# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020109

## Optimal ordering and pricing models of a two-echelon supply chain under multipletimes ordering

 1 School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China, Springfield, MO 65801-2604, USA 2 School of Economics and Management, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an Shaanxi, 710121, China, Springfield, MO 65810, USA

* Corresponding author: Fujun Hou

Received  October 2019 Revised  February 2020 Published  June 2020

Fund Project: This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (71571019)

This paper studies ordering and pricing issues under multiple times ordering. A manufacturer and a retailer are involved in our discussion. The definition of a reasonable price is given based on the practical requirement. First, we construct a Stackelberg model in which the manufacturer and the retailer make their decisions respectively. During the process of derivation, both ordering time-points and optimal prices are expressed as functions of number of times of ordering. By solving a quadratic programming model with an undetermined parameter, we demonstrate that the optimal ordering time-points of the retailer are equidistant time points on the given selling period. Second, a cooperative model is developed in which the manufacturer and the retailer jointly make decisions. It is shown that the optimal retail price is lower and the number of times of ordering is more in the cooperative situation than the noncooperative one. Further, an allocation method based on revenue proportions is proposed.

Citation: Zhenkai Lou, Fujun Hou, Xuming Lou. Optimal ordering and pricing models of a two-echelon supply chain under multipletimes ordering. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020109
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Model parameters
 Parameters Definition [0, $T$] The given selling period $t_{i }$ The ordering time-point, where $t_{i} \in$[0, $T$] and $i \in M$, $M$ = {$1, \ldots, m$} $p_{b}$ The wholesale price determined by the manufacturer $p_{c}$ The retail price determined by the retailer $q$ The total procurement volume of the retailer $e$ The production cost per item of the manufacturer $m$ The number of times of ordering of the retailer $k$ The fixed ordering cost of each order $\lambda$ The linear price-sensitive coefficient of the demand rate $r(p_{c})$ The demand rate under price $p_{c}$: $r(p_{c}) = a$ – $\lambda p_{c}$, $a$ ¿ 0 $h$ The stock-holding cost per item per unit time $W$ The revenue of the manufacturer $Z$ The revenue of the retailer $S$ The total revenue incurred by centralized decision-making
 Parameters Definition [0, $T$] The given selling period $t_{i }$ The ordering time-point, where $t_{i} \in$[0, $T$] and $i \in M$, $M$ = {$1, \ldots, m$} $p_{b}$ The wholesale price determined by the manufacturer $p_{c}$ The retail price determined by the retailer $q$ The total procurement volume of the retailer $e$ The production cost per item of the manufacturer $m$ The number of times of ordering of the retailer $k$ The fixed ordering cost of each order $\lambda$ The linear price-sensitive coefficient of the demand rate $r(p_{c})$ The demand rate under price $p_{c}$: $r(p_{c}) = a$ – $\lambda p_{c}$, $a$ ¿ 0 $h$ The stock-holding cost per item per unit time $W$ The revenue of the manufacturer $Z$ The revenue of the retailer $S$ The total revenue incurred by centralized decision-making
 [1] Lianju Sun, Ziyou Gao, Yiju Wang. A Stackelberg game management model of the urban public transport. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (2) : 507-520. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.507 [2] Li Deng, Wenjie Bi, Haiying Liu, Kok Lay Teo. A multi-stage method for joint pricing and inventory model with promotion constrains. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (6) : 1653-1682. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020097 [3] Jui-Jung Liao, Wei-Chun Lee, Kuo-Nan Huang, Yung-Fu Huang. Optimal ordering policy for a two-warehouse inventory model use of two-level trade credit. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (4) : 1661-1683. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017012 [4] Yanju Zhou, Zhen Shen, Renren Ying, Xuanhua Xu. A loss-averse two-product ordering model with information updating in two-echelon inventory system. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (2) : 687-705. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017069 [5] Jingzhen Liu, Ka Fai Cedric Yiu, Alain Bensoussan. Ergodic control for a mean reverting inventory model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (3) : 857-876. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017079 [6] Shuren Liu, Qiying Hu, Yifan Xu. Optimal inventory control with fixed ordering cost for selling by internet auctions. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (1) : 19-40. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.19 [7] Sebastián Ferrer, Francisco Crespo. Parametric quartic Hamiltonian model. A unified treatment of classic integrable systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2014, 6 (4) : 479-502. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2014.6.479 [8] Ghendrih Philippe, Hauray Maxime, Anne Nouri. Derivation of a gyrokinetic model. Existence and uniqueness of specific stationary solution. Kinetic & Related Models, 2009, 2 (4) : 707-725. doi: 10.3934/krm.2009.2.707 [9] Xin Zhou, Liangping Shi, Bingzhi Huang. Integrated inventory model with stochastic lead time and controllable variability for milk runs. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (3) : 657-672. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.657 [10] Tao Li, Suresh P. Sethi. A review of dynamic Stackelberg game models. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (1) : 125-159. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017007 [11] Ali Naimi Sadigh, S. Kamal Chaharsooghi, Majid Sheikhmohammady. A game theoretic approach to coordination of pricing, advertising, and inventory decisions in a competitive supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (1) : 337-355. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.337 [12] Semu Mitiku Kassa. Three-level global resource allocation model for HIV control: A hierarchical decision system approach. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (1) : 255-273. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018011 [13] Yeong-Cheng Liou, Siegfried Schaible, Jen-Chih Yao. Supply chain inventory management via a Stackelberg equilibrium. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2006, 2 (1) : 81-94. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.81 [14] Qing-you Yan, Juan-bo Li, Ju-liang Zhang. Licensing schemes in Stackelberg model under asymmetric information of product costs. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (4) : 763-774. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.763 [15] Zhimin Zhang. On a risk model with randomized dividend-decision times. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (4) : 1041-1058. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.1041 [16] Faker Ben Belgacem. Uniqueness for an ill-posed reaction-dispersion model. Application to organic pollution in stream-waters. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (2) : 163-181. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.163 [17] Mohsen Lashgari, Ata Allah Taleizadeh, Shib Sankar Sana. An inventory control problem for deteriorating items with back-ordering and financial considerations under two levels of trade credit linked to order quantity. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (3) : 1091-1119. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1091 [18] Vincent Choudri, Mathiyazhgan Venkatachalam, Sethuraman Panayappan. Production inventory model with deteriorating items, two rates of production cost and taking account of time value of money. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (3) : 1153-1172. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1153 [19] Cheng-Kang Chen, Yi-Xiang Liao. A deteriorating inventory model for an intermediary firm under return on inventory investment maximization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (4) : 989-1000. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.989 [20] Baojun Bian, Nan Wu, Harry Zheng. Optimal liquidation in a finite time regime switching model with permanent and temporary pricing impact. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (5) : 1401-1420. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016002

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

## Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables