# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
An efficient genetic algorithm for decentralized multi-project scheduling with resource transfers
• JIMO Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Approach to the consistency and consensus of Pythagorean fuzzy preference relations based on their partial orders in group decision making
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020152

## A self adaptive inertial algorithm for solving split variational inclusion and fixed point problems with applications

 School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

* Corresponding author: Oluwatosin Temitope Mewomo

Received  November 2019 Revised  March 2020 Published  October 2020

We propose a general iterative scheme with inertial term and self-adaptive stepsize for approximating a common solution of Split Variational Inclusion Problem (SVIP) and Fixed Point Problem (FPP) for a quasi-nonexpansive mapping in real Hilbert spaces. We prove that our iterative scheme converges strongly to a common solution of SVIP and FPP for a quasi-nonexpansive mapping, which is also a solution of a certain optimization problem related to a strongly positive bounded linear operator. We apply our proposed algorithm to the problem of finding an equilibrium point with minimal cost of production for a model in industrial electricity production. Numerical results are presented to demonstrate the efficiency of our algorithm in comparison with some other existing algorithms in the literature.

Citation: Timilehin Opeyemi Alakoya, Lateef Olakunle Jolaoso, Oluwatosin Temitope Mewomo. A self adaptive inertial algorithm for solving split variational inclusion and fixed point problems with applications. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020152
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Example 5.1, Top Left: $N = 50$; Top Left: $N = 100$; Bottom Left: $N = 500$; Bottom Right: $N = 1000$
Example 5.2, Top Left: Case I; Top Left: Case II; Bottom Left: Case III; Bottom Right: Case IV
Example 5.3, Top Left: Choice (i); Top Left: Choice (ii); Bottom Left: Choice (iii); Bottom Right: Choice (iv)
Numerical results for Example 5.1
 No of Iteration CPU time (sec) $N= 50$ 19 0.0289 $N=100$ 19 0.0386 $N=500$ 41 0.1386 $N=1000$ 138 0.3523
 No of Iteration CPU time (sec) $N= 50$ 19 0.0289 $N=100$ 19 0.0386 $N=500$ 41 0.1386 $N=1000$ 138 0.3523
Numerical results for Example 5.2
 Algorithm 3.1 Algorithm 1.1 Algorithm 1.2 Case I CPU time (sec) 0.0021 0.0071 0.0036 $x_0 = 1, x_1 = 0.5$ No of Iter. 8 22 16 Case II CPU time (sec) 0.0021 0.0041 0.0047 $x_0 = -0.5, x_1 = 2$ No. of Iter. 9 25 17 Case III CPU time (sec) 0.0044 0.0532 0.0095 $x_0 = 5, x_1 = 10$ No of Iter. 10 28 19 Case IV CPU time (sec) 0.0062 0.0589 0.0071 $x_0 = -5, x_1 = 2$ No of Iter. 10 27 19
 Algorithm 3.1 Algorithm 1.1 Algorithm 1.2 Case I CPU time (sec) 0.0021 0.0071 0.0036 $x_0 = 1, x_1 = 0.5$ No of Iter. 8 22 16 Case II CPU time (sec) 0.0021 0.0041 0.0047 $x_0 = -0.5, x_1 = 2$ No. of Iter. 9 25 17 Case III CPU time (sec) 0.0044 0.0532 0.0095 $x_0 = 5, x_1 = 10$ No of Iter. 10 28 19 Case IV CPU time (sec) 0.0062 0.0589 0.0071 $x_0 = -5, x_1 = 2$ No of Iter. 10 27 19
Numerical results for Example 5.3
 Algorithm 3.1 Algorithm 1.1 Choice (i) CPU time (sec) 1.7859 5.1231 No of Iter. 11 23 Choice (ii) CPU time (sec) 1.4997 13.3981 No. of Iter. 13 27 Choice (iii) CPU time (sec) 2.6789 9.1093 No of Iter. 7 12 Choice (iv) CPU time (sec) 6.3222 24.5622 No of Iter. 11 24
 Algorithm 3.1 Algorithm 1.1 Choice (i) CPU time (sec) 1.7859 5.1231 No of Iter. 11 23 Choice (ii) CPU time (sec) 1.4997 13.3981 No. of Iter. 13 27 Choice (iii) CPU time (sec) 2.6789 9.1093 No of Iter. 7 12 Choice (iv) CPU time (sec) 6.3222 24.5622 No of Iter. 11 24
 [1] Zuliang Lu, Fei Huang, Xiankui Wu, Lin Li, Shang Liu. Convergence and quasi-optimality of $L^2-$norms based an adaptive finite element method for nonlinear optimal control problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1459-1486. doi: 10.3934/era.2020077 [2] Thierry Horsin, Mohamed Ali Jendoubi. On the convergence to equilibria of a sequence defined by an implicit scheme. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020465 [3] Zhilei Liang, Jiangyu Shuai. Existence of strong solution for the Cauchy problem of fully compressible Navier-Stokes equations in two dimensions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020348 [4] Lingfeng Li, Shousheng Luo, Xue-Cheng Tai, Jiang Yang. A new variational approach based on level-set function for convex hull problem with outliers. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020070 [5] Parikshit Upadhyaya, Elias Jarlebring, Emanuel H. Rubensson. A density matrix approach to the convergence of the self-consistent field iteration. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 99-115. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020018 [6] Guido Cavallaro, Roberto Garra, Carlo Marchioro. Long time localization of modified surface quasi-geostrophic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020336 [7] Gunther Uhlmann, Jian Zhai. Inverse problems for nonlinear hyperbolic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 455-469. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020380 [8] Monia Capanna, Jean C. Nakasato, Marcone C. Pereira, Julio D. Rossi. Homogenization for nonlocal problems with smooth kernels. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020385 [9] Marion Darbas, Jérémy Heleine, Stephanie Lohrengel. Numerical resolution by the quasi-reversibility method of a data completion problem for Maxwell's equations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 1107-1133. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020056 [10] Wenmeng Geng, Kai Tao. Large deviation theorems for dirichlet determinants of analytic quasi-periodic jacobi operators with Brjuno-Rüssmann frequency. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5305-5335. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020240 [11] Vieri Benci, Sunra Mosconi, Marco Squassina. Preface: Applications of mathematical analysis to problems in theoretical physics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020446 [12] Lars Grüne, Matthias A. Müller, Christopher M. Kellett, Steven R. Weller. Strict dissipativity for discrete time discounted optimal control problems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020046 [13] Shiqiu Fu, Kanishka Perera. On a class of semipositone problems with singular Trudinger-Moser nonlinearities. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020452 [14] Zhiyan Ding, Qin Li, Jianfeng Lu. Ensemble Kalman Inversion for nonlinear problems: Weights, consistency, and variance bounds. Foundations of Data Science, 2020  doi: 10.3934/fods.2020018 [15] Yi-Hsuan Lin, Gen Nakamura, Roland Potthast, Haibing Wang. Duality between range and no-response tests and its application for inverse problems. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020072 [16] Giuseppina Guatteri, Federica Masiero. Stochastic maximum principle for problems with delay with dependence on the past through general measures. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020048 [17] Kha Van Huynh, Barbara Kaltenbacher. Some application examples of minimization based formulations of inverse problems and their regularization. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020074 [18] Antoine Benoit. Weak well-posedness of hyperbolic boundary value problems in a strip: when instabilities do not reflect the geometry. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (12) : 5475-5486. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020248 [19] Shasha Hu, Yihong Xu, Yuhan Zhang. Second-Order characterizations for set-valued equilibrium problems with variable ordering structures. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020164 [20] Anna Canale, Francesco Pappalardo, Ciro Tarantino. Weighted multipolar Hardy inequalities and evolution problems with Kolmogorov operators perturbed by singular potentials. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020274

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

## Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables