# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Feedback limited opportunistic scheduling and admission control for ergodic rate guarantees over Nakagami-$m$ fading channels
• JIMO Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Delay distribution and loss probability of bandwidth requests under truncated binary exponential backoff mechanism in IEEE 802.16e over Gilbert-Elliot error channel
July  2009, 5(3): 541-552. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.541

## Traffic modelling and bandwidth allocation algorithm for video telephony service traffic

 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences and Telecommunication Engineering Program, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 305-701, South Korea, South Korea 2 R&D Division, Corporate Customer Supporting BU, Business Group, KT, KT Daeduk 2 Center, Daejeon 305-811, South Korea

Received  August 2008 Revised  April 2009 Published  June 2009

In this paper, we analyze the stochastic characteristics of the measured video telephony service traffic and propose a mathematical model of the video telephony service traffic based on the analyzed stochastic characteristics. From our analysis, a voice traffic can be modelled by a renewal process with deterministic inter-arrival times and fixed packet size. On the other hand, a video traffic is modelled by an on and off source, where on and off periods are according to gamma distributions with respective parameters. Using the mathematical model, we estimate the required bandwidth to satisfy a given Quality of Service (QoS) requirement for the video telephony service traffic. To show the validity of our analysis, numerical studies with the NS-2 simulator are provided.
Citation: Bong Joo Kim, Gang Uk Hwang, Yeon Hwa Chung. Traffic modelling and bandwidth allocation algorithm for video telephony service traffic. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (3) : 541-552. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.541
 [1] Mary Luz Mouronte, Rosa María Benito. Structural analysis and traffic flow in the transport networks of Madrid. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10 (1) : 127-148. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.127 [2] Tong Li. Qualitative analysis of some PDE models of traffic flow. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (3) : 773-781. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.773 [3] Shiyong Li, Wei Sun, Quan-Lin Li. Utility maximization for bandwidth allocation in peer-to-peer file-sharing networks. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-19. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018194 [4] Christos Sourdis. Analysis of an irregular boundary layer behavior for the steady state flow of a Boussinesq fluid. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (2) : 1039-1059. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017043 [5] Yacine Chitour, Benedetto Piccoli. Traffic circles and timing of traffic lights for cars flow. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2005, 5 (3) : 599-630. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.599 [6] Sho Nanao, Hiroyuki Masuyama, Shoji Kasahara, Yutaka Takahashi. Queueing analysis of data block synchronization mechanism in peer-to-peer based video streaming system. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (3) : 699-716. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.699 [7] Tao Jiang, Liwei Liu. Analysis of a batch service multi-server polling system with dynamic service control. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (2) : 743-757. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017073 [8] Pikkala Vijaya Laxmi, Obsie Mussa Yesuf. Analysis of a finite buffer general input queue with Markovian service process and accessible and non-accessible batch service. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (4) : 929-944. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.929 [9] Gábor Horváth, Zsolt Saffer, Miklós Telek. Queue length analysis of a Markov-modulated vacation queue with dependent arrival and service processes and exhaustive service policy. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (3) : 1365-1381. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016077 [10] Michiel De Muynck, Herwig Bruneel, Sabine Wittevrongel. Analysis of a discrete-time queue with general service demands and phase-type service capacities. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (4) : 1901-1926. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017024 [11] Gabriella Bretti, Roberto Natalini, Benedetto Piccoli. Numerical approximations of a traffic flow model on networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2006, 1 (1) : 57-84. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.57 [12] Gabriella Bretti, Roberto Natalini, Benedetto Piccoli. Fast algorithms for the approximation of a traffic flow model on networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (3) : 427-448. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.427 [13] Alberto Bressan, Khai T. Nguyen. Conservation law models for traffic flow on a network of roads. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10 (2) : 255-293. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.255 [14] Rinaldo M. Colombo, Andrea Corli. Dynamic parameters identification in traffic flow modeling. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 190-199. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.190 [15] Paola Goatin. Traffic flow models with phase transitions on road networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4 (2) : 287-301. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.287 [16] Alberto Bressan, Ke Han. Existence of optima and equilibria for traffic flow on networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2013, 8 (3) : 627-648. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2013.8.627 [17] Alberto Bressan, Fang Yu. Continuous Riemann solvers for traffic flow at a junction. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (9) : 4149-4171. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4149 [18] Wen Shen, Karim Shikh-Khalil. Traveling waves for a microscopic model of traffic flow. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (5) : 2571-2589. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018108 [19] Michael Herty, J.-P. Lebacque, S. Moutari. A novel model for intersections of vehicular traffic flow. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2009, 4 (4) : 813-826. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.813 [20] Luisa Fermo, Andrea Tosin. Fundamental diagrams for kinetic equations of traffic flow. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2014, 7 (3) : 449-462. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2014.7.449

2018 Impact Factor: 1.025