American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
April  2006, 2(2): 177-197. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.177

Option pricing under threshold autoregressive models by threshold Esscher transform

Tak Kuen Siu 1, , Howell Tong 2, and  Hailiang Yang 3,

1. 

Department of Actuarial Mathematics and Statistics, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
2. 

London School of Economics, United Kingdom
3. 

Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China

Received  September 2005 Revised  January 2006 Published  April 2006

This paper develops a valuation model for options under the class of self-exciting threshold autoregressive (SETAR) models and their variants for the price dynamics of the underlying asset using the self-exciting threshold autoregressive Esscher transform (SETARET). In particular, we focus on the first generation SETAR models first proposed by Tong (1977, 1978) and later developed in Tong (1980, 1983) and Tong and Lim (1980), and the second generation models, including the SETAR-GARCH model proposed in Tong (1990) and the double-threshold autoregressive heteroskedastic time series model (DTARCH) proposed by Li and Li (1996). The class of SETAR-GARCH models has the advantage of modelling the non-linearity of the conditional first moment and the varying conditional second moment of the financial time series. We adopt the SETARET to identify an equivalent martingale measure for option valuation in the incomplete market described by the discrete-time SETAR models. We are able to justify our choice of probability measure by the SETARET by considering the self-exciting threshold dynamic utility maximization. Simulation studies will be conducted to investigate the impacts of the threshold effect in the conditional mean described by the first generation model and that in the conditional variance described by the second generation model on the qualitative behaviors of the option prices as the strike price varies.
Keywords: Setar models, infinitely divisible distributions, Dtarch models, Setaret, Setar-Garch models, Option valuation, threshold dynamic utility maximization..
Mathematics Subject Classification: 91B24, 91B2.
Citation: Tak Kuen Siu, Howell Tong, Hailiang Yang. Option pricing under threshold autoregressive models by threshold Esscher transform. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2006, 2 (2) : 177-197. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.177
[1]

Sharif E. Guseynov, Eugene A. Kopytov, Edvin Puzinkevich. On continuous models of current stock of divisible productions. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 601-613. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.601
[2]

Hao-Zhe Tay, Kok-Haur Ng, You-Beng Koh, Kooi-Huat Ng. Model selection based on value-at-risk backtesting approach for GARCH-Type models. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (4) : 1635-1654. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019021
[3]

Junling Ma, Zhien Ma. Epidemic threshold conditions for seasonally forced SEIR models. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2006, 3 (1) : 161-172. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.161
[4]

Tao Li, Suresh P. Sethi. A review of dynamic Stackelberg game models. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (1) : 125-159. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017007
[5]

Zhuo Jin, Linyi Qian. Lookback option pricing for regime-switching jump diffusion models. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (2) : 237-258. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.237
[6]

Bruce D. Craven, Sardar M. N. Islam. Dynamic optimization models in finance: Some extensions to the framework, models, and computation. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (4) : 1129-1146. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.1129
[7]

Mauro Garavello, Benedetto Piccoli. On fluido-dynamic models for urban traffic. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4 (1) : 107-126. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.107
[8]

P. K. Jha, R. Lipton. Finite element approximation of nonlocal dynamic fracture models. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020178
[9]

K Najarian. On stochastic stability of dynamic neural models in presence of noise. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 656-663. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.656
[10]

Dong-Mei Zhu, Wai-Ki Ching, Robert J. Elliott, Tak-Kuen Siu, Lianmin Zhang. Hidden Markov models with threshold effects and their applications to oil price forecasting. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (2) : 757-773. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016045
[11]

Zhimin Li, Tailei Zhang, Xiuqing Li. Threshold dynamics of stochastic models with time delays: A case study for yunnan, China. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2020085
[12]

Jiapeng Liu, Ruihua Liu, Dan Ren. Investment and consumption in regime-switching models with proportional transaction costs and log utility. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (3) : 465-491. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017017
[13]

Jingzhen Liu, Yike Wang, Ming Zhou. Utility maximization with habit formation of interaction. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020029
[14]

Xu Chen, Jianping Wan. Integro-differential equations for foreign currency option prices in exponential Lévy models. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 8 (3) : 529-537. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.8.529
[15]

Hari Nandan Nath, Urmila Pyakurel, Tanka Nath Dhamala, Stephan Dempe. Dynamic network flow location models and algorithms for quickest evacuation planning. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020102
[16]

Heikki Haario, Leonid Kalachev, Marko Laine. Reduction and identification of dynamic models. Simple example: Generic receptor model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (2) : 417-435. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.417
[17]

Nicholas Westray, Harry Zheng. Constrained nonsmooth utility maximization on the positive real line. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (3) : 679-695. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.679
[18]

Gianni Dal Maso, Flaviana Iurlano. Fracture models as $\Gamma$-limits of damage models. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (4) : 1657-1686. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.1657
[19]

Na Song, Yue Xie, Wai-Ki Ching, Tak-Kuen Siu. A real option approach for investment opportunity valuation. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (3) : 1213-1235. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016069
[20]

Junkee Jeon, Jehan Oh. Valuation of American strangle option: Variational inequality approach. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (2) : 755-781. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018206

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (21)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (9)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences