# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
An integrated Principal Component Analysis and multi-objective mathematical programming approach to agile supply chain network design under uncertainty
• JIMO Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
On the global optimal solution for linear quadratic problems of switched system
April  2019, 15(2): 833-854. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018073

## Exact and heuristic methods for personalized display advertising in virtual reality platforms

 Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, 34956, Turkey

* Corresponding author: Kemal Kilic

Received  October 2016 Revised  December 2017 Published  June 2018

Citation: Kemal Kilic, Menekse G. Saygi, Semih O. Sezer. Exact and heuristic methods for personalized display advertising in virtual reality platforms. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (2) : 833-854. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018073
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
The sample mean revenues of the six algorithms for varying number of replications in Experiment 111
Computed expected revenues (ER) and the sample mean revenues (SMR) obtained for various L = 1/h values for the finite difference algorithm in Experiment #111
Computed expected revenues determined at each iteration (that is, $n \mapsto U_n$) for the value iteration algorithms with different resolution parameter values in Experiment # 111
Computed expected revenues determined by the value iteration algorithm after 40 iterations for different resolution parameter values in Experiment #111
The computational time in days for the value iteration algorithm with iteration number = 40, for different resolution parameter values in Experiment 111
The expected revenues determined by the value iteration algorithm with iteration number = 40, for different resolution parameter values in Experiment 111
The sample mean revenues (SMRs) determined by the finite difference algorithm for different h-value in Experiment 111
Parameters for numerical experiments
 Problem Specific Parameters Algorithm Specific Parameters Problem Size $h$ value Initial States Iteration Number Transition Rates Resolution (i.e., Step Length in Time) $\beta$-probabilities Exposure Payment Matrix Min./Max. Display Constraint Min./Max. Payment Constraint
 Problem Specific Parameters Algorithm Specific Parameters Problem Size $h$ value Initial States Iteration Number Transition Rates Resolution (i.e., Step Length in Time) $\beta$-probabilities Exposure Payment Matrix Min./Max. Display Constraint Min./Max. Payment Constraint
Experimental Conditions
 Experiment # Maximum Display Minimum Payment Maximum Payment 111 5 10 40 112 5 10 70 121 5 30 40 122 5 30 70 211 8 10 40 212 8 10 70 221 8 30 40 222 8 30 70
 Experiment # Maximum Display Minimum Payment Maximum Payment 111 5 10 40 112 5 10 70 121 5 30 40 122 5 30 70 211 8 10 40 212 8 10 70 221 8 30 40 222 8 30 70
Revenue performance of the algorithms for different experimental conditions
 Heuristics Finite Difference Value Iteration Exp.# A B C Random SMR ER SMR ER 111 32.25 45.46 42.24 28.83 45.93 45.57 45.90 44.57 112 32.69 45.99 42.24 28.99 46.47 46.01 46.49 45.01 121 13.28 14.86 9.54 9.70 30.75 30.46 30.79 29.61 122 13.82 15.40 9.54 9.86 33.71 33.38 33.64 32.35 211 33.81 49.55 49.13 29.71 49.63 49.27 49.62 48.16 212 35.28 49.85 49.34 30.11 49.89 49.55 49.91 48.46 221 15.66 31.44 30.75 11.52 34.80 34.36 34.85 33.17 222 17.00 31.75 30.96 11.92 39.94 39.90 39.90 38.55
 Heuristics Finite Difference Value Iteration Exp.# A B C Random SMR ER SMR ER 111 32.25 45.46 42.24 28.83 45.93 45.57 45.90 44.57 112 32.69 45.99 42.24 28.99 46.47 46.01 46.49 45.01 121 13.28 14.86 9.54 9.70 30.75 30.46 30.79 29.61 122 13.82 15.40 9.54 9.86 33.71 33.38 33.64 32.35 211 33.81 49.55 49.13 29.71 49.63 49.27 49.62 48.16 212 35.28 49.85 49.34 30.11 49.89 49.55 49.91 48.46 221 15.66 31.44 30.75 11.52 34.80 34.36 34.85 33.17 222 17.00 31.75 30.96 11.92 39.94 39.90 39.90 38.55
 [1] Yahia Zare Mehrjerdi. A new methodology for solving bi-criterion fractional stochastic programming. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/naco.2020054 [2] Predrag S. Stanimirović, Branislav Ivanov, Haifeng Ma, Dijana Mosić. A survey of gradient methods for solving nonlinear optimization. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1573-1624. doi: 10.3934/era.2020115 [3] Alberto Bressan, Sondre Tesdal Galtung. A 2-dimensional shape optimization problem for tree branches. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2020  doi: 10.3934/nhm.2020031 [4] Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad. Oscillation criteria for kernel function dependent fractional dynamic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020443 [5] Chao Xing, Jiaojiao Pan, Hong Luo. Stability and dynamic transition of a toxin-producing phytoplankton-zooplankton model with additional food. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020275 [6] Haixiang Yao, Ping Chen, Miao Zhang, Xun Li. Dynamic discrete-time portfolio selection for defined contribution pension funds with inflation risk. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020166 [7] Zhenzhen Wang, Tianshou Zhou. Asymptotic behaviors and stochastic traveling waves in stochastic Fisher-KPP equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020323 [8] Lorenzo Zambotti. A brief and personal history of stochastic partial differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 471-487. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020264 [9] Siyang Cai, Yongmei Cai, Xuerong Mao. A stochastic differential equation SIS epidemic model with regime switching. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020317 [10] Xuhui Peng, Rangrang Zhang. Approximations of stochastic 3D tamed Navier-Stokes equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5337-5365. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020241 [11] Yueyang Zheng, Jingtao Shi. A stackelberg game of backward stochastic differential equations with partial information. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020047 [12] Reza Chaharpashlou, Abdon Atangana, Reza Saadati. On the fuzzy stability results for fractional stochastic Volterra integral equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020432 [13] Christian Beck, Lukas Gonon, Martin Hutzenthaler, Arnulf Jentzen. On existence and uniqueness properties for solutions of stochastic fixed point equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020320 [14] Giuseppina Guatteri, Federica Masiero. Stochastic maximum principle for problems with delay with dependence on the past through general measures. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020048 [15] Yangrong Li, Shuang Yang, Qiangheng Zhang. Odd random attractors for stochastic non-autonomous Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations without dissipation. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1529-1544. doi: 10.3934/era.2020080 [16] Pengyu Chen. Non-autonomous stochastic evolution equations with nonlinear noise and nonlocal conditions governed by noncompact evolution families. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020383 [17] Lin Shi, Xuemin Wang, Dingshi Li. Limiting behavior of non-autonomous stochastic reaction-diffusion equations with colored noise on unbounded thin domains. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5367-5386. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020242

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366