# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020101

## A ${BMAP/BMSP/1}$ queue with Markov dependent arrival and Markov dependent service batches

 1 Centre for Research in Mathematics, C.M.S. College, Kottayam-686001, India 2 Department of Mathematics, Union Christian College, Aluva-683102, India

Received  November 2019 Published  May 2020

Fund Project: The first author is supported by UGC, Govt. of India, Emeritus Fellow(EMERITUS 2017-18 GEN 10822(SA-II)) and DST, Indo-Russian project: INT/RUS/RSF/P-15

Batch arrival and batch service queueing systems are of importance in the context of telecommunication networks. None of the work reported so far consider the dependence of consecutive arrival and service batches. Batch Markovian Arrival Process($BMAP$) and Batch Markovian Service Process ($BMSP$) take care of the dependence between successive inter-arrival and service times, respectively. However in real life situations dependence between consecutive arrival and service batch sizes also play an important role. This is to regulate the workload of the server in the context of service and to restrict the arrival batch size when the flow is from the same source. In this paper we study a queueing system with Markov dependent arrival and service batch sizes. The arrival and service batch sizes are assumed to be finite. Further, successive inter-arrival and service time durations are also assumed to be correlated. Specifically, we consider a $BMAP/BMSP/1$ queue with Markov dependent arrival and Markov dependent service batch sizes. The stability of the system is investigated. The steady state probability vectors of the system state and some important performance measures are computed. The Laplace-Stieltjes transform of waiting time and idle time of the server are obtained. Some numerical examples are provided.

Citation: Achyutha Krishnamoorthy, Anu Nuthan Joshua. A ${BMAP/BMSP/1}$ queue with Markov dependent arrival and Markov dependent service batches. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020101
##### References:
 [1] A. D. Banik, Analyzing state-dependent arrival in $GI/BMSP/1/\infty$ queues, Math. Comput. Modelling, 53 (2011), 1229-1246.  doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.12.007.  Google Scholar [2] A. D. Banik, Queueing analysis and optimal control of $BMAP/G^{(a, b)}/1/N$ and $BMAP/MSP^{(a, b)}/1/N$ systems, Comput. Industrial Engineering, 57 (2009), 748-761.  doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2009.02.002.  Google Scholar [3] A. D. Banik, Stationary analysis of a $BMAP/R/1$ queue with $R$-type multiple working vacations, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput., 46 (2017), 1035-1061.  doi: 10.1080/03610918.2014.990096.  Google Scholar [4] A. D. Banik, M. L. Chaudhry and U. C. Gupta, On the finite buffer queue with renewal input and batch Markovian service process: $GI/BMSP/1/N$, Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab., 10 (2008), 559-575.  doi: 10.1007/s11009-007-9064-0.  Google Scholar [5] S. Ghosh and A. D. Banik, An algorithmic analysis of the $BMAP/MSP/1$ generalized processor-sharing queue, Comput. Oper. Res., 79 (2017), 1-11.  doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2016.10.001.  Google Scholar [6] S. Ghosh and A. D. Banik, Computing conditional sojourn time of a randomly chosen tagged customer in a $BMAP/MSP/1$ queue under random order service discipline, Ann. Oper. Res., 261 (2018), 185-206.  doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2534-z.  Google Scholar [7] S. Ghosh and A. D. Banik, Efficient computational analysis of non-exhaustive service vacation queues: $BMAP/R/1/N(\infty)$ under gated-limited discipline, Appl. Math. Model., 68 (2019), 540-562.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.11.040.  Google Scholar [8] C. Kim, V. I. Klimenok and A. N. Dudin, Analysis of unreliable $BMAP/PH/N$ type queue with Markovian flow of breakdowns, Appl. Math. Comput., 314 (2017), 154-172.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2017.06.035.  Google Scholar [9] V. Klimenok, A. N. Dudin and K. Samouylov, Computation of moments of queue length in the $BMAP/SM/1$ queue, Oper. Res. Lett., 45 (2017), 467-470.  doi: 10.1016/j.orl.2017.07.003.  Google Scholar [10] V. Klimenok and O. Dudina, Retrial tandem queue with controllable strategy of repeated attempts, Quality Tech. Quantitative Manag., 14 (2017), 74-93.  doi: 10.1080/16843703.2016.1189177.  Google Scholar [11] V. Klimenok, O. Dudina, V. Vishnevsky and K. Samouylov, Retrial tandem queue with $BMAP$ input and semi-Markovian service process, in International Conference on Distributed Computer and Communication Networks, Communications in Computer and Information Science, 700, Springer, Cham, 2017,159–173. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66836-9_14.  Google Scholar [12] V. I. Klimenok, A. N. Dudin and K. E. Samouylov, Analysis of the $BMAP/PH/N$ queueing systems with backup servers, Appl. Math. Model., 57 (2018), 64-84.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.12.024.  Google Scholar [13] D. M. Lucantoni, New results on the single server queue with a batch Markovian arrival process, Comm. Statist. Stochastic Models, 7 (1991), 1-46.  doi: 10.1080/15326349108807174.  Google Scholar [14] D. M. Lucantoni, K. S. Meier-Hellstern and M. F. Neuts, A single-server queue with server vacations and a class of non-renewal arrival processes, Adv. in Appl. Probab., 22 (1990), 676-705.  doi: 10.2307/1427464.  Google Scholar [15] M. F. Neuts, Versatile Markovian point process, J. Appl. Probab., 16 (1979), 764-779.  doi: 10.2307/3213143.  Google Scholar [16] M. F. Neuts, Matrix-Geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models. An Algorithmic Approach, Johns Hopkins Series in the Mathematical Sciences, 2, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1981.  doi: 10.2307/2287748.  Google Scholar [17] G. Rama, R. Ramshankar, R. Sandhya, V. Sundar and R. Ramanarayanan, $BMAP/M/C$ bulk service queue with randomly varying environment, IOSR J. Engineering, 5 (2015), 33-47.   Google Scholar [18] V. Ramaswami, The $N/G/1$ queue and its detailed analysis, Adv. in Appl. Probab., 12 (1980), 222-261.  doi: 10.2307/1426503.  Google Scholar [19] S. K. Samanta, M. L. Chaudhry and A. Pacheco, Analysis of $BMAP/MSP/1$ queue, Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab., 18 (2016), 419-440.  doi: 10.1007/s11009-014-9429-0.  Google Scholar [20] R. Sandhya, V. Sundar, G. Rama, R. Ramshankar and R. Ramanarayanan, $BMAP/BMSP/1$ queue with randomly varying environment, IOSR J. Engineering, 5 (2015), 01-12.   Google Scholar [21] V. M. Vishnevskii and A. N. Dudin, Queueing systems with correlated arrival flows and their applications to modeling telecommunication networks, Autom. Remote Control, 78 (2017), 1361-1403.  doi: 10.1134/S000511791708001X.  Google Scholar

show all references

##### References:
 [1] A. D. Banik, Analyzing state-dependent arrival in $GI/BMSP/1/\infty$ queues, Math. Comput. Modelling, 53 (2011), 1229-1246.  doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.12.007.  Google Scholar [2] A. D. Banik, Queueing analysis and optimal control of $BMAP/G^{(a, b)}/1/N$ and $BMAP/MSP^{(a, b)}/1/N$ systems, Comput. Industrial Engineering, 57 (2009), 748-761.  doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2009.02.002.  Google Scholar [3] A. D. Banik, Stationary analysis of a $BMAP/R/1$ queue with $R$-type multiple working vacations, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput., 46 (2017), 1035-1061.  doi: 10.1080/03610918.2014.990096.  Google Scholar [4] A. D. Banik, M. L. Chaudhry and U. C. Gupta, On the finite buffer queue with renewal input and batch Markovian service process: $GI/BMSP/1/N$, Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab., 10 (2008), 559-575.  doi: 10.1007/s11009-007-9064-0.  Google Scholar [5] S. Ghosh and A. D. Banik, An algorithmic analysis of the $BMAP/MSP/1$ generalized processor-sharing queue, Comput. Oper. Res., 79 (2017), 1-11.  doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2016.10.001.  Google Scholar [6] S. Ghosh and A. D. Banik, Computing conditional sojourn time of a randomly chosen tagged customer in a $BMAP/MSP/1$ queue under random order service discipline, Ann. Oper. Res., 261 (2018), 185-206.  doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2534-z.  Google Scholar [7] S. Ghosh and A. D. Banik, Efficient computational analysis of non-exhaustive service vacation queues: $BMAP/R/1/N(\infty)$ under gated-limited discipline, Appl. Math. Model., 68 (2019), 540-562.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.11.040.  Google Scholar [8] C. Kim, V. I. Klimenok and A. N. Dudin, Analysis of unreliable $BMAP/PH/N$ type queue with Markovian flow of breakdowns, Appl. Math. Comput., 314 (2017), 154-172.  doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2017.06.035.  Google Scholar [9] V. Klimenok, A. N. Dudin and K. Samouylov, Computation of moments of queue length in the $BMAP/SM/1$ queue, Oper. Res. Lett., 45 (2017), 467-470.  doi: 10.1016/j.orl.2017.07.003.  Google Scholar [10] V. Klimenok and O. Dudina, Retrial tandem queue with controllable strategy of repeated attempts, Quality Tech. Quantitative Manag., 14 (2017), 74-93.  doi: 10.1080/16843703.2016.1189177.  Google Scholar [11] V. Klimenok, O. Dudina, V. Vishnevsky and K. Samouylov, Retrial tandem queue with $BMAP$ input and semi-Markovian service process, in International Conference on Distributed Computer and Communication Networks, Communications in Computer and Information Science, 700, Springer, Cham, 2017,159–173. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66836-9_14.  Google Scholar [12] V. I. Klimenok, A. N. Dudin and K. E. Samouylov, Analysis of the $BMAP/PH/N$ queueing systems with backup servers, Appl. Math. Model., 57 (2018), 64-84.  doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.12.024.  Google Scholar [13] D. M. Lucantoni, New results on the single server queue with a batch Markovian arrival process, Comm. Statist. Stochastic Models, 7 (1991), 1-46.  doi: 10.1080/15326349108807174.  Google Scholar [14] D. M. Lucantoni, K. S. Meier-Hellstern and M. F. Neuts, A single-server queue with server vacations and a class of non-renewal arrival processes, Adv. in Appl. Probab., 22 (1990), 676-705.  doi: 10.2307/1427464.  Google Scholar [15] M. F. Neuts, Versatile Markovian point process, J. Appl. Probab., 16 (1979), 764-779.  doi: 10.2307/3213143.  Google Scholar [16] M. F. Neuts, Matrix-Geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models. An Algorithmic Approach, Johns Hopkins Series in the Mathematical Sciences, 2, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1981.  doi: 10.2307/2287748.  Google Scholar [17] G. Rama, R. Ramshankar, R. Sandhya, V. Sundar and R. Ramanarayanan, $BMAP/M/C$ bulk service queue with randomly varying environment, IOSR J. Engineering, 5 (2015), 33-47.   Google Scholar [18] V. Ramaswami, The $N/G/1$ queue and its detailed analysis, Adv. in Appl. Probab., 12 (1980), 222-261.  doi: 10.2307/1426503.  Google Scholar [19] S. K. Samanta, M. L. Chaudhry and A. Pacheco, Analysis of $BMAP/MSP/1$ queue, Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab., 18 (2016), 419-440.  doi: 10.1007/s11009-014-9429-0.  Google Scholar [20] R. Sandhya, V. Sundar, G. Rama, R. Ramshankar and R. Ramanarayanan, $BMAP/BMSP/1$ queue with randomly varying environment, IOSR J. Engineering, 5 (2015), 01-12.   Google Scholar [21] V. M. Vishnevskii and A. N. Dudin, Queueing systems with correlated arrival flows and their applications to modeling telecommunication networks, Autom. Remote Control, 78 (2017), 1361-1403.  doi: 10.1134/S000511791708001X.  Google Scholar
Transition rate submatrices within level 0
 $\rm{ From}$ $\rm{To}$ $\rm{ Rate}$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2 = 0(k))$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2 = 0(k))$ $\textbf I_s \otimes D_0$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2)$ $S_0 \oplus D_0$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(0, p + m_1, m_1, n_2)$ $\textbf I_s \otimes p_{n_1 m_1}D_{c}$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2 = 0(k))$ $(0, p + m_1 - k, m_1, k)$ $\textbf I_s \otimes p_{n_1 m_1} D_{c}$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2 = 0(k))$ $(0, p+m_1, m_1, 0(k))$ $\textbf I_s \otimes p_{n_1 m_1} D_{c}$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2 )$ $(0, p, n_1, m_2 = 0(k))$ $q_{n_2 k} S_d \otimes \textbf I_r$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(0, p-m_2, n_1, m_2)$ $q_{n_2 m_2} S_d \otimes \textbf I_r$
 $\rm{ From}$ $\rm{To}$ $\rm{ Rate}$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2 = 0(k))$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2 = 0(k))$ $\textbf I_s \otimes D_0$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2)$ $S_0 \oplus D_0$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(0, p + m_1, m_1, n_2)$ $\textbf I_s \otimes p_{n_1 m_1}D_{c}$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2 = 0(k))$ $(0, p + m_1 - k, m_1, k)$ $\textbf I_s \otimes p_{n_1 m_1} D_{c}$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2 = 0(k))$ $(0, p+m_1, m_1, 0(k))$ $\textbf I_s \otimes p_{n_1 m_1} D_{c}$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2 )$ $(0, p, n_1, m_2 = 0(k))$ $q_{n_2 k} S_d \otimes \textbf I_r$ $(0, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(0, p-m_2, n_1, m_2)$ $q_{n_2 m_2} S_d \otimes \textbf I_r$
Transition rate submatrices except those within level 0
 $\rm{ From}$ $\rm{To}$ $\rm{ Rate}$ $(0, p, n_1 , n_2)$ $(1, p + m_1- q, m_1, n_2)$ $\textbf I_s \otimes p_{n_1 m_1}D_{c}$ $(1, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(0, q + p- m_2, n_1, m_2)$ $q_{n_2 m_2} S_d \otimes \textbf I_r$ $(l, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(l+1, p + m_1 - q, m_1, n_2)$ $\textbf I_s \otimes p_{n_1 m_1} D_{c}$ $(l, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(l, p, n_1, n_2)$ $S_0 \oplus D_0$ $(l, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(l, p + m_1, m_1, n_2)$ $\textbf I_s \otimes p_{n_1 m_1} D_{c}$ $(l, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(l, p- m_2, n_1, m_2)$ $q_{n_2 m_2} S_d \otimes \textbf I_r$ $(l, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(l-1, q + p- m_2, n_1, m_2)$ $q_{n_2 m_2} S_d \otimes \textbf I_r$
 $\rm{ From}$ $\rm{To}$ $\rm{ Rate}$ $(0, p, n_1 , n_2)$ $(1, p + m_1- q, m_1, n_2)$ $\textbf I_s \otimes p_{n_1 m_1}D_{c}$ $(1, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(0, q + p- m_2, n_1, m_2)$ $q_{n_2 m_2} S_d \otimes \textbf I_r$ $(l, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(l+1, p + m_1 - q, m_1, n_2)$ $\textbf I_s \otimes p_{n_1 m_1} D_{c}$ $(l, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(l, p, n_1, n_2)$ $S_0 \oplus D_0$ $(l, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(l, p + m_1, m_1, n_2)$ $\textbf I_s \otimes p_{n_1 m_1} D_{c}$ $(l, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(l, p- m_2, n_1, m_2)$ $q_{n_2 m_2} S_d \otimes \textbf I_r$ $(l, p, n_1, n_2)$ $(l-1, q + p- m_2, n_1, m_2)$ $q_{n_2 m_2} S_d \otimes \textbf I_r$
Expected queue length under various arrival and service processes
 NCA (2a) NCA (2b) ZCA PCA (3a) PCA (3b) NCS(2b) ${4.5898}$ ${5.7659}$ ${3.1824}$ ${42.5934}$ ${179.1428}$ NCS(2a) ${3.3006}$ ${4.3856}$ ${2.1585}$ ${41.1375}$ ${177.7154}$ ZCS ${1.1070}$ ${1.1905}$ ${0.9351}$ ${8.1323}$ ${40.2739}$ PCS ${40.5835}$ ${42.1713}$ ${32.6996}$ ${82.5983}$ ${214.3443}$
 NCA (2a) NCA (2b) ZCA PCA (3a) PCA (3b) NCS(2b) ${4.5898}$ ${5.7659}$ ${3.1824}$ ${42.5934}$ ${179.1428}$ NCS(2a) ${3.3006}$ ${4.3856}$ ${2.1585}$ ${41.1375}$ ${177.7154}$ ZCS ${1.1070}$ ${1.1905}$ ${0.9351}$ ${8.1323}$ ${40.2739}$ PCS ${40.5835}$ ${42.1713}$ ${32.6996}$ ${82.5983}$ ${214.3443}$
Expected idle time in $(0, 0, 1, 0(1), 1, 1), (0, 0, 1, 0(2), 1, 1), (0, 0, 1, 0(3), 1, 1)$ respectively and arrival phase changes to 1, 2, 3 respectively at the end of idle time under various arrival and service processes
 L(1, 1) M(1, 1) N(1, 1) L(1, 2) M(1, 2) N(1, 2) L(1, 3) M(1, 3) N(1, 3) ZCS NCA(2a) ${0.0200}$ ${1.5725}$ ${0.7685}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${1.9756}$ ${0.4426}$ ${2.5034}$ ZCS NCA(2b) ${0.2199}$ ${1.2456}$ ${1.1507}$ ${0.2274}$ ${0.1551}$ ${0.2979}$ ${1.4797}$ ${0.8040}$ ${1.7725}$ ZCS ZCA ${1.0333}$ ${1.8600}$ ${2.7280}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ZCS PCA(3a) ${1.8098}$ ${2.2052}$ ${2.3602}$ ${1.8682}$ ${2.3471}$ ${2.5799}$ ${2.5189}$ ${4.2899}$ ${6.0942}$ ZCS PCA(3b) ${1.9756}$ ${1.5247}$ ${5.1267}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0200}$ ${0.0514}$ ${0.0965}$ PCS NCA(2a) ${0.0200}$ ${1.5725}$ ${0.7685}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${1.9756}$ ${0.4426}$ ${2.5034}$ PCS NCA(2b) ${0.2199}$ ${1.2456}$ ${1.1507}$ ${0.2274}$ ${0.1551}$ ${0.2979}$ ${1.4797}$ ${0.8040}$ ${1.7725}$ PCS ZCA ${1.0333}$ ${1.8600}$ ${2.7280}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ PCS PCA(3a) ${1.8098}$ ${2.2052}$ ${2.3602}$ ${1.8682}$ ${2.3471}$ ${2.5799}$ ${2.5189}$ ${4.2899}$ ${6.0942}$ PCS PCA(3b) ${1.9756}$ ${1.5247}$ ${5.1267}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0200}$ ${0.0514}$ ${0.0965}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2a) ${0.0200}$ ${1.5725}$ ${0.7685}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${1.9756}$ ${0.4426}$ ${2.5034}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2b) ${0.2199}$ ${1.2456}$ ${1.1507}$ ${0.2274}$ ${0.1551}$ ${0.2979}$ ${1.4797}$ ${0.8040}$ ${1.7725}$ NCS(2a) ZCA ${1.0333}$ ${1.8600}$ ${2.7280}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3a) ${1.8098}$ ${2.2052}$ ${2.3602}$ ${1.8682}$ ${2.3471}$ ${2.5799}$ ${2.5189}$ ${4.2899}$ ${6.0942}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3b) ${1.9756}$ ${1.5247}$ ${5.1267}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0200}$ ${0.0514}$ ${0.0965}$
 L(1, 1) M(1, 1) N(1, 1) L(1, 2) M(1, 2) N(1, 2) L(1, 3) M(1, 3) N(1, 3) ZCS NCA(2a) ${0.0200}$ ${1.5725}$ ${0.7685}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${1.9756}$ ${0.4426}$ ${2.5034}$ ZCS NCA(2b) ${0.2199}$ ${1.2456}$ ${1.1507}$ ${0.2274}$ ${0.1551}$ ${0.2979}$ ${1.4797}$ ${0.8040}$ ${1.7725}$ ZCS ZCA ${1.0333}$ ${1.8600}$ ${2.7280}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ZCS PCA(3a) ${1.8098}$ ${2.2052}$ ${2.3602}$ ${1.8682}$ ${2.3471}$ ${2.5799}$ ${2.5189}$ ${4.2899}$ ${6.0942}$ ZCS PCA(3b) ${1.9756}$ ${1.5247}$ ${5.1267}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0200}$ ${0.0514}$ ${0.0965}$ PCS NCA(2a) ${0.0200}$ ${1.5725}$ ${0.7685}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${1.9756}$ ${0.4426}$ ${2.5034}$ PCS NCA(2b) ${0.2199}$ ${1.2456}$ ${1.1507}$ ${0.2274}$ ${0.1551}$ ${0.2979}$ ${1.4797}$ ${0.8040}$ ${1.7725}$ PCS ZCA ${1.0333}$ ${1.8600}$ ${2.7280}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ PCS PCA(3a) ${1.8098}$ ${2.2052}$ ${2.3602}$ ${1.8682}$ ${2.3471}$ ${2.5799}$ ${2.5189}$ ${4.2899}$ ${6.0942}$ PCS PCA(3b) ${1.9756}$ ${1.5247}$ ${5.1267}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0200}$ ${0.0514}$ ${0.0965}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2a) ${0.0200}$ ${1.5725}$ ${0.7685}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${1.9756}$ ${0.4426}$ ${2.5034}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2b) ${0.2199}$ ${1.2456}$ ${1.1507}$ ${0.2274}$ ${0.1551}$ ${0.2979}$ ${1.4797}$ ${0.8040}$ ${1.7725}$ NCS(2a) ZCA ${1.0333}$ ${1.8600}$ ${2.7280}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3a) ${1.8098}$ ${2.2052}$ ${2.3602}$ ${1.8682}$ ${2.3471}$ ${2.5799}$ ${2.5189}$ ${4.2899}$ ${6.0942}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3b) ${1.9756}$ ${1.5247}$ ${5.1267}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0200}$ ${0.0514}$ ${0.0965}$
Expected idle time in $(0, 0, 1, 0(1), 1, 2), (0, 0, 1, 0(2), 1, 2), (0, 0, 1, 0(3), 1, 2)$ respectively and arrival phase changes to 1, 2, 3 respectively at the end of idle time under various arrival and service processes
 L(2, 1) M(2, 1) N(2, 1) L(2, 2) M(2, 2) N(2, 2) L(2, 3) M(2, 3) N(2, 3) ZCS NCA(2a) ${0.0100}$ ${0.7881}$ ${0.3977}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.9878}$ ${0.2292}$ ${1.8764}$ ZCS NCA(2b) ${0.0567}$ ${0.5166}$ ${0.5367}$ ${0.0351}$ ${0.0530}$ ${0.2016}$ ${0.5964}$ ${0.3021}$ ${1.2421}$ ZCS ZCA ${0.5333}$ ${1.3600}$ ${2.2280}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ZCS PCA(3a) ${1.9276}$ ${2.5820}$ ${2.8420}$ ${1.9727}$ ${2.6957}$ ${3.0442}$ ${1.4113}$ ${3.6018}$ ${5.8677}$ ZCS PCA(3b) ${0.9878}$ ${2.5447}$ ${4.1548}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0100}$ ${0.0336}$ ${0.0707}$ PCS NCA(2a) ${0.0100}$ ${0.7881}$ ${0.3977}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.9878}$ ${0.2292}$ ${1.8764}$ PCS NCA(2b) ${0.0567}$ ${0.5166}$ ${0.5367}$ ${0.0351}$ ${0.0530}$ ${0.2016}$ ${0.5964}$ ${0.3021}$ ${1.2421}$ PCS ZCA ${0.5333}$ ${1.3600}$ ${2.2280}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ PCS PCA(3a) ${1.9276}$ ${2.5820}$ ${2.8420}$ ${1.9727}$ ${2.6957}$ ${3.0442}$ ${1.4113}$ ${3.6018}$ ${5.8677}$ PCS PCA(3b) ${0.9878}$ ${2.5447}$ ${4.1548}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0100}$ ${0.0336}$ ${0.0707}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2a) ${0.0100}$ ${0.7881}$ ${0.3977}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.9878}$ ${0.2292}$ ${1.8764}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2b) ${0.0567}$ ${0.5166}$ ${0.5367}$ ${0.0351}$ ${0.0530}$ ${0.2016}$ ${0.5964}$ ${0.3021}$ ${1.2421}$ NCS(2a) ZCA ${0.5333}$ ${1.3600}$ ${2.2280}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3a) ${1.9276}$ ${2.5820}$ ${2.8420}$ ${1.9727}$ ${2.6957}$ ${3.0442}$ ${1.4113}$ ${3.6018}$ ${5.8677}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3b) ${0.9878}$ ${2.5447}$ ${4.1548}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0100}$ ${0.0336}$ ${0.0707}$
 L(2, 1) M(2, 1) N(2, 1) L(2, 2) M(2, 2) N(2, 2) L(2, 3) M(2, 3) N(2, 3) ZCS NCA(2a) ${0.0100}$ ${0.7881}$ ${0.3977}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.9878}$ ${0.2292}$ ${1.8764}$ ZCS NCA(2b) ${0.0567}$ ${0.5166}$ ${0.5367}$ ${0.0351}$ ${0.0530}$ ${0.2016}$ ${0.5964}$ ${0.3021}$ ${1.2421}$ ZCS ZCA ${0.5333}$ ${1.3600}$ ${2.2280}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ZCS PCA(3a) ${1.9276}$ ${2.5820}$ ${2.8420}$ ${1.9727}$ ${2.6957}$ ${3.0442}$ ${1.4113}$ ${3.6018}$ ${5.8677}$ ZCS PCA(3b) ${0.9878}$ ${2.5447}$ ${4.1548}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0100}$ ${0.0336}$ ${0.0707}$ PCS NCA(2a) ${0.0100}$ ${0.7881}$ ${0.3977}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.9878}$ ${0.2292}$ ${1.8764}$ PCS NCA(2b) ${0.0567}$ ${0.5166}$ ${0.5367}$ ${0.0351}$ ${0.0530}$ ${0.2016}$ ${0.5964}$ ${0.3021}$ ${1.2421}$ PCS ZCA ${0.5333}$ ${1.3600}$ ${2.2280}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ PCS PCA(3a) ${1.9276}$ ${2.5820}$ ${2.8420}$ ${1.9727}$ ${2.6957}$ ${3.0442}$ ${1.4113}$ ${3.6018}$ ${5.8677}$ PCS PCA(3b) ${0.9878}$ ${2.5447}$ ${4.1548}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0100}$ ${0.0336}$ ${0.0707}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2a) ${0.0100}$ ${0.7881}$ ${0.3977}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.9878}$ ${0.2292}$ ${1.8764}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2b) ${0.0567}$ ${0.5166}$ ${0.5367}$ ${0.0351}$ ${0.0530}$ ${0.2016}$ ${0.5964}$ ${0.3021}$ ${1.2421}$ NCS(2a) ZCA ${0.5333}$ ${1.3600}$ ${2.2280}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3a) ${1.9276}$ ${2.5820}$ ${2.8420}$ ${1.9727}$ ${2.6957}$ ${3.0442}$ ${1.4113}$ ${3.6018}$ ${5.8677}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3b) ${0.9878}$ ${2.5447}$ ${4.1548}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0100}$ ${0.0336}$ ${0.0707}$
Expected idle time in $(0, 0, 1, 0(1), 1, 3), (0, 0, 1, 0(2), 1, 3), (0, 0, 1, 0(3), 1, 3)$ respectively and arrival phase changes to 1, 2, 3 respectively at the end of idle time under various arrival and service processes
 L(3, 1) M(3, 1) N(3, 1) L(3, 2) M(3, 2) N(3, 2) L(3, 3) M(3, 3) N(3, 3) ZCS NCA(2a) ${0.0044}$ ${0.0168}$ ${1.2523}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${1.5682}$ ${0.7559}$ ZCS NCA(2b) ${0.0483}$ ${0.1888}$ ${1.0304}$ ${0.0032}$ ${0.1781}$ ${0.1684}$ ${0.0088}$ ${1.1688}$ ${0.9376}$ ZCS ZCA ${0.2000}$ ${1.0267}$ ${1.8947}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ZCS PCA(3a) ${0.0176}$ ${0.1166}$ ${0.2426}$ ${0.0214}$ ${0.1252}$ ${0.2598}$ ${0.0891}$ ${0.2358}$ ${0.4843}$ ZCS PCA(3b) ${0}$ ${0.0159}$ ${0.0449}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0044}$ ${0.0080}$ ${0.0120}$ PCS NCA(2a) ${0.0044}$ ${0.0168}$ ${1.2523}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${1.5682}$ ${0.7559}$ PCS NCA(2b) ${0.0483}$ ${0.1888}$ ${1.0304}$ ${0.0032}$ ${0.1781}$ ${0.1684}$ ${0.0088}$ ${1.1688}$ ${0.9376}$ PCS ZCA ${0.2000}$ ${1.0267}$ ${1.8947}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ PCS PCA(3a) ${0.0176}$ ${0.1166}$ ${0.2426}$ ${0.0214}$ ${0.1252}$ ${0.2598}$ ${0.0891}$ ${0.2358}$ ${0.4843}$ PCS PCA(3b) ${0}$ ${0.0159}$ ${0.0449}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0044}$ ${0.0080}$ ${0.0120}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2a) ${0.0044}$ ${0.0168}$ ${1.2523}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${1.5682}$ ${0.7559}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2b) ${0.0483}$ ${0.1888}$ ${1.0304}$ ${0.0032}$ ${0.1781}$ ${0.1684}$ ${0.0088}$ ${1.1688}$ ${0.9376}$ NCS(2a) ZCA ${0.2000}$ ${1.0267}$ ${1.8947}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3a) ${0.0176}$ ${0.1166}$ ${0.2426}$ ${0.0214}$ ${0.1252}$ ${0.2598}$ ${0.0891}$ ${0.2358}$ ${0.4843}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3b) ${0}$ ${0.0159}$ ${0.0449}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0044}$ ${0.0080}$ ${0.0120}$
 L(3, 1) M(3, 1) N(3, 1) L(3, 2) M(3, 2) N(3, 2) L(3, 3) M(3, 3) N(3, 3) ZCS NCA(2a) ${0.0044}$ ${0.0168}$ ${1.2523}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${1.5682}$ ${0.7559}$ ZCS NCA(2b) ${0.0483}$ ${0.1888}$ ${1.0304}$ ${0.0032}$ ${0.1781}$ ${0.1684}$ ${0.0088}$ ${1.1688}$ ${0.9376}$ ZCS ZCA ${0.2000}$ ${1.0267}$ ${1.8947}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ZCS PCA(3a) ${0.0176}$ ${0.1166}$ ${0.2426}$ ${0.0214}$ ${0.1252}$ ${0.2598}$ ${0.0891}$ ${0.2358}$ ${0.4843}$ ZCS PCA(3b) ${0}$ ${0.0159}$ ${0.0449}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0044}$ ${0.0080}$ ${0.0120}$ PCS NCA(2a) ${0.0044}$ ${0.0168}$ ${1.2523}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${1.5682}$ ${0.7559}$ PCS NCA(2b) ${0.0483}$ ${0.1888}$ ${1.0304}$ ${0.0032}$ ${0.1781}$ ${0.1684}$ ${0.0088}$ ${1.1688}$ ${0.9376}$ PCS ZCA ${0.2000}$ ${1.0267}$ ${1.8947}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ PCS PCA(3a) ${0.0176}$ ${0.1166}$ ${0.2426}$ ${0.0214}$ ${0.1252}$ ${0.2598}$ ${0.0891}$ ${0.2358}$ ${0.4843}$ PCS PCA(3b) ${0}$ ${0.0159}$ ${0.0449}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0044}$ ${0.0080}$ ${0.0120}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2a) ${0.0044}$ ${0.0168}$ ${1.2523}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${1.5682}$ ${0.7559}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2b) ${0.0483}$ ${0.1888}$ ${1.0304}$ ${0.0032}$ ${0.1781}$ ${0.1684}$ ${0.0088}$ ${1.1688}$ ${0.9376}$ NCS(2a) ZCA ${0.2000}$ ${1.0267}$ ${1.8947}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3a) ${0.0176}$ ${0.1166}$ ${0.2426}$ ${0.0214}$ ${0.1252}$ ${0.2598}$ ${0.0891}$ ${0.2358}$ ${0.4843}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3b) ${0}$ ${0.0159}$ ${0.0449}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0}$ ${0.0044}$ ${0.0080}$ ${0.0120}$
$A_1(j, j')$ and $B_1(j, j')$
 $A (1, 1)$ $A (1, 2)$ $A(2, 1)$ $A(2, 2)$ $B(1, 1)$ B(1, 2) $B(2, 1)$ $B(2, 2)$ ZCS NCA(2a) ${0}$ ${0.3000}$ ${0}$ ${0.1000}$ ${0}$ ${0.3400}$ ${0}$ ${0.1150}$ ZCS NCA(2b) ${0}$ ${0.3000}$ ${0}$ ${0.1000}$ ${0}$ ${0.3400}$ ${0}$ ${0.1150}$ ZCS ZCA ${0}$ ${0.3000}$ ${0}$ ${0.1000}$ ${0}$ ${0.3400}$ ${0}$ ${0.1150}$ ZCS PCA(3a) ${0}$ ${0.3000}$ ${0}$ ${0.1000}$ ${0}$ ${0.3400}$ ${0}$ ${0.1150}$ ZCS PCA(3b) ${0}$ ${0.3000}$ ${0}$ ${0.1000}$ ${0}$ ${0.3400}$ ${0}$ ${0.1150}$ PCS NCA(2a) ${0.0838}$ ${0.0093}$ ${0.0784}$ ${2.0463}$ ${0.0963}$ ${0.0110}$ ${0.0974}$ ${2.3432}$ PCS NCA(2b) ${0.0838}$ ${0.0093}$ ${0.0784}$ ${2.0463}$ ${0.0963}$ ${0.0110}$ ${0.0974}$ ${2.3432}$ PCS ZCA ${0.0838}$ ${0.0093}$ ${0.0784}$ ${2.0463}$ ${0.0963}$ ${0.0110}$ ${0.0974}$ ${2.3432}$ PCS PCA(3a) ${0.0838}$ ${0.0093}$ ${0.0784}$ ${2.0463}$ ${0.0963}$ ${0.0110}$ ${0.0974}$ ${2.3432}$ PCS PCA(3b) ${0.0838}$ ${0.0093}$ ${0.0784}$ ${2.0463}$ ${0.0963}$ ${0.0110}$ ${0.0974}$ ${2.3432}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2a) ${0.3631}$ ${0.1072}$ ${0.1397}$ ${0.0389}$ ${0.4172}$ ${0.1227}$ ${0.1618}$ ${0.0453}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2b) ${0.3631}$ ${0.1072}$ ${0.1397}$ ${0.0389}$ ${0.4172}$ ${0.1227}$ ${0.1618}$ ${0.0453}$ NCS(2a) ZCA ${0.3631}$ ${0.1072}$ ${0.1397}$ ${0.0389}$ ${0.4172}$ ${0.1227}$ ${0.1618}$ ${0.0453}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3a) ${0.3631}$ ${0.1072}$ ${0.1397}$ ${0.0389}$ ${0.4172}$ ${0.1227}$ ${0.1618}$ ${0.0453}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3b) ${0.3631}$ ${0.1072}$ ${0.1397}$ ${0.0389}$ ${0.4172}$ ${0.1227}$ ${0.1618}$ ${0.0453}$
 $A (1, 1)$ $A (1, 2)$ $A(2, 1)$ $A(2, 2)$ $B(1, 1)$ B(1, 2) $B(2, 1)$ $B(2, 2)$ ZCS NCA(2a) ${0}$ ${0.3000}$ ${0}$ ${0.1000}$ ${0}$ ${0.3400}$ ${0}$ ${0.1150}$ ZCS NCA(2b) ${0}$ ${0.3000}$ ${0}$ ${0.1000}$ ${0}$ ${0.3400}$ ${0}$ ${0.1150}$ ZCS ZCA ${0}$ ${0.3000}$ ${0}$ ${0.1000}$ ${0}$ ${0.3400}$ ${0}$ ${0.1150}$ ZCS PCA(3a) ${0}$ ${0.3000}$ ${0}$ ${0.1000}$ ${0}$ ${0.3400}$ ${0}$ ${0.1150}$ ZCS PCA(3b) ${0}$ ${0.3000}$ ${0}$ ${0.1000}$ ${0}$ ${0.3400}$ ${0}$ ${0.1150}$ PCS NCA(2a) ${0.0838}$ ${0.0093}$ ${0.0784}$ ${2.0463}$ ${0.0963}$ ${0.0110}$ ${0.0974}$ ${2.3432}$ PCS NCA(2b) ${0.0838}$ ${0.0093}$ ${0.0784}$ ${2.0463}$ ${0.0963}$ ${0.0110}$ ${0.0974}$ ${2.3432}$ PCS ZCA ${0.0838}$ ${0.0093}$ ${0.0784}$ ${2.0463}$ ${0.0963}$ ${0.0110}$ ${0.0974}$ ${2.3432}$ PCS PCA(3a) ${0.0838}$ ${0.0093}$ ${0.0784}$ ${2.0463}$ ${0.0963}$ ${0.0110}$ ${0.0974}$ ${2.3432}$ PCS PCA(3b) ${0.0838}$ ${0.0093}$ ${0.0784}$ ${2.0463}$ ${0.0963}$ ${0.0110}$ ${0.0974}$ ${2.3432}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2a) ${0.3631}$ ${0.1072}$ ${0.1397}$ ${0.0389}$ ${0.4172}$ ${0.1227}$ ${0.1618}$ ${0.0453}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2b) ${0.3631}$ ${0.1072}$ ${0.1397}$ ${0.0389}$ ${0.4172}$ ${0.1227}$ ${0.1618}$ ${0.0453}$ NCS(2a) ZCA ${0.3631}$ ${0.1072}$ ${0.1397}$ ${0.0389}$ ${0.4172}$ ${0.1227}$ ${0.1618}$ ${0.0453}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3a) ${0.3631}$ ${0.1072}$ ${0.1397}$ ${0.0389}$ ${0.4172}$ ${0.1227}$ ${0.1618}$ ${0.0453}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3b) ${0.3631}$ ${0.1072}$ ${0.1397}$ ${0.0389}$ ${0.4172}$ ${0.1227}$ ${0.1618}$ ${0.0453}$
$A_2(j, j')$ and $B_2(j, j')$
 $A 2(1, 1)$ $A2 (1, 2)$ $A2(2, 1)$ $A2(2, 2)$ $B2(1, 1)$ B2(1, 2) $B2(2, 1)$ $B2(2, 2)$ ZCS NCA(2a) ${0}$ ${1.4212}$ ${0}$ ${0.4737}$ ${0}$ ${0.4599}$ ${0}$ ${0.1717}$ ZCS NCA(2b) ${0}$ ${1.1870}$ ${0}$ ${0.3957}$ ${0}$ ${0.5642}$ ${0}$ ${0.2033}$ ZCS ZCA ${0}$ ${1.9840}$ ${0}$ ${0.6613}$ ${0}$ ${1.5335}$ ${0}$ ${0.5363}$ ZCS PCA(3a) ${0}$ ${2.5277}$ ${0}$ ${0.8426}$ ${0}$ ${2.3911}$ ${0}$ ${0.8288}$ ZCS PCA(3b) ${0}$ ${3.7649}$ ${0}$ ${1.2550}$ ${0}$ ${2.9230}$ ${0}$ ${1.0221}$ PCS NCA(2a) ${0.3972}$ ${0.0441}$ ${0.3716}$ ${9.6942}$ ${0.1426}$ ${0.0197}$ ${0.2146}$ ${3.4026}$ PCS NCA(2b) ${0.3317}$ ${0.0368}$ ${0.3103}$ ${8.0964}$ ${0.1693}$ ${0.0220}$ ${0.2257}$ ${4.0690}$ PCS ZCA ${0.5544}$ ${0.0615}$ ${0.5187}$ ${13.5328}$ ${0.4477}$ ${0.0550}$ ${0.5298}$ ${10.8229}$ PCS PCA(3a) ${0.7063}$ ${0.0784}$ ${0.6608}$ ${17.2411}$ ${0.6924}$ ${0.0835}$ ${0.7879}$ ${16.7681}$ PCS PCA(3b) ${1.0521}$ ${0.1168}$ ${0.9843}$ ${25.6805}$ ${0.8533}$ ${0.1048}$ ${1.0087}$ ${20.6271}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2a) ${1.7200}$ ${0.5080}$ ${0.6618}$ ${0.1843}$ ${0.6196}$ ${0.1777}$ ${0.2529}$ ${0.0732}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2b) ${1.4365}$ ${0.4243}$ ${0.5528}$ ${0.1539}$ ${0.7351}$ ${0.2128}$ ${0.2949}$ ${0.0844}$ NCS(2a) ZCA ${2.4011}$ ${0.7091}$ ${0.9239}$ ${0.2573}$ ${1.9419}$ ${0.5664}$ ${0.7671}$ ${0.2174}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3a) ${3.0590}$ ${0.9035}$ ${1.1771}$ ${0.3278}$ ${3.0025}$ ${0.8777}$ ${1.1804}$ ${0.3335}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3b) ${4.5564}$ ${1.3457}$ ${1.7533}$ ${0.4882}$ ${3.7009}$ ${1.0794}$ ${1.4617}$ ${0.4143}$
 $A 2(1, 1)$ $A2 (1, 2)$ $A2(2, 1)$ $A2(2, 2)$ $B2(1, 1)$ B2(1, 2) $B2(2, 1)$ $B2(2, 2)$ ZCS NCA(2a) ${0}$ ${1.4212}$ ${0}$ ${0.4737}$ ${0}$ ${0.4599}$ ${0}$ ${0.1717}$ ZCS NCA(2b) ${0}$ ${1.1870}$ ${0}$ ${0.3957}$ ${0}$ ${0.5642}$ ${0}$ ${0.2033}$ ZCS ZCA ${0}$ ${1.9840}$ ${0}$ ${0.6613}$ ${0}$ ${1.5335}$ ${0}$ ${0.5363}$ ZCS PCA(3a) ${0}$ ${2.5277}$ ${0}$ ${0.8426}$ ${0}$ ${2.3911}$ ${0}$ ${0.8288}$ ZCS PCA(3b) ${0}$ ${3.7649}$ ${0}$ ${1.2550}$ ${0}$ ${2.9230}$ ${0}$ ${1.0221}$ PCS NCA(2a) ${0.3972}$ ${0.0441}$ ${0.3716}$ ${9.6942}$ ${0.1426}$ ${0.0197}$ ${0.2146}$ ${3.4026}$ PCS NCA(2b) ${0.3317}$ ${0.0368}$ ${0.3103}$ ${8.0964}$ ${0.1693}$ ${0.0220}$ ${0.2257}$ ${4.0690}$ PCS ZCA ${0.5544}$ ${0.0615}$ ${0.5187}$ ${13.5328}$ ${0.4477}$ ${0.0550}$ ${0.5298}$ ${10.8229}$ PCS PCA(3a) ${0.7063}$ ${0.0784}$ ${0.6608}$ ${17.2411}$ ${0.6924}$ ${0.0835}$ ${0.7879}$ ${16.7681}$ PCS PCA(3b) ${1.0521}$ ${0.1168}$ ${0.9843}$ ${25.6805}$ ${0.8533}$ ${0.1048}$ ${1.0087}$ ${20.6271}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2a) ${1.7200}$ ${0.5080}$ ${0.6618}$ ${0.1843}$ ${0.6196}$ ${0.1777}$ ${0.2529}$ ${0.0732}$ NCS(2a) NCA(2b) ${1.4365}$ ${0.4243}$ ${0.5528}$ ${0.1539}$ ${0.7351}$ ${0.2128}$ ${0.2949}$ ${0.0844}$ NCS(2a) ZCA ${2.4011}$ ${0.7091}$ ${0.9239}$ ${0.2573}$ ${1.9419}$ ${0.5664}$ ${0.7671}$ ${0.2174}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3a) ${3.0590}$ ${0.9035}$ ${1.1771}$ ${0.3278}$ ${3.0025}$ ${0.8777}$ ${1.1804}$ ${0.3335}$ NCS(2a) PCA(3b) ${4.5564}$ ${1.3457}$ ${1.7533}$ ${0.4882}$ ${3.7009}$ ${1.0794}$ ${1.4617}$ ${0.4143}$
 [1] Jian Zhang, Tony T. Lee, Tong Ye, Liang Huang. An approximate mean queue length formula for queueing systems with varying service rate. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 185-204. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019106 [2] Philipp Harms. Strong convergence rates for markovian representations of fractional processes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020367 [3] Hanyu Gu, Hue Chi Lam, Yakov Zinder. Planning rolling stock maintenance: Optimization of train arrival dates at a maintenance center. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020177 [4] Guangjun Shen, Xueying Wu, Xiuwei Yin. Stabilization of stochastic differential equations driven by G-Lévy process with discrete-time feedback control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (2) : 755-774. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020133 [5] Zonghong Cao, Jie Min. Selection and impact of decision mode of encroachment and retail service in a dual-channel supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020167 [6] Hui Lv, Xing'an Wang. Dissipative control for uncertain singular markovian jump systems via hybrid impulsive control. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 127-142. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020020 [7] Tong Tang, Jianzhu Sun. Local well-posedness for the density-dependent incompressible magneto-micropolar system with vacuum. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020377 [8] Angelica Pachon, Federico Polito, Costantino Ricciuti. On discrete-time semi-Markov processes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1499-1529. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020170 [9] Zsolt Saffer, Miklós Telek, Gábor Horváth. Analysis of Markov-modulated fluid polling systems with gated discipline. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 575-599. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019124 [10] Xin Zhao, Tao Feng, Liang Wang, Zhipeng Qiu. Threshold dynamics and sensitivity analysis of a stochastic semi-Markov switched SIRS epidemic model with nonlinear incidence and vaccination. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021010 [11] Jiaquan Liu, Xiangqing Liu, Zhi-Qiang Wang. Sign-changing solutions for a parameter-dependent quasilinear equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020454 [12] Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad. Oscillation criteria for kernel function dependent fractional dynamic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020443 [13] Hui Zhao, Zhengrong Liu, Yiren Chen. Global dynamics of a chemotaxis model with signal-dependent diffusion and sensitivity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021011 [14] Jean-Paul Chehab. Damping, stabilization, and numerical filtering for the modeling and the simulation of time dependent PDEs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021002 [15] Soniya Singh, Sumit Arora, Manil T. Mohan, Jaydev Dabas. Approximate controllability of second order impulsive systems with state-dependent delay in Banach spaces. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2020  doi: 10.3934/eect.2020103 [16] Wenbin Lv, Qingyuan Wang. Global existence for a class of Keller-Segel models with signal-dependent motility and general logistic term. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2021, 10 (1) : 25-36. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020040 [17] Michiyuki Watanabe. Inverse $N$-body scattering with the time-dependent hartree-fock approximation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2021002 [18] Bao Wang, Alex Lin, Penghang Yin, Wei Zhu, Andrea L. Bertozzi, Stanley J. Osher. Adversarial defense via the data-dependent activation, total variation minimization, and adversarial training. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2021, 15 (1) : 129-145. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020046 [19] Qiwei Wu, Liping Luan. Large-time behavior of solutions to unipolar Euler-Poisson equations with time-dependent damping. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021003 [20] Zongyuan Li, Weinan Wang. Norm inflation for the Boussinesq system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020353

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

## Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables