# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

November  2020, 16(6): 3047-3063. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019093

## Parametric Smith iterative algorithms for discrete Lyapunov matrix equations

 School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China

* Corresponding author: zhangyinghit@126.com

Received  November 2018 Revised  March 2019 Published  July 2019

Fund Project: The authors are supported by Shenzhen Municipal Basic Research Project for Discipline Layout with Project No.JCYJ20170811160715620, by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61822305, by Guangdong Natural Science Foundation under Grant No. 2017A030313340, and by Shenzhen Municipal Project for International Cooperation with Project No. GJHZ20180420180849805

An iterative algorithm is established in this paper for solving the discrete Lyapunov matrix equations. The proposed algorithm contains a tunable parameter, and includes the Smith iteration as a special case, and thus is called the parametric Smith iterative algorithm. Some convergence conditions are developed for the proposed parametric Smith iterative algorithm. Moreover, the optimal parameter for the proposed algorithm to have the fastest convergence rate is also provided for a special case. Finally, numerical examples are employed to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

Citation: Ai-Guo Wu, Ying Zhang, Hui-Jie Sun. Parametric Smith iterative algorithms for discrete Lyapunov matrix equations. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (6) : 3047-3063. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019093
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Convergence performance of the algorithm (3) for Example 1
Spectral radius of $G$ for Example 1
Convergence curve of the algorithm (5) for Example 1
Convergence performance of the algorithm (3) for Example 2
Spectral radius of $G$ for Example 2
Convergence curve of the algorithm (5) for Example 2
Spectral radius of $G$ for Example 3
Convergence curve of the algorithm (5) for Example 3
 [1] Parikshit Upadhyaya, Elias Jarlebring, Emanuel H. Rubensson. A density matrix approach to the convergence of the self-consistent field iteration. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 99-115. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020018 [2] Lars Grüne. Computing Lyapunov functions using deep neural networks. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jcd.2021006 [3] Peter Giesl, Sigurdur Hafstein. System specific triangulations for the construction of CPA Lyapunov functions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020378 [4] Jing Qin, Shuang Li, Deanna Needell, Anna Ma, Rachel Grotheer, Chenxi Huang, Natalie Durgin. Stochastic greedy algorithms for multiple measurement vectors. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (1) : 79-107. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020066 [5] Riccarda Rossi, Ulisse Stefanelli, Marita Thomas. Rate-independent evolution of sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 89-119. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020304 [6] Peter Giesl, Zachary Langhorne, Carlos Argáez, Sigurdur Hafstein. Computing complete Lyapunov functions for discrete-time dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (1) : 299-336. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020331 [7] Ningyu Sha, Lei Shi, Ming Yan. Fast algorithms for robust principal component analysis with an upper bound on the rank. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (1) : 109-128. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020067 [8] Nicola Pace, Angelo Sonnino. On the existence of PD-sets: Algorithms arising from automorphism groups of codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2021, 15 (2) : 267-277. doi: 10.3934/amc.2020065 [9] Peizhao Yu, Guoshan Zhang, Yi Zhang. Decoupling of cubic polynomial matrix systems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 13-26. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020012 [10] Shengxin Zhu, Tongxiang Gu, Xingping Liu. AIMS: Average information matrix splitting. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2020, 3 (4) : 301-308. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2020012 [11] George W. Patrick. The geometry of convergence in numerical analysis. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2021, 8 (1) : 33-58. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2021003 [12] Matania Ben–Artzi, Joseph Falcovitz, Jiequan Li. The convergence of the GRP scheme. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 1-27. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.1 [13] Jian Zhang, Tony T. Lee, Tong Ye, Liang Huang. An approximate mean queue length formula for queueing systems with varying service rate. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 185-204. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019106 [14] Patrick Martinez, Judith Vancostenoble. Lipschitz stability for the growth rate coefficients in a nonlinear Fisher-KPP equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (2) : 695-721. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020362 [15] Thierry Horsin, Mohamed Ali Jendoubi. On the convergence to equilibria of a sequence defined by an implicit scheme. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020465 [16] Philipp Harms. Strong convergence rates for markovian representations of fractional processes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020367 [17] Alberto Bressan, Carlotta Donadello. On the convergence of viscous approximations after shock interactions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 29-48. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.29 [18] Dorothee Knees, Chiara Zanini. Existence of parameterized BV-solutions for rate-independent systems with discontinuous loads. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 121-149. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020332 [19] Xueli Bai, Fang Li. Global dynamics of competition models with nonsymmetric nonlocal dispersals when one diffusion rate is small. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 3075-3092. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020035 [20] Xing Wu, Keqin Su. Global existence and optimal decay rate of solutions to hyperbolic chemotaxis system in Besov spaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021002

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366