American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    Evolution of operating parameters for multiple vendors multiple buyers vendor managed inventory system with outsourcing
  • JIMO Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Convergence properties of a non-interior-point smoothing algorithm for the P*NCP
July  2007, 3(3): 585-596. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.585

Optimal control of a batch crystallization process

Volker Rehbock 1, and  Iztok Livk 2,

1. 

Western Australian Centre of Excellence in Industrial Optimisation, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, WA, 6102, Australia
2. 

Parker Cooperative Research Centre for Integrated Hydrometallurgy Solutions, CSIRO Division of Minerals, PO Box 90, Bentley, WA 6982, Australia

Received  November 2005 Revised  May 2007 Published  July 2007

A dynamic model of an aluminium trihydroxide batch crystallization is considered in this work. The process model, which takes into account kinetics of nucleation, growth and agglomeration, is based on the mass balance of the process and the population balance of the dispersed crystals. Assuming that the temperature of the solution and the seeding policy are variable, optimal control techniques are applied to the model to optimize various performance criteria. Some interesting numerical results for the behaviour of the model are presented.
Keywords: Bayer process., optimal control computation, crystallization modelling.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 49N90; Secondary: 62P3.
Citation: Volker Rehbock, Iztok Livk. Optimal control of a batch crystallization process. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (3) : 585-596. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.585
[1]

C.Z. Wu, K. L. Teo. Global impulsive optimal control computation. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2006, 2 (4) : 435-450. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.435
[2]

Tan H. Cao, Boris S. Mordukhovich. Optimal control of a perturbed sweeping process via discrete approximations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (10) : 3331-3358. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016100
[3]

Lukáš Adam, Jiří Outrata. On optimal control of a sweeping process coupled with an ordinary differential equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (9) : 2709-2738. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2709
[4]

Zahra Al Helal, Volker Rehbock, Ryan Loxton. Modelling and optimal control of blood glucose levels in the human body. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (4) : 1149-1164. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.1149
[5]

Ling Yun Wang, Wei Hua Gui, Kok Lay Teo, Ryan Loxton, Chun Hua Yang. Time delayed optimal control problems with multiple characteristic time points: Computation and industrial applications. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (4) : 705-718. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.705
[6]

Tan H. Cao, Boris S. Mordukhovich. Applications of optimal control of a nonconvex sweeping process to optimization of the planar crowd motion model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (8) : 4191-4216. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019078
[7]

Yuefen Chen, Yuanguo Zhu. Indefinite LQ optimal control with process state inequality constraints for discrete-time uncertain systems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (3) : 913-930. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017082
[8]

Chongyang Liu, Zhaohua Gong, Enmin Feng, Hongchao Yin. Modelling and optimal control for nonlinear multistage dynamical system of microbial fed-batch culture. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (4) : 835-850. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.835
[9]

Francesco Sanna Passino, Nicholas A. Heard. Modelling dynamic network evolution as a Pitman-Yor process. Foundations of Data Science, 2019, 1 (3) : 293-306. doi: 10.3934/fods.2019013
[10]

Liumei Wu, Baojun Song, Wen Du, Jie Lou. Mathematical modelling and control of echinococcus in Qinghai province, China. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (2) : 425-444. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.425
[11]

Robert S. Anderssen, Martin Kružík. Modelling of wheat-flour dough mixing as an open-loop hysteretic process. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (2) : 283-293. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.283
[12]

Valery Y. Glizer, Vladimir Turetsky, Emil Bashkansky. Statistical process control optimization with variable sampling interval and nonlinear expected loss. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (1) : 105-133. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.105
[13]

Xing Tan, Yilan Gu, Jimmy Xiangji Huang. An ontological account of flow-control components in BPMN process models. Big Data & Information Analytics, 2017, 2 (2) : 177-189. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2017016
[14]

Yongxia Zhao, Rongming Wang, Chuancun Yin. Optimal dividends and capital injections for a spectrally positive Lévy process. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 1-21. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016001
[15]

Jacques Henry. For which objective is birth process an optimal feedback in age structured population dynamics?. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 8 (1) : 107-114. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.8.107
[16]

Ellina Grigorieva, Evgenii Khailov, Andrei Korobeinikov. Parametrization of the attainable set for a nonlinear control model of a biochemical process. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (4) : 1067-1094. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1067
[17]

Linlin Tian, Xiaoyi Zhang, Yizhou Bai. Optimal dividend of compound poisson process under a stochastic interest rate. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (5) : 2141-2157. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019047
[18]

Thalya Burden, Jon Ernstberger, K. Renee Fister. Optimal control applied to immunotherapy. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (1) : 135-146. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.135
[19]

Ellina Grigorieva, Evgenii Khailov. Optimal control of pollution stock. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 578-588. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.578
[20]

Hang-Chin Lai, Jin-Chirng Lee, Shuh-Jye Chern. A variational problem and optimal control. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (4) : 967-975. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.967

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (44)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (7)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences