American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
July  2018, 14(3): 1055-1083. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017090

Optimal risk control and dividend strategies in the presence of two reinsurers: Variance premium principle

Dingjun Yao 1, and  Kun Fan 2,,

1. 

School of Finance, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China
2. 

School of Statistics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

* Corresponding author

Received  March 2017 Revised  June 2017 Published  September 2017

Fund Project: This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71671082,71471081,11501211), Humanities and Social Sciences Project of the Ministry Education of China (15YJC910008), Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (15KJB110009), Shanghai Pujiang Program (15PJC026), Shanghai Philosophy Social Science Planning Office Project (2015EJB002), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M581564), Shanghai Chenguang Plan (15CG22).

This paper assumes that an insurer can control the dividend, refinancing and reinsurance strategies dynamically. Particularly, the reinsurance is provided by two reinsurers and the variance premium principle is applied in pricing insurance contracts. Using the optimal control method, we identify the optimal strategies for maximizing the insurance company's value. Meanwhile, the effects of transaction costs and terminal value at bankruptcy are investigated. The results turn out that the insurer should consider refinancing when and only when the transaction costs and terminal value are relatively low. Also, it should buy less reinsurance when the surplus increases, while the proportion of risk allocation between two reinsurers remains constant. When the dividend rate is unbounded, dividends should be paid according to the barrier strategy. When the dividend rate is restricted, dividends should be distributed according to the threshold strategy. Some examples are provided to illustrate the implementation of our results.

Keywords: Dividend, refinancing, reinsurance with two reinsurers, variance premium principle, terminal value.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 97M30, 93E20; Secondary: 91G80.
Citation: Dingjun Yao, Kun Fan. Optimal risk control and dividend strategies in the presence of two reinsurers: Variance premium principle. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (3) : 1055-1083. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017090
References:
[1]

S. Asmussen and M. Taksar, Controlled diffusion models for optimal dividend pay-out, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 20 (1997), 1-15.  doi: 10.1016/S0167-6687(96)00017-0.  Google Scholar

[2]

L. Bai, J. Guo and H. Zhang, Optimal excess-of-loss reinsurance and dividend payments with both transaction costs and taxes, Quantitative Finance, 10 (2010), 1163-1172.  doi: 10.1080/14697680902968005.  Google Scholar

[3]

A. Barth and S. Moreno-Bromberg, Optimal risk and liquidity management with costly refinancing opportunities, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 57 (2014), 31-45.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.05.001.  Google Scholar

[4]

A. Cadenillas, T. Choulli, M. Taksar and L. Zhang, Classical and impulse stochastic control for the optimization of the dividend and risk policies of an insurance firm, Mathematical Finance, 16 (2006), 181-202.  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9965.2006.00267.x.  Google Scholar

[5]

M. Chen, X. Peng and J. Guo, Optimal dividend problem with a nonlinear regular-singular stochastic control, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 52 (2013), 448-456.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.02.010.  Google Scholar

[6]

M. Chen and K. C. Yuen, Optimal dividend and reinsurance in the presence of two reinsurers, Journal of Applied Probability, 53 (2016), 554-571.  doi: 10.1017/jpr.2016.20.  Google Scholar

[7] B. De Finetti, Su un'impostzione alternativa della teoria collettiva del rischio, in Transactions of the XVth International Congress of Actuaries, Congrès Internationald'Actuaires, New York, 1957.   Google Scholar
[8]

W. Fleming and H. Soner, Controlled Markov Process and Viscosity Solutions, Springer-Verlag, 1993.  Google Scholar

[9]

H. U. Gerber and E. S. W. Shiu, On optimal dividend strategies in the compound Poisson model, North American Actuarial Journal, 10 (2006), 76-93.  doi: 10.1080/10920277.2006.10596249.  Google Scholar

[10]

J. Grandell, Aspects of Risk Theory, Springer-Verlag, 1991. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-9058-9.  Google Scholar

[11]

H. Guan and Z. Liang, Viscosity solution and impulse control of the diffusion model with reinsurance and fixed transaction costs, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 54 (2014), 109-122.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.11.003.  Google Scholar

[12]

L. He and Z. Liang, Optimal financing and dividend control of the insurance company with fixed and proportional transaction costs, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44 (2009), 88-94.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2008.10.001.  Google Scholar

[13]

B. H$\phi $gaard and M. Taksar, Controlling risk exposure and dividends payout schemes: Insurance company example, Mathematical Finance, 9 (1999), 153-182.  doi: 10.1111/1467-9965.00066.  Google Scholar

[14]

Z. Liang and V. Young, Dividends and reinsurance under a penalty for ruin, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 50 (2012), 437-445.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2012.02.005.  Google Scholar

[15]

W. Liu and Y. Hu, Optimal financing and dividend control of the insurance company with excess-of-loss reinsurance policy, Statistics and Probability Letters, 84 (2014), 121-130.  doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2013.09.034.  Google Scholar

[16]

R. L. Loeffen, An optimal dividends problem with transaction costs for spectrally negative L$\acute{e}$vy processes, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 45 (2009), 41-48.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2009.03.002.  Google Scholar

[17]

A. L$φ$kka and M. Zervos, Optimal dividend and issuance of equity policies in the presence of proportional costs, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 42 (2008), 954-961.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.10.013.  Google Scholar

[18]

H. Meng, Optimal impulse control with variance premium principle, Science China Mathematics (in Chinese), 43 (2013), 925-939.   Google Scholar

[19]

H. Meng and T. K. Siu, On optimal reinsurance, dividend and reinvestment strategies, Economic Modelling, 28 (2011), 211-218.  doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2010.09.009.  Google Scholar

[20]

X. Peng, M. Chen and J. Guo, Optimal dividend and equity issuance problem with proportional and fixed transaction costs, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 51 (2012), 576-585.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2012.08.004.  Google Scholar

[21]

M. Taksar, Dependence of the optimal risk control decisions on the terminal value for a financial corporation, Annals of Operations Research, 98 (2000), 89-99.  doi: 10.1023/A:1019239920624.  Google Scholar

[22]

J. Xu and M. Zhou, Optimal risk control and dividend distribution policies for a diffusion model with terminal value, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 56 (2012), 180-190.  doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.041.  Google Scholar

[23]

D. Yao, H. Yang and R. Wang, Optimal risk and dividend control problem with fixed costs and salvage value: Variance premium principle, Economic Modelling, 37 (2014), 53-64.  doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.10.026.  Google Scholar

[24]

M. Zhou and K. C. Yuen, Optimal reinsurance and dividend for a diffusion model with capital injection: Variance premium principle, Economic Modelling, 29 (2012), 198-207.  doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2011.09.007.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

S. Asmussen and M. Taksar, Controlled diffusion models for optimal dividend pay-out, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 20 (1997), 1-15.  doi: 10.1016/S0167-6687(96)00017-0.  Google Scholar

[2]

L. Bai, J. Guo and H. Zhang, Optimal excess-of-loss reinsurance and dividend payments with both transaction costs and taxes, Quantitative Finance, 10 (2010), 1163-1172.  doi: 10.1080/14697680902968005.  Google Scholar

[3]

A. Barth and S. Moreno-Bromberg, Optimal risk and liquidity management with costly refinancing opportunities, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 57 (2014), 31-45.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.05.001.  Google Scholar

[4]

A. Cadenillas, T. Choulli, M. Taksar and L. Zhang, Classical and impulse stochastic control for the optimization of the dividend and risk policies of an insurance firm, Mathematical Finance, 16 (2006), 181-202.  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9965.2006.00267.x.  Google Scholar

[5]

M. Chen, X. Peng and J. Guo, Optimal dividend problem with a nonlinear regular-singular stochastic control, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 52 (2013), 448-456.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.02.010.  Google Scholar

[6]

M. Chen and K. C. Yuen, Optimal dividend and reinsurance in the presence of two reinsurers, Journal of Applied Probability, 53 (2016), 554-571.  doi: 10.1017/jpr.2016.20.  Google Scholar

[7] B. De Finetti, Su un'impostzione alternativa della teoria collettiva del rischio, in Transactions of the XVth International Congress of Actuaries, Congrès Internationald'Actuaires, New York, 1957.   Google Scholar
[8]

W. Fleming and H. Soner, Controlled Markov Process and Viscosity Solutions, Springer-Verlag, 1993.  Google Scholar

[9]

H. U. Gerber and E. S. W. Shiu, On optimal dividend strategies in the compound Poisson model, North American Actuarial Journal, 10 (2006), 76-93.  doi: 10.1080/10920277.2006.10596249.  Google Scholar

[10]

J. Grandell, Aspects of Risk Theory, Springer-Verlag, 1991. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-9058-9.  Google Scholar

[11]

H. Guan and Z. Liang, Viscosity solution and impulse control of the diffusion model with reinsurance and fixed transaction costs, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 54 (2014), 109-122.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2013.11.003.  Google Scholar

[12]

L. He and Z. Liang, Optimal financing and dividend control of the insurance company with fixed and proportional transaction costs, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44 (2009), 88-94.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2008.10.001.  Google Scholar

[13]

B. H$\phi $gaard and M. Taksar, Controlling risk exposure and dividends payout schemes: Insurance company example, Mathematical Finance, 9 (1999), 153-182.  doi: 10.1111/1467-9965.00066.  Google Scholar

[14]

Z. Liang and V. Young, Dividends and reinsurance under a penalty for ruin, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 50 (2012), 437-445.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2012.02.005.  Google Scholar

[15]

W. Liu and Y. Hu, Optimal financing and dividend control of the insurance company with excess-of-loss reinsurance policy, Statistics and Probability Letters, 84 (2014), 121-130.  doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2013.09.034.  Google Scholar

[16]

R. L. Loeffen, An optimal dividends problem with transaction costs for spectrally negative L$\acute{e}$vy processes, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 45 (2009), 41-48.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2009.03.002.  Google Scholar

[17]

A. L$φ$kka and M. Zervos, Optimal dividend and issuance of equity policies in the presence of proportional costs, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 42 (2008), 954-961.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.10.013.  Google Scholar

[18]

H. Meng, Optimal impulse control with variance premium principle, Science China Mathematics (in Chinese), 43 (2013), 925-939.   Google Scholar

[19]

H. Meng and T. K. Siu, On optimal reinsurance, dividend and reinvestment strategies, Economic Modelling, 28 (2011), 211-218.  doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2010.09.009.  Google Scholar

[20]

X. Peng, M. Chen and J. Guo, Optimal dividend and equity issuance problem with proportional and fixed transaction costs, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 51 (2012), 576-585.  doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2012.08.004.  Google Scholar

[21]

M. Taksar, Dependence of the optimal risk control decisions on the terminal value for a financial corporation, Annals of Operations Research, 98 (2000), 89-99.  doi: 10.1023/A:1019239920624.  Google Scholar

[22]

J. Xu and M. Zhou, Optimal risk control and dividend distribution policies for a diffusion model with terminal value, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 56 (2012), 180-190.  doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.041.  Google Scholar

[23]

D. Yao, H. Yang and R. Wang, Optimal risk and dividend control problem with fixed costs and salvage value: Variance premium principle, Economic Modelling, 37 (2014), 53-64.  doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.10.026.  Google Scholar

[24]

M. Zhou and K. C. Yuen, Optimal reinsurance and dividend for a diffusion model with capital injection: Variance premium principle, Economic Modelling, 29 (2012), 198-207.  doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2011.09.007.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  The influences of $\beta_1$ on $u(x)$ and $u_1(x)$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  The influences of the refinancing costs on u1(x)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  The influences of P on u(x) and u1(x)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  The influences of M on v(x) and v1(x)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  The influence of β1 on optimal strategy
$\beta_2=1.1, \lambda=0.5, \theta_0=0.24, \theta_1=1, \theta_2=0.8, \sigma^2=2, \delta=0.05, P=4, K=0.2$
${ \beta_1}\uparrow$ $q^{\pi^*}(0)\downarrow$ $h_0\uparrow$ $q_1^{\pi^*}(0)\uparrow$ $h_1\downarrow$ $\tilde{\xi}_0\uparrow$ $u'(0)\uparrow$ $I(\xi_0)\uparrow$ Re
$0.70$ 0.6409 3.2729 - - - 1.2438 0.0184 n
$0.75$ 0.6116 3.4762 - - - 1.4845 0.1096 n
$0.80$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 1.7414 0.2610 y
$0.85$ 0.5719 3.7665 0.6236 3.3919 0.9531 2.0110 0.4598 y
$0.90$ 0.5582 3.8730 0.6455 3.2418 1.0286 2.2903 0.6979 y
$0.95$ 0.5472 3.9621 0.6695 3.0787 1.1255 2.5775 0.9700 y
Table Options

Download as excel

$\beta_2=1.1, \lambda=0.5, \theta_0=0.24, \theta_1=1, \theta_2=0.8, \sigma^2=2, \delta=0.05, P=4, K=0.2$
${ \beta_1}\uparrow$ $q^{\pi^*}(0)\downarrow$ $h_0\uparrow$ $q_1^{\pi^*}(0)\uparrow$ $h_1\downarrow$ $\tilde{\xi}_0\uparrow$ $u'(0)\uparrow$ $I(\xi_0)\uparrow$ Re
$0.70$ 0.6409 3.2729 - - - 1.2438 0.0184 n
$0.75$ 0.6116 3.4762 - - - 1.4845 0.1096 n
$0.80$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 1.7414 0.2610 y
$0.85$ 0.5719 3.7665 0.6236 3.3919 0.9531 2.0110 0.4598 y
$0.90$ 0.5582 3.8730 0.6455 3.2418 1.0286 2.2903 0.6979 y
$0.95$ 0.5472 3.9621 0.6695 3.0787 1.1255 2.5775 0.9700 y
Table 2.  The influence of β2 on optimal strategy
$\beta_1=0.8, \lambda=0.5, \theta_0=0.24, \theta_1=1, \theta_2=0.8, \sigma^2=2, \delta=0.05, P=4, K=0.2$
${ \beta_2}\uparrow$ $q^{\pi^*}(0)\equiv$ $h_0\equiv$ $q_1^{\pi^*}(0)\downarrow$ $h_1\uparrow$ $\tilde{\xi}_0\downarrow$ $u'(0)\equiv$ $I(\xi_0)\downarrow$ Re
$1.05$ 0.5892 3.6368 - - - 1.7414 0.3145 n
$1.10$ 0.5892 3.6368 - - - 1.7414 0.2610 n
$1.15$ 0.5892 - - - 3.6368 1.7414 0.2146 n
$1.20$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6160 3.4445 0.9557 1.7414 0.1743 y
$1.25$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 1.7414 0.1395 y
$1.30$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.5927 3.6116 0.8387 1.7414 0.1095 y
Table Options

Download as excel

$\beta_1=0.8, \lambda=0.5, \theta_0=0.24, \theta_1=1, \theta_2=0.8, \sigma^2=2, \delta=0.05, P=4, K=0.2$
${ \beta_2}\uparrow$ $q^{\pi^*}(0)\equiv$ $h_0\equiv$ $q_1^{\pi^*}(0)\downarrow$ $h_1\uparrow$ $\tilde{\xi}_0\downarrow$ $u'(0)\equiv$ $I(\xi_0)\downarrow$ Re
$1.05$ 0.5892 3.6368 - - - 1.7414 0.3145 n
$1.10$ 0.5892 3.6368 - - - 1.7414 0.2610 n
$1.15$ 0.5892 - - - 3.6368 1.7414 0.2146 n
$1.20$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6160 3.4445 0.9557 1.7414 0.1743 y
$1.25$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 1.7414 0.1395 y
$1.30$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.5927 3.6116 0.8387 1.7414 0.1095 y
Table 3.  The influence of K on optimal strategy
$\beta_1=0.8, \beta_2=1.1, \lambda=0.5, \theta_0=0.24, \theta_1=1, \theta_2=0.8, \sigma^2=2, \delta=0.05, P=4$
$K\uparrow$ $q^{\pi^*}(0)\equiv$ $h_0\equiv$ $q_1^{\pi^*}(0)\downarrow$ $h_1\uparrow$ $\tilde{\xi}_0\uparrow$ $u'(0)\equiv$ $I(\xi_0)\equiv$ Re
$0.05$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6625 3.1266 0.4850 1.7414 0.2610 y
$0.10$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6364 3.3034 0.6619 1.7414 0.2610 y
$0.15$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6180 3.4308 0.7893 1.7414 0.2610 y
$0.20$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 1.7414 0.2610 y
$0.25$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.5916 3.6195 0.9779 1.7414 0.2610 y
$0.30$ 0.5892 - - - 3.6368 1.7414 0.2610 n
Table Options

Download as excel

$\beta_1=0.8, \beta_2=1.1, \lambda=0.5, \theta_0=0.24, \theta_1=1, \theta_2=0.8, \sigma^2=2, \delta=0.05, P=4$
$K\uparrow$ $q^{\pi^*}(0)\equiv$ $h_0\equiv$ $q_1^{\pi^*}(0)\downarrow$ $h_1\uparrow$ $\tilde{\xi}_0\uparrow$ $u'(0)\equiv$ $I(\xi_0)\equiv$ Re
$0.05$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6625 3.1266 0.4850 1.7414 0.2610 y
$0.10$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6364 3.3034 0.6619 1.7414 0.2610 y
$0.15$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6180 3.4308 0.7893 1.7414 0.2610 y
$0.20$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 1.7414 0.2610 y
$0.25$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.5916 3.6195 0.9779 1.7414 0.2610 y
$0.30$ 0.5892 - - - 3.6368 1.7414 0.2610 n
Table 4.  The influence of P on optimal strategy
$\beta_1=0.8, \beta_2=1.1, \lambda=0.5, \theta_0=0.24, \theta_1=1, \theta_2=0.8, \sigma^2=2, \delta=0.05, K=0.2$
$P\uparrow$ $q^{\pi^*}(0)\uparrow$ $h_0\downarrow$ $q_1^{\pi^*}(0)\equiv$ $h_1\equiv$ $\tilde{\xi}_0\equiv$ $u'(0)\downarrow$ $I(\xi_0)\downarrow$ Re
$-4$ 0.4368 5.5029 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 9.6961 6.2083 y
$-2$ 0.4449 5.2679 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 7.4376 4.4668 y
$0$ 0.4600 4.9497 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 5.2780 2.8168 y
$2$ 0.4940 4.4728 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 3.3073 1.3414 y
$4$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 1.7414 0.2610 y
$6$ 0.8209 2.0027 - - - 0.9351 - n
Table Options

Download as excel

$\beta_1=0.8, \beta_2=1.1, \lambda=0.5, \theta_0=0.24, \theta_1=1, \theta_2=0.8, \sigma^2=2, \delta=0.05, K=0.2$
$P\uparrow$ $q^{\pi^*}(0)\uparrow$ $h_0\downarrow$ $q_1^{\pi^*}(0)\equiv$ $h_1\equiv$ $\tilde{\xi}_0\equiv$ $u'(0)\downarrow$ $I(\xi_0)\downarrow$ Re
$-4$ 0.4368 5.5029 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 9.6961 6.2083 y
$-2$ 0.4449 5.2679 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 7.4376 4.4668 y
$0$ 0.4600 4.9497 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 5.2780 2.8168 y
$2$ 0.4940 4.4728 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 3.3073 1.3414 y
$4$ 0.5892 3.6368 0.6035 3.5331 0.8915 1.7414 0.2610 y
$6$ 0.8209 2.0027 - - - 0.9351 - n
Table 5.  The influence of M on optimal strategy
$\beta_1=0.8, \beta_2=1.1, \lambda=0.5, \theta_0=0.24, \theta_1=1, \theta_2=0.8, \sigma^2=2, \delta=0.05, K=0.2, P=4$
$M\uparrow$ $q^{\pi^*}(0)\downarrow$ $d_0\uparrow$ $q_1^{\pi^*}(0)\uparrow$ $d_1\uparrow$ $\tilde{\zeta}_0\uparrow$ $v'(0)\uparrow$ $J(\zeta_0)\uparrow$ Re
$0.5$ 0.6036 2.3715 - - - 1.5666 0.1530 n
$1$ 0.5918 3.0719 0.6011 3.0056 0.8841 1.7066 0.2380 y
$5$ 0.5893 3.5344 0.6035 3.4318 0.8913 1.7403 0.2602 y
$10$ 0.5892 3.5862 0.6035 3.4827 0.8915 1.7411 0.2608 y
$100$ 0.5892 3.6318 0.6035 3.5280 0.8915 1.7414 0.2610 y
$1000$ 0.5892 3.6363 0.6035 3.5325 0.8915 1.7414 0.2610 y
Table Options

Download as excel

$\beta_1=0.8, \beta_2=1.1, \lambda=0.5, \theta_0=0.24, \theta_1=1, \theta_2=0.8, \sigma^2=2, \delta=0.05, K=0.2, P=4$
$M\uparrow$ $q^{\pi^*}(0)\downarrow$ $d_0\uparrow$ $q_1^{\pi^*}(0)\uparrow$ $d_1\uparrow$ $\tilde{\zeta}_0\uparrow$ $v'(0)\uparrow$ $J(\zeta_0)\uparrow$ Re
$0.5$ 0.6036 2.3715 - - - 1.5666 0.1530 n
$1$ 0.5918 3.0719 0.6011 3.0056 0.8841 1.7066 0.2380 y
$5$ 0.5893 3.5344 0.6035 3.4318 0.8913 1.7403 0.2602 y
$10$ 0.5892 3.5862 0.6035 3.4827 0.8915 1.7411 0.2608 y
$100$ 0.5892 3.6318 0.6035 3.5280 0.8915 1.7414 0.2610 y
$1000$ 0.5892 3.6363 0.6035 3.5325 0.8915 1.7414 0.2610 y
[1]

Gongpin Cheng, Lin Xu. Optimal size of business and dividend strategy in a nonlinear model with refinancing and liquidation value. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (1) : 1-19. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017001
[2]

Xin Jiang, Kam Chuen Yuen, Mi Chen. Optimal investment and reinsurance with premium control. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-17. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019080
[3]

Lin Xu, Rongming Wang, Dingjun Yao. On maximizing the expected terminal utility by investment and reinsurance. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (4) : 801-815. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.801
[4]

Qian Zhao, Zhuo Jin, Jiaqin Wei. Optimal investment and dividend payment strategies with debt management and reinsurance. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (4) : 1323-1348. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018009
[5]

Nan Zhang, Ping Chen, Zhuo Jin, Shuanming Li. Markowitz's mean-variance optimization with investment and constrained reinsurance. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 375-397. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016022
[6]

Yingxu Tian, Junyi Guo, Zhongyang Sun. Optimal mean-variance reinsurance in a financial market with stochastic rate of return. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020051
[7]

Yan Wang, Yanxiang Zhao, Lei Wang, Aimin Song, Yanping Ma. Stochastic maximum principle for partial information optimal investment and dividend problem of an insurer. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (2) : 653-671. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017067
[8]

Gongpin Cheng, Rongming Wang, Dingjun Yao. Optimal dividend and capital injection strategy with excess-of-loss reinsurance and transaction costs. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (1) : 371-395. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017051
[9]

Lv Chen, Hailiang Yang. Optimal reinsurance and investment strategy with two piece utility function. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (2) : 737-755. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016044
[10]

Ming Yan, Hongtao Yang, Lei Zhang, Shuhua Zhang. Optimal investment-reinsurance policy with regime switching and value-at-risk constraint. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-17. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019050
[11]

Arjuna Flenner, Gary A. Hewer, Charles S. Kenney. Two dimensional histogram analysis using the Helmholtz principle. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2008, 2 (4) : 485-525. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2008.2.485
[12]

K. Q. Lan, G. C. Yang. Optimal constants for two point boundary value problems. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 624-633. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.624
[13]

Guy Barles, Ariela Briani, Emmanuel Trélat. Value function for regional control problems via dynamic programming and Pontryagin maximum principle. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 509-533. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018021
[14]

Yu Tian, John R. Graef, Lingju Kong, Min Wang. Existence of solutions to a multi-point boundary value problem for a second order differential system via the dual least action principle. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 759-769. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.759
[15]

M. Mahalingam, Parag Ravindran, U. Saravanan, K. R. Rajagopal. Two boundary value problems involving an inhomogeneous viscoelastic solid. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (6) : 1351-1373. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017072
[16]

Chan-Gyun Kim, Yong-Hoon Lee. A bifurcation result for two point boundary value problem with a strong singularity. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 834-843. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.834
[17]

Feliz Minhós, A. I. Santos. Higher order two-point boundary value problems with asymmetric growth. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2008, 1 (1) : 127-137. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2008.1.127
[18]

Wenming Zou. Multiple solutions results for two-point boundary value problem with resonance. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1998, 4 (3) : 485-496. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1998.4.485
[19]

Anna Amirdjanova, Jie Xiong. Large deviation principle for a stochastic navier-Stokes equation in its vorticity form for a two-dimensional incompressible flow. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (4) : 651-666. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.651
[20]

Zhigang Wu, Weike Wang. Generalized Huygens' principle for a reduced gravity two and a half layer model in dimension three. Kinetic & Related Models, 2017, 10 (4) : 1205-1233. doi: 10.3934/krm.2017046

2018 Impact Factor: 1.025

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (111)
  • HTML views (887)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences