-
Previous Article
Pricing vulnerable options under a Markov-modulated jump-diffusion model with fire sales
- JIMO Home
- This Issue
-
Next Article
Pricing options on investment project expansions under commodity price uncertainty
January
2019, 15(1): 275-291.
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018043
A slacks-based model for dynamic data envelopment analysis
Department of Mathematics, Tafresh University, Tafresh, 3951879611, Iran |
Dynamic Data Envelopment Analysis (DDEA) deals with efficiency analysis of decision making units in time dependent situations. A finite number of time periods and some carry-over activities between each two consecutive periods are assumed in DDEA. There are many models in DEA for efficiency evaluation of decision making units over time periods. One important class of dynamic models is the class of slacks-based models. By using a numerical example we show that some slacks-based DDEA models, especially ones proposed by Tone and Tsutsui, suffer from efficiency overestimation. A new dynamic slacks-based DEA model is proposed to overcome the deficiencies of the available slacks-based models. The model proposed in this paper is capable of revealing all sources of inefficiencies and providing more discrimination between decision making units. The theoretical and practical examinations demonstrate the merits of the new model.
Keywords:
Data envelopment analysis,
dynamic efficiency,
DDEA,
slacks-based model,
carry-over activity.
Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary: 90C05, 90B50; Secondary: 91B06.
Citation:
Mohammad Afzalinejad, Zahra Abbasi. A slacks-based model for dynamic data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization,
2019, 15
(1)
: 275-291.
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018043
![]()
References:
| [1] |
A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes,
Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2 (1978), 429-444.
doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8. |
| [2] |
W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford and K. Tone,
Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-solver Software, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2007.
doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8. |
| [3] |
D. K. Despotis, D. Sotiros and G. Koronakos,
A network DEA approach for series multi-stage processes, Omega, 61 (2016), 35-48.
doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.07.005. |
| [4] |
A. Emrouznejad and E. Thanassoulis,
A mathematical model for dynamic efficiency using data envelopment analysis, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 160 (2005), 363-378.
doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2003.09.026. |
| [5] |
R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, C. A. K. Lovell and C. Pasurka,
Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71 (1989), 90-98.
doi: 10.2307/1928055. |
| [6] |
R. Färe and S. Grosskopf,
Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA, Springer-Verlag, Netherlands, 1996.
doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-1816-0. |
| [7] |
R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang,
Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries, The American Economic Review, 84 (1994), 66-83.
|
| [8] |
H. Fukuyama and W. L. Weber,
Measuring Japanese bank performance: A dynamic network DEA approach, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 44 (2015), 249-264.
doi: 10.1007/s11123-014-0403-1. |
| [9] |
S. Hung, D. He and W. Lu,
Evaluating the dynamic performances of business groups from the carry-over perspective: A case study of Taiwan's semiconductor industry, Omega, 46 (2014), 1-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.01.003. |
| [10] |
C. Kao,
Dynamic data envelopment analysis: A relational analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 227 (2013), 325-330.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.012. |
| [11] |
C. Kao and S. Hwang,
Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan, European Journal of Operational Research, 185 (2008), 418-429.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041. |
| [12] |
G. A. Klopp,
The Analysis of the Efficiency of Production System with Multiple Inputs and Outputs, Ph. D thesis, Industrial and System Engineering College, University of Illinois in Chicago, 1985. |
| [13] |
L. Liang, W. D. Cook and J. Zhu,
DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition, Naval Research Logistics, 55 (2008), 643-653.
doi: 10.1002/nav.20308. |
| [14] |
P. Moreno and S. Lozano,
Super SBI Dynamic Network DEA approach to measuring efficiency in the provision of public services, International Transactions in Operational Research, 25 (2018), 715-735.
doi: 10.1111/itor.12257. |
| [15] |
J. Nemoto and M. Goto,
Dynamic data envelopment analysis: modeling intertemporal behavior of a firm in the presence of productive inefficiencies, Economic Letters, 64 (1999), 51-56.
doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00070-1. |
| [16] |
J. Nemoto and M. Goto,
Measuring dynamic efficiency in production: an application of data envelopment analysis to Japanese electric utilities, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19 (2003), 191-210.
doi: 10.1023/A:1022805500570. |
| [17] |
H. Omrani and E. Soltanzadeh,
Dynamic DEA models with network structure: An application for Iranian airlines, Journal of Air Transport Management, 57 (2016), 52-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.07.014. |
| [18] |
K. S. Park and K. Park,
Measurement of multiperiod aggregative efficiency, European Journal of Operational Research, 193 (2009), 567-580.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.11.028. |
| [19] |
H. Scheel,
Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations, European Journal of Operational Research, 132 (2001), 400-410.
doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00160-0. |
| [20] |
J. K. Sengupta,
A dynamic efficiency model using data envelopment analysis, International Journal of Production Economics, 62 (1999), 209-218.
doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00244-8. |
| [21] |
M. Shafiee, M. Sangi and M. Ghaderi,
Bank performance evaluation using dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach, Journal of Data Envelopment Analysis and Decision Science, 2013 (2013), 1-12.
doi: 10.5899/2013/dea-00026. |
| [22] |
M. Soleimani-damaneh,
An effective computational attempt in DDEA, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33 (2009), 3943-3948.
doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.01.013. |
| [23] |
T. Sueyoshi and K. Sekitani,
Returns to scale in dynamic DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 161 (2005), 536-544.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.055. |
| [24] |
K. Tone,
A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 130 (2001), 498-509.
doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5. |
| [25] |
K. Tone and M. Tsutsui,
Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach, Omega, 38 (2010), 145-156.
doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2009.07.003. |
| [26] |
K. Tone and M. Tsutsui,
Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach, Omega, 42 (2014), 124-131.
doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2013.04.002. |
show all references
References:
| [1] |
A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes,
Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2 (1978), 429-444.
doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8. |
| [2] |
W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford and K. Tone,
Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-solver Software, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2007.
doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8. |
| [3] |
D. K. Despotis, D. Sotiros and G. Koronakos,
A network DEA approach for series multi-stage processes, Omega, 61 (2016), 35-48.
doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.07.005. |
| [4] |
A. Emrouznejad and E. Thanassoulis,
A mathematical model for dynamic efficiency using data envelopment analysis, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 160 (2005), 363-378.
doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2003.09.026. |
| [5] |
R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, C. A. K. Lovell and C. Pasurka,
Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71 (1989), 90-98.
doi: 10.2307/1928055. |
| [6] |
R. Färe and S. Grosskopf,
Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA, Springer-Verlag, Netherlands, 1996.
doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-1816-0. |
| [7] |
R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang,
Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries, The American Economic Review, 84 (1994), 66-83.
|
| [8] |
H. Fukuyama and W. L. Weber,
Measuring Japanese bank performance: A dynamic network DEA approach, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 44 (2015), 249-264.
doi: 10.1007/s11123-014-0403-1. |
| [9] |
S. Hung, D. He and W. Lu,
Evaluating the dynamic performances of business groups from the carry-over perspective: A case study of Taiwan's semiconductor industry, Omega, 46 (2014), 1-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.01.003. |
| [10] |
C. Kao,
Dynamic data envelopment analysis: A relational analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 227 (2013), 325-330.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.12.012. |
| [11] |
C. Kao and S. Hwang,
Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan, European Journal of Operational Research, 185 (2008), 418-429.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041. |
| [12] |
G. A. Klopp,
The Analysis of the Efficiency of Production System with Multiple Inputs and Outputs, Ph. D thesis, Industrial and System Engineering College, University of Illinois in Chicago, 1985. |
| [13] |
L. Liang, W. D. Cook and J. Zhu,
DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition, Naval Research Logistics, 55 (2008), 643-653.
doi: 10.1002/nav.20308. |
| [14] |
P. Moreno and S. Lozano,
Super SBI Dynamic Network DEA approach to measuring efficiency in the provision of public services, International Transactions in Operational Research, 25 (2018), 715-735.
doi: 10.1111/itor.12257. |
| [15] |
J. Nemoto and M. Goto,
Dynamic data envelopment analysis: modeling intertemporal behavior of a firm in the presence of productive inefficiencies, Economic Letters, 64 (1999), 51-56.
doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00070-1. |
| [16] |
J. Nemoto and M. Goto,
Measuring dynamic efficiency in production: an application of data envelopment analysis to Japanese electric utilities, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19 (2003), 191-210.
doi: 10.1023/A:1022805500570. |
| [17] |
H. Omrani and E. Soltanzadeh,
Dynamic DEA models with network structure: An application for Iranian airlines, Journal of Air Transport Management, 57 (2016), 52-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.07.014. |
| [18] |
K. S. Park and K. Park,
Measurement of multiperiod aggregative efficiency, European Journal of Operational Research, 193 (2009), 567-580.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.11.028. |
| [19] |
H. Scheel,
Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations, European Journal of Operational Research, 132 (2001), 400-410.
doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00160-0. |
| [20] |
J. K. Sengupta,
A dynamic efficiency model using data envelopment analysis, International Journal of Production Economics, 62 (1999), 209-218.
doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00244-8. |
| [21] |
M. Shafiee, M. Sangi and M. Ghaderi,
Bank performance evaluation using dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach, Journal of Data Envelopment Analysis and Decision Science, 2013 (2013), 1-12.
doi: 10.5899/2013/dea-00026. |
| [22] |
M. Soleimani-damaneh,
An effective computational attempt in DDEA, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33 (2009), 3943-3948.
doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.01.013. |
| [23] |
T. Sueyoshi and K. Sekitani,
Returns to scale in dynamic DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 161 (2005), 536-544.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.055. |
| [24] |
K. Tone,
A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 130 (2001), 498-509.
doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5. |
| [25] |
K. Tone and M. Tsutsui,
Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach, Omega, 38 (2010), 145-156.
doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2009.07.003. |
| [26] |
K. Tone and M. Tsutsui,
Dynamic DEA with network structure: A slacks-based measure approach, Omega, 42 (2014), 124-131.
doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2013.04.002. |
Figure 2.
Comparison of rank order (input-oriented).
Table 1.
Data of 10 bank branches
| DMUs | Average monthly salaries | Operating expense | Total loans | Net profit | Loan Losses | ||||||||||
| t=1 | t=2 | t=3 | t=1 | t=2 | t=3 | t=1 | t=2 | t=3 | t=1 | t=2 | t=3 | t=1 | t=2 | t=3 | |
| DMU1 | 2.828 | 2.705 | 3.775 | 27.55 | 35.25 | 50.43 | 40.01 | 49.85 | 54.38 | 57.95 | 58.85 | 66.64 | 12.41 | 7.88 | 7.4 |
| DMU2 | 5.667 | 5.825 | 7.657 | 84.5 | 122 | 105.5 | 282.9 | 297.6 | 322.5 | 94.18 | 87.29 | 111.6 | 41.34 | 34.95 | 28.64 |
| DMU3 | 6.23 | 6.32 | 8.899 | 183.6 | 159.5 | 170.8 | 184.5 | 191.4 | 188.4 | 103.7 | 120.5 | 121.6 | 28.44 | 22.71 | 21.41 |
| DMU4 | 5.577 | 5.532 | 7.552 | 122.7 | 94.48 | 94.97 | 195.9 | 200.5 | 202.2 | 58.98 | 58.42 | 58.25 | 22.8 | 25.68 | 26.69 |
| DMU5 | 3.864 | 4.526 | 5.72 | 57.19 | 38.43 | 40.27 | 106.2 | 102.9 | 98.36 | 32.41 | 42.5 | 48.91 | 8.51 | 6.25 | 8.93 |
| DMU6 | 4.696 | 4.601 | 6.196 | 72.07 | 2.64 | 3.41 | 175.5 | 176.1 | 190.7 | 60.7 | 58.88 | 47.68 | 10.35 | 11.89 | 10.22 |
| DMU7 | 3.582 | 3.108 | 4.221 | 21.83 | 21.3 | 29.76 | 21.56 | 24.38 | 28.28 | 18.68 | 19.17 | 19.42 | 1.91 | 1.24 | 2.02 |
| DMU8 | 5.395 | 5.522 | 7.139 | 63.85 | 56.14 | 49 | 133 | 147.1 | 156.8 | 76.77 | 99.79 | 100.9 | 30.49 | 21.06 | 18.07 |
| DMU9 | 7.761 | 7.522 | 10.746 | 27.93 | 34.4 | 31.14 | 872.9 | 815.4 | 803.3 | 314.7 | 312.8 | 31.21 | 80.96 | 119.5 | 115.5 |
| DMU10 | 3.748 | 3.593 | 5.138 | 59.99 | 96.5 | 60.43 | 113.7 | 121.6 | 122.9 | 72.64 | 84.51 | 81.45 | 7.33 | 3.28 | 13.53 |
| DMUs | Average monthly salaries | Operating expense | Total loans | Net profit | Loan Losses | ||||||||||
| t=1 | t=2 | t=3 | t=1 | t=2 | t=3 | t=1 | t=2 | t=3 | t=1 | t=2 | t=3 | t=1 | t=2 | t=3 | |
| DMU1 | 2.828 | 2.705 | 3.775 | 27.55 | 35.25 | 50.43 | 40.01 | 49.85 | 54.38 | 57.95 | 58.85 | 66.64 | 12.41 | 7.88 | 7.4 |
| DMU2 | 5.667 | 5.825 | 7.657 | 84.5 | 122 | 105.5 | 282.9 | 297.6 | 322.5 | 94.18 | 87.29 | 111.6 | 41.34 | 34.95 | 28.64 |
| DMU3 | 6.23 | 6.32 | 8.899 | 183.6 | 159.5 | 170.8 | 184.5 | 191.4 | 188.4 | 103.7 | 120.5 | 121.6 | 28.44 | 22.71 | 21.41 |
| DMU4 | 5.577 | 5.532 | 7.552 | 122.7 | 94.48 | 94.97 | 195.9 | 200.5 | 202.2 | 58.98 | 58.42 | 58.25 | 22.8 | 25.68 | 26.69 |
| DMU5 | 3.864 | 4.526 | 5.72 | 57.19 | 38.43 | 40.27 | 106.2 | 102.9 | 98.36 | 32.41 | 42.5 | 48.91 | 8.51 | 6.25 | 8.93 |
| DMU6 | 4.696 | 4.601 | 6.196 | 72.07 | 2.64 | 3.41 | 175.5 | 176.1 | 190.7 | 60.7 | 58.88 | 47.68 | 10.35 | 11.89 | 10.22 |
| DMU7 | 3.582 | 3.108 | 4.221 | 21.83 | 21.3 | 29.76 | 21.56 | 24.38 | 28.28 | 18.68 | 19.17 | 19.42 | 1.91 | 1.24 | 2.02 |
| DMU8 | 5.395 | 5.522 | 7.139 | 63.85 | 56.14 | 49 | 133 | 147.1 | 156.8 | 76.77 | 99.79 | 100.9 | 30.49 | 21.06 | 18.07 |
| DMU9 | 7.761 | 7.522 | 10.746 | 27.93 | 34.4 | 31.14 | 872.9 | 815.4 | 803.3 | 314.7 | 312.8 | 31.21 | 80.96 | 119.5 | 115.5 |
| DMU10 | 3.748 | 3.593 | 5.138 | 59.99 | 96.5 | 60.43 | 113.7 | 121.6 | 122.9 | 72.64 | 84.51 | 81.45 | 7.33 | 3.28 | 13.53 |
Table 2.
Comparison of the efficiency scores resulted from Tone and Tsutsui's model and the proposed model.
| Overall input-oriented efficiency | Overall output-oriented efficiency | Non-oriented combined efficiency | |||||
| DMUs | Model (16) with TT objective: |
||||||
| DMU1 | 0.9194 | 0.8792 | 0.6771 | 0.7587 | 0.6771 | 0.6225 | 0.6671 |
| DMU2 | 1 | 0.7040 | 1 | 0.8458 | 0.7492 | 1 | 0.5954 |
| DMU3 | 0.6521 | 0.4735 | 0.7618 | 0.7959 | 0.7230 | 0.4968 | 0.3761 |
| DMU4 | 0.5133 | 0.6773 | 0.5840 | 0.7117 | 0.5456 | 0.2998 | 0.4821 |
| DMU5 | 0.7648 | 0.7614 | 0.7916 | 0.8100 | 0.7286 | 0.6054 | 0.6168 |
| DMU6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DMU7 | 0.8854 | 0.6421 | 0.9409 | 0.8979 | 0.8700 | 0.8331 | 0.5766 |
| DMU8 | 0.7765 | 0.7020 | 0.7482 | 0.7766 | 0.6841 | 0.5810 | 0.5451 |
| DMU9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DMU10 | 1 | 0.5660 | 0.1 | 0.6979 | 0.9977 | 1 | 0.3950 |
| Overall input-oriented efficiency | Overall output-oriented efficiency | Non-oriented combined efficiency | |||||
| DMUs | Model (16) with TT objective: |
||||||
| DMU1 | 0.9194 | 0.8792 | 0.6771 | 0.7587 | 0.6771 | 0.6225 | 0.6671 |
| DMU2 | 1 | 0.7040 | 1 | 0.8458 | 0.7492 | 1 | 0.5954 |
| DMU3 | 0.6521 | 0.4735 | 0.7618 | 0.7959 | 0.7230 | 0.4968 | 0.3761 |
| DMU4 | 0.5133 | 0.6773 | 0.5840 | 0.7117 | 0.5456 | 0.2998 | 0.4821 |
| DMU5 | 0.7648 | 0.7614 | 0.7916 | 0.8100 | 0.7286 | 0.6054 | 0.6168 |
| DMU6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DMU7 | 0.8854 | 0.6421 | 0.9409 | 0.8979 | 0.8700 | 0.8331 | 0.5766 |
| DMU8 | 0.7765 | 0.7020 | 0.7482 | 0.7766 | 0.6841 | 0.5810 | 0.5451 |
| DMU9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DMU10 | 1 | 0.5660 | 0.1 | 0.6979 | 0.9977 | 1 | 0.3950 |
Table 3.
The input-oriented period efficiency scores resulted from the TT model and the proposed model
| DMUs | Tone and Tsutsui's model | The proposed model | ||||
| Period 1 efficiency | Period 2 efficiency | Period 3 efficiency | Period 1 efficiency | Period 2 efficiency | Period 3 efficiency | |
| DMU1 | 0.7574 | 1 | 1 | 0.6364 | 1 | 1 |
| DMU2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.2769 | 0.8169 | 1 |
| DMU3 | 0.5217 | 0.6987 | 0.7450 | 0.1962 | 0.4393 | 0.7247 |
| DMU4 | 0.3887 | 0.6334 | 0.5324 | 0.1802 | 0.8321 | 1 |
| DMU5 | 0.7047 | 0.8411 | 0.7477 | 0.5053 | 0.7744 | 1 |
| DMU6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DMU7 | 0.6562 | 1 | 1 | 0.4236 | 0.5221 | 0.9991 |
| DMU8 | 0.4524 | 0.8718 | 1 | 0.2319 | 0.8498 | 1 |
| DMU9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DMU10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.2602 | 0.8350 | 0.5901 |
| DMUs | Tone and Tsutsui's model | The proposed model | ||||
| Period 1 efficiency | Period 2 efficiency | Period 3 efficiency | Period 1 efficiency | Period 2 efficiency | Period 3 efficiency | |
| DMU1 | 0.7574 | 1 | 1 | 0.6364 | 1 | 1 |
| DMU2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.2769 | 0.8169 | 1 |
| DMU3 | 0.5217 | 0.6987 | 0.7450 | 0.1962 | 0.4393 | 0.7247 |
| DMU4 | 0.3887 | 0.6334 | 0.5324 | 0.1802 | 0.8321 | 1 |
| DMU5 | 0.7047 | 0.8411 | 0.7477 | 0.5053 | 0.7744 | 1 |
| DMU6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DMU7 | 0.6562 | 1 | 1 | 0.4236 | 0.5221 | 0.9991 |
| DMU8 | 0.4524 | 0.8718 | 1 | 0.2319 | 0.8498 | 1 |
| DMU9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DMU10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.2602 | 0.8350 | 0.5901 |
| [1] |
Nan Zhu, Kai He. The efficiency of major industrial enterprises in Sichuan province of China: A super slacks-based measure analysis. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021231 |
| [2] |
Dilek Günneç, Ezgi Demir. Fair-fixture: Minimizing carry-over effects in football leagues. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (4) : 1565-1577. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018110 |
| [3] |
Cheng-Kai Hu, Fung-Bao Liu, Cheng-Feng Hu. Efficiency measures in fuzzy data envelopment analysis with common weights. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 237-249. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016014 |
| [4] |
Pooja Bansal, Aparna Mehra. Integrated dynamic interval data envelopment analysis in the presence of integer and negative data. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022, 18 (2) : 1339-1363. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021023 |
| [5] |
Mahdi Mahdiloo, Abdollah Noorizadeh, Reza Farzipoor Saen. Developing a new data envelopment analysis model for customer value analysis. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (3) : 531-558. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.531 |
| [6] |
Habibe Zare Haghighi, Sajad Adeli, Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, Gholam Reza Jahanshahloo. Revenue congestion: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (4) : 1311-1322. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1311 |
| [7] |
Runqin Hao, Guanwen Zhang, Dong Li, Jie Zhang. Data modeling analysis on removal efficiency of hexavalent chromium. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2019, 2 (3) : 203-213. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2019014 |
| [8] |
Cheng-Kai Hu, Fung-Bao Liu, Hong-Ming Chen, Cheng-Feng Hu. Network data envelopment analysis with fuzzy non-discretionary factors. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1795-1807. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020046 |
| [9] |
Hasan Hosseini-Nasab, Vahid Ettehadi. Development of opened-network data envelopment analysis models under uncertainty. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022027 |
| [10] |
Pooja Bansal. Sequential Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index for interval data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022058 |
| [11] |
Saber Saati, Adel Hatami-Marbini, Per J. Agrell, Madjid Tavana. A common set of weight approach using an ideal decision making unit in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (3) : 623-637. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.623 |
| [12] |
Ali Hadi, Saeid Mehrabian. A two-stage data envelopment analysis approach to solve extended transportation problem with non-homogenous costs. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2022 doi: 10.3934/naco.2022006 |
| [13] |
Tailei Zhang, Zhimin Li. Analysis of COVID-19 epidemic transmission trend based on a time-delayed dynamic model. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021088 |
| [14] |
Zheng Dai, I.G. Rosen, Chuming Wang, Nancy Barnett, Susan E. Luczak. Using drinking data and pharmacokinetic modeling to calibrate transport model and blind deconvolution based data analysis software for transdermal alcohol biosensors. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (5) : 911-934. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016023 |
| [15] |
Angela Cadena, Adriana Marcucci, Juan F. Pérez, Hernando Durán, Hernando Mutis, Camilo Taútiva, Fernando Palacios. Efficiency analysis in electricity transmission utilities. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (2) : 253-274. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.253 |
| [16] |
Cheng-Feng Hu, Hsiao-Fan Wang, Tingyang Liu. Measuring efficiency of a recycling production system with imprecise data. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2022, 12 (1) : 79-91. doi: 10.3934/naco.2021052 |
| [17] |
Jingmei Zhou, Xiangmo Zhao, Xin Cheng, Zhigang Xu. Visualization analysis of traffic congestion based on floating car data. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (6) : 1423-1433. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.1423 |
| [18] |
Matthew O. Williams, Clarence W. Rowley, Ioannis G. Kevrekidis. A kernel-based method for data-driven koopman spectral analysis. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2015, 2 (2) : 247-265. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2015005 |
| [19] |
Wu Chanti, Qiu Youzhen. A nonlinear empirical analysis on influence factor of circulation efficiency. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (4&5) : 929-940. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019062 |
| [20] |
Shi'an Wang, N. U. Ahmed. Optimum management of the network of city bus routes based on a stochastic dynamic model. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (2) : 619-631. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018061 |
2020 Impact Factor: 1.801
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]