American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    Selective void creation/filling for variable size packets and multiple wavelengths
  • JIMO Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Times until service completion and abandonment in an M/M/$ m$ preemptive-resume LCFS queue with impatient customers
October  2018, 14(4): 1685-1700. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018027

Optimal impulse control of a mean-reverting inventory with quadratic costs

Yanqing Hu , Zaiming Liu and  Jinbiao Wu ,

School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, China

* Corresponding author: Jinbiao Wu

Received  June 2016 Revised  November 2017 Published  February 2018

Fund Project: The second author is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 11671404. The third author is supported by the Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Hunan under Grant 2017JJ3405 and Innovation-Driven of Central South University (10900-506010101) and the Yu Ying project of Central South University

In this paper, we analyze an optimal impulse control problem of a stochastic inventory system whose state follows a mean-reverting Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. The objective of the management is to keep the inventory level as close as possible to a given target. When the management intervenes in the system, it requires costs consisting of a quadratic form of the system state. Besides, there are running costs associated with the difference between the inventory level and the target. Those costs are also of a quadratic form. The objective of this paper is to find an optimal control of minimizing the expected total discounted sum of the intervention costs and running costs incurred over the infinite time horizon. We solve the problem by using stochastic impulse control theory.

Keywords: Stochastic impulse control, inventory control, mean-reverting Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, quasi-variational inequalities, quadratic costs.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 93E20, 90B05; Secondary: 49J40.
Citation: Yanqing Hu, Zaiming Liu, Jinbiao Wu. Optimal impulse control of a mean-reverting inventory with quadratic costs. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (4) : 1685-1700. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018027
References:
[1]

A. Bensoussan and J. L. Lions, Impulse Control and Quasi-Variational Inequalities, Gaunthier-Villars, paris, 1984.Google Scholar

[2]

G. Bertola, W. J. Runggaldier and K. Yasuda, On classical and restricted impulse stochastic control for the exchange rate, Applied Mathematics and Optimization, 74 (2016), 423-454. doi: 10.1007/s00245-015-9320-6. Google Scholar

[3]

O. Bouasker, N. Letifi and J. L. Prigent, Optimal funding and hiring/firing policies with mean reverting demand, Economic Modeling, 58 (2016), 569-579. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.11.015. Google Scholar

[4]

K. A. Brekke and B. Φksendal, A verification theorem for combined stochastic control and impulse control, Stochastic Analysis and Related Topics, 42 (1998), 211-220. Google Scholar

[5]

A. Cadenillas and F. Zapatero, Optimal central bank intervention in the foreign exchange market, Journal of Economic Theory, 87 (1999), 218-242. doi: 10.1006/jeth.1999.2523. Google Scholar

[6]

A. Cadenillas and F. Zapatero, Classical and impulse stochastic control of the exchange rate using interest rates and reserves, Mathematical Finance, 10 (2000), 141-156. doi: 10.1111/1467-9965.00086. Google Scholar

[7]

A. Cadenillas, Consumption-investment problems with transaction costs: Survey and open problems, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 51 (2000), 43-68. doi: 10.1007/s001860050002. Google Scholar

[8]

A. Cadenillas, P. Lakner and M. Pinedo, Optimal control of a mean-reverting inventory, Operations Research, 58 (2010), 1697-1710. doi: 10.1287/opre.1100.0835. Google Scholar

[9]

G. M. Constantinides and S. F. Richard, Existence of optimal simple policies for discounted-cost inventory and cash management in continuous time, Operations Research, 26 (1978), 620-636. doi: 10.1287/opre.26.4.620. Google Scholar

[10]

H. Feng, Q. Wu, K. Muthuraman and V. Deshpande, Replenishment policies for multi-product stochastic inventory systems with correlated demand and joint-replenishment costs, Production and Operations Management, 24 (2015), 647-664. doi: 10.1111/poms.12290. Google Scholar

[11]

T. Gescheidt, V. I. Losada and K. Mensikova, Impulse control disorders in patients with young-onset Parkinson's disease: a cross-sectional study seeking associated factors, Basal Ganglia, 6 (2016), 197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.baga.2016.09.001. Google Scholar

[12]

J. M. Harrison, T. M. Sellke and A. J. Taylor, Impulse control of brownian motion, Mathematics of Operations Research, 8 (1983), 454-466. doi: 10.1287/moor.8.3.454. Google Scholar

[13]

A. Madhavan and S. Smidt, An analysis of changes in specialist inventories and quotations, Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 1595-1628. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05122.x. Google Scholar

[14]

D. W. Miao, X. C. Lin and W. L. Chao, Option pricing under jump-diffusion model with mean-reverting bivariate jumps, Operations Research Letters, 42 (2014), 27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.orl.2013.11.004. Google Scholar

[15]

M. Ohnishi and M. Tsujimura, An impulse control of a geometric brownian motion with quadratic costs, European Journal of Operational Research, 168 (2006), 311-321. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.006. Google Scholar

[16]

B. Øksendal and A. Sulem, Applied Stochastic Control of Jump Diffusions, Second edition. Universitext. Springer, Berlin, 2007. Google Scholar

[17]

M. Ormeci, J. G. Dai and J. Vande Vate, Impulse control of Brownian motion: The constrained average cost case, Operations Research, 56 (2008), 618-629. doi: 10.1287/opre.1060.0380. Google Scholar

[18]

X. J. Pan and S. D. Li, Optimal control of a stochastic production-inventory system under deteriorating items and environmental constraints, International Journal of Production Research, 53 (2015), 607-628. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.961201. Google Scholar

[19]

L. C. G. Rogers and D. Williams, Diffusions, Markov Processes and Martingales, Cambridge University Press, 2000. Google Scholar

[20]

L. Vela, J. C. M. Castrillo and P. J. Garcia-Ruiz, The high prevalence of impulse control behaviors in patients with early-onset Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional multicenter study, Journal of Neurological Sciences, 368 (2016), 150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.07.003. Google Scholar

[21]

A. Weerasinghe and C. Zhu, Optimal inventory control with path-dependent cost criteria, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 126 (2016), 1585-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.spa.2015.11.014. Google Scholar

[22]

D. Yao, X. Chao and J. Wu, Optimal control policy for a Brownian inventory system with concave ordering cost, Journal of Applied Probability, 52 (2015), 909-925. doi: 10.1017/S0021900200112987. Google Scholar

[23]

S. Young, Transaction Cost Economics Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_221. Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

A. Bensoussan and J. L. Lions, Impulse Control and Quasi-Variational Inequalities, Gaunthier-Villars, paris, 1984.Google Scholar

[2]

G. Bertola, W. J. Runggaldier and K. Yasuda, On classical and restricted impulse stochastic control for the exchange rate, Applied Mathematics and Optimization, 74 (2016), 423-454. doi: 10.1007/s00245-015-9320-6. Google Scholar

[3]

O. Bouasker, N. Letifi and J. L. Prigent, Optimal funding and hiring/firing policies with mean reverting demand, Economic Modeling, 58 (2016), 569-579. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.11.015. Google Scholar

[4]

K. A. Brekke and B. Φksendal, A verification theorem for combined stochastic control and impulse control, Stochastic Analysis and Related Topics, 42 (1998), 211-220. Google Scholar

[5]

A. Cadenillas and F. Zapatero, Optimal central bank intervention in the foreign exchange market, Journal of Economic Theory, 87 (1999), 218-242. doi: 10.1006/jeth.1999.2523. Google Scholar

[6]

A. Cadenillas and F. Zapatero, Classical and impulse stochastic control of the exchange rate using interest rates and reserves, Mathematical Finance, 10 (2000), 141-156. doi: 10.1111/1467-9965.00086. Google Scholar

[7]

A. Cadenillas, Consumption-investment problems with transaction costs: Survey and open problems, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 51 (2000), 43-68. doi: 10.1007/s001860050002. Google Scholar

[8]

A. Cadenillas, P. Lakner and M. Pinedo, Optimal control of a mean-reverting inventory, Operations Research, 58 (2010), 1697-1710. doi: 10.1287/opre.1100.0835. Google Scholar

[9]

G. M. Constantinides and S. F. Richard, Existence of optimal simple policies for discounted-cost inventory and cash management in continuous time, Operations Research, 26 (1978), 620-636. doi: 10.1287/opre.26.4.620. Google Scholar

[10]

H. Feng, Q. Wu, K. Muthuraman and V. Deshpande, Replenishment policies for multi-product stochastic inventory systems with correlated demand and joint-replenishment costs, Production and Operations Management, 24 (2015), 647-664. doi: 10.1111/poms.12290. Google Scholar

[11]

T. Gescheidt, V. I. Losada and K. Mensikova, Impulse control disorders in patients with young-onset Parkinson's disease: a cross-sectional study seeking associated factors, Basal Ganglia, 6 (2016), 197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.baga.2016.09.001. Google Scholar

[12]

J. M. Harrison, T. M. Sellke and A. J. Taylor, Impulse control of brownian motion, Mathematics of Operations Research, 8 (1983), 454-466. doi: 10.1287/moor.8.3.454. Google Scholar

[13]

A. Madhavan and S. Smidt, An analysis of changes in specialist inventories and quotations, Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 1595-1628. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05122.x. Google Scholar

[14]

D. W. Miao, X. C. Lin and W. L. Chao, Option pricing under jump-diffusion model with mean-reverting bivariate jumps, Operations Research Letters, 42 (2014), 27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.orl.2013.11.004. Google Scholar

[15]

M. Ohnishi and M. Tsujimura, An impulse control of a geometric brownian motion with quadratic costs, European Journal of Operational Research, 168 (2006), 311-321. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.006. Google Scholar

[16]

B. Øksendal and A. Sulem, Applied Stochastic Control of Jump Diffusions, Second edition. Universitext. Springer, Berlin, 2007. Google Scholar

[17]

M. Ormeci, J. G. Dai and J. Vande Vate, Impulse control of Brownian motion: The constrained average cost case, Operations Research, 56 (2008), 618-629. doi: 10.1287/opre.1060.0380. Google Scholar

[18]

X. J. Pan and S. D. Li, Optimal control of a stochastic production-inventory system under deteriorating items and environmental constraints, International Journal of Production Research, 53 (2015), 607-628. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.961201. Google Scholar

[19]

L. C. G. Rogers and D. Williams, Diffusions, Markov Processes and Martingales, Cambridge University Press, 2000. Google Scholar

[20]

L. Vela, J. C. M. Castrillo and P. J. Garcia-Ruiz, The high prevalence of impulse control behaviors in patients with early-onset Parkinson's disease: A cross-sectional multicenter study, Journal of Neurological Sciences, 368 (2016), 150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.07.003. Google Scholar

[21]

A. Weerasinghe and C. Zhu, Optimal inventory control with path-dependent cost criteria, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 126 (2016), 1585-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.spa.2015.11.014. Google Scholar

[22]

D. Yao, X. Chao and J. Wu, Optimal control policy for a Brownian inventory system with concave ordering cost, Journal of Applied Probability, 52 (2015), 909-925. doi: 10.1017/S0021900200112987. Google Scholar

[23]

S. Young, Transaction Cost Economics Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_221. Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Function $D(x)$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Function $D'(x)$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  effect of changes in k
$k$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
0.10.93413.35834.61387.06562.42422.4518
0.150.86223.31274.66757.15002.45052.4925
0.20.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
0.250.69623.20354.79947.34792.50732.5485
0.30.60053.13854.87937.46362.53792.5843
$\sigma$=1.2, $\rho$=4.0, $\lambda$=0.06, $k_{01}$=5.0, $k_{02}$=5.0, $k_{21}$=0.04, $k_{22}$=0.04, $k_{11}$=2.0, $k_{12}$=2.0.
Table Options

Download as excel

$k$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
0.10.93413.35834.61387.06562.42422.4518
0.150.86223.31274.66757.15002.45052.4925
0.20.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
0.250.69623.20354.79947.34792.50732.5485
0.30.60053.13854.87937.46362.53792.5843
$\sigma$=1.2, $\rho$=4.0, $\lambda$=0.06, $k_{01}$=5.0, $k_{02}$=5.0, $k_{21}$=0.04, $k_{22}$=0.04, $k_{11}$=2.0, $k_{12}$=2.0.
Table 2.  effect of changes in $\lambda$
$\lambda$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
0.010.85063.29154.69147.16652.44092.4751
0.030.82393.27974.70637.19172.45582.4908
0.050.79683.26764.72147.22812.47082.5067
0.060.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
0.070.76953.25514.73687.25952.48562.5227
$\sigma$=1.2, $\rho$=4.0, $k$=0.2, $k_{01}$=5.0, $k_{02}$=5.0, $k_{21}$=0.04, $k_{22}$=0.04, $k_{11}$=2.0, $k_{12}$=2.0.
Table Options

Download as excel

$\lambda$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
0.010.85063.29154.69147.16652.44092.4751
0.030.82393.27974.70637.19172.45582.4908
0.050.79683.26764.72147.22812.47082.5067
0.060.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
0.070.76953.25514.73687.25952.48562.5227
$\sigma$=1.2, $\rho$=4.0, $k$=0.2, $k_{01}$=5.0, $k_{02}$=5.0, $k_{21}$=0.04, $k_{22}$=0.04, $k_{11}$=2.0, $k_{12}$=2.0.
Table 3.  effect of changes in $\sigma$
$\sigma$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
1.10.90303.29594.69897.12592.39292.4270
1.20.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
1.30.66613.22654.75957.35872.56042.5992
1.40.55173.19134.79017.47102.63962.6800
1.50.43973.15594.82077.58072.71622.7600
$\lambda$=0.06, $\rho$=4.0, $k$=0.2, $k_{01}$=5.0, $k_{02}$=5.0, $k_{21}$=0.04, $k_{22}$=0.04, $k_{11}$=2.0, $k_{12}$=2.0.
Table Options

Download as excel

$\sigma$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
1.10.90303.29594.69897.12592.39292.4270
1.20.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
1.30.66613.22654.75957.35872.56042.5992
1.40.55173.19134.79017.47102.63962.6800
1.50.43973.15594.82077.58072.71622.7600
$\lambda$=0.06, $\rho$=4.0, $k$=0.2, $k_{01}$=5.0, $k_{02}$=5.0, $k_{21}$=0.04, $k_{22}$=0.04, $k_{11}$=2.0, $k_{12}$=2.0.
Table 4.  effect of changes in $\rho$
$\rho$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
3.50.29152.77174.21826.73512.48022.5169
3.80.58653.06554.52487.04032.47902.5155
4.00.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
4.51.27503.75115.23997.75232.47612.5124
$\lambda$=0.06, $\sigma$=1.2, $k$=0.2, $k_{01}$=5.0, $k_{02}$=5.0, $k_{21}$=0.04, $k_{22}$=0.04, $k_{11}$=2.0, $k_{12}$=2.0.
Table Options

Download as excel

$\rho$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
3.50.29152.77174.21826.73512.48022.5169
3.80.58653.06554.52487.04032.47902.5155
4.00.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
4.51.27503.75115.23997.75232.47612.5124
$\lambda$=0.06, $\sigma$=1.2, $k$=0.2, $k_{01}$=5.0, $k_{02}$=5.0, $k_{21}$=0.04, $k_{22}$=0.04, $k_{11}$=2.0, $k_{12}$=2.0.
Table 5.  effect of changes in $k_{21}$, $k_{22}$, $k_{11}$, $k_{12}$, $k_{01}$, and $k_{02}$
$k_{21}$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
0.040.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
0.10.72293.16394.72917.24952.44102.5103
0.20.62983.01404.75957.25792.38422.5041
0.40.46722.75274.82077.26502.28552.4946
$k_{22}$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
0.040.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
0.10.76693.23334.84427.36532.46642.5211
0.20.74343.19335.05237.58492.44992.5326
0.40.70903.13585.54548.10282.42682.5574
$k_{11}$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
2.00.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
2.50.69203.15394.75007.25572.46192.5057
3.00.60083.04694.76887.26662.44612.4978
4.00.41772.83414.80107.28542.41642.4844
$k_{12}$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
2.00.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
2.50.77193.24184.84197.33892.46992.4970
3.00.76163.22424.95407.43412.46262.4801
4.00.74403.19435.17697.62512.45032.4482
$k_{01}$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
5.00.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
6.00.66703.30154.74577.25322.63452.5075
7.00.56063.33534.76027.26162.77472.5014
8.00.46193.36444.77317.26912.90252.4960
$k_{02}$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
5.00.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
6.00.77433.24604.68897.36222.47172.6733
7.00.76653.23264.65517.47072.46612.8156
8.00.75963.22074.62607.57132.46112.9453
The default parameters in the calculations are $\rho$=4.0, $\lambda$=0.06, $\rho$=4.0, $k$=0.2, $k_{01}$=5.0, $k_{02}$=5.0, $k_{21}$=0.04, $k_{22}$=0.04, $k_{11}$=2.0, $k_{12}$=2.0.
Table Options

Download as excel

$k_{21}$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
0.040.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
0.10.72293.16394.72917.24952.44102.5103
0.20.62983.01404.75957.25792.38422.5041
0.40.46722.75274.82077.26502.28552.4946
$k_{22}$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
0.040.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
0.10.76693.23334.84427.36532.46642.5211
0.20.74343.19335.05237.58492.44992.5326
0.40.70903.13585.54548.10282.42682.5574
$k_{11}$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
2.00.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
2.50.69203.15394.75007.25572.46192.5057
3.00.60083.04694.76887.26662.44612.4978
4.00.41772.83414.80107.28542.41642.4844
$k_{12}$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
2.00.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
2.50.77193.24184.84197.33892.46992.4970
3.00.76163.22424.95407.43412.46262.4801
4.00.74403.19435.17697.62512.45032.4482
$k_{01}$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
5.00.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
6.00.66703.30154.74577.25322.63452.5075
7.00.56063.33534.76027.26162.77472.5014
8.00.46193.36444.77317.26912.90252.4960
$k_{02}$ $a$ $\alpha$ $\beta$b $\alpha-a$$ b-\beta$
5.00.78323.26144.72917.24372.47822.5146
6.00.77433.24604.68897.36222.47172.6733
7.00.76653.23264.65517.47072.46612.8156
8.00.75963.22074.62607.57132.46112.9453
The default parameters in the calculations are $\rho$=4.0, $\lambda$=0.06, $\rho$=4.0, $k$=0.2, $k_{01}$=5.0, $k_{02}$=5.0, $k_{21}$=0.04, $k_{22}$=0.04, $k_{11}$=2.0, $k_{12}$=2.0.
[1]

Kai Liu. Quadratic control problem of neutral Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes with control delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (6) : 1651-1661. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1651
[2]

Yusuke Murase, Atsushi Kadoya, Nobuyuki Kenmochi. Optimal control problems for quasi-variational inequalities and its numerical approximation. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 1101-1110. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.1101
[3]

Jingzhen Liu, Ka Fai Cedric Yiu, Alain Bensoussan. Ergodic control for a mean reverting inventory model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (3) : 857-876. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017079
[4]

Tomasz Komorowski, Łukasz Stȩpień. Kinetic limit for a harmonic chain with a conservative Ornstein-Uhlenbeck stochastic perturbation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (2) : 239-278. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018013
[5]

Lori Badea. Multigrid methods for some quasi-variational inequalities. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (6) : 1457-1471. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.1457
[6]

Yusuke Murase, Risei Kano, Nobuyuki Kenmochi. Elliptic Quasi-variational inequalities and applications. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 583-591. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.583
[7]

Virginia Giorno, Serena Spina. On the return process with refractoriness for a non-homogeneous Ornstein-Uhlenbeck neuronal model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (2) : 285-302. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.285
[8]

Annalisa Cesaroni, Matteo Novaga, Enrico Valdinoci. A symmetry result for the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (6) : 2451-2467. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.2451
[9]

Yurii Nesterov, Laura Scrimali. Solving strongly monotone variational and quasi-variational inequalities. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 31 (4) : 1383-1396. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.1383
[10]

Laura Scrimali. Mixed behavior network equilibria and quasi-variational inequalities. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (2) : 363-379. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.363
[11]

Edward Allen. Environmental variability and mean-reverting processes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (7) : 2073-2089. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016037
[12]

Hoi Tin Kong, Qing Zhang. An optimal trading rule of a mean-reverting asset. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (4) : 1403-1417. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.1403
[13]

Filomena Feo, Pablo Raúl Stinga, Bruno Volzone. The fractional nonlocal Ornstein-Uhlenbeck equation, Gaussian symmetrization and regularity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (7) : 3269-3298. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018142
[14]

Tomasz Komorowski, Lenya Ryzhik. Fluctuations of solutions to Wigner equation with an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck potential. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (3) : 871-914. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.871
[15]

Haisen Zhang. Clarke directional derivatives of regularized gap functions for nonsmooth quasi-variational inequalities. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2014, 4 (3) : 365-379. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2014.4.365
[16]

Qihong Chen. Recovery of local volatility for financial assets with mean-reverting price processes. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 625-635. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018026
[17]

Weiwei Wang, Ping Chen. A mean-reverting currency model with floating interest rates in uncertain environment. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (4) : 1921-1936. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018129
[18]

Antonio Avantaggiati, Paola Loreti. Hypercontractivity, Hopf-Lax type formulas, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operators (II). Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2009, 2 (3) : 525-545. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2009.2.525
[19]

Tiziana Durante, Abdelaziz Rhandi. On the essential self-adjointness of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operators perturbed by inverse-square potentials. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (3) : 649-655. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.649
[20]

Thi Tuyen Nguyen. Large time behavior of solutions of local and nonlocal nondegenerate Hamilton-Jacobi equations with Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operator. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (3) : 999-1021. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019049

2018 Impact Factor: 1.025

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (77)
  • HTML views (920)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences