# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020097

## A dual-channel supply chain problem with resource-utilization penalty: Who can benefit from sales effort?

 1 School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China 2 School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China 3 Edward P.Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7906, USA

* Corresponding author: Shu-Cherng Fang

Received  October 2019 Revised  February 2020 Published  May 2020

Fund Project: This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71502100, 71671125) and Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Chinese Ministry of Education (20YJAZH135)

As manufacturers may engage in both direct sale and wholesale, the channel conflict between manufacturer and retailer becomes inevitable. This paper considers a dual-channel supply chain in which a retailer sells the product through store channel with sales effort while the manufacturer holds a direct channel and may provide an incentive measure to share the cost of sales effort. To meet social responsibility, a penalty on the total resource consumed is imposed on the manufacturer. We present a manufacturer-led decentralized model in which both members maximize individual profit, and then derive the corresponding optimal direct/store price and wholesale price. The dual-channel supply chain model without sales effort policy is also considered so as to explain the effects of sales effort policy and sharing cost measure on both parties. Special properties are presented to show (ⅰ) the influence of retailer's sales effort and manufacturer's sharing cost on the optimal strategies; (ⅱ) the resource-utilized penalty on the optimal decisions. Finally, numerical experiments are conducted to highlight the influence of various parameters on optimal solutions. We find that if the market response to retailer's sales effort is strong or the manufacturer's sharing portion of sales effort cost is increased, the retailer's profit and store selling price increase while the manufacturer's profit decreases and the direct sale and wholesale prices do not change. We also show that if the consumer's value on direct channel exceeds a threshold, the manufacturer's profit will be greater than that of the retailer. Moreover, if the market response to retailer's sales effort is strong, manufacturer's profit will be lesser than retailer's profit.

Citation: Lianxia Zhao, Jianxin You, Shu-Cherng Fang. A dual-channel supply chain problem with resource-utilization penalty: Who can benefit from sales effort?. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020097
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Variation of profits with the change of $\delta$ for $c = 0.20, \lambda = 0.75, \beta = 0.15, a = 0.35$
Variation of profits with the change of $a$ for $c = 0.25, \lambda = 0.75, \beta = 0.08, \delta = 0.50$
Variation of profits with the change of $\lambda$ for $c = 0.15, \beta = 0.20, \delta = 0.55, a = 0.35$
Variation of profits with the change of $\beta$ for $c = 0.25, \lambda = 0.70, \delta = 0.55, a = 0.30$
Notations
 Notation Description Parameters $\theta$ Willing-to-pay of the consumer for retailer channel, $0\leq\theta\leq1$. $\delta$ Consumer's preference to select direct channel, $0\leq\delta<1$. $c$ Marginal costs incurred by the retailer for the product sold through the store channel, $0\leq c <1$. $\beta$ The coefficient of resource-utilization penalty, $\beta\geq0$. $a$ Market response to retailer's sales effort, $0\leq a\leq1$. $\lambda$ Retailer's cost-sharing proportion for sales effort, $0\leq\lambda\leq1$. $NS/S$ Without/with retailer's sales effort. $q_r, q_r^i$ Market demand for the retailer, $i\in\{NS,S\}$. $q_d, q_d^i$ Market demand for the manufacturer, $i\in\{NS,S\}$. $\Pi_r^i/\Pi_d^i$ Retailer's/Manufacturer's profit, $i\in\{NS,S\}$. $CS^i$ Consumer surplus, $i\in\{NS,S\}$. Superscript $*$ The optimal value of each decision variable. Decision variables $p_r, p_r^i$ Retail price at the retail store channel, $i\in\{NS,S\}$. $p_d, p_d^i$ Retail price at the manufacturer's online channel, $i\in\{NS,S\}$. $s$ Sales effort level provided by the retailer. $w, w^i$ Manufacturer's wholesale price to retailer, $i\in\{NS,S\}$.
 Notation Description Parameters $\theta$ Willing-to-pay of the consumer for retailer channel, $0\leq\theta\leq1$. $\delta$ Consumer's preference to select direct channel, $0\leq\delta<1$. $c$ Marginal costs incurred by the retailer for the product sold through the store channel, $0\leq c <1$. $\beta$ The coefficient of resource-utilization penalty, $\beta\geq0$. $a$ Market response to retailer's sales effort, $0\leq a\leq1$. $\lambda$ Retailer's cost-sharing proportion for sales effort, $0\leq\lambda\leq1$. $NS/S$ Without/with retailer's sales effort. $q_r, q_r^i$ Market demand for the retailer, $i\in\{NS,S\}$. $q_d, q_d^i$ Market demand for the manufacturer, $i\in\{NS,S\}$. $\Pi_r^i/\Pi_d^i$ Retailer's/Manufacturer's profit, $i\in\{NS,S\}$. $CS^i$ Consumer surplus, $i\in\{NS,S\}$. Superscript $*$ The optimal value of each decision variable. Decision variables $p_r, p_r^i$ Retail price at the retail store channel, $i\in\{NS,S\}$. $p_d, p_d^i$ Retail price at the manufacturer's online channel, $i\in\{NS,S\}$. $s$ Sales effort level provided by the retailer. $w, w^i$ Manufacturer's wholesale price to retailer, $i\in\{NS,S\}$.
Equilibrium decisions under different strategies
 Variables $i=NS$ $i=S$ $p_r^i$ $\frac{(\beta+2\delta)(1+c)+\beta\delta}{2(\beta+2\delta)}$ $\frac{\lambda(1-\delta)[(\beta+2\delta)(c+1)+\delta\beta ]-a^2[\delta(\beta+\delta)+c(\beta+2\delta)]}{(\beta+2\delta)[2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2]}$ $p_d^i$ $\frac{\delta(\beta+\delta)}{\beta+2\delta}$ $\frac{\delta(\beta+\delta)}{\beta+2\delta}$ $w^i$ $\frac{\delta(\beta+\delta)}{\beta+2\delta}$ $\frac{\delta(\beta+\delta)}{\beta+2\delta}$ $s_i$ N/A $\frac{a(1-c-\delta)}{2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2}$ $q_r^i$ $\frac{1-c-\delta}{2(1-\delta)}$ $\frac{\lambda(1-c-\delta)}{2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2}$ $q_d^i$ $\frac{2c\delta-\beta(1-c-\delta)}{2(1-\delta)(\beta+2\delta)}$ $\frac{\lambda[2c\delta-\beta(1-c-\delta)]-a^2\delta}{(\beta+2\delta)[2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2]}$ $\Pi_r^i$ $\frac{(1-c-\delta)^2}{4(1-\delta)}$ $\frac{\lambda(1-c-\delta)^2}{2[2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2]}$ $\Pi_d^i$ $\frac{\delta^2}{2(\beta+2\delta)}$ $\frac{\delta^2[2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2]^2 +a^2(\beta+2\delta)(\lambda-1)(1-c-\delta)^2}{2(\beta+2\delta)[2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2]^2}$ NS=No sales effort, S=Sales effort
 Variables $i=NS$ $i=S$ $p_r^i$ $\frac{(\beta+2\delta)(1+c)+\beta\delta}{2(\beta+2\delta)}$ $\frac{\lambda(1-\delta)[(\beta+2\delta)(c+1)+\delta\beta ]-a^2[\delta(\beta+\delta)+c(\beta+2\delta)]}{(\beta+2\delta)[2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2]}$ $p_d^i$ $\frac{\delta(\beta+\delta)}{\beta+2\delta}$ $\frac{\delta(\beta+\delta)}{\beta+2\delta}$ $w^i$ $\frac{\delta(\beta+\delta)}{\beta+2\delta}$ $\frac{\delta(\beta+\delta)}{\beta+2\delta}$ $s_i$ N/A $\frac{a(1-c-\delta)}{2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2}$ $q_r^i$ $\frac{1-c-\delta}{2(1-\delta)}$ $\frac{\lambda(1-c-\delta)}{2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2}$ $q_d^i$ $\frac{2c\delta-\beta(1-c-\delta)}{2(1-\delta)(\beta+2\delta)}$ $\frac{\lambda[2c\delta-\beta(1-c-\delta)]-a^2\delta}{(\beta+2\delta)[2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2]}$ $\Pi_r^i$ $\frac{(1-c-\delta)^2}{4(1-\delta)}$ $\frac{\lambda(1-c-\delta)^2}{2[2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2]}$ $\Pi_d^i$ $\frac{\delta^2}{2(\beta+2\delta)}$ $\frac{\delta^2[2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2]^2 +a^2(\beta+2\delta)(\lambda-1)(1-c-\delta)^2}{2(\beta+2\delta)[2\lambda(1-\delta)-a^2]^2}$ NS=No sales effort, S=Sales effort
 [1] Lisha Wang, Huaming Song, Ding Zhang, Hui Yang. Pricing decisions for complementary products in a fuzzy dual-channel supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (1) : 343-364. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018046 [2] Mingyong Lai, Hongzhao Yang, Erbao Cao, Duo Qiu, Jing Qiu. Optimal decisions for a dual-channel supply chain under information asymmetry. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (3) : 1023-1040. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017088 [3] Chong Zhang, Yaxian Wang, Ying Liu, Haiyan Wang. Coordination contracts for a dual-channel supply chain under capital constraints. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020031 [4] Lei Yang, Jingna Ji, Kebing Chen. Advertising games on national brand and store brand in a dual-channel supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (1) : 105-134. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017039 [5] Hongxia Sun, Yao Wan, Yu Li, Linlin Zhang, Zhen Zhou. Competition in a dual-channel supply chain considering duopolistic retailers with different behaviours. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019125 [6] Mitali Sarkar, Young Hae Lee. Optimum pricing strategy for complementary products with reservation price in a supply chain model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (3) : 1553-1586. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017007 [7] Xue-Yan Wu, Zhi-Ping Fan, Bing-Bing Cao. Cost-sharing strategy for carbon emission reduction and sales effort: A nash game with government subsidy. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (4) : 1999-2027. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019040 [8] Yeong-Cheng Liou, Siegfried Schaible, Jen-Chih Yao. Supply chain inventory management via a Stackelberg equilibrium. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2006, 2 (1) : 81-94. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.81 [9] Wenying Xie, Bin Chen, Fuyou Huang, Juan He. Coordination of a supply chain with a loss-averse retailer under supply uncertainty and marketing effort. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020125 [10] Katherinne Salas Navarro, Jaime Acevedo Chedid, Whady F. Florez, Holman Ospina Mateus, Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón, Shib Sankar Sana. A collaborative EPQ inventory model for a three-echelon supply chain with multiple products considering the effect of marketing effort on demand. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (4) : 1613-1633. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019020 [11] Jing Shi. Fit revelation strategy in a supply chain with two types of consumers. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020017 [12] Jingming Pan, Wenqing Shi, Xiaowo Tang. Pricing and ordering strategies of supply chain with selling gift cards. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (1) : 349-369. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017050 [13] Zhidan Wu, Xiaohu Qian, Min Huang, Wai-Ki Ching, Hanbin Kuang, Xingwei Wang. Channel leadership and recycling channel in closed-loop supply chain: The case of recycling price by the recycling party. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020116 [14] Amin Aalaei, Hamid Davoudpour. Two bounds for integrating the virtual dynamic cellular manufacturing problem into supply chain management. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (3) : 907-930. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.907 [15] Jun Li, Hairong Feng, Kun-Jen Chung. Using the algebraic approach to determine the replenishment optimal policy with defective products, backlog and delay of payments in the supply chain management. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (1) : 263-269. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.263 [16] Ali Naimi Sadigh, S. Kamal Chaharsooghi, Majid Sheikhmohammady. A game theoretic approach to coordination of pricing, advertising, and inventory decisions in a competitive supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (1) : 337-355. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.337 [17] Xiaohong Chen, Kui Li, Fuqiang Wang, Xihua Li. Optimal production, pricing and government subsidy policies for a closed loop supply chain with uncertain returns. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (3) : 1389-1414. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019008 [18] Zhenkai Lou, Fujun Hou, Xuming Lou. Optimal ordering and pricing models of a two-echelon supply chain under multipletimes ordering. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020109 [19] Guibin Lu, Qiying Hu, Youying Zhou, Wuyi Yue. Optimal execution strategy with an endogenously determined sales period. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (3) : 289-304. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.289 [20] Jiuping Xu, Pei Wei. Production-distribution planning of construction supply chain management under fuzzy random environment for large-scale construction projects. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (1) : 31-56. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.31

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366