ice layer in summer and numerical simulation

1. 

Department of Applied Mathematics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, 116024, P.R., China, China, China

2. 

State Key Lab. of Coastal and offshore Eng, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, 116024, P.R., China

Received  September 2004 Revised  March 2005 Published  July 2005

For the Arctic ice layer with high temperature in summer, the concepts of enthalpy degree, specific enthalpy and enthalpy conduction coefficient etc. are introduced in terms of the concept of enthalpy in calorifics. Heat conduction equation of enthalpy is constructed in the process of phase transformation of the Arctic ice. The condition of determinant solution and the identification model of diffusion coefficient of enthalpy are presented. Half implicit difference scheme and Schwartz alternating direction iteration are applied to solve the enthalpy conduction equation and sensitivity equation. Furthermore the Newton-Raphson algorithm is used for identification. The numerical results illustrate that the mathematic model and optimization algorithm are precise and feasible by the data(2003.8)of the Second Chinese Arctic Research Expedition in situ.
Citation: Yila Bai, Haiqing Zhao, Xu Zhang, Enmin Feng, Zhijun Li. The model of heat transfer of the arctic snow-ice layer in summer and numerical simulation. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (3) : 405-414. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.405
[1]

Qinxi Bai, Zhijun Li, Lei Wang, Bing Tan, Enmin Feng. Parameter identification and numerical simulation for the exchange coefficient of dissolved oxygen concentration under ice in a boreal lake. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (4) : 1463-1478. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018016

[2]

Tram Thi Ngoc Nguyen, Anne Wald. On numerical aspects of parameter identification for the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation in Magnetic Particle Imaging. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021042

[3]

Pingping Niu, Shuai Lu, Jin Cheng. On periodic parameter identification in stochastic differential equations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (3) : 513-543. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019025

[4]

Yuepeng Wang, Yue Cheng, I. Michael Navon, Yuanhong Guan. Parameter identification techniques applied to an environmental pollution model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (2) : 817-831. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017077

[5]

Xianbo Sun, Zhanbo Chen, Pei Yu. Parameter identification on Abelian integrals to achieve Chebyshev property. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (10) : 5661-5679. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020375

[6]

Gong Chen, Peter J. Olver. Numerical simulation of nonlinear dispersive quantization. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (3) : 991-1008. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.991

[7]

Nicolas Vauchelet. Numerical simulation of a kinetic model for chemotaxis. Kinetic & Related Models, 2010, 3 (3) : 501-528. doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.501

[8]

Petr Bauer, Michal Beneš, Radek Fučík, Hung Hoang Dieu, Vladimír Klement, Radek Máca, Jan Mach, Tomáš Oberhuber, Pavel Strachota, Vítězslav Žabka, Vladimír Havlena. Numerical simulation of flow in fluidized beds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (5) : 833-846. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.833

[9]

Barbara Kaltenbacher, William Rundell. On the identification of the nonlinearity parameter in the Westervelt equation from boundary measurements. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021020

[10]

Qinqin Chai, Ryan Loxton, Kok Lay Teo, Chunhua Yang. A unified parameter identification method for nonlinear time-delay systems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (2) : 471-486. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.471

[11]

Masahiro Yamaguchi, Yasuhiro Takeuchi, Wanbiao Ma. Population dynamics of sea bass and young sea bass. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (3) : 833-840. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.833

[12]

Ana I. Muñoz, José Ignacio Tello. Mathematical analysis and numerical simulation of a model of morphogenesis. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (4) : 1035-1059. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.1035

[13]

Andriy Sokolov, Robert Strehl, Stefan Turek. Numerical simulation of chemotaxis models on stationary surfaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (10) : 2689-2704. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.2689

[14]

Yue Qiu, Sara Grundel, Martin Stoll, Peter Benner. Efficient numerical methods for gas network modeling and simulation. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2020, 15 (4) : 653-679. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2020018

[15]

Sergio Amat, Pablo Pedregal. On a variational approach for the analysis and numerical simulation of ODEs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (4) : 1275-1291. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.1275

[16]

Michal Beneš, Pavel Eichler, Jakub Klinkovský, Miroslav Kolář, Jakub Solovský, Pavel Strachota, Alexandr Žák. Numerical simulation of fluidization for application in oxyfuel combustion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (3) : 769-783. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020232

[17]

Kari Eloranta. Archimedean ice. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2013, 33 (9) : 4291-4303. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.4291

[18]

Pavel Krejčí. The Preisach hysteresis model: Error bounds for numerical identification and inversion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (1) : 101-119. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.101

[19]

Lei Wang, Jinlong Yuan, Yingfang Li, Enmin Feng, Zhilong Xiu. Parameter identification of nonlinear delayed dynamical system in microbial fermentation based on biological robustness. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2014, 4 (2) : 103-113. doi: 10.3934/naco.2014.4.103

[20]

Hedia Fgaier, Hermann J. Eberl. Parameter identification and quantitative comparison of differential equations that describe physiological adaptation of a bacterial population under iron limitation. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 230-239. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.230

2020 Impact Factor: 1.801

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (35)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (0)

[Back to Top]