# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020152

## A self adaptive inertial algorithm for solving split variational inclusion and fixed point problems with applications

 School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

* Corresponding author: Oluwatosin Temitope Mewomo

Received  November 2019 Revised  March 2020 Published  October 2020

We propose a general iterative scheme with inertial term and self-adaptive stepsize for approximating a common solution of Split Variational Inclusion Problem (SVIP) and Fixed Point Problem (FPP) for a quasi-nonexpansive mapping in real Hilbert spaces. We prove that our iterative scheme converges strongly to a common solution of SVIP and FPP for a quasi-nonexpansive mapping, which is also a solution of a certain optimization problem related to a strongly positive bounded linear operator. We apply our proposed algorithm to the problem of finding an equilibrium point with minimal cost of production for a model in industrial electricity production. Numerical results are presented to demonstrate the efficiency of our algorithm in comparison with some other existing algorithms in the literature.

Citation: Timilehin Opeyemi Alakoya, Lateef Olakunle Jolaoso, Oluwatosin Temitope Mewomo. A self adaptive inertial algorithm for solving split variational inclusion and fixed point problems with applications. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020152
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Example 5.1, Top Left: $N = 50$; Top Left: $N = 100$; Bottom Left: $N = 500$; Bottom Right: $N = 1000$
Example 5.2, Top Left: Case I; Top Left: Case II; Bottom Left: Case III; Bottom Right: Case IV
Example 5.3, Top Left: Choice (i); Top Left: Choice (ii); Bottom Left: Choice (iii); Bottom Right: Choice (iv)
Numerical results for Example 5.1
 No of Iteration CPU time (sec) $N= 50$ 19 0.0289 $N=100$ 19 0.0386 $N=500$ 41 0.1386 $N=1000$ 138 0.3523
 No of Iteration CPU time (sec) $N= 50$ 19 0.0289 $N=100$ 19 0.0386 $N=500$ 41 0.1386 $N=1000$ 138 0.3523
Numerical results for Example 5.2
 Algorithm 3.1 Algorithm 1.1 Algorithm 1.2 Case I CPU time (sec) 0.0021 0.0071 0.0036 $x_0 = 1, x_1 = 0.5$ No of Iter. 8 22 16 Case II CPU time (sec) 0.0021 0.0041 0.0047 $x_0 = -0.5, x_1 = 2$ No. of Iter. 9 25 17 Case III CPU time (sec) 0.0044 0.0532 0.0095 $x_0 = 5, x_1 = 10$ No of Iter. 10 28 19 Case IV CPU time (sec) 0.0062 0.0589 0.0071 $x_0 = -5, x_1 = 2$ No of Iter. 10 27 19
 Algorithm 3.1 Algorithm 1.1 Algorithm 1.2 Case I CPU time (sec) 0.0021 0.0071 0.0036 $x_0 = 1, x_1 = 0.5$ No of Iter. 8 22 16 Case II CPU time (sec) 0.0021 0.0041 0.0047 $x_0 = -0.5, x_1 = 2$ No. of Iter. 9 25 17 Case III CPU time (sec) 0.0044 0.0532 0.0095 $x_0 = 5, x_1 = 10$ No of Iter. 10 28 19 Case IV CPU time (sec) 0.0062 0.0589 0.0071 $x_0 = -5, x_1 = 2$ No of Iter. 10 27 19
Numerical results for Example 5.3
 Algorithm 3.1 Algorithm 1.1 Choice (i) CPU time (sec) 1.7859 5.1231 No of Iter. 11 23 Choice (ii) CPU time (sec) 1.4997 13.3981 No. of Iter. 13 27 Choice (iii) CPU time (sec) 2.6789 9.1093 No of Iter. 7 12 Choice (iv) CPU time (sec) 6.3222 24.5622 No of Iter. 11 24
 Algorithm 3.1 Algorithm 1.1 Choice (i) CPU time (sec) 1.7859 5.1231 No of Iter. 11 23 Choice (ii) CPU time (sec) 1.4997 13.3981 No. of Iter. 13 27 Choice (iii) CPU time (sec) 2.6789 9.1093 No of Iter. 7 12 Choice (iv) CPU time (sec) 6.3222 24.5622 No of Iter. 11 24
 [1] Xue-Ping Luo, Yi-Bin Xiao, Wei Li. Strict feasibility of variational inclusion problems in reflexive Banach spaces. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (5) : 2495-2502. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019065 [2] Sergi Simon. Linearised higher variational equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (11) : 4827-4854. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4827 [3] Guo-Bao Zhang, Ruyun Ma, Xue-Shi Li. Traveling waves of a Lotka-Volterra strong competition system with nonlocal dispersal. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (2) : 587-608. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018035 [4] Gheorghe Craciun, Abhishek Deshpande, Hyejin Jenny Yeon. Quasi-toric differential inclusions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2343-2359. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020181 [5] Livia Betz, Irwin Yousept. Optimal control of elliptic variational inequalities with bounded and unbounded operators. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021009 [6] Chaoqian Li, Yajun Liu, Yaotang Li. Note on $Z$-eigenvalue inclusion theorems for tensors. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 687-693. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019129 [7] Mansour Shrahili, Ravi Shanker Dubey, Ahmed Shafay. Inclusion of fading memory to Banister model of changes in physical condition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020, 13 (3) : 881-888. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020051 [8] J. Frédéric Bonnans, Justina Gianatti, Francisco J. Silva. On the convergence of the Sakawa-Shindo algorithm in stochastic control. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2016, 6 (3) : 391-406. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2016008 [9] Fernando P. da Costa, João T. Pinto, Rafael Sasportes. On the convergence to critical scaling profiles in submonolayer deposition models. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (6) : 1359-1376. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018053 [10] Alberto Bressan, Carlotta Donadello. On the convergence of viscous approximations after shock interactions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 29-48. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.29 [11] Caifang Wang, Tie Zhou. The order of convergence for Landweber Scheme with $\alpha,\beta$-rule. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (1) : 133-146. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.133 [12] Zhigang Pan, Chanh Kieu, Quan Wang. Hopf bifurcations and transitions of two-dimensional Quasi-Geostrophic flows. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021025 [13] Ka Luen Cheung, Man Chun Leung. Asymptotic behavior of positive solutions of the equation $\Delta u + K u^{\frac{n+2}{n-2}} = 0$ in $IR^n$ and positive scalar curvature. Conference Publications, 2001, 2001 (Special) : 109-120. doi: 10.3934/proc.2001.2001.109 [14] Jiangxing Wang. Convergence analysis of an accurate and efficient method for nonlinear Maxwell's equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2429-2440. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020185 [15] Zengyun Wang, Jinde Cao, Zuowei Cai, Lihong Huang. Finite-time stability of impulsive differential inclusion: Applications to discontinuous impulsive neural networks. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2677-2692. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020200 [16] Misha Bialy, Andrey E. Mironov. Rich quasi-linear system for integrable geodesic flows on 2-torus. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2011, 29 (1) : 81-90. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.81 [17] Marion Darbas, Jérémy Heleine, Stephanie Lohrengel. Numerical resolution by the quasi-reversibility method of a data completion problem for Maxwell's equations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 1107-1133. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020056 [18] Xiaoming Wang. Quasi-periodic solutions for a class of second order differential equations with a nonlinear damping term. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (3) : 543-556. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017027 [19] Bin Pei, Yong Xu, Yuzhen Bai. Convergence of p-th mean in an averaging principle for stochastic partial differential equations driven by fractional Brownian motion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (3) : 1141-1158. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019213 [20] Haibo Cui, Haiyan Yin. Convergence rate of solutions toward stationary solutions to the isentropic micropolar fluid model in a half line. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020210

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

## Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables