• Previous Article
    Good programs in the RSS model without concavity of a utility function
  • JIMO Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    A novel approach in uncertain programming part II: a class of constrained nonlinear programming problems with interval objective functions
October  2006, 2(4): 387-398. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.387

Multiple workshift options in aggregrate production Multiple workshift options in aggregrate production

1. 

Graduate School of Management, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, United States

2. 

Department of Applied Mathematics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China

3. 

Department of Applied Mathematics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

Received  March 2006 Revised  August 2006 Published  October 2006

Second and third shift considerations are important for production planning and scheduling in most manufacturing facilities. A careful literature survey revealed that multiple workshift considerations have not been previously discussed for general aggregate production planning models. In this paper, we propose a mixed integer logic for permitting the opening or closing of second and third shifts of production within a generic model having linear and quadratic cost components. We illustrate the results of the model on a hypothetical data set. The model permits different costs for opening and closing the extra shifts and provides for a minimum required work force size for the extra shifts.
Citation: M. D. Troutt, S. H. Hou, W. K. Pang. Multiple workshift options in aggregrate production Multiple workshift options in aggregrate production. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2006, 2 (4) : 387-398. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.387
[1]

Yi Gao, Rui Li, Yingjing Shi, Li Xiao. Design of path planning and tracking control of quadrotor. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021063

[2]

Sheng-I Chen, Yen-Che Tseng. A partitioning column approach for solving LED sorter manipulator path planning problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021055

[3]

Yongkun Wang, Fengshou He, Xiaobo Deng. Multi-aircraft cooperative path planning for maneuvering target detection. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021050

[4]

Zheng Chang, Haoxun Chen, Farouk Yalaoui, Bo Dai. Adaptive large neighborhood search Algorithm for route planning of freight buses with pickup and delivery. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1771-1793. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020045

[5]

Shan-Shan Lin. Due-window assignment scheduling with learning and deterioration effects. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021081

[6]

Mehmet Duran Toksari, Emel Kizilkaya Aydogan, Berrin Atalay, Saziye Sari. Some scheduling problems with sum of logarithm processing times based learning effect and exponential past sequence dependent delivery times. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021044

[7]

Kun Hu, Yuanshi Wang. Dynamics of consumer-resource systems with consumer's dispersal between patches. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021077

[8]

Hsin-Lun Li. Mixed Hegselmann-Krause dynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021084

[9]

Todd Hurst, Volker Rehbock. Optimizing micro-algae production in a raceway pond with variable depth. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021027

[10]

Ardeshir Ahmadi, Hamed Davari-Ardakani. A multistage stochastic programming framework for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (3) : 359-377. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017023

[11]

Luke Finlay, Vladimir Gaitsgory, Ivan Lebedev. Linear programming solutions of periodic optimization problems: approximation of the optimal control. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (2) : 399-413. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.399

[12]

Mohammed Abdelghany, Amr B. Eltawil, Zakaria Yahia, Kazuhide Nakata. A hybrid variable neighbourhood search and dynamic programming approach for the nurse rostering problem. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 2051-2072. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020058

[13]

Vieri Benci, Sunra Mosconi, Marco Squassina. Preface: Applications of mathematical analysis to problems in theoretical physics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (5) : i-i. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020446

[14]

Stefano Bianchini, Paolo Bonicatto. Forward untangling and applications to the uniqueness problem for the continuity equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (6) : 2739-2776. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020384

[15]

Ana Rita Nogueira, João Gama, Carlos Abreu Ferreira. Causal discovery in machine learning: Theories and applications. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jdg.2021008

[16]

Hong Yi, Chunlai Mu, Guangyu Xu, Pan Dai. A blow-up result for the chemotaxis system with nonlinear signal production and logistic source. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2537-2559. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020194

[17]

Xu Pan, Liangchen Wang. Boundedness and asymptotic stability in a quasilinear two-species chemotaxis system with nonlinear signal production. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021064

[18]

Demetres D. Kouvatsos, Jumma S. Alanazi, Kevin Smith. A unified ME algorithm for arbitrary open QNMs with mixed blocking mechanisms. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2011, 1 (4) : 781-816. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.781

[19]

Jianli Xiang, Guozheng Yan. The uniqueness of the inverse elastic wave scattering problem based on the mixed reciprocity relation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (3) : 539-554. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021004

[20]

Vladimir Gaitsgory, Ilya Shvartsman. Linear programming estimates for Cesàro and Abel limits of optimal values in optimal control problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021102

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (38)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]