American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    Angel capitalists exit decisions under information asymmetry: IPO or acquisitions
  • JIMO Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    The dual step size of the alternating direction method can be larger than 1.618 when one function is strongly convex
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019103

Pricing power exchange options with hawkes jump diffusion processes

Puneet Pasricha and  Anubha Goel ,

Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, Delhi, 110016, India

* Corresponding author: Anubha Goel

Received  June 2018 Revised  March 2019 Published  September 2019

In this article, we propose a jump diffusion framework to price the power exchange options. We model the price dynamics of assets using a Hawkes jump diffusion model with common factors to describe the correlated jump risk and clustering of asset price jumps. In the proposed model, the jumps, reflecting common systematic risk and idiosyncratic risk, are modeled by self-exciting Hawkes process with exponential decay. A pricing formula for valuation of power exchange option is obtained following the measure-change technique. Existing models in the literature are shown to be special cases of the proposed model. Finally, sensitivity analysis is given to illustrate the effect of jump risk and jump clustering on option prices. We observe that jump clustering significantly effects the option prices.

Keywords: Jump clustering, Hawkes process, power exchange options, jump diffusion, change of measure.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 60G51; Secondary: 60G55.
Citation: Puneet Pasricha, Anubha Goel. Pricing power exchange options with hawkes jump diffusion processes. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019103
References:
[1]

L. Adamopoulos, Cluster models for earthquakes: Regional comparisons, J. of the Internat. Assoc. for Math. Geology, 8 (1976), 463-475.  doi: 10.1007/BF01028982.  Google Scholar

[2]

Y. Aït-Sahalia, J. Cacho-Diaz and R. J. Laeven, Modeling financial contagion using mutually exciting jump processes, J. Financial Economics, 117 (2015), 585-606.  doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.03.002.  Google Scholar

[3]

G. Bakshi, C. Cao and Z. Chen, Empirical performance of alternative option pricing models, The Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 2003-2049.  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02749.x.  Google Scholar

[4]

D. S. Bates, Jumps and stochastic volatility: Exchange rate processes implicit in deutsche mark options, The Review of Financial Studies, 9 (1996), 69-107.  doi: 10.1093/rfs/9.1.69.  Google Scholar

[5]

D. S. Bates, Post-'87 crash fears in the S & P 500 futures option market, J. Econometrics, 94 (2000), 181-238.  doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00021-4.  Google Scholar

[6]

L. P. Blenman and S. P. Clark, Power exchange options, Finance Research Letters, 2 (2005), 97-106.  doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2005.01.003.  Google Scholar

[7]

N. Cai and S. G. Kou, Option pricing under a mixed-exponential jump diffusion model, Management Science, 57 (2011), 2067-2081.  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1393.  Google Scholar

[8]

P. Carr and L. Wu, Time-changed lévy processes and option pricing, J. Financial Economics, 71 (2004), 113-141.  doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1.  Google Scholar

[9]

A. Dassios and H. Zhao, A dynamic contagion process, Adv. in Appl. Probab., 43 (2011), 814-846.  doi: 10.1239/aap/1316792671.  Google Scholar

[10]

B. Eraker, Do stock prices and volatility jump? Reconciling evidence from spot and option prices, J. Finance, 59 (2004), 1367-1403.  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00666.x.  Google Scholar

[11]

B. Eraker, M. Johannes and N. Polson, The impact of jumps in volatility and returns, J. Finance, 58 (2003), 1269-1300.  doi: 10.1111/1540-6261.00566.  Google Scholar

[12]

E. Errais, K. Giesecke and L. R. Goldberg, Affine point processes and portfolio credit risk, SIAM J. Financial Math., 1 (2010), 642-665.  doi: 10.1137/090771272.  Google Scholar

[13]

S. Fischer, Call option pricing when the exercise price is uncertain, and the valuation of index bonds, J. Finance, 33 (1978), 169-176.  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1978.tb03396.x.  Google Scholar

[14]

A. G. Hawkes, Point spectra of some mutually exciting point processes, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 33 (1971), 438-443.  doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1971.tb01530.x.  Google Scholar

[15]

A. G. Hawkes, Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes, Biometrika, 58 (1971), 83-90.  doi: 10.1093/biomet/58.1.83.  Google Scholar

[16]

A. G. Hawkes, Hawkes processes and their applications to finance: A review, Quant. Finance, 18 (2018), 193-198.  doi: 10.1080/14697688.2017.1403131.  Google Scholar

[17]

S. G. Kou, A jump-diffusion model for option pricing, Management Science, 48 (2002), 1086-1101.  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1086.166.  Google Scholar

[18]

W. Liu and S.-P. Zhu, Pricing variance swaps under the Hawkes jump-diffusion process, J. Futures Markets, 39 (2019). doi: 10.1002/fut.21997.  Google Scholar

[19]

T. Lux and M. Marchesi, Volatility clustering in financial markets: A microsimulation of interacting agents, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance, 3 (2000), 675-702.  doi: 10.1142/S0219024900000826.  Google Scholar

[20]

Y. Ma, K. Shrestha and W. Xu, Pricing vulnerable options with jump clustering, J. Futures Markets, 37 (2017), 1155-1178.  doi: 10.1002/fut.21843.  Google Scholar

[21]

Y. Ma and W. Xu, Structural credit risk modelling with Hawkes jump diffusion processes, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 303 (2016), 69-80.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.02.032.  Google Scholar

[22]

J. M. Maheu and T. H. McCurdy, News arrival, jump dynamics, and volatility components for individual stock returns, J. Finance, 59 (2004), 755-793.  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00648.x.  Google Scholar

[23]

B. Mandelbrot, The variation of certain speculative prices, J. Business, 36 (1963), 394-419.  doi: 10.1086/294632.  Google Scholar

[24]

W. Margrabe, The value of an option to exchange one asset for another, J. Finance, 33 (1978), 177-186.  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1978.tb03397.x.  Google Scholar

[25]

S. Meyer, J. Elias and M. Höhle, A space–time conditional intensity model for invasive meningococcal disease occurrence, Biometrics, 68 (2012), 607-616.  doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01684.x.  Google Scholar

[26]

Y. Ogata, On Lewis' simulation method for point processes, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 27 (1981), 23-31.  doi: 10.1109/TIT.1981.1056305.  Google Scholar

[27]

Y. Ogata, Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes, J. Amer. Statistical Association, 83 (1988), 9-27.  doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478560.  Google Scholar

[28]

J. Pan, The jump-risk premia implicit in options: Evidence from an integrated time-series study, J. of Financial Economics, 63 (2002), 3-50.  doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00088-5.  Google Scholar

[29]

P. Pasricha and A. Goel, Pricing vulnerable power exchange options in an intensity based framework, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 355 (2019), 106-115.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2019.01.019.  Google Scholar

[30]

A. Reinhart, A review of self-exciting spatio-temporal point processes and their applications, Statist. Sci., 33 (2018), 330-333.  doi: 10.1214/18-STS654.  Google Scholar

[31]

R. Tompkins, Power options: hedging nonlinear risks, J. Risk, 2 (2000), 29-45.  doi: 10.21314/JOR.2000.022.  Google Scholar

[32]

X. Wang, Pricing power exchange options with correlated jump risk, Finance Research Letters, 19 (2016), 90-97.  doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2016.06.009.  Google Scholar

[33]

X. Wang, S. Song and Y. Wang, The valuation of power exchange options with counterparty risk and jump risk, J. Futures Markets, 37 (2017), 499-521.  doi: 10.1002/fut.21803.  Google Scholar

[34]

J. Yu, Empirical characteristic function estimation and its applications, Econometric Rev., 23 (2004), 93-123.  doi: 10.1081/ETC-120039605.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

L. Adamopoulos, Cluster models for earthquakes: Regional comparisons, J. of the Internat. Assoc. for Math. Geology, 8 (1976), 463-475.  doi: 10.1007/BF01028982.  Google Scholar

[2]

Y. Aït-Sahalia, J. Cacho-Diaz and R. J. Laeven, Modeling financial contagion using mutually exciting jump processes, J. Financial Economics, 117 (2015), 585-606.  doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.03.002.  Google Scholar

[3]

G. Bakshi, C. Cao and Z. Chen, Empirical performance of alternative option pricing models, The Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 2003-2049.  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02749.x.  Google Scholar

[4]

D. S. Bates, Jumps and stochastic volatility: Exchange rate processes implicit in deutsche mark options, The Review of Financial Studies, 9 (1996), 69-107.  doi: 10.1093/rfs/9.1.69.  Google Scholar

[5]

D. S. Bates, Post-'87 crash fears in the S & P 500 futures option market, J. Econometrics, 94 (2000), 181-238.  doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00021-4.  Google Scholar

[6]

L. P. Blenman and S. P. Clark, Power exchange options, Finance Research Letters, 2 (2005), 97-106.  doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2005.01.003.  Google Scholar

[7]

N. Cai and S. G. Kou, Option pricing under a mixed-exponential jump diffusion model, Management Science, 57 (2011), 2067-2081.  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1393.  Google Scholar

[8]

P. Carr and L. Wu, Time-changed lévy processes and option pricing, J. Financial Economics, 71 (2004), 113-141.  doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1.  Google Scholar

[9]

A. Dassios and H. Zhao, A dynamic contagion process, Adv. in Appl. Probab., 43 (2011), 814-846.  doi: 10.1239/aap/1316792671.  Google Scholar

[10]

B. Eraker, Do stock prices and volatility jump? Reconciling evidence from spot and option prices, J. Finance, 59 (2004), 1367-1403.  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00666.x.  Google Scholar

[11]

B. Eraker, M. Johannes and N. Polson, The impact of jumps in volatility and returns, J. Finance, 58 (2003), 1269-1300.  doi: 10.1111/1540-6261.00566.  Google Scholar

[12]

E. Errais, K. Giesecke and L. R. Goldberg, Affine point processes and portfolio credit risk, SIAM J. Financial Math., 1 (2010), 642-665.  doi: 10.1137/090771272.  Google Scholar

[13]

S. Fischer, Call option pricing when the exercise price is uncertain, and the valuation of index bonds, J. Finance, 33 (1978), 169-176.  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1978.tb03396.x.  Google Scholar

[14]

A. G. Hawkes, Point spectra of some mutually exciting point processes, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 33 (1971), 438-443.  doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1971.tb01530.x.  Google Scholar

[15]

A. G. Hawkes, Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes, Biometrika, 58 (1971), 83-90.  doi: 10.1093/biomet/58.1.83.  Google Scholar

[16]

A. G. Hawkes, Hawkes processes and their applications to finance: A review, Quant. Finance, 18 (2018), 193-198.  doi: 10.1080/14697688.2017.1403131.  Google Scholar

[17]

S. G. Kou, A jump-diffusion model for option pricing, Management Science, 48 (2002), 1086-1101.  doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1086.166.  Google Scholar

[18]

W. Liu and S.-P. Zhu, Pricing variance swaps under the Hawkes jump-diffusion process, J. Futures Markets, 39 (2019). doi: 10.1002/fut.21997.  Google Scholar

[19]

T. Lux and M. Marchesi, Volatility clustering in financial markets: A microsimulation of interacting agents, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance, 3 (2000), 675-702.  doi: 10.1142/S0219024900000826.  Google Scholar

[20]

Y. Ma, K. Shrestha and W. Xu, Pricing vulnerable options with jump clustering, J. Futures Markets, 37 (2017), 1155-1178.  doi: 10.1002/fut.21843.  Google Scholar

[21]

Y. Ma and W. Xu, Structural credit risk modelling with Hawkes jump diffusion processes, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 303 (2016), 69-80.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.02.032.  Google Scholar

[22]

J. M. Maheu and T. H. McCurdy, News arrival, jump dynamics, and volatility components for individual stock returns, J. Finance, 59 (2004), 755-793.  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00648.x.  Google Scholar

[23]

B. Mandelbrot, The variation of certain speculative prices, J. Business, 36 (1963), 394-419.  doi: 10.1086/294632.  Google Scholar

[24]

W. Margrabe, The value of an option to exchange one asset for another, J. Finance, 33 (1978), 177-186.  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1978.tb03397.x.  Google Scholar

[25]

S. Meyer, J. Elias and M. Höhle, A space–time conditional intensity model for invasive meningococcal disease occurrence, Biometrics, 68 (2012), 607-616.  doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01684.x.  Google Scholar

[26]

Y. Ogata, On Lewis' simulation method for point processes, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 27 (1981), 23-31.  doi: 10.1109/TIT.1981.1056305.  Google Scholar

[27]

Y. Ogata, Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes, J. Amer. Statistical Association, 83 (1988), 9-27.  doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478560.  Google Scholar

[28]

J. Pan, The jump-risk premia implicit in options: Evidence from an integrated time-series study, J. of Financial Economics, 63 (2002), 3-50.  doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00088-5.  Google Scholar

[29]

P. Pasricha and A. Goel, Pricing vulnerable power exchange options in an intensity based framework, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 355 (2019), 106-115.  doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2019.01.019.  Google Scholar

[30]

A. Reinhart, A review of self-exciting spatio-temporal point processes and their applications, Statist. Sci., 33 (2018), 330-333.  doi: 10.1214/18-STS654.  Google Scholar

[31]

R. Tompkins, Power options: hedging nonlinear risks, J. Risk, 2 (2000), 29-45.  doi: 10.21314/JOR.2000.022.  Google Scholar

[32]

X. Wang, Pricing power exchange options with correlated jump risk, Finance Research Letters, 19 (2016), 90-97.  doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2016.06.009.  Google Scholar

[33]

X. Wang, S. Song and Y. Wang, The valuation of power exchange options with counterparty risk and jump risk, J. Futures Markets, 37 (2017), 499-521.  doi: 10.1002/fut.21803.  Google Scholar

[34]

J. Yu, Empirical characteristic function estimation and its applications, Econometric Rev., 23 (2004), 93-123.  doi: 10.1081/ETC-120039605.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Option prices against time to maturity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Option prices against correlation coefficient when T = 1.5
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Option prices against the parameters of common Hawkes process
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Option prices against the parameters of Hawkes process for Asset 1
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Option prices against the parameters of Hawkes process for Asset 2
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  Comparison of option prices against the parameters of common Hawkes process and asset specific Hawkes processes
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Comparison of option prices against the parameters of amplitudes of jump sizes
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Values of the Parameters in the Base Case
Parameters Values Parameters Values
$ S_1(0) $ 10 $ S_2(0) $ 10
$ \sigma_1 $ 0.2 $ \sigma_2 $ 0.2
$ a_1 $ 0 $ a_2 $ 0
$ b_1 $ 0.01 $ b_2 $ 0.01
$ \lambda_{1, 0} $ 1 $ \lambda_{2, 0} $ 1
$ \theta_{1} $ 1 $ \theta_2 $ 1
$ \delta_1 $ 2 $ \delta_2 $ 2
$ \lambda_{0} $ 1 $ \alpha_1 $ 1
$ \theta $ 1 $ \alpha_2 $ 1
$ \delta $ 2 $ \eta_1 $ 1
$ r $ 0.02 $ \eta_2 $ 1
Table Options

Download as excel

Parameters Values Parameters Values
$ S_1(0) $ 10 $ S_2(0) $ 10
$ \sigma_1 $ 0.2 $ \sigma_2 $ 0.2
$ a_1 $ 0 $ a_2 $ 0
$ b_1 $ 0.01 $ b_2 $ 0.01
$ \lambda_{1, 0} $ 1 $ \lambda_{2, 0} $ 1
$ \theta_{1} $ 1 $ \theta_2 $ 1
$ \delta_1 $ 2 $ \delta_2 $ 2
$ \lambda_{0} $ 1 $ \alpha_1 $ 1
$ \theta $ 1 $ \alpha_2 $ 1
$ \delta $ 2 $ \eta_1 $ 1
$ r $ 0.02 $ \eta_2 $ 1
[1]

Donny Citra Lesmana, Song Wang. A numerical scheme for pricing American options with transaction costs under a jump diffusion process. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (4) : 1793-1813. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017019
[2]

Kai Zhang, Xiaoqi Yang, Kok Lay Teo. A power penalty approach to american option pricing with jump diffusion processes. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (4) : 783-799. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.783
[3]

Wei Wang, Linyi Qian, Xiaonan Su. Pricing and hedging catastrophe equity put options under a Markov-modulated jump diffusion model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (2) : 493-514. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.493
[4]

Qing-Qing Yang, Wai-Ki Ching, Wanhua He, Tak-Kuen Siu. Pricing vulnerable options under a Markov-modulated jump-diffusion model with fire sales. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (1) : 293-318. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018044
[5]

Isabelle Kuhwald, Ilya Pavlyukevich. Bistable behaviour of a jump-diffusion driven by a periodic stable-like additive process. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (9) : 3175-3190. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016092
[6]

Wuyuan Jiang. The maximum surplus before ruin in a jump-diffusion insurance risk process with dependence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (7) : 3037-3050. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018298
[7]

Benoît Perthame, P. E. Souganidis. Front propagation for a jump process model arising in spacial ecology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2005, 13 (5) : 1235-1246. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.13.1235
[8]

Fuke Wu, George Yin, Zhuo Jin. Kolmogorov-type systems with regime-switching jump diffusion perturbations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (7) : 2293-2319. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016048
[9]

Qiang Du, Zhan Huang, Richard B. Lehoucq. Nonlocal convection-diffusion volume-constrained problems and jump processes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (2) : 373-389. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.373
[10]

Zhuo Jin, Linyi Qian. Lookback option pricing for regime-switching jump diffusion models. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (2) : 237-258. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.237
[11]

Roberta Sirovich, Laura Sacerdote, Alessandro E. P. Villa. Cooperative behavior in a jump diffusion model for a simple network of spiking neurons. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (2) : 385-401. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.385
[12]

Xin Zhang, Hui Meng, Jie Xiong, Yang Shen. Robust optimal investment and reinsurance of an insurer under Jump-diffusion models. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2019, 9 (1) : 59-76. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019003
[13]

Elvio Accinelli, Enrique Covarrubias. Evolution and jump in a Walrasian framework. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2016, 3 (3) : 279-301. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2016015
[14]

Zhuo Jin, George Yin, Hailiang Yang. Numerical methods for dividend optimization using regime-switching jump-diffusion models. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2011, 1 (1) : 21-40. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2011.1.21
[15]

Chuancun Yin, Kam Chuen Yuen. Optimal dividend problems for a jump-diffusion model with capital injections and proportional transaction costs. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (4) : 1247-1262. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.1247
[16]

Dan Li, Jing'an Cui, Yan Zhang. Permanence and extinction of non-autonomous Lotka-Volterra facultative systems with jump-diffusion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (7) : 2069-2088. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.2069
[17]

Ishak Alia. A non-exponential discounting time-inconsistent stochastic optimal control problem for jump-diffusion. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2019, 9 (3) : 541-570. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019025
[18]

Ziheng Chen, Siqing Gan, Xiaojie Wang. Mean-square approximations of Lévy noise driven SDEs with super-linearly growing diffusion and jump coefficients. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (8) : 4513-4545. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019154
[19]

Chao Xu, Yinghui Dong, Zhaolu Tian, Guojing Wang. Pricing dynamic fund protection under a Regime-switching Jump-diffusion model with stochastic protection level. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (5) : 1-21. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019072
[20]

Renata Bunoiu, Claudia Timofte. Homogenization of a thermal problem with flux jump. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11 (4) : 545-562. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016009

2018 Impact Factor: 1.025

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences