American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020043

An optimal setup cost reduction and lot size for economic production quantity model with imperfect quality and quantity discounts

 1 School of Economics and Management, Sanming University, Sanming, Fujian 365004, China 2 Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA 3 Department of International Business, National Chengchi University, Taipei 11605, Taiwan (R.O.C)

* Corresponding author: Chien-Jui Lin (j698102@gmail.com)

Received  July 2018 Revised  August 2019 Published  March 2020

The purpose of this paper concentrates on an economic production quantity model with the factors of imperfect quality and quantity discounts, in which the inspection action occurs during the production stage. There is specific consideration of there being a finite production rate, and the quantity discounts offered by the supplier serves the purpose of stimulating buying greater quantities. This is in contrast to EPQ models that do not take these added factors into consideration. The objective of this paper is to determine the setup cost reduction, which is a function of capital investment, and inventory lot size. An alternative solution procedure was developed that does not employ the Hessian Matrix concavity in the expected total profit. We develop an algorithm to determine the optimal solution for this model. Theoretical results are discussed and a numerical example is proposed. Managerial insights are also examined.

Citation: Tien-Yu Lin, Bhaba R. Sarker, Chien-Jui Lin. An optimal setup cost reduction and lot size for economic production quantity model with imperfect quality and quantity discounts. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020043
References:

show all references

References:
The behavior of the inventory level per cycle
The expected total profit
Procurement cost structure for the manufacture
 $r$ $Q_{r-1} \sim Q_{r}$ $c_{r}$ 1 $0 < Q < 150$ $c_{1} = 20.05$ 2 $150 \leq Q < 400$ $c_{2} = 20.04$ 3 $400 \leq Q < 800$ $c_{3} = 20.03$ 4 $800 \leq Q < 1250$ $c_{4} = 20.02$ 5 $Q \geq 800$ $c_{5} = 20.01$
 $r$ $Q_{r-1} \sim Q_{r}$ $c_{r}$ 1 $0 < Q < 150$ $c_{1} = 20.05$ 2 $150 \leq Q < 400$ $c_{2} = 20.04$ 3 $400 \leq Q < 800$ $c_{3} = 20.03$ 4 $800 \leq Q < 1250$ $c_{4} = 20.02$ 5 $Q \geq 800$ $c_{5} = 20.01$
The values of $Q^{*}, S^{*}$ and $E T P U^{*}$ corresponding to 32 combinations of $\sigma, f_{g} M, i, U(d)$
 $\sigma$ $f_{g}$ $M$ $i$ $U(d)$ $Q^{*}$ $S^{*}$ $E T P U^{*}$ 9600 0.05 192000 0.2 0.04 858.9 175.3 274724.7 0.056 866.3 175.4 275046.5 0.28 0.04 910.9 200 274036.9 0.056 918.8 200 274358.8 268800 0.2 0.04 846.1 163.3 274694.8 0.056 853.5 172.8 275016.6 0.28 0.04 897.4 200 274004.6 0.056 905.2 200 274326.4 0.07 192000 0.2 0.04 800 163.3 274570.9 0.056 800 162 274892.8 0.28 0.04 858.9 200 273906.7 0.056 866.4 200 274228.7 268800 0.2 0.04 800 163.3 374599.6 0.056 800 162 274862.7 0.28 0.04 846 200 273872.3 0.056 853.5 200 274194.3 13440 0.05 192000 0.2 0.04 877.4 128 385689.5 0.056 885 128.1 386139.7 0.28 0.04 930.5 190 384839 0.056 938.6 190.1 385289.5 268800 0.2 0.04 858.9 125.2 385646.9 0.056 866.3 125.3 386097 0.28 0.04 910.9 186 384779.3 0.056 918.8 186.1 385229.8 0.07 192000 0.2 0.04 812.5 118.4 385535.8 0.056 819.6 118.5 385986.1 0.28 0.04 877.4 179.1 384674.4 0.056 885.1 179.2 385125.1 268800 0.2 0.04 800 116.7 385493.1 0.056 800 115.7 385943.3 0.28 0.04 858.9 175.3 384614.7 0.056 866.4 175.4 385065.3
 $\sigma$ $f_{g}$ $M$ $i$ $U(d)$ $Q^{*}$ $S^{*}$ $E T P U^{*}$ 9600 0.05 192000 0.2 0.04 858.9 175.3 274724.7 0.056 866.3 175.4 275046.5 0.28 0.04 910.9 200 274036.9 0.056 918.8 200 274358.8 268800 0.2 0.04 846.1 163.3 274694.8 0.056 853.5 172.8 275016.6 0.28 0.04 897.4 200 274004.6 0.056 905.2 200 274326.4 0.07 192000 0.2 0.04 800 163.3 274570.9 0.056 800 162 274892.8 0.28 0.04 858.9 200 273906.7 0.056 866.4 200 274228.7 268800 0.2 0.04 800 163.3 374599.6 0.056 800 162 274862.7 0.28 0.04 846 200 273872.3 0.056 853.5 200 274194.3 13440 0.05 192000 0.2 0.04 877.4 128 385689.5 0.056 885 128.1 386139.7 0.28 0.04 930.5 190 384839 0.056 938.6 190.1 385289.5 268800 0.2 0.04 858.9 125.2 385646.9 0.056 866.3 125.3 386097 0.28 0.04 910.9 186 384779.3 0.056 918.8 186.1 385229.8 0.07 192000 0.2 0.04 812.5 118.4 385535.8 0.056 819.6 118.5 385986.1 0.28 0.04 877.4 179.1 384674.4 0.056 885.1 179.2 385125.1 268800 0.2 0.04 800 116.7 385493.1 0.056 800 115.7 385943.3 0.28 0.04 858.9 175.3 384614.7 0.056 866.4 175.4 385065.3
 [1] Tien-Yu Lin, Ming-Te Chen, Kuo-Lung Hou. An inventory model for items with imperfect quality and quantity discounts under adjusted screening rate and earned interest. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (4) : 1333-1347. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1333 [2] Pedro Piñeyro, Omar Viera. Inventory policies for the economic lot-sizing problem with remanufacturing and final disposal options. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (2) : 217-238. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.217 [3] Min Tang, Fuying Jing, Xiangrui Chao. A dynamic lot sizing model with production-or-outsourcing decision under minimum production quantities. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019059 [4] Onur Kaya, Halit Bayer. Pricing and lot-sizing decisions for perishable products when demand changes by freshness. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020110 [5] Tien-Yu Lin. Effect of warranty and quantity discounts on a deteriorating production system with a Markovian production process and allowable shortages. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020013 [6] Lalida Deeratanasrikul, Shinji Mizuno. Multiple-stage multiple-machine capacitated lot-sizing and scheduling with sequence-dependent setup: A case study in the wheel industry. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (1) : 413-428. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016024 [7] Hong Fu, Mingwu Liu, Bo Chen. Supplier's investment in manufacturer's quality improvement with equity holding. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019127 [8] Yong Ma, Shiping Shan, Weidong Xu. Optimal investment and consumption in the market with jump risk and capital gains tax. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (4) : 1937-1953. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018130 [9] Chui-Yu Chiu, Ming-Feng Yang, Chung-Jung Tang, Yi Lin. Integrated imperfect production inventory model under permissible delay in payments depending on the order quantity. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (4) : 945-965. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.945 [10] Shouyu Ma, Zied Jemai, Evren Sahin, Yves Dallery. Analysis of the Newsboy Problem subject to price dependent demand and multiple discounts. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (3) : 931-951. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017083 [11] Caichun Chai, Tiaojun Xiao, Eilin Francis. Is social responsibility for firms competing on quantity evolutionary stable?. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (1) : 325-347. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017049 [12] Zhenwei Luo, Jinting Wang. The optimal price discount, order quantity and minimum quantity in newsvendor model with group purchase. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (1) : 1-11. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.1 [13] Jian Yang, Youhua (Frank) Chen. On information quality ranking and its managerial implications. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (4) : 729-750. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.729 [14] Ruiqi Li, Yifan Chen, Xiang Zhao, Yanli Hu, Weidong Xiao. Time series based urban air quality predication. Big Data & Information Analytics, 2016, 1 (2&3) : 171-183. doi: 10.3934/bdia.2016003 [15] Taofeng Ye, Yan Zhao. Quality choice and capacity rationing in advance selling. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020107 [16] Ming-Jong Yao, Shih-Chieh Chen, Yu-Jen Chang. A common cycle approach for solving the economic lot and inspection scheduling problem. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (1) : 141-162. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.141 [17] Yu-Jen Chang, Ming-Jong Yao. New heuristics for solving the economic lot scheduling problem with reworks. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (1) : 229-251. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.229 [18] S.M. Moghadas. Modelling the effect of imperfect vaccines on disease epidemiology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (4) : 999-1012. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.999 [19] C. Bandle, Y. Kabeya, Hirokazu Ninomiya. Imperfect bifurcations in nonlinear elliptic equations on spherical caps. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (5) : 1189-1208. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.1189 [20] Sara Monsurrò, Carmen Perugia. Homogenization and exact controllability for problems with imperfect interface. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14 (2) : 411-444. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019017

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables