October  2009, 5(4): 767-781. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.767

Two-echelon requirements planning with pricing decisions

1. 

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, P.O. Box 116595, Gainesville, Florida 32611-6595, United States

2. 

Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, The University of Michigan, 1205 Beal Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2117, United States

Received  May 2008 Revised  May 2009 Published  August 2009

We consider a two-level uncapacitated lot-sizing problem where production, inventory carrying, transportation, and pricing decisions are integrated to maximize total profits. We show how this problem, under many different revenue functions and production, inventory holding, and transportation cost structures can be solved in polynomial time. As a byproduct, we develop polynomial-time algorithms for generalizations of single-level lot-sizing problems with pricing as well.
Citation: Mehmet Önal, H. Edwin Romeijn. Two-echelon requirements planning with pricing decisions. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (4) : 767-781. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.767
[1]

Puneet Pasricha, Anubha Goel. Pricing power exchange options with hawkes jump diffusion processes. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 133-149. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019103

[2]

Tien-Yu Lin, Bhaba R. Sarker, Chien-Jui Lin. An optimal setup cost reduction and lot size for economic production quantity model with imperfect quality and quantity discounts. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 467-484. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020043

[3]

Musen Xue, Guowei Zhu. Partial myopia vs. forward-looking behaviors in a dynamic pricing and replenishment model for perishable items. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 633-648. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019126

[4]

Editorial Office. Retraction: Xiao-Qian Jiang and Lun-Chuan Zhang, A pricing option approach based on backward stochastic differential equation theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (4&5) : 969-969. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019065

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (76)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (2)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]