
-
Previous Article
Bargaining in a multi-echelon supply chain with power structure: KS solution vs. Nash solution
- JIMO Home
- This Issue
-
Next Article
A dynamical system method for solving the split convex feasibility problem
Multi-criteria decision making method based on Bonferroni mean aggregation operators of complex intuitionistic fuzzy numbers
School of Mathematics, Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology (Deemed University), Patiala-147004, Punjab, India |
Complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets (CIFSs), characterized by complex-valued grades of membership and non-membership, are a generalization of standard intuitionistic fuzzy (IF) sets that better speak to time-periodic issues and handle two-dimensional data in a solitary set. Under this environment, in this article, various mean-type operators, namely complex IF Bonferroni means (CIFBM) and complex IF weighted Bonferroni mean (CIFWBM) are presented along with their properties and numerous particular cases of CIFBM are discussed. Further, using the presented operators a decision-making approach is developed and is illustrated with the help of a practical example. Also, the reliability of the developed methodology is investigated with the aid of validity test criteria and the example results are compared with prevailing methods based on operators.
References:
[1] |
M. Ali and F. Smarandache, Complex neutrosophic set, Neural Computing and Applications, 28 (2017), 1817-1834. Google Scholar |
[2] |
A. Alkouri and A. Salleh, Complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets, chap. 2nd International Conference on Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 1482 (2012), 464-470. Google Scholar |
[3] |
A. U. M. Alkouri and A. R. Salleh, Complex Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy relation, Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2013 (2013), Article ID 287382, 18 pages.
doi: 10.1155/2013/287382. |
[4] |
R. Arora and H. Garg, Group decision-making method based on prioritized linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and its fundamental properties, Computational and Applied Mathematics, 38 (2019), Art. 36, 32 pp.
doi: 10.1007/s40314-019-0764-1. |
[5] |
K. Atanassov and G. Gargov,
Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 31 (1989), 343-349.
doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(89)90205-4. |
[6] |
K. T. Atanassov,
Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20 (1986), 87-96.
doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3. |
[7] |
C. Bonferroni,
Sulle medie multiple di potenze, Bollettino Dell'Unione Matematica Italiana, 5 (1950), 267-270.
|
[8] |
S. M. Chen and C. H. Chang,
Fuzzy multiattribute decision making based on transformation techniques of intuitionistic fuzzy values and intuitionistic fuzzy geometric averaging operators, Information Sciences, 352/353 (2016), 133-149.
doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.02.049. |
[9] |
S. Dick, R. R. Yager and O. Yazdanbakhsh, On Pythagorean and complex fuzzy set operations, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 24 (2016), 1009-1021. Google Scholar |
[10] |
H. Garg,
Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy interactive geometric interaction operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm and their application to decision making, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 101 (2016), 53-69.
doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.08.017. |
[11] |
H. Garg, Some series of intuitionistic fuzzy interactive averaging aggregation operators, SpringerPlus, 5 (2016), 999.
doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2591-9. |
[12] |
H. Garg,
Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method based on an improved operation laws and its application, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 60 (2017), 164-174.
doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2017.02.008. |
[13] |
H. Garg,
Intuitionistic fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators with entropy weight and their applications to multi-criteria decision-making problems, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering, 43 (2019), 597-613.
doi: 10.1007/s40998-018-0167-0. |
[14] |
H. Garg and R. Arora,
Bonferroni mean aggregation operators under intuitionistic fuzzy soft set environment and their applications to decision-making, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69 (2018), 1711-1724.
doi: 10.1080/01605682.2017.1409159. |
[15] |
H. Garg and K. Kumar,
Linguistic interval-valued atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to group decision-making problems, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27 (2019), 2302-2311.
doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2897961. |
[16] |
H. Garg and D. Rani,
Complex interval- valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their aggregation operators, Fundamenta Informaticae, 164 (2019), 61-101.
doi: 10.3233/FI-2019-1755. |
[17] |
H. Garg and D. Rani,
Exponential, logarithmic and compensative generalized aggregation operators under complex intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Group Decision and Negotiation, 28 (2019), 991-1050.
doi: 10.1007/s10726-019-09631-8. |
[18] |
H. Garg and D. Rani, New generalized Bonferroni mean aggregation operators of complex intuitionistic fuzzy information based on Archimedean t-norm and t-conorm, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 32 (2020), 81-109. Google Scholar |
[19] |
H. Garg and D. Rani,
Robust Averaging - Geometric aggregation operators for Complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to MCDM process, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45 (2020), 2017-2033.
doi: 10.1007/s13369-019-03925-4. |
[20] |
H. Garg and D. Rani,
A robust correlation coefficient measure of complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications in decision-making, Applied Intelligence, 49 (2019), 496-512.
doi: 10.1007/s10489-018-1290-3. |
[21] |
H. Garg and D. Rani, Some generalized complex intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multicriteria decision-making process, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44 (2019), 2679-2698. Google Scholar |
[22] |
H. Garg and D. Rani,
Some results on information measures for complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34 (2019), 2319-2363.
doi: 10.1002/int.22127. |
[23] |
M. Goyal, D. Yadav and A. Tripathi,
Intuitionistic fuzzy genetic weighted averaging operator and its application for multiple attribute decision making in E-learning, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9 (2016), 1-15.
doi: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i1/76191. |
[24] |
Y. He, H. Chen, L. Zhau, J. Liu and Z. Tao,
Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric interaction averaging operators and their application to multi-criteria decision making, Information Sciences, 259 (2014), 142-159.
doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.08.018. |
[25] |
J. Y. Huang,
Intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operator and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 27 (2014), 505-513.
doi: 10.3233/IFS-131019. |
[26] |
G. Kaur and H. Garg,
Cubic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 8 (2018), 405-427.
doi: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2018020471. |
[27] |
G. Kaur and H. Garg,
Generalized cubic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators using t-norm operations and their applications to group decision-making process, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44 (2019), 2775-2794.
doi: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2018020471. |
[28] |
G. Kaur and H. Garg, Multi - attribute decision - making based on Bonferroni mean operators under cubic intuitionistic fuzzy set environment, Entropy, 20 (2018), Paper No. 65, 26 pp.
doi: 10.3390/e20010065. |
[29] |
K. Kumar and H. Garg,
Connection number of set pair analysis based TOPSIS method on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to decision making, Applied Intelligence, 48 (2018), 2112-2119.
doi: 10.1007/s10489-017-1067-0. |
[30] |
T. Kumar and R. K. Bajaj, On complex intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets with distance measures and entropies, Journal of Mathematics, 2014 (2014), Article ID 972198, 12 pages.
doi: 10.1155/2014/972198. |
[31] |
D. Li, W. Zeng and J. Li,
Geometric bonferroni mean operators, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31 (2016), 1181-1197.
doi: 10.1002/int.21822. |
[32] |
C. Maclaurin, A second letter to martin folkes, esq.; concerning the roots of equations, with demonstration of other rules of algebra, Philos Trans Roy Soc London Ser A, 36 (1729), 59-96. Google Scholar |
[33] |
A. A. Quran and N. Hassan, The complex neutrosophic soft expert set and its application in decision making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 34 (2018), 569-582. Google Scholar |
[34] |
D. Ramot, M. Friedman, G. Langholz and A. Kandel, Complex fuzzy logic, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 11 (2003), 450-461. Google Scholar |
[35] |
D. Ramot, R. Milo, M. Fiedman and A. Kandel, Complex fuzzy sets, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 10 (2002), 171-186. Google Scholar |
[36] |
D. Rani and H. Garg,
Distance measures between the complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its applications to the decision - making process, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 7 (2017), 423-439.
doi: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2017020356. |
[37] |
D. Rani and H. Garg, Complex intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making, Expert Systems, 35 (2018), e12325. Google Scholar |
[38] |
R. Verma,
Generalized bonferroni mean operator for fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to multiattribute decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 30 (2015), 499-519.
doi: 10.1002/int.21705. |
[39] |
W. Wang and X. Liu,
Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20 (2012), 923-938.
doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2189405. |
[40] |
X. Wang and E. Triantaphyllou,
Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods, Omega - International Journal of Management Science, 36 (2008), 45-63.
doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.12.003. |
[41] |
Z. Xu,
Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators, Knowledge-Based Systems, 24 (2011), 749-760.
doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.01.011. |
[42] |
Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, Intuitionistic fuzzy bonferroni means, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 41 (2011), 568-578. Google Scholar |
[43] |
Z. S. Xu, Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15 (2007), 1179-1187. Google Scholar |
[44] |
Z. S. Xu and R. R. Yager,
Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of General Systems, 35 (2006), 417-433.
doi: 10.1080/03081070600574353. |
[45] |
R. R. Yager,
On generalized bonferroni mean operators for multi-criteria aggregation, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 50 (2009), 1279-1286.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2009.06.004. |
[46] |
R. R. Yager and A. M. Abbasov, Pythagorean membeship grades, complex numbers and decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28 (2013), 436-452. Google Scholar |
[47] |
O. Yazdanbakhsh and S. Dick,
A systematic review of complex fuzzy sets and logic, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 338 (2018), 1-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2017.01.010. |
[48] |
J. Ye,
Intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid arithmetic and geometric aggregation operators for the decision-making of mechanical design schemes, Applied Intelligence, 47 (2017), 743-751.
doi: 10.1007/s10489-017-0930-3. |
[49] |
L. A. Zadeh,
Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8 (1965), 338-353.
doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X. |
[50] |
W. Zhou and Z. Xu, Extreme intuitionistic fuzzy weighted aggregation operators and their applications in optimism and pessimism decision-making processes, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 32 (2017), 1129-1138. Google Scholar |
show all references
References:
[1] |
M. Ali and F. Smarandache, Complex neutrosophic set, Neural Computing and Applications, 28 (2017), 1817-1834. Google Scholar |
[2] |
A. Alkouri and A. Salleh, Complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets, chap. 2nd International Conference on Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 1482 (2012), 464-470. Google Scholar |
[3] |
A. U. M. Alkouri and A. R. Salleh, Complex Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy relation, Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2013 (2013), Article ID 287382, 18 pages.
doi: 10.1155/2013/287382. |
[4] |
R. Arora and H. Garg, Group decision-making method based on prioritized linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and its fundamental properties, Computational and Applied Mathematics, 38 (2019), Art. 36, 32 pp.
doi: 10.1007/s40314-019-0764-1. |
[5] |
K. Atanassov and G. Gargov,
Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 31 (1989), 343-349.
doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(89)90205-4. |
[6] |
K. T. Atanassov,
Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20 (1986), 87-96.
doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3. |
[7] |
C. Bonferroni,
Sulle medie multiple di potenze, Bollettino Dell'Unione Matematica Italiana, 5 (1950), 267-270.
|
[8] |
S. M. Chen and C. H. Chang,
Fuzzy multiattribute decision making based on transformation techniques of intuitionistic fuzzy values and intuitionistic fuzzy geometric averaging operators, Information Sciences, 352/353 (2016), 133-149.
doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.02.049. |
[9] |
S. Dick, R. R. Yager and O. Yazdanbakhsh, On Pythagorean and complex fuzzy set operations, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 24 (2016), 1009-1021. Google Scholar |
[10] |
H. Garg,
Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy interactive geometric interaction operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm and their application to decision making, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 101 (2016), 53-69.
doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2016.08.017. |
[11] |
H. Garg, Some series of intuitionistic fuzzy interactive averaging aggregation operators, SpringerPlus, 5 (2016), 999.
doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2591-9. |
[12] |
H. Garg,
Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method based on an improved operation laws and its application, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 60 (2017), 164-174.
doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2017.02.008. |
[13] |
H. Garg,
Intuitionistic fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators with entropy weight and their applications to multi-criteria decision-making problems, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering, 43 (2019), 597-613.
doi: 10.1007/s40998-018-0167-0. |
[14] |
H. Garg and R. Arora,
Bonferroni mean aggregation operators under intuitionistic fuzzy soft set environment and their applications to decision-making, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69 (2018), 1711-1724.
doi: 10.1080/01605682.2017.1409159. |
[15] |
H. Garg and K. Kumar,
Linguistic interval-valued atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to group decision-making problems, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27 (2019), 2302-2311.
doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2897961. |
[16] |
H. Garg and D. Rani,
Complex interval- valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their aggregation operators, Fundamenta Informaticae, 164 (2019), 61-101.
doi: 10.3233/FI-2019-1755. |
[17] |
H. Garg and D. Rani,
Exponential, logarithmic and compensative generalized aggregation operators under complex intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Group Decision and Negotiation, 28 (2019), 991-1050.
doi: 10.1007/s10726-019-09631-8. |
[18] |
H. Garg and D. Rani, New generalized Bonferroni mean aggregation operators of complex intuitionistic fuzzy information based on Archimedean t-norm and t-conorm, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 32 (2020), 81-109. Google Scholar |
[19] |
H. Garg and D. Rani,
Robust Averaging - Geometric aggregation operators for Complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to MCDM process, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45 (2020), 2017-2033.
doi: 10.1007/s13369-019-03925-4. |
[20] |
H. Garg and D. Rani,
A robust correlation coefficient measure of complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications in decision-making, Applied Intelligence, 49 (2019), 496-512.
doi: 10.1007/s10489-018-1290-3. |
[21] |
H. Garg and D. Rani, Some generalized complex intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multicriteria decision-making process, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44 (2019), 2679-2698. Google Scholar |
[22] |
H. Garg and D. Rani,
Some results on information measures for complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34 (2019), 2319-2363.
doi: 10.1002/int.22127. |
[23] |
M. Goyal, D. Yadav and A. Tripathi,
Intuitionistic fuzzy genetic weighted averaging operator and its application for multiple attribute decision making in E-learning, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9 (2016), 1-15.
doi: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i1/76191. |
[24] |
Y. He, H. Chen, L. Zhau, J. Liu and Z. Tao,
Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric interaction averaging operators and their application to multi-criteria decision making, Information Sciences, 259 (2014), 142-159.
doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.08.018. |
[25] |
J. Y. Huang,
Intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operator and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 27 (2014), 505-513.
doi: 10.3233/IFS-131019. |
[26] |
G. Kaur and H. Garg,
Cubic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 8 (2018), 405-427.
doi: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2018020471. |
[27] |
G. Kaur and H. Garg,
Generalized cubic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators using t-norm operations and their applications to group decision-making process, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44 (2019), 2775-2794.
doi: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2018020471. |
[28] |
G. Kaur and H. Garg, Multi - attribute decision - making based on Bonferroni mean operators under cubic intuitionistic fuzzy set environment, Entropy, 20 (2018), Paper No. 65, 26 pp.
doi: 10.3390/e20010065. |
[29] |
K. Kumar and H. Garg,
Connection number of set pair analysis based TOPSIS method on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to decision making, Applied Intelligence, 48 (2018), 2112-2119.
doi: 10.1007/s10489-017-1067-0. |
[30] |
T. Kumar and R. K. Bajaj, On complex intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets with distance measures and entropies, Journal of Mathematics, 2014 (2014), Article ID 972198, 12 pages.
doi: 10.1155/2014/972198. |
[31] |
D. Li, W. Zeng and J. Li,
Geometric bonferroni mean operators, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31 (2016), 1181-1197.
doi: 10.1002/int.21822. |
[32] |
C. Maclaurin, A second letter to martin folkes, esq.; concerning the roots of equations, with demonstration of other rules of algebra, Philos Trans Roy Soc London Ser A, 36 (1729), 59-96. Google Scholar |
[33] |
A. A. Quran and N. Hassan, The complex neutrosophic soft expert set and its application in decision making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 34 (2018), 569-582. Google Scholar |
[34] |
D. Ramot, M. Friedman, G. Langholz and A. Kandel, Complex fuzzy logic, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 11 (2003), 450-461. Google Scholar |
[35] |
D. Ramot, R. Milo, M. Fiedman and A. Kandel, Complex fuzzy sets, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 10 (2002), 171-186. Google Scholar |
[36] |
D. Rani and H. Garg,
Distance measures between the complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its applications to the decision - making process, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 7 (2017), 423-439.
doi: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2017020356. |
[37] |
D. Rani and H. Garg, Complex intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making, Expert Systems, 35 (2018), e12325. Google Scholar |
[38] |
R. Verma,
Generalized bonferroni mean operator for fuzzy number intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to multiattribute decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 30 (2015), 499-519.
doi: 10.1002/int.21705. |
[39] |
W. Wang and X. Liu,
Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20 (2012), 923-938.
doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2012.2189405. |
[40] |
X. Wang and E. Triantaphyllou,
Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods, Omega - International Journal of Management Science, 36 (2008), 45-63.
doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.12.003. |
[41] |
Z. Xu,
Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators, Knowledge-Based Systems, 24 (2011), 749-760.
doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.01.011. |
[42] |
Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, Intuitionistic fuzzy bonferroni means, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 41 (2011), 568-578. Google Scholar |
[43] |
Z. S. Xu, Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 15 (2007), 1179-1187. Google Scholar |
[44] |
Z. S. Xu and R. R. Yager,
Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of General Systems, 35 (2006), 417-433.
doi: 10.1080/03081070600574353. |
[45] |
R. R. Yager,
On generalized bonferroni mean operators for multi-criteria aggregation, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 50 (2009), 1279-1286.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2009.06.004. |
[46] |
R. R. Yager and A. M. Abbasov, Pythagorean membeship grades, complex numbers and decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28 (2013), 436-452. Google Scholar |
[47] |
O. Yazdanbakhsh and S. Dick,
A systematic review of complex fuzzy sets and logic, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 338 (2018), 1-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2017.01.010. |
[48] |
J. Ye,
Intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid arithmetic and geometric aggregation operators for the decision-making of mechanical design schemes, Applied Intelligence, 47 (2017), 743-751.
doi: 10.1007/s10489-017-0930-3. |
[49] |
L. A. Zadeh,
Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8 (1965), 338-353.
doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X. |
[50] |
W. Zhou and Z. Xu, Extreme intuitionistic fuzzy weighted aggregation operators and their applications in optimism and pessimism decision-making processes, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 32 (2017), 1129-1138. Google Scholar |
Model | Uncertainty | Falsity | Hesitation | Periodicity | Ability to represent |
two-dimensional information | |||||
Fuzzy set | |||||
Interval-valued fuzzy set | |||||
Intuitionistic fuzzy set | |||||
Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set | |||||
Complex fuzzy set | |||||
Interval-valued complex fuzzy set | |||||
Complex intuitionistic fuzzy set |
Model | Uncertainty | Falsity | Hesitation | Periodicity | Ability to represent |
two-dimensional information | |||||
Fuzzy set | |||||
Interval-valued fuzzy set | |||||
Intuitionistic fuzzy set | |||||
Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set | |||||
Complex fuzzy set | |||||
Interval-valued complex fuzzy set | |||||
Complex intuitionistic fuzzy set |
Values of |
Score values | Ranking | ||||
-0.8301 | -0.9395 | -1.2343 | -1.1190 | -0.6852 | ||
-0.7549 | -0.9000 | -1.1946 | -1.0670 | -0.6387 | ||
-0.7566 | -0.8957 | -1.1800 | -1.0779 | -0.6358 | ||
-0.7017 | -0.8657 | -1.1530 | -1.0419 | -0.6009 | ||
-0.4369 | -0.7490 | -1.0863 | -0.8261 | -0.4493 | ||
-0.3898 | -0.7234 | -1.0694 | -0.7911 | -0.4178 | ||
-0.3927 | -0.7177 | -1.0684 | -0.7962 | -0.4108 | ||
-0.3966 | -0.7141 | -1.0639 | -0.8049 | -0.4050 |
Values of |
Score values | Ranking | ||||
-0.8301 | -0.9395 | -1.2343 | -1.1190 | -0.6852 | ||
-0.7549 | -0.9000 | -1.1946 | -1.0670 | -0.6387 | ||
-0.7566 | -0.8957 | -1.1800 | -1.0779 | -0.6358 | ||
-0.7017 | -0.8657 | -1.1530 | -1.0419 | -0.6009 | ||
-0.4369 | -0.7490 | -1.0863 | -0.8261 | -0.4493 | ||
-0.3898 | -0.7234 | -1.0694 | -0.7911 | -0.4178 | ||
-0.3927 | -0.7177 | -1.0684 | -0.7962 | -0.4108 | ||
-0.3966 | -0.7141 | -1.0639 | -0.8049 | -0.4050 |
Value of |
Accuracy for |
Ranking of the alternatives | |||
When |
When |
When |
|||
Figure 1(a) | |||||
Figure 1(b) | |||||
Figure 1(c) | |||||
Figure 1(d) |
Value of |
Accuracy for |
Ranking of the alternatives | |||
When |
When |
When |
|||
Figure 1(a) | |||||
Figure 1(b) | |||||
Figure 1(c) | |||||
Figure 1(d) |
Method used | Score values | Ranking | ||||
Method based on CIFWA operator [19] | 1.1605 | 0.8812 | 0.3491 | 0.6484 | 1.2545 | |
Method based on CIFWPA operator [37] | 1.1449 | 0.8829 | 0.3540 | 0.6432 | 1.2504 | |
Method based on Distance measure [3] | - | |||||
Method based on Euclidean distance measure [36] | - | |||||
Method based on Correlation coefficient [20] | - | |||||
Proposed method with |
-0.8301 | -0.9395 | -1.2343 | -1.1190 | -0.6852 | |
Proposed method with |
-0.2174 | -0.6143 | -0.9993 | -0.6744 | -0.2686 | |
Proposed method with |
-0.6921 | -0.8863 | -1.1942 | -1.0262 | -0.6041 | |
Method used | Score values | Ranking | ||||
Method based on CIFWA operator [19] | 1.1605 | 0.8812 | 0.3491 | 0.6484 | 1.2545 | |
Method based on CIFWPA operator [37] | 1.1449 | 0.8829 | 0.3540 | 0.6432 | 1.2504 | |
Method based on Distance measure [3] | - | |||||
Method based on Euclidean distance measure [36] | - | |||||
Method based on Correlation coefficient [20] | - | |||||
Proposed method with |
-0.8301 | -0.9395 | -1.2343 | -1.1190 | -0.6852 | |
Proposed method with |
-0.2174 | -0.6143 | -0.9993 | -0.6744 | -0.2686 | |
Proposed method with |
-0.6921 | -0.8863 | -1.1942 | -1.0262 | -0.6041 | |
Method used | Score values | Ranking | ||||
Xu and Yager [42] method based on IFWBM operator |
-0.3968 | -0.5370 | -0.6319 | -0.5754 | -0.3136 | |
Xu [41] method based on IFPWA operator | 0.5653 | 0.3332 | 0.1484 | 0.2441 | 0.6839 | |
Wang and Liu [39] method based on IFEWA operator | 0.5670 | 0.3276 | 0.1183 | 0.2181 | 0.6871 | |
Xu and Yager [44] based on IFWG operator | 0.5314 | 0.2826 | -0.0179 | 0.1466 | 0.6536 | |
Xu [43] method based on IFWA operator | 0.5701 | 0.3351 | 0.1432 | 0.2301 | 0.6898 | |
Garg [10] method based on IFEWGIA operator | 0.6563 | 0.4787 | 0.0142 | 0.2849 | 0.7193 | |
He et al. [24] method based on IFGIA method | 0.6484 | 0.4768 | -0.0085 | 0.2707 | 0.7172 | |
Huang [25] method based on IFHWA operator | 0.5658 | 0.3241 | 0.1064 | 0.2127 | 0.6860 | |
Garg [11] method | 0.4307 | 0.1603 | 0.0710 | 0.0694 | 0.6375 | |
Chen and Chang [8] method | 0.4339 | 0.1804 | 0.1000 | 0.0845 | 0.6435 | |
Goyal et al.[23] method | 0.7982 | 0.6623 | 0.3109 | 0.4510 | 0.8604 | |
Garg [12] method | 0.4316 | 0.1669 | 0.0809 | 0.0743 | 0.6392 | |
Ye [48] method | 0.5506 | 0.3084 | 0.0596 | 0.1876 | 0.6715 | |
Zhou and Xu [50] method | 0.5868 | 0.3824 | 0.3288 | 0.3776 | 0.6979 | |
The proposed CIFWBM operator |
-1.3968 | -1.5370 | -1.6319 | -1.5754 | -1.3136 | |
The proposed CIFWBM operator |
-1.3485 | -1.5108 | -1.6119 | -1.5700 | -1.2525 | |
Abbreviations. IFWA: Intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging; IFWG: Intuitionistic fuzzy weighted geometric; IFEWA: intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein weighted averaging; IFPWA: intuitionistic fuzzy power weighted averaging; IFWBM: intuitionistic fuzzy weighted Bonferroni mean; IFGIA: intuitionistic fuzzy geometric interactive averaging; IFEWGIA: intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein weighted geometric interactive averaging; IFHWA: intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher weighted averaging; CIFWBM: complex intuitionistic fuzzy weighted Bonferroni mean. |
Method used | Score values | Ranking | ||||
Xu and Yager [42] method based on IFWBM operator |
-0.3968 | -0.5370 | -0.6319 | -0.5754 | -0.3136 | |
Xu [41] method based on IFPWA operator | 0.5653 | 0.3332 | 0.1484 | 0.2441 | 0.6839 | |
Wang and Liu [39] method based on IFEWA operator | 0.5670 | 0.3276 | 0.1183 | 0.2181 | 0.6871 | |
Xu and Yager [44] based on IFWG operator | 0.5314 | 0.2826 | -0.0179 | 0.1466 | 0.6536 | |
Xu [43] method based on IFWA operator | 0.5701 | 0.3351 | 0.1432 | 0.2301 | 0.6898 | |
Garg [10] method based on IFEWGIA operator | 0.6563 | 0.4787 | 0.0142 | 0.2849 | 0.7193 | |
He et al. [24] method based on IFGIA method | 0.6484 | 0.4768 | -0.0085 | 0.2707 | 0.7172 | |
Huang [25] method based on IFHWA operator | 0.5658 | 0.3241 | 0.1064 | 0.2127 | 0.6860 | |
Garg [11] method | 0.4307 | 0.1603 | 0.0710 | 0.0694 | 0.6375 | |
Chen and Chang [8] method | 0.4339 | 0.1804 | 0.1000 | 0.0845 | 0.6435 | |
Goyal et al.[23] method | 0.7982 | 0.6623 | 0.3109 | 0.4510 | 0.8604 | |
Garg [12] method | 0.4316 | 0.1669 | 0.0809 | 0.0743 | 0.6392 | |
Ye [48] method | 0.5506 | 0.3084 | 0.0596 | 0.1876 | 0.6715 | |
Zhou and Xu [50] method | 0.5868 | 0.3824 | 0.3288 | 0.3776 | 0.6979 | |
The proposed CIFWBM operator |
-1.3968 | -1.5370 | -1.6319 | -1.5754 | -1.3136 | |
The proposed CIFWBM operator |
-1.3485 | -1.5108 | -1.6119 | -1.5700 | -1.2525 | |
Abbreviations. IFWA: Intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging; IFWG: Intuitionistic fuzzy weighted geometric; IFEWA: intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein weighted averaging; IFPWA: intuitionistic fuzzy power weighted averaging; IFWBM: intuitionistic fuzzy weighted Bonferroni mean; IFGIA: intuitionistic fuzzy geometric interactive averaging; IFEWGIA: intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein weighted geometric interactive averaging; IFHWA: intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher weighted averaging; CIFWBM: complex intuitionistic fuzzy weighted Bonferroni mean. |
Method | Captures interrelationship among arguments | Ability to capture information using complex numbers | Ability to handle two-dimensional information | Ability to integrate Information | Flexible according to decision-maker's preferences |
In [37] | |||||
In [19] | |||||
In [3] | |||||
In [36] | |||||
In [42] | |||||
In [41] | |||||
In [39] | |||||
The proposed approach |
Method | Captures interrelationship among arguments | Ability to capture information using complex numbers | Ability to handle two-dimensional information | Ability to integrate Information | Flexible according to decision-maker's preferences |
In [37] | |||||
In [19] | |||||
In [3] | |||||
In [36] | |||||
In [42] | |||||
In [41] | |||||
In [39] | |||||
The proposed approach |
[1] |
Xiao-Xu Chen, Peng Xu, Jiao-Jiao Li, Thomas Walker, Guo-Qiang Yang. Decision-making in a retailer-led closed-loop supply chain involving a third-party logistics provider. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021014 |
[2] |
Kung-Ching Chang, Xuefeng Wang, Xie Wu. On the spectral theory of positive operators and PDE applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 3171-3200. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020054 |
[3] |
Matthieu Alfaro, Isabeau Birindelli. Evolution equations involving nonlinear truncated Laplacian operators. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020, 40 (6) : 3057-3073. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020046 |
[4] |
Ali Mahmoodirad, Harish Garg, Sadegh Niroomand. Solving fuzzy linear fractional set covering problem by a goal programming based solution approach. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020162 |
[5] |
Huiying Fan, Tao Ma. Parabolic equations involving Laguerre operators and weighted mixed-norm estimates. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5487-5508. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020249 |
[6] |
Yuxia Guo, Shaolong Peng. A direct method of moving planes for fully nonlinear nonlocal operators and applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020462 |
[7] |
Anton A. Kutsenko. Isomorphism between one-dimensional and multidimensional finite difference operators. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 359-368. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020270 |
[8] |
Wenmeng Geng, Kai Tao. Large deviation theorems for dirichlet determinants of analytic quasi-periodic jacobi operators with Brjuno-Rüssmann frequency. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5305-5335. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020240 |
[9] |
Anna Canale, Francesco Pappalardo, Ciro Tarantino. Weighted multipolar Hardy inequalities and evolution problems with Kolmogorov operators perturbed by singular potentials. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 405-425. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020274 |
[10] |
Pierluigi Colli, Gianni Gilardi, Jürgen Sprekels. Deep quench approximation and optimal control of general Cahn–Hilliard systems with fractional operators and double obstacle potentials. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 243-271. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020213 |
[11] |
Isabeau Birindelli, Françoise Demengel, Fabiana Leoni. Boundary asymptotics of the ergodic functions associated with fully nonlinear operators through a Liouville type theorem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020395 |
[12] |
Xin-Guang Yang, Rong-Nian Wang, Xingjie Yan, Alain Miranville. Dynamics of the 2D Navier-Stokes equations with sublinear operators in Lipschitz-like domains. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020408 |
[13] |
Liang Huang, Jiao Chen. The boundedness of multi-linear and multi-parameter pseudo-differential operators. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020291 |
[14] |
Yuanfen Xiao. Mean Li-Yorke chaotic set along polynomial sequence with full Hausdorff dimension for $ \beta $-transformation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (2) : 525-536. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020267 |
[15] |
Jie Li, Xiangdong Ye, Tao Yu. Mean equicontinuity, complexity and applications. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 359-393. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020167 |
[16] |
Reza Chaharpashlou, Abdon Atangana, Reza Saadati. On the fuzzy stability results for fractional stochastic Volterra integral equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020432 |
[17] |
Hua Shi, Xiang Zhang, Yuyan Zhang. Complex planar Hamiltonian systems: Linearization and dynamics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020406 |
[18] |
Zonghong Cao, Jie Min. Selection and impact of decision mode of encroachment and retail service in a dual-channel supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020167 |
[19] |
Weisong Dong, Chang Li. Second order estimates for complex Hessian equations on Hermitian manifolds. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020377 |
[20] |
Tuoc Phan, Grozdena Todorova, Borislav Yordanov. Existence uniqueness and regularity theory for elliptic equations with complex-valued potentials. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (3) : 1071-1099. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020310 |
2019 Impact Factor: 1.366
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]