American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
July  2007, 3(3): 457-479. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.457

Revenue management via multi-product available to promise

Sandeep Dulluri 1, and  N. R. Srinivasa Raghavan 2,

1. 

JDA Software Group Inc., (formerly Manugistics Inc.,), New Product Development - Demand Planning, Hyderabad, INDIA - 500 081, India
2. 

Associate Professor, Decision Sciences Laboratory, Department of Management Studies, Bangalore, INDIA - 560 012, India

Received  March 2006 Revised  October 2006 Published  July 2007

Today's industries are highly complex in nature offering multiple customized quality products with shorter product life-cycles, volatile demand and tighter due-dates etc. to the customers. Manufacturers are focussing on Available-To-Promise (ATP) to their customers as a retention strategy. In other words manufacturers are forced to commit in advance to the customers the amount they can deliver by the specified due-date. In the current work we address a single manufacturer and multi-customer supply chain setting wherein there are multiple products, stochastic demands, varying profit rates, different learning rates etc. We restrict our focus to the multi-product ATP (MATP) strategies that maximize net profit of the manufacturer. We present optimization models in which there is a possibility of cancelling prior committed orders. We also model the dynamic pricing decision integrated with revenue management in MATP setting. We present the results of weak concavity of the MATP models and related structural insights. We support our thesis with rigorous numerical experimental results.
Keywords: Weak Concavity, Cancellation., Revenue Maximization, Available-to-Promise.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 90C90, 90C27, 90B30 ; Secondary: 90C3.
Citation: Sandeep Dulluri, N. R. Srinivasa Raghavan. Revenue management via multi-product available to promise. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (3) : 457-479. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.457
[1]

Abdelmalek Aboussoror, Samir Adly, Vincent Jalby. Weak nonlinear bilevel problems: Existence of solutions via reverse convex and convex maximization problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (3) : 559-571. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.559
[2]

Konstantinos Drakakis. A review of the available construction methods for Golomb rulers. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2009, 3 (3) : 235-250. doi: 10.3934/amc.2009.3.235
[3]

Yao Kuang, Raphael Douady. Crisis risk prediction with concavity from Polymodel. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2022, 9 (1) : 97-115. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2021027
[4]

Jingzhen Liu, Yike Wang, Ming Zhou. Utility maximization with habit formation of interaction. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (3) : 1451-1469. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020029
[5]

Jérôme Lohéac, Chaouki N. E. Boultifat, Philippe Chevrel, Mohamed Yagoubi. Exact noise cancellation for 1d-acoustic propagation systems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2022, 12 (1) : 1-16. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020055
[6]

Habibe Zare Haghighi, Sajad Adeli, Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, Gholam Reza Jahanshahloo. Revenue congestion: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (4) : 1311-1322. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1311
[7]

Alexander J. Zaslavski. Good programs in the RSS model without concavity of a utility function. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2006, 2 (4) : 399-423. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.399
[8]

Xuepeng Zhang, Zhibin Liang. Optimal layer reinsurance on the maximization of the adjustment coefficient. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2016, 6 (1) : 21-34. doi: 10.3934/naco.2016.6.21
[9]

Nicholas Westray, Harry Zheng. Constrained nonsmooth utility maximization on the positive real line. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (3) : 679-695. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.679
[10]

Ashkan Mohsenzadeh Ledari, Alireza Arshadi Khamseh, Mohammad Mohammadi. A three echelon revenue oriented green supply chain network design. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2018, 8 (2) : 157-168. doi: 10.3934/naco.2018009
[11]

F. Zeyenp Sargut, H. Edwin Romeijn. Capacitated requirements planning with pricing flexibility and general cost and revenue functions. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (1) : 87-98. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.87
[12]

Caichun Chai, Tiaojun Xiao, Zhangwei Feng. Evolution of revenue preference for competing firms with nonlinear inverse demand. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021071
[13]

Sushil Kumar Dey, Bibhas C. Giri. Coordination of a sustainable reverse supply chain with revenue sharing contract. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2022, 18 (1) : 487-510. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020165
[14]

Xiaojiao Tong, Felix F. Wu, Jifeng Su. Quadratic approximation and visualization of online contract-based available transfer capability region of power systems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (3) : 553-563. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.553
[15]

Cheng-Kang Chen, Yi-Xiang Liao. A deteriorating inventory model for an intermediary firm under return on inventory investment maximization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (4) : 989-1000. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.989
[16]

Ming Yan, Alex A. T. Bui, Jason Cong, Luminita A. Vese. General convergent expectation maximization (EM)-type algorithms for image reconstruction. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (3) : 1007-1029. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.1007
[17]

Lu Han, Min Li, Dachuan Xu, Dongmei Zhang. Stochastic-Lazier-Greedy Algorithm for monotone non-submodular maximization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (5) : 2607-2614. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020085
[18]

John Sebastian Simon, Hirofumi Notsu. A shape optimization problem constrained with the Stokes equations to address maximization of vortices. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2022  doi: 10.3934/eect.2022003
[19]

Michael Kühn. Power- and Log-concavity of viscosity solutions to some elliptic Dirichlet problems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (6) : 2773-2788. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018131
[20]

Hideaki Takagi. Extension of Littlewood's rule to the multi-period static revenue management model with standby customers. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 2181-2202. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020064

2020 Impact Factor: 1.801

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (110)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy