American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    Finding a stable solution of a system of nonlinear equations arising from dynamic systems
  • JIMO Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    A nonmonotone smoothing Newton algorithm for solving box constrained variational inequalities with a $P_0$ function
April  2011, 7(2): 483-496. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.483

Optimality conditions for approximate solutions of vector optimization problems

Ying Gao 1, , Xinmin Yang 1, and  Kok Lay Teo 2,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 400047, China
2. 

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Curtin University, G.P.O. Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845

Received  October 2009 Revised  March 2011 Published  April 2011

In this paper, we introduce a new kind of properly approximate efficient solution of vector optimization problems. Some properties for this new class of approximate solutions are established. Also necessary and sufficient conditions via nonlinear scalarizations are obtained for properly approximate solutions. And under the assumption of cone subconvexlike functions, we derive linear scalarizations for properly approximate efficient solutions.
Keywords: nonlinear scalar functions, scalarization., approximate solutions, cone subconvexlike, Vector optimization problem.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 90C29, 90C30, 90C4.
Citation: Ying Gao, Xinmin Yang, Kok Lay Teo. Optimality conditions for approximate solutions of vector optimization problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (2) : 483-496. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.483
References:
[1]

E. M. Bednarczuk and M. J. Przybyla, The vector-valued variational principle in Banach spaces ordered by cones with nonempty interiors, SIAM J. Optim., 18 (2007), 907-913. doi: 10.1137/060658989.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. Beldiman, E. Panaitescu and L. Dogaru, Approximate quasi efficient solutions in multiobjective optimization, Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roumanie Tome, 99 (2008), 109-121.  Google Scholar

[3]

H. P. Benson, An improved definition of proper efficiency for vector maximization with respect to cones, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 71 (1979), 232-241. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(79)90226-9.  Google Scholar

[4]

S. Bolintinéanu, Vector variational principles: $\epsilon-$efficiency and scalar stationarity, J. Convex Anal., 8 (2001), 71-85.  Google Scholar

[5]

J. Borwein, Proper efficient points for maximizations with respect to cones, SIAM J. Control Optim., 15 (1977), 57-63. doi: 10.1137/0315004.  Google Scholar

[6]

G. Y. Chen, X. X. Huang and X. M. Yang, "Vector Optimization. Set-Valued and Variational Analysis," Lecture Notes in Econom. and Math. Systems 541, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005.  Google Scholar

[7]

J. Dutta and V. Vetrivel, On approximate minima in vector optimization, Numer. Func. Anal. Optim., 22 (2001), 845-859. doi: 10.1081/NFA-100108312.  Google Scholar

[8]

M. Durea, J. Dutta and C. Tammer, Lagrange multipliers for $\epsilon$-Pareto solutions in vector optimization with nonsolid cones in Banach spaces, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 145 (2010), 196-211. doi: 10.1007/s10957-009-9609-1.  Google Scholar

[9]

J. B. G. Frenk and G. Kassay, On classes of generalized convex functions, Gordan-Farkas type theorems, and Lagrangian duality, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 102 (1999), 315-343. doi: 10.1023/A:1021780423989.  Google Scholar

[10]

A. Göpfert, H. Riahi, C. Tammer and C. Zălinescu, "Variational Methods in Partially Ordered Spaces," Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003.  Google Scholar

[11]

D. Gupta and A. Mehra, Two types of approximate saddle points, Numer. Func. Anal. Optim., 29 (2008), 532-550. doi: 10.1080/01630560802099274.  Google Scholar

[12]

C. Gutiérrez, B. Jiménez and V. Novo, A set-valued Ekeland's variational principle in vector optimization, SIAM J. Control Optim., 47 (2008), 883-903. doi: 10.1137/060672868.  Google Scholar

[13]

C. Gutiérrez, R. López and V. Novo, Generalized $\epsilon-$quasi-solutions in multiobjective optimization problems: Existence results and optimality conditions, Nonlinear Anal., 72 (2010), 4331-4346. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2010.02.012.  Google Scholar

[14]

C. Gutiérrez, B. Jiménez and V. Novo, A unified approach and optimality conditions for approximate solutions of vector optimization problems, SIAM J. Optim., 17 (2006), 688-710. doi: 10.1137/05062648X.  Google Scholar

[15]

C. Gutiérrez, B. Jiménez and V. Novo, On approximate efficiency in multiobjective programming, Math. Methods Oper. Res., 64 (2006), 165-185. doi: 10.1007/s00186-006-0078-0.  Google Scholar

[16]

C. Gutiérrez, B. Jiménez and V. Novo, Optimality conditions via scalarization for a new $\epsilon$-efficiency concept in vector optimization problems, European J. Oper. Res., 201 (2010), 11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.02.007.  Google Scholar

[17]

A. M. Geoffrion, Proper efficiency and the theory of vector maximization, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 22 (1968), 618-630. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(68)90201-1.  Google Scholar

[18]

T. X. D. Ha, The Ekeland variational principle for Henig proper minimizers and super minimizers, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 364 (2010), 156-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.10.065.  Google Scholar

[19]

S. Helbig, "On a new concept for $\epsilon$-efficency," A Talk at Optimization Days 1992, Montreal,1992. Google Scholar

[20]

M. I. Henig, Proper efficiency with respect to cones, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 36 (1982), 387-407. doi: 10.1007/BF00934353.  Google Scholar

[21]

J. B. Hiriart-Urruty, New concepts in nondifferentiable programming, Bull. Soc. Math. France Mém., 60 (1979), 57-85.  Google Scholar

[22]

J. B. Hiriart-Urruty, Tangent cones, generalized gradients and mathematical programming in Banach spaces, Math. Oper. Res., 4 (1979), 79-97. doi: 10.1287/moor.4.1.79.  Google Scholar

[23]

S. Kutateladze, Convex $\epsilon-$programming, Soviet Math. Dokl., 20 (1979), 391-393. Google Scholar

[24]

H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, Nonlinear programming, from "Proceedings of the 2nd Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability," Berkeley, California, (1951), 481-492  Google Scholar

[25]

J. C. Liu, $\epsilon-$properly efficient solutions to nondifferentiable multiobjective programming problems, Appl. Math. Lett., 12 (1999), 109-113. doi: 10.1016/S0893-9659(99)00087-7.  Google Scholar

[26]

Z. Li and S. Wang, $\epsilon$-approximate solutions in multiobjective optimization, Optimization, 44 (1998), 161-174. doi: 10.1080/02331939808844406.  Google Scholar

[27]

C. G. Liu, K. F. Ng and W. H. Yang, Merit functions in vector optimization, Math. Program., Ser. A, 119 (2009), 215-237. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.04.036.  Google Scholar

[28]

A. B. Németh, A nonconvex vector minimization problem, Nonlinear Anal., 10 (1986), 669-678. doi: 10.1016/0362-546X(86)90126-4.  Google Scholar

[29]

W. D. Rong and Y. N. Wu, $\epsilon$-weak minimal solutions of vector optimization problems with set-valued maps, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 106 (2000), 569-579. doi: 10.1023/A:1004657412928.  Google Scholar

[30]

W. D. Rong, $\epsilon-$efficiency in vector optimization problems with cone subconvexlikeness, Acta Sci. Natur. Univ. NeiMongol., 28 (1997), 609-613.  Google Scholar

[31]

T. Tanaka, A new approach to approximation of solutions in vector optimization problems, in "Proceedings of APORS, 1994" M. Fushimi and K. Tone (eds), World Scientific, Singapore, (1995), 497-504. Google Scholar

[32]

I. Vályi, Approximate saddle-point theorems in vector optimization, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 55 (1987), 435-448. doi: 10.1007/BF00941179.  Google Scholar

[33]

D. J. White, Epsilon efficiency, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 49 (1986), 319-337. doi: 10.1007/BF00940762.  Google Scholar

[34]

A. Zaffaroni, Degrees of efficiency and degrees of minimality, SIAM J. Control Optim., 42 (2003), 1071-1086. doi: 10.1137/S0363012902411532.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

E. M. Bednarczuk and M. J. Przybyla, The vector-valued variational principle in Banach spaces ordered by cones with nonempty interiors, SIAM J. Optim., 18 (2007), 907-913. doi: 10.1137/060658989.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. Beldiman, E. Panaitescu and L. Dogaru, Approximate quasi efficient solutions in multiobjective optimization, Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roumanie Tome, 99 (2008), 109-121.  Google Scholar

[3]

H. P. Benson, An improved definition of proper efficiency for vector maximization with respect to cones, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 71 (1979), 232-241. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(79)90226-9.  Google Scholar

[4]

S. Bolintinéanu, Vector variational principles: $\epsilon-$efficiency and scalar stationarity, J. Convex Anal., 8 (2001), 71-85.  Google Scholar

[5]

J. Borwein, Proper efficient points for maximizations with respect to cones, SIAM J. Control Optim., 15 (1977), 57-63. doi: 10.1137/0315004.  Google Scholar

[6]

G. Y. Chen, X. X. Huang and X. M. Yang, "Vector Optimization. Set-Valued and Variational Analysis," Lecture Notes in Econom. and Math. Systems 541, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005.  Google Scholar

[7]

J. Dutta and V. Vetrivel, On approximate minima in vector optimization, Numer. Func. Anal. Optim., 22 (2001), 845-859. doi: 10.1081/NFA-100108312.  Google Scholar

[8]

M. Durea, J. Dutta and C. Tammer, Lagrange multipliers for $\epsilon$-Pareto solutions in vector optimization with nonsolid cones in Banach spaces, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 145 (2010), 196-211. doi: 10.1007/s10957-009-9609-1.  Google Scholar

[9]

J. B. G. Frenk and G. Kassay, On classes of generalized convex functions, Gordan-Farkas type theorems, and Lagrangian duality, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 102 (1999), 315-343. doi: 10.1023/A:1021780423989.  Google Scholar

[10]

A. Göpfert, H. Riahi, C. Tammer and C. Zălinescu, "Variational Methods in Partially Ordered Spaces," Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003.  Google Scholar

[11]

D. Gupta and A. Mehra, Two types of approximate saddle points, Numer. Func. Anal. Optim., 29 (2008), 532-550. doi: 10.1080/01630560802099274.  Google Scholar

[12]

C. Gutiérrez, B. Jiménez and V. Novo, A set-valued Ekeland's variational principle in vector optimization, SIAM J. Control Optim., 47 (2008), 883-903. doi: 10.1137/060672868.  Google Scholar

[13]

C. Gutiérrez, R. López and V. Novo, Generalized $\epsilon-$quasi-solutions in multiobjective optimization problems: Existence results and optimality conditions, Nonlinear Anal., 72 (2010), 4331-4346. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2010.02.012.  Google Scholar

[14]

C. Gutiérrez, B. Jiménez and V. Novo, A unified approach and optimality conditions for approximate solutions of vector optimization problems, SIAM J. Optim., 17 (2006), 688-710. doi: 10.1137/05062648X.  Google Scholar

[15]

C. Gutiérrez, B. Jiménez and V. Novo, On approximate efficiency in multiobjective programming, Math. Methods Oper. Res., 64 (2006), 165-185. doi: 10.1007/s00186-006-0078-0.  Google Scholar

[16]

C. Gutiérrez, B. Jiménez and V. Novo, Optimality conditions via scalarization for a new $\epsilon$-efficiency concept in vector optimization problems, European J. Oper. Res., 201 (2010), 11-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.02.007.  Google Scholar

[17]

A. M. Geoffrion, Proper efficiency and the theory of vector maximization, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 22 (1968), 618-630. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(68)90201-1.  Google Scholar

[18]

T. X. D. Ha, The Ekeland variational principle for Henig proper minimizers and super minimizers, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 364 (2010), 156-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.10.065.  Google Scholar

[19]

S. Helbig, "On a new concept for $\epsilon$-efficency," A Talk at Optimization Days 1992, Montreal,1992. Google Scholar

[20]

M. I. Henig, Proper efficiency with respect to cones, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 36 (1982), 387-407. doi: 10.1007/BF00934353.  Google Scholar

[21]

J. B. Hiriart-Urruty, New concepts in nondifferentiable programming, Bull. Soc. Math. France Mém., 60 (1979), 57-85.  Google Scholar

[22]

J. B. Hiriart-Urruty, Tangent cones, generalized gradients and mathematical programming in Banach spaces, Math. Oper. Res., 4 (1979), 79-97. doi: 10.1287/moor.4.1.79.  Google Scholar

[23]

S. Kutateladze, Convex $\epsilon-$programming, Soviet Math. Dokl., 20 (1979), 391-393. Google Scholar

[24]

H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, Nonlinear programming, from "Proceedings of the 2nd Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability," Berkeley, California, (1951), 481-492  Google Scholar

[25]

J. C. Liu, $\epsilon-$properly efficient solutions to nondifferentiable multiobjective programming problems, Appl. Math. Lett., 12 (1999), 109-113. doi: 10.1016/S0893-9659(99)00087-7.  Google Scholar

[26]

Z. Li and S. Wang, $\epsilon$-approximate solutions in multiobjective optimization, Optimization, 44 (1998), 161-174. doi: 10.1080/02331939808844406.  Google Scholar

[27]

C. G. Liu, K. F. Ng and W. H. Yang, Merit functions in vector optimization, Math. Program., Ser. A, 119 (2009), 215-237. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.04.036.  Google Scholar

[28]

A. B. Németh, A nonconvex vector minimization problem, Nonlinear Anal., 10 (1986), 669-678. doi: 10.1016/0362-546X(86)90126-4.  Google Scholar

[29]

W. D. Rong and Y. N. Wu, $\epsilon$-weak minimal solutions of vector optimization problems with set-valued maps, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 106 (2000), 569-579. doi: 10.1023/A:1004657412928.  Google Scholar

[30]

W. D. Rong, $\epsilon-$efficiency in vector optimization problems with cone subconvexlikeness, Acta Sci. Natur. Univ. NeiMongol., 28 (1997), 609-613.  Google Scholar

[31]

T. Tanaka, A new approach to approximation of solutions in vector optimization problems, in "Proceedings of APORS, 1994" M. Fushimi and K. Tone (eds), World Scientific, Singapore, (1995), 497-504. Google Scholar

[32]

I. Vályi, Approximate saddle-point theorems in vector optimization, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 55 (1987), 435-448. doi: 10.1007/BF00941179.  Google Scholar

[33]

D. J. White, Epsilon efficiency, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 49 (1986), 319-337. doi: 10.1007/BF00940762.  Google Scholar

[34]

A. Zaffaroni, Degrees of efficiency and degrees of minimality, SIAM J. Control Optim., 42 (2003), 1071-1086. doi: 10.1137/S0363012902411532.  Google Scholar

[1]

Lili Li, Chunrong Chen. Nonlinear scalarization with applications to Hölder continuity of approximate solutions. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2014, 4 (4) : 295-307. doi: 10.3934/naco.2014.4.295
[2]

Qiusheng Qiu, Xinmin Yang. Scalarization of approximate solution for vector equilibrium problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (1) : 143-151. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.143
[3]

Caiping Liu, Heungwing Lee. Lagrange multiplier rules for approximate solutions in vector optimization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (3) : 749-764. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.749
[4]

Ying Gao, Xinmin Yang, Jin Yang, Hong Yan. Scalarizations and Lagrange multipliers for approximate solutions in the vector optimization problems with set-valued maps. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (2) : 673-683. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.673
[5]

Hong-Zhi Wei, Xin Zuo, Chun-Rong Chen. Unified vector quasiequilibrium problems via improvement sets and nonlinear scalarization with stability analysis. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020, 10 (1) : 107-125. doi: 10.3934/naco.2019036
[6]

Pooja Louhan, S. K. Suneja. On fractional vector optimization over cones with support functions. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (2) : 549-572. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016031
[7]

Hua Chen, Yawei Wei. Multiple solutions for nonlinear cone degenerate elliptic equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (7&8) : 2505-2518. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020272
[8]

Giuseppina Barletta, Roberto Livrea, Nikolaos S. Papageorgiou. A nonlinear eigenvalue problem for the periodic scalar $p$-Laplacian. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2014, 13 (3) : 1075-1086. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2014.13.1075
[9]

Guolin Yu. Global proper efficiency and vector optimization with cone-arcwise connected set-valued maps. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2016, 6 (1) : 35-44. doi: 10.3934/naco.2016.6.35
[10]

Anurag Jayswala, Tadeusz Antczakb, Shalini Jha. Second order modified objective function method for twice differentiable vector optimization problems over cone constraints. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2019, 9 (2) : 133-145. doi: 10.3934/naco.2019010
[11]

Xinmin Yang. On symmetric and self duality in vector optimization problem. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (3) : 523-529. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.523
[12]

Yu Han, Nan-Jing Huang. Some characterizations of the approximate solutions to generalized vector equilibrium problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (3) : 1135-1151. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1135
[13]

Alexander Balandin. The localized basis functions for scalar and vector 3D tomography and their ray transforms. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2016, 10 (4) : 899-914. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2016026
[14]

Jiawei Chen, Shengjie Li, Jen-Chih Yao. Vector-valued separation functions and constrained vector optimization problems: optimality and saddle points. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (2) : 707-724. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018174
[15]

Vladimir Müller, Aljoša Peperko. On the Bonsall cone spectral radius and the approximate point spectrum. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (10) : 5337-5354. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017232
[16]

Yuan-mei Xia, Xin-min Yang, Ke-quan Zhao. A combined scalarization method for multi-objective optimization problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (5) : 2669-2683. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020088
[17]

Ye Tian, Qingwei Jin, Zhibin Deng. Quadratic optimization over a polyhedral cone. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (1) : 269-283. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.269
[18]

Chunrong Chen. A unified nonlinear augmented Lagrangian approach for nonconvex vector optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2011, 1 (3) : 495-508. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.495
[19]

Wancheng Sheng, Tong Zhang. Structural stability of solutions to the Riemann problem for a scalar nonconvex CJ combustion model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 25 (2) : 651-667. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.25.651
[20]

Radu Ioan Boţ, Anca Grad, Gert Wanka. Sequential characterization of solutions in convex composite programming and applications to vector optimization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (4) : 767-782. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.767

2020 Impact Factor: 1.801

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (157)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (16)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences