doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020154

Modelling and computation of optimal multiple investment timing in multi-stage capacity expansion infrastructure projects

1. 

Department of Mathematics, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China

2. 

Coordinated Innovation Center for Computable Modeling in Management Science, Tianjin University of Finance and Economics, Tianjin 300222, China

* Corresponding author: Jinghuan Li

Received  January 2020 Revised  August 2020 Published  October 2020

Fund Project: This project was supported by the Scientific Research Plan of Tianjin Municipal Education Commission (2017SK076)

So far, the optimal investment timing to maximize the total profit of multi-stage capacity expansion infrastructure projects is not clear. In the case of uncertain demands, the optimal multiple stopping time theory is adopted to model the optimal decision-making of investment timing for multi-stage expansion infrastructure projects in a finite time horizon. In this context, the first-stage of the project involves a dedicated asset investment for later expansion, and the capacity of the project at each stage is constrained, which makes the cash flow of the project exhibit the characteristic of bull call spread. The upwind finite difference method and multi-least squares Monte Carlo simulation are combined to solve the project value and determine the optimal exercise boundaries at all stages described by a sequence of demand thresholds. A multi-stage power plant project is taken as an example to validate the model. Through the example, the optimal investment strategies and the value of the multi-stage project are provided; the effects of the dedicated asset and capacity constraint are illustrated. This study novelly reveals the effect of the capacity constraints on the project value using the bull call spread theory.

Citation: Jinghuan Li, Shuhua Zhang, Yu Li. Modelling and computation of optimal multiple investment timing in multi-stage capacity expansion infrastructure projects. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020154
References:
[1]

L. E. Brandao and E. Saraiva, The option value of government guarantees in infrastructure projects, Constr. Manage. Econ., 26 (2008), 1171-1180.  doi: 10.1080/01446190802428051.  Google Scholar

[2]

G. CortazarM. Gravet and J. Urzua, The valuation of multidimensional American real options using the LSM simulation method, Comput. Oper. Res., 35 (2008), 113-129.  doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.02.016.  Google Scholar

[3]

E. Dahlgren and T. Leung, An optimal multiple stopping approach to infrastructure investment decisions, J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 53 (2015), 251-267.  doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2015.02.001.  Google Scholar

[4]

T. Dangl, Investment and capacity choice under uncertain demand, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 117 (1999), 415-428.  doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00274-4.  Google Scholar

[5]

R. De NeufvilleS. Scholtes and T. Wang, Real options by spreadsheet: Parking garage case example, J. Infrastruct. Syst., 12 (2006), 107-111.  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:2(107).  Google Scholar

[6] A. K. Dixit and R. S. Pindyck, Investment under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994.  doi: 10.1515/9781400830176.  Google Scholar
[7]

P. Doan and K. Menyah, Impact of irreversibility and uncertainty on the timing of infrastructure projects, J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 139 (2013), 331-338.  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000615.  Google Scholar

[8]

U. Dörr, Valuation of Swing Options and Examination of Exercise Strategies by Monte Carlo Techniques, Master Dissertation, Christ Church College, University of Oxford, 2003. Google Scholar

[9]

C. F. Fisher, J. S. Paik and W. R. Schriver, Power Plant Economy of Scale and Cost Trends-Further Analyses and Review of Empirical Studies, University of Tennessee, 1986. doi: 10.2172/5508075.  Google Scholar

[10]

B. FlyvbjergM. Holm and S. Buhl, How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects?, Transp. Rev., 23 (2003), 71-88.   Google Scholar

[11]

C. C. Gkochari, Optimal investment timing in the dry bulk shipping sector, Transp. Res. Part E, 79 (2015), 102-109.  doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2015.02.018.  Google Scholar

[12]

K. C. Han and A. Heinemann, A bull call spread as a strategy for small investors, J. of Pers. Fin., 6 (2008), 108-127.   Google Scholar

[13]

H. B. Herath and C. Park, Multi-stage capital unvestment opportunities as compound real options, Eng. Econ., 47 (2002), 1-27.  doi: 10.1080/00137910208965021.  Google Scholar

[14]

Y. L. Huang and C. C. Pi, Valuation of multi-stage BOT projects involving dedicated asset investments: A sequential compound option approach, Constr. Manage. Econ., 27 (2009), 653-666.  doi: 10.1080/01446190903002789.  Google Scholar

[15]

B. Klein and K. B. Leffler, The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance, J. Polit. Econ., 89 (1981), 615-641.  doi: 10.1086/260996.  Google Scholar

[16]

N. A. Kr$\mathrm{\ddot{u}}$ger, To kill a real option - Incomplete contracts, real options and PPP, Transp. Res. Part A, 46 (2012), 1359-1371.  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.009.  Google Scholar

[17]

Y. LaiZ. Li and Y. Zeng, Control variate methods and applications to Asian and basket options pricing under jump-diffusion models, IMA J. Manage. Math., 26 (2015), 11-37.  doi: 10.1093/imaman/dpt016.  Google Scholar

[18]

J. LiY. Li and S. Zhang, Optimal expansion timing decisions in multi-stage PPP projects involving dedicated asset and government subsidies, J. Ind. Manage. Optim., 16 (2020), 2065-2086.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019043.  Google Scholar

[19]

Y. P. Lin, Upwind finite difference schemes for linear conservation law with memory, Numer. Meth. Part. Diff. Equ., 10 (1994), 475-489.  doi: 10.1002/num.1690100406.  Google Scholar

[20]

F. A. Longstaff and E. S. Schwartz, Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least squares approach, Rev. Financ. Stud., 14 (2001), 113-147.  doi: 10.1093/rfs/14.1.113.  Google Scholar

[21]

E. LukasS. Mölls and A. Welling, Venture capital, staged financing and optimal funding policies under uncertainty, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 250 (2016), 305-313.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.051.  Google Scholar

[22]

J. MartinsR. C. Marques and C. O. Cruz, Maximizing the value for money of PPP arrangements through flexibility: An application to airports, J. Air Transp. Manage., 39 (2014), 72-80.  doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.04.003.  Google Scholar

[23]

M. Marzouk and M. Ali, Mitigating risks in wastewater treatment plant PPPs using minimum revenue guarantee and real options, Util. Policy, 53 (2018), 121-133.  doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2018.06.012.  Google Scholar

[24]

J. Paslawski, Flexible approach for construction process management under risk and uncertaity, Proc. Eng., 208 (2017), 114-124.  doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.028.  Google Scholar

[25]

P. C. Pendharkar, Valuing interdependent multi-stage IT investments: A real options approach, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 201 (2010), 847-859.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.037.  Google Scholar

[26]

A. M. P. SantosJ. P. Mendes and C. Guedes Soares, A dynamic model for marginal cost pricing of port infrastructures, Marit. Policy Manage., 43 (2016), 812-829.  doi: 10.1080/03088839.2016.1152404.  Google Scholar

[27]

N. SongY. XieW. Ching and et al., A real option approach for investment opportunity valuation, J. Ind. Manage. Optim., 13 (2017), 1213-1235.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016069.  Google Scholar

[28]

Z. Tan and H. Yang, Flexible build-operate-transfer contracts for road franchising under demand uncertainty, Transp. Res. Part B, 46 (2012), 1419-1439.  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.07.001.  Google Scholar

[29]

S. WangL. S. Jennings and K. L. Teo, An upwind finite-difference method for the approximation of viscosity solutions to Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations, IMA J. Math. Control Inf., 17 (2000), 167-178.  doi: 10.1093/imamci/17.2.167.  Google Scholar

[30] O. E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, The Free Press, New York, 1985.   Google Scholar
[31]

T. Zhao and C. L. Tseng, Valuing flexibility in infrastructure expansion, J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9 (2003), 89-97.  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2003)9:3(89).  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

L. E. Brandao and E. Saraiva, The option value of government guarantees in infrastructure projects, Constr. Manage. Econ., 26 (2008), 1171-1180.  doi: 10.1080/01446190802428051.  Google Scholar

[2]

G. CortazarM. Gravet and J. Urzua, The valuation of multidimensional American real options using the LSM simulation method, Comput. Oper. Res., 35 (2008), 113-129.  doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2006.02.016.  Google Scholar

[3]

E. Dahlgren and T. Leung, An optimal multiple stopping approach to infrastructure investment decisions, J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 53 (2015), 251-267.  doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2015.02.001.  Google Scholar

[4]

T. Dangl, Investment and capacity choice under uncertain demand, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 117 (1999), 415-428.  doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00274-4.  Google Scholar

[5]

R. De NeufvilleS. Scholtes and T. Wang, Real options by spreadsheet: Parking garage case example, J. Infrastruct. Syst., 12 (2006), 107-111.  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:2(107).  Google Scholar

[6] A. K. Dixit and R. S. Pindyck, Investment under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994.  doi: 10.1515/9781400830176.  Google Scholar
[7]

P. Doan and K. Menyah, Impact of irreversibility and uncertainty on the timing of infrastructure projects, J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 139 (2013), 331-338.  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000615.  Google Scholar

[8]

U. Dörr, Valuation of Swing Options and Examination of Exercise Strategies by Monte Carlo Techniques, Master Dissertation, Christ Church College, University of Oxford, 2003. Google Scholar

[9]

C. F. Fisher, J. S. Paik and W. R. Schriver, Power Plant Economy of Scale and Cost Trends-Further Analyses and Review of Empirical Studies, University of Tennessee, 1986. doi: 10.2172/5508075.  Google Scholar

[10]

B. FlyvbjergM. Holm and S. Buhl, How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects?, Transp. Rev., 23 (2003), 71-88.   Google Scholar

[11]

C. C. Gkochari, Optimal investment timing in the dry bulk shipping sector, Transp. Res. Part E, 79 (2015), 102-109.  doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2015.02.018.  Google Scholar

[12]

K. C. Han and A. Heinemann, A bull call spread as a strategy for small investors, J. of Pers. Fin., 6 (2008), 108-127.   Google Scholar

[13]

H. B. Herath and C. Park, Multi-stage capital unvestment opportunities as compound real options, Eng. Econ., 47 (2002), 1-27.  doi: 10.1080/00137910208965021.  Google Scholar

[14]

Y. L. Huang and C. C. Pi, Valuation of multi-stage BOT projects involving dedicated asset investments: A sequential compound option approach, Constr. Manage. Econ., 27 (2009), 653-666.  doi: 10.1080/01446190903002789.  Google Scholar

[15]

B. Klein and K. B. Leffler, The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance, J. Polit. Econ., 89 (1981), 615-641.  doi: 10.1086/260996.  Google Scholar

[16]

N. A. Kr$\mathrm{\ddot{u}}$ger, To kill a real option - Incomplete contracts, real options and PPP, Transp. Res. Part A, 46 (2012), 1359-1371.  doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.009.  Google Scholar

[17]

Y. LaiZ. Li and Y. Zeng, Control variate methods and applications to Asian and basket options pricing under jump-diffusion models, IMA J. Manage. Math., 26 (2015), 11-37.  doi: 10.1093/imaman/dpt016.  Google Scholar

[18]

J. LiY. Li and S. Zhang, Optimal expansion timing decisions in multi-stage PPP projects involving dedicated asset and government subsidies, J. Ind. Manage. Optim., 16 (2020), 2065-2086.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019043.  Google Scholar

[19]

Y. P. Lin, Upwind finite difference schemes for linear conservation law with memory, Numer. Meth. Part. Diff. Equ., 10 (1994), 475-489.  doi: 10.1002/num.1690100406.  Google Scholar

[20]

F. A. Longstaff and E. S. Schwartz, Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least squares approach, Rev. Financ. Stud., 14 (2001), 113-147.  doi: 10.1093/rfs/14.1.113.  Google Scholar

[21]

E. LukasS. Mölls and A. Welling, Venture capital, staged financing and optimal funding policies under uncertainty, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 250 (2016), 305-313.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.10.051.  Google Scholar

[22]

J. MartinsR. C. Marques and C. O. Cruz, Maximizing the value for money of PPP arrangements through flexibility: An application to airports, J. Air Transp. Manage., 39 (2014), 72-80.  doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.04.003.  Google Scholar

[23]

M. Marzouk and M. Ali, Mitigating risks in wastewater treatment plant PPPs using minimum revenue guarantee and real options, Util. Policy, 53 (2018), 121-133.  doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2018.06.012.  Google Scholar

[24]

J. Paslawski, Flexible approach for construction process management under risk and uncertaity, Proc. Eng., 208 (2017), 114-124.  doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.028.  Google Scholar

[25]

P. C. Pendharkar, Valuing interdependent multi-stage IT investments: A real options approach, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 201 (2010), 847-859.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.03.037.  Google Scholar

[26]

A. M. P. SantosJ. P. Mendes and C. Guedes Soares, A dynamic model for marginal cost pricing of port infrastructures, Marit. Policy Manage., 43 (2016), 812-829.  doi: 10.1080/03088839.2016.1152404.  Google Scholar

[27]

N. SongY. XieW. Ching and et al., A real option approach for investment opportunity valuation, J. Ind. Manage. Optim., 13 (2017), 1213-1235.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016069.  Google Scholar

[28]

Z. Tan and H. Yang, Flexible build-operate-transfer contracts for road franchising under demand uncertainty, Transp. Res. Part B, 46 (2012), 1419-1439.  doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.07.001.  Google Scholar

[29]

S. WangL. S. Jennings and K. L. Teo, An upwind finite-difference method for the approximation of viscosity solutions to Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations, IMA J. Math. Control Inf., 17 (2000), 167-178.  doi: 10.1093/imamci/17.2.167.  Google Scholar

[30] O. E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, The Free Press, New York, 1985.   Google Scholar
[31]

T. Zhao and C. L. Tseng, Valuing flexibility in infrastructure expansion, J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9 (2003), 89-97.  doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2003)9:3(89).  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  The operation load of the $ i $-th stage project
Figure 2.  The comparisons between multi-stage and single period investments
Figure 3.  The distribution of investment times from one million sample path
Figure 4.  The optimal exercise boundaries for the i-th investment
Figure 5.  The influences of the dedicated asset ratio
Figure 6.  The net revenue of the i-th stage project for different demand levels
Figure 7.  The impacts of the demand volatility on the project value
Table 1.  Default parameters used in the calculations
Parameter Symbol Value Unit
Investment period $ T $ 10 Year
Planned investment times $ N $ 3 time
Construction period $ \nu $ 1.5 Year
Refraction time $ \delta $ 2 Year
Capacity of i-th stage $ m_{i} $ $ 6\times10^{4} $ MW$ \cdot $h/year
Unit price $ p $ $ 5\times10^{-4} $ million CNY/MW$ \cdot $h
Unit operational cost $ c $ $ 4\times10^{-5} $ million CNY/MW$ \cdot $h
Construction cost parameter $ \lambda $ $ 1\times10^{-2} $ million CNY/MW$ \cdot $h
Construction cost parameter $ \beta $ 0.9
Drift $ \alpha $ 6%
Volatility rate $ \sigma $ 15%
Discount rate $ r $ 8%
Dedicated asset ratio $ \eta $ 0.1
Parameter Symbol Value Unit
Investment period $ T $ 10 Year
Planned investment times $ N $ 3 time
Construction period $ \nu $ 1.5 Year
Refraction time $ \delta $ 2 Year
Capacity of i-th stage $ m_{i} $ $ 6\times10^{4} $ MW$ \cdot $h/year
Unit price $ p $ $ 5\times10^{-4} $ million CNY/MW$ \cdot $h
Unit operational cost $ c $ $ 4\times10^{-5} $ million CNY/MW$ \cdot $h
Construction cost parameter $ \lambda $ $ 1\times10^{-2} $ million CNY/MW$ \cdot $h
Construction cost parameter $ \beta $ 0.9
Drift $ \alpha $ 6%
Volatility rate $ \sigma $ 15%
Discount rate $ r $ 8%
Dedicated asset ratio $ \eta $ 0.1
[1]

Hirokazu Ninomiya. Entire solutions of the Allen–Cahn–Nagumo equation in a multi-dimensional space. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 395-412. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020364

[2]

Xuefei He, Kun Wang, Liwei Xu. Efficient finite difference methods for the nonlinear Helmholtz equation in Kerr medium. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1503-1528. doi: 10.3934/era.2020079

[3]

Anton A. Kutsenko. Isomorphism between one-Dimensional and multidimensional finite difference operators. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020270

[4]

Tommi Brander, Joonas Ilmavirta, Petteri Piiroinen, Teemu Tyni. Optimal recovery of a radiating source with multiple frequencies along one line. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 967-983. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020044

[5]

A. M. Elaiw, N. H. AlShamrani, A. Abdel-Aty, H. Dutta. Stability analysis of a general HIV dynamics model with multi-stages of infected cells and two routes of infection. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020441

[6]

Lars Grüne, Matthias A. Müller, Christopher M. Kellett, Steven R. Weller. Strict dissipativity for discrete time discounted optimal control problems. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2020  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2020046

[7]

Zuliang Lu, Fei Huang, Xiankui Wu, Lin Li, Shang Liu. Convergence and quasi-optimality of $ L^2- $norms based an adaptive finite element method for nonlinear optimal control problems. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1459-1486. doi: 10.3934/era.2020077

[8]

Hua Chen, Yawei Wei. Multiple solutions for nonlinear cone degenerate elliptic equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020272

[9]

Omid Nikan, Seyedeh Mahboubeh Molavi-Arabshai, Hossein Jafari. Numerical simulation of the nonlinear fractional regularized long-wave model arising in ion acoustic plasma waves. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020466

[10]

Sihem Guerarra. Maximum and minimum ranks and inertias of the Hermitian parts of the least rank solution of the matrix equation AXB = C. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 75-86. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020016

[11]

José Madrid, João P. G. Ramos. On optimal autocorrelation inequalities on the real line. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020271

[12]

Hong Niu, Zhijiang Feng, Qijin Xiao, Yajun Zhang. A PID control method based on optimal control strategy. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 117-126. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020019

[13]

Yue Feng, Yujie Liu, Ruishu Wang, Shangyou Zhang. A conforming discontinuous Galerkin finite element method on rectangular partitions. Electronic Research Archive, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/era.2020120

[14]

Gang Bao, Mingming Zhang, Bin Hu, Peijun Li. An adaptive finite element DtN method for the three-dimensional acoustic scattering problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020351

[15]

Serena Dipierro, Benedetta Pellacci, Enrico Valdinoci, Gianmaria Verzini. Time-fractional equations with reaction terms: Fundamental solutions and asymptotics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2021, 41 (1) : 257-275. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020137

[16]

Guido Cavallaro, Roberto Garra, Carlo Marchioro. Long time localization of modified surface quasi-geostrophic equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020336

[17]

Cuicui Li, Lin Zhou, Zhidong Teng, Buyu Wen. The threshold dynamics of a discrete-time echinococcosis transmission model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020339

[18]

Awais Younus, Zoubia Dastgeer, Nudrat Ishaq, Abdul Ghaffar, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Devendra Kumar. On the observability of conformable linear time-invariant control systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020444

[19]

Yongge Tian, Pengyang Xie. Simultaneous optimal predictions under two seemingly unrelated linear random-effects models. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020168

[20]

Youming Guo, Tingting Li. Optimal control strategies for an online game addiction model with low and high risk exposure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020347

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]