# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Bregman subgradient extragradient method with monotone self-adjustment stepsize for solving pseudo-monotone variational inequalities and fixed point problems
• JIMO Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Effect of reliability on varying demand and holding cost on inventory system incorporating probabilistic deterioration
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020155

## Preannouncement strategy of platform-type new product for competing platforms: Technical or marketing information

 1 Center for Behavioral Decision and Control, School of Management and Engineering, Nanjing University, Hankou Road 22, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210093, China 2 School of Business, Jiangsu Open University, Jiangdong North Road 399, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210036, China

* Corresponding author: Tiaojun Xiao

Received  March 2020 Revised  July 2020 Published  October 2020

Fund Project: This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71871112) and Jiangsu province's "333 project" training funding project (No. BRA2019040)

What message should be released to consumers and developers is an important part of the preannouncement strategy of platforms' new product. From the perspectives of consumers and developers' information perceptions, we develop a game model of two-sided market, which can better describe the impacts of information preannouncement on consumers, developers, and platforms behavior in a competitive environment. There are two preannouncement strategies: Technical or marketing information. Our studies reveal that (i) when the development capabilities are heterogeneous enough, both platforms release technical information; (ii) both platforms preannounce marketing information when the heterogeneity of development capability is sufficiently small, even if it decreases total social welfare; (iii) the platform lacking competitive advantage is more inclined to adopt a strategy different from the competitive advantage platform, and competitive advantage platform is likely to change the preannouncement strategy constantly; (iv) the heterogeneity of platforms is the prerequisite for the asymmetric equilibrium, even if it may decrease the overall social welfare.

Citation: Ye Jiang, Tiaojun Xiao. Preannouncement strategy of platform-type new product for competing platforms: Technical or marketing information. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020155
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Game structure of the PNPP
(a) SPNE change with $t_{e}$ when $t = 15$ and $f_{e} = 1$ and (b)SPNE change with $f_{e}$ when $t = 1$ and $t_{e} = 15$
(a) SPNE distribution when $\beta_{b} = 1.01$ and (b)SPNE distribution when $\beta_{b} = 5.01$
(a) Consumer price changes with $\delta$ and (b)Developer price changes with $\delta$
(a) SPNE changes with $f_{e}$ when $\delta = 0.2$ and (b)SPNE changes with $f_{e}$ when $\delta = 1.2$
SPNE changes with $\delta$
Total social welfare changes with $\delta$
Equilibrium results under $(M, M)$
 Decisions Consumers' price $p_{bi}^{MM}=t+t_{e}+\beta_{b}(1-g)/(4g)-\beta_{b}(2v_{d} +\beta_{b}+3\beta_{d})/(8gc_{d})$ Developers' price $p_{di}^{MM}=[2v_{d}-2c_{d}(1-g)+\beta_{b}-\beta_{d}]/4$ Consumers' number $n_{bi}^{MM}=1/2$ Developers' number $n_{di}^{MM}=[2v_{d}-2c_{d}(1-g)+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}]/(8gc_{d})$ Equilibrium profits/total utilities Platforms' profit $\Pi_{i}^{MM}=(t+t_{e})/2+(4V_{1}^2-B_{0}-2\beta_{b}\beta_{d})/(32gc_{d})-c_{M}$ Consumers' total utility $BS_{i}^{MM}=[4v_{b}-5(t+t_{e})]/8+[B_{0}+2(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})V_{1}]/(16gc_{d})$ Developers' total utility $DS_{i}^{MM}=(2V_{1}+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})^2/(64gc_{d})$
 Decisions Consumers' price $p_{bi}^{MM}=t+t_{e}+\beta_{b}(1-g)/(4g)-\beta_{b}(2v_{d} +\beta_{b}+3\beta_{d})/(8gc_{d})$ Developers' price $p_{di}^{MM}=[2v_{d}-2c_{d}(1-g)+\beta_{b}-\beta_{d}]/4$ Consumers' number $n_{bi}^{MM}=1/2$ Developers' number $n_{di}^{MM}=[2v_{d}-2c_{d}(1-g)+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}]/(8gc_{d})$ Equilibrium profits/total utilities Platforms' profit $\Pi_{i}^{MM}=(t+t_{e})/2+(4V_{1}^2-B_{0}-2\beta_{b}\beta_{d})/(32gc_{d})-c_{M}$ Consumers' total utility $BS_{i}^{MM}=[4v_{b}-5(t+t_{e})]/8+[B_{0}+2(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})V_{1}]/(16gc_{d})$ Developers' total utility $DS_{i}^{MM}=(2V_{1}+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})^2/(64gc_{d})$
Nash equilibrium under $(T, T)$
 Decisions Consumers' price $p_{bi}^{TT}=t+\beta_{b}(1-g)/(4g)-\beta_{b}[2(v_{d}+f_{e}) +\beta_{b}+3\beta_{d}]/(8gc_{d})$ Developers' price $p_{di}^{TT}=(2v_{d}-2c_{d}+2c_{d}g+2f_{e}+\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})/4$ Consumers' number $n_{bi}^{TT}=1/2$ Developers' number $n_{di}^{TT}=[2v_{d}+2f_{e}+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}-2c_{d}(1-g)]/(8gc_{d})$ Equilibrium profits/total utilities Platforms' profit $\Pi_{i}^{TT}=t/2+[4(V_{1}+f_{e})^2-B_{0}-2\beta_{b}\beta_{d}]/(32gc_{d})-c_{T}$ Consumers' total utility $BS_{i}^{TT}=(4v_{b}-5t)/8+[B_{0}+2(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})(V_{1}+f_{e})]/(16gc_{d})$ Developers' total utility $DS_{i}^{TT}=[2(V_{1}+f_{e})+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}]^2/(64gc_{d})$
 Decisions Consumers' price $p_{bi}^{TT}=t+\beta_{b}(1-g)/(4g)-\beta_{b}[2(v_{d}+f_{e}) +\beta_{b}+3\beta_{d}]/(8gc_{d})$ Developers' price $p_{di}^{TT}=(2v_{d}-2c_{d}+2c_{d}g+2f_{e}+\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})/4$ Consumers' number $n_{bi}^{TT}=1/2$ Developers' number $n_{di}^{TT}=[2v_{d}+2f_{e}+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}-2c_{d}(1-g)]/(8gc_{d})$ Equilibrium profits/total utilities Platforms' profit $\Pi_{i}^{TT}=t/2+[4(V_{1}+f_{e})^2-B_{0}-2\beta_{b}\beta_{d}]/(32gc_{d})-c_{T}$ Consumers' total utility $BS_{i}^{TT}=(4v_{b}-5t)/8+[B_{0}+2(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})(V_{1}+f_{e})]/(16gc_{d})$ Developers' total utility $DS_{i}^{TT}=[2(V_{1}+f_{e})+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}]^2/(64gc_{d})$
Nash equilibrium under $(M, T)$
 Decisions Consumers' price $p_{bi}^{TT}=t+\beta_{b}(1-g)/(4g)-\beta_{b}[2(v_{d}+f_{e}) +\beta_{b}+3\beta_{d}]/(8gc_{d})$ Developers' price $p_{di}^{TT}=(2v_{d}-2c_{d}+2c_{d}g+2f_{e}+\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})/4$ Consumers' number $n_{bi}^{TT}=1/2$ Developers' number $n_{di}^{TT}=[2v_{d}+2f_{e}+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}-2c_{d}(1-g)]/(8gc_{d})$ Equilibrium profits/total utilities Platforms' profit $\Pi_{i}^{TT}=t/2+[4(V_{1}+f_{e})^2-B_{0}-2\beta_{b}\beta_{d}]/(32gc_{d})-c_{T}$ Consumers' total utility $BS_{i}^{TT}=(4v_{b}-5t)/8+[B_{0}+2(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})(V_{1}+f_{e})]/(16gc_{d})$ Developers' total utility $DS_{i}^{TT}=[2(V_{1}+f_{e})+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}]^2/(64gc_{d})$
 Decisions Consumers' price $p_{bi}^{TT}=t+\beta_{b}(1-g)/(4g)-\beta_{b}[2(v_{d}+f_{e}) +\beta_{b}+3\beta_{d}]/(8gc_{d})$ Developers' price $p_{di}^{TT}=(2v_{d}-2c_{d}+2c_{d}g+2f_{e}+\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})/4$ Consumers' number $n_{bi}^{TT}=1/2$ Developers' number $n_{di}^{TT}=[2v_{d}+2f_{e}+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}-2c_{d}(1-g)]/(8gc_{d})$ Equilibrium profits/total utilities Platforms' profit $\Pi_{i}^{TT}=t/2+[4(V_{1}+f_{e})^2-B_{0}-2\beta_{b}\beta_{d}]/(32gc_{d})-c_{T}$ Consumers' total utility $BS_{i}^{TT}=(4v_{b}-5t)/8+[B_{0}+2(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})(V_{1}+f_{e})]/(16gc_{d})$ Developers' total utility $DS_{i}^{TT}=[2(V_{1}+f_{e})+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}]^2/(64gc_{d})$
Factors of effect asymmetric strategy to be a SPNE
 $t=1$ $c_{d}=1$ $c_{d}$ $\hat{f}_{e1}$ $\hat{f}_{e2}$ $\hat{f}_{e2}-\hat{f}_{e1}$ $t$ $\hat{f}_{e1}$ $\hat{f}_{e2}$ $\hat{f}_{e2}-\hat{f}_{e1}$ 1 0.31 0.61 0.30 1 0.31 0.61 0.30 3 0.93 1.72 0.79 3 0.34 0.58 0.24 5 1.52 2.74 1.22 5 0.36 0.56 0.20 7 2.08 3.69 1.61 7 0.37 0.54 0.17 9 2.62 4.59 1.96 9 0.38 0.53 0.15
 $t=1$ $c_{d}=1$ $c_{d}$ $\hat{f}_{e1}$ $\hat{f}_{e2}$ $\hat{f}_{e2}-\hat{f}_{e1}$ $t$ $\hat{f}_{e1}$ $\hat{f}_{e2}$ $\hat{f}_{e2}-\hat{f}_{e1}$ 1 0.31 0.61 0.30 1 0.31 0.61 0.30 3 0.93 1.72 0.79 3 0.34 0.58 0.24 5 1.52 2.74 1.22 5 0.36 0.56 0.20 7 2.08 3.69 1.61 7 0.37 0.54 0.17 9 2.62 4.59 1.96 9 0.38 0.53 0.15
Nash equilibrium of non-identical platforms
 $(M, M)$ $(T, T)$ $p_{bi, E}^{MM}=p_{bi}^{MM}-3\beta_{b}(v_{di}-v_{d})/(12gc_{d})$ $-F(i)[(\beta_{b}+2\beta_{d})E_{2}/(24gc_{d}W_{1})-E_{3}/(12gc_{d})]$ $p_{bi, E}^{TT}=p_{bi}^{TT}-3\beta_{b}(v_{di}-v_{d})/(12gc_{d})$ $-F(i)[(\beta_{b}+2\beta_{d})E_{2}/(24gc_{d}W_{2})-E_{3}/(12gc_{d})]$ $p_{di, E}^{MM}=p_{di}^{MM}+F(i)E_{2}/W_{1}+(v_{di}-v_{d})/2$ $p_{di, E}^{TT}=p_{di}^{TT}+F(i)E_{2}/(4W_{2})+(v_{di}-v_{d})/2$ $n_{bi, E}^{MM}=n_{bi}^{MM}+F(i)E_{3}/W_{1}$ $n_{bi, E}^{TT}=n_{bi}^{TT}+F(i)E_{3}/W_{2}$ $n_{di, E}^{MM}=n_{di}^{MM}+F(i)E_{4}/W_{1}+(v_{di}-v_{d})/(4gc_{d})$ $n_{di, E}^{TT}=n_{di}^{TT}+F(i)E_{4}/W_{2}+(v_{di}-v_{d})/(4gc_{d})$ $\Pi_{i, E}^{MM}=\Pi_{i}^{MM}+E_{2}^2/(96gc_{d}W_{1}^2)+E_{3}^2/(24gc_{d}W_{1})$ $+F(i)E_{3}(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2/(48gc_{d}W_{1})+E_{3}/(12gc_{d})$ $+[(v_{di}+v_{d})-2c_{d}+2c_{d}g](v_{di}-v_{d})/(8gc_{d})$} $\Pi_{i, E}^{TT}=\Pi_{i}^{TT}+E_{2}^2/(96gc_{d}W_{1}^2)+E_{3}^2/(24gc_{d}W_{1})$ $+F(i)E_{3}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})^2/(48gc_{d}W_{1})+E_{3}/(12gc_{d})$ $+[(v_{di}+v_{d})-2c_{d}+2c_{d}g](v_{di}-v_{d})/(8gc_{d})$} $(M, T)$ $p_{bi, E}^{MT}=p_{bi}^{MT}-\beta_{b}(v_{di}-v_{d})/(4gc_{d})-F(i)E_{3}(B_{2}-2W_{3})/(24gc_{d}W_{3})$ $p_{di, E}^{MT}=p_{di}^{MT}+F(i)E_{2}/(4W_{3})+(v_{di}-v_{d})/2$ $n_{bi, E}^{MT}=n_{bi}^{MT}+F(i)E_{3}/(2W_{3})$ $n_{di, E}^{MT}=n_{di}^{MT}+F(i)E_{4}/W_{3}+(v_{di}-v_{d})/(4gc_{d})$ $\Pi_{1, E}^{MT}=\Pi_{1}^{MT}+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2E_{3}(E_{3}-2R_{2})/(96gc_{d}W_{3}^2)+[8E_{3}+12(2v_{d}+\delta-2\phi)\delta]/(96gc_{d})$ $-(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})\delta[8gc_{d}t_{e}+4f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})-(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2-2E_{3}]/(48gc_{d}W_{3})$ $\Pi_{2, E}^{MT}=\Pi_{2}^{MT}+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2E_{3}(E_{3}-2R_{2})/(96gc_{d}W_{3}^2)+[8E_{3}+12(2v_{d}-\delta-2\phi+2f_{e})\delta]/(96gc_{d})$ $+(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})\delta[8gc_{d}t_{e}+4f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2-2E_{3}]/(48gc_{d}W_{3})$ $(T, M)$ $\Pi_{1, E}^{TM}=\Pi_{1, E}^{MT}+[3f_{e}^2+8gc_{d}t_{e}+f_{e}(6\delta+6V_1+4\beta_{b}+4\beta_{d})]/(24gc_{d})+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})R_{2}E_{4}/(3W_{3}^2)$ $+R_{2}[8\delta(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2]/(24gc_{d}W_{3})$}} $\Pi_{2, E}^{TM}=\Pi_{2, E}^{MT}-[3f_{e}^2+8gc_{d}t_{e}+f_{e}(6\delta+6V_1+4\beta_{b}+4\beta_{d})]/(24gc_{d})+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})R_{2}E_{4}/(3W_{3}^2)$ $+R_{2}[(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2-8\delta(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})]/(24gc_{d}W_{3})$
 $(M, M)$ $(T, T)$ $p_{bi, E}^{MM}=p_{bi}^{MM}-3\beta_{b}(v_{di}-v_{d})/(12gc_{d})$ $-F(i)[(\beta_{b}+2\beta_{d})E_{2}/(24gc_{d}W_{1})-E_{3}/(12gc_{d})]$ $p_{bi, E}^{TT}=p_{bi}^{TT}-3\beta_{b}(v_{di}-v_{d})/(12gc_{d})$ $-F(i)[(\beta_{b}+2\beta_{d})E_{2}/(24gc_{d}W_{2})-E_{3}/(12gc_{d})]$ $p_{di, E}^{MM}=p_{di}^{MM}+F(i)E_{2}/W_{1}+(v_{di}-v_{d})/2$ $p_{di, E}^{TT}=p_{di}^{TT}+F(i)E_{2}/(4W_{2})+(v_{di}-v_{d})/2$ $n_{bi, E}^{MM}=n_{bi}^{MM}+F(i)E_{3}/W_{1}$ $n_{bi, E}^{TT}=n_{bi}^{TT}+F(i)E_{3}/W_{2}$ $n_{di, E}^{MM}=n_{di}^{MM}+F(i)E_{4}/W_{1}+(v_{di}-v_{d})/(4gc_{d})$ $n_{di, E}^{TT}=n_{di}^{TT}+F(i)E_{4}/W_{2}+(v_{di}-v_{d})/(4gc_{d})$ $\Pi_{i, E}^{MM}=\Pi_{i}^{MM}+E_{2}^2/(96gc_{d}W_{1}^2)+E_{3}^2/(24gc_{d}W_{1})$ $+F(i)E_{3}(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2/(48gc_{d}W_{1})+E_{3}/(12gc_{d})$ $+[(v_{di}+v_{d})-2c_{d}+2c_{d}g](v_{di}-v_{d})/(8gc_{d})$} $\Pi_{i, E}^{TT}=\Pi_{i}^{TT}+E_{2}^2/(96gc_{d}W_{1}^2)+E_{3}^2/(24gc_{d}W_{1})$ $+F(i)E_{3}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})^2/(48gc_{d}W_{1})+E_{3}/(12gc_{d})$ $+[(v_{di}+v_{d})-2c_{d}+2c_{d}g](v_{di}-v_{d})/(8gc_{d})$} $(M, T)$ $p_{bi, E}^{MT}=p_{bi}^{MT}-\beta_{b}(v_{di}-v_{d})/(4gc_{d})-F(i)E_{3}(B_{2}-2W_{3})/(24gc_{d}W_{3})$ $p_{di, E}^{MT}=p_{di}^{MT}+F(i)E_{2}/(4W_{3})+(v_{di}-v_{d})/2$ $n_{bi, E}^{MT}=n_{bi}^{MT}+F(i)E_{3}/(2W_{3})$ $n_{di, E}^{MT}=n_{di}^{MT}+F(i)E_{4}/W_{3}+(v_{di}-v_{d})/(4gc_{d})$ $\Pi_{1, E}^{MT}=\Pi_{1}^{MT}+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2E_{3}(E_{3}-2R_{2})/(96gc_{d}W_{3}^2)+[8E_{3}+12(2v_{d}+\delta-2\phi)\delta]/(96gc_{d})$ $-(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})\delta[8gc_{d}t_{e}+4f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})-(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2-2E_{3}]/(48gc_{d}W_{3})$ $\Pi_{2, E}^{MT}=\Pi_{2}^{MT}+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2E_{3}(E_{3}-2R_{2})/(96gc_{d}W_{3}^2)+[8E_{3}+12(2v_{d}-\delta-2\phi+2f_{e})\delta]/(96gc_{d})$ $+(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})\delta[8gc_{d}t_{e}+4f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2-2E_{3}]/(48gc_{d}W_{3})$ $(T, M)$ $\Pi_{1, E}^{TM}=\Pi_{1, E}^{MT}+[3f_{e}^2+8gc_{d}t_{e}+f_{e}(6\delta+6V_1+4\beta_{b}+4\beta_{d})]/(24gc_{d})+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})R_{2}E_{4}/(3W_{3}^2)$ $+R_{2}[8\delta(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2]/(24gc_{d}W_{3})$}} $\Pi_{2, E}^{TM}=\Pi_{2, E}^{MT}-[3f_{e}^2+8gc_{d}t_{e}+f_{e}(6\delta+6V_1+4\beta_{b}+4\beta_{d})]/(24gc_{d})+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})R_{2}E_{4}/(3W_{3}^2)$ $+R_{2}[(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2-8\delta(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})]/(24gc_{d}W_{3})$
Mathematical abbreviation and threshold
 $V_{1}=v_{d}-c_{d}(1-g)$ $B_{0}=\beta_{b}^2+\beta_{d}^2+4\beta_{b}\beta_{d}$ $B_{1}=\beta_{b}^2+\beta_{d}^2+6\beta_{b}\beta_{d}$ $\phi=c_{d}(1-g)$ $R_{1}=\beta_{b}^2-2\beta_{d}^2+\beta_{b}\beta_{d}$ $R_{2}=f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})+2gc_{d}t_{e}$ $R_{3}=24gc_{d}(c_{T}-c_{M})-6f_{e}[v_{d}-c_{d}(1-g)]$ $+2gc_{d}t_{e}-f_{e}(3f_{e}+2\beta_{b}+2\beta_{d})$ $R_{4}=f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})+5gc_{d}t_{e}$ $R_{5}=6(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})(2v_{d}-2c_{d}+2c_{d}g+f_{e})$ $+48gc_{d}v_{b}+2\beta_{b}^2+8\beta_{b}\beta_{d}+\beta_{d}^2$ $R_{6}=2v_{d}-2c_{d}(1-g)+f_{e}+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}$ $R_{7}=f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})+8gc_{d}t_{e}$ $E_{2}=2\delta(\beta_{b}^2-\beta_{d}^2)$ $E_{3}=2\delta(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})$ $E_{4}=2\delta(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})^2/(8gc_{d})$ $E_{5}=2v_{d}+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}$ $W_{1}=12gc_{d}(t+t_{e})-(\beta_{b}^2+\beta_{d}^2+4\beta_{b}\beta_{d})$ $W_{2}=12gc_{d}t-(\beta_{b}^2+\beta_{d}^2+4\beta_{b}\beta_{d})$ $W_{3}=6gc_{d}(2t+t_{e})-(\beta_{b}^2+\beta_{d}^2+4\beta_{b}\beta_{d})$ $H_{1}=[6f_{e}V_{1}+3f_{e}^2+2f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})$ $-2gc_{d}t_{e}]/(24gc_{d})$} $H_{2}=R_{2}[4gc_{d}t_{e}-(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2$ $+2f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})]/(48gc_{d}W_{3})$} $H_{3}=R_{2}[4gc_{d}t_{e}+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2$ $+2f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})]/(48gc_{d}W_{3})$} $H_{4}=R_{2}^2(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2/(96gc_{d}W_{3}^2)$ Threshold $\hat{t}^{MM}=\beta_{b}\beta_{d}/(2gc_{d})-t_{e}$ $\hat{t}^{MT}=\beta_{b}\beta_{d}/(2gc_{d})-t_{e}/2$ $\hat{t}^{TT}=\beta_{b}\beta_{d}/(2gc_{d})$ $\hat{t}_{e7}=-(1+g)f_{e}(2\phi+f_{e}+E_{5})/(gc_{d})$ $\hat{f}_{e7}=\{2\phi-2v_{d}-\beta_{b}-\beta_{d}+\sqrt{(1+g)[(1+g)(E_{5}-2\phi)^2-4gc_{d}t_{e}]}/(1+g)\}/2$
 $V_{1}=v_{d}-c_{d}(1-g)$ $B_{0}=\beta_{b}^2+\beta_{d}^2+4\beta_{b}\beta_{d}$ $B_{1}=\beta_{b}^2+\beta_{d}^2+6\beta_{b}\beta_{d}$ $\phi=c_{d}(1-g)$ $R_{1}=\beta_{b}^2-2\beta_{d}^2+\beta_{b}\beta_{d}$ $R_{2}=f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})+2gc_{d}t_{e}$ $R_{3}=24gc_{d}(c_{T}-c_{M})-6f_{e}[v_{d}-c_{d}(1-g)]$ $+2gc_{d}t_{e}-f_{e}(3f_{e}+2\beta_{b}+2\beta_{d})$ $R_{4}=f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})+5gc_{d}t_{e}$ $R_{5}=6(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})(2v_{d}-2c_{d}+2c_{d}g+f_{e})$ $+48gc_{d}v_{b}+2\beta_{b}^2+8\beta_{b}\beta_{d}+\beta_{d}^2$ $R_{6}=2v_{d}-2c_{d}(1-g)+f_{e}+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}$ $R_{7}=f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})+8gc_{d}t_{e}$ $E_{2}=2\delta(\beta_{b}^2-\beta_{d}^2)$ $E_{3}=2\delta(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})$ $E_{4}=2\delta(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})^2/(8gc_{d})$ $E_{5}=2v_{d}+\beta_{b}+\beta_{d}$ $W_{1}=12gc_{d}(t+t_{e})-(\beta_{b}^2+\beta_{d}^2+4\beta_{b}\beta_{d})$ $W_{2}=12gc_{d}t-(\beta_{b}^2+\beta_{d}^2+4\beta_{b}\beta_{d})$ $W_{3}=6gc_{d}(2t+t_{e})-(\beta_{b}^2+\beta_{d}^2+4\beta_{b}\beta_{d})$ $H_{1}=[6f_{e}V_{1}+3f_{e}^2+2f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})$ $-2gc_{d}t_{e}]/(24gc_{d})$} $H_{2}=R_{2}[4gc_{d}t_{e}-(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2$ $+2f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})]/(48gc_{d}W_{3})$} $H_{3}=R_{2}[4gc_{d}t_{e}+(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2$ $+2f_{e}(\beta_{b}+\beta_{d})]/(48gc_{d}W_{3})$} $H_{4}=R_{2}^2(\beta_{b}-\beta_{d})^2/(96gc_{d}W_{3}^2)$ Threshold $\hat{t}^{MM}=\beta_{b}\beta_{d}/(2gc_{d})-t_{e}$ $\hat{t}^{MT}=\beta_{b}\beta_{d}/(2gc_{d})-t_{e}/2$ $\hat{t}^{TT}=\beta_{b}\beta_{d}/(2gc_{d})$ $\hat{t}_{e7}=-(1+g)f_{e}(2\phi+f_{e}+E_{5})/(gc_{d})$ $\hat{f}_{e7}=\{2\phi-2v_{d}-\beta_{b}-\beta_{d}+\sqrt{(1+g)[(1+g)(E_{5}-2\phi)^2-4gc_{d}t_{e}]}/(1+g)\}/2$
 [1] Rabiaa Ouahabi, Nasr-Eddine Hamri. Design of new scheme adaptive generalized hybrid projective synchronization for two different chaotic systems with uncertain parameters. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2361-2370. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020182 [2] David Cantala, Juan Sebastián Pereyra. Endogenous budget constraints in the assignment game. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2015, 2 (3&4) : 207-225. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2015002 [3] Wolf-Jüergen Beyn, Janosch Rieger. The implicit Euler scheme for one-sided Lipschitz differential inclusions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 14 (2) : 409-428. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.409 [4] Guillaume Bal, Wenjia Jing. Homogenization and corrector theory for linear transport in random media. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 28 (4) : 1311-1343. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.1311 [5] Felix Finster, Jürg Fröhlich, Marco Oppio, Claudio F. Paganini. Causal fermion systems and the ETH approach to quantum theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (5) : 1717-1746. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020451 [6] Lucas C. F. Ferreira, Jhean E. Pérez-López, Élder J. Villamizar-Roa. On the product in Besov-Lorentz-Morrey spaces and existence of solutions for the stationary Boussinesq equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (6) : 2423-2439. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018115 [7] Xiaoyi Zhou, Tong Ye, Tony T. Lee. Designing and analysis of a Wi-Fi data offloading strategy catering for the preference of mobile users. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021038 [8] Akio Matsumot, Ferenc Szidarovszky. Stability switching and its directions in cournot duopoly game with three delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021069 [9] W. Cary Huffman. On the theory of $\mathbb{F}_q$-linear $\mathbb{F}_{q^t}$-codes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2013, 7 (3) : 349-378. doi: 10.3934/amc.2013.7.349 [10] Charles Fulton, David Pearson, Steven Pruess. Characterization of the spectral density function for a one-sided tridiagonal Jacobi matrix operator. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 247-257. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.247 [11] John Leventides, Costas Poulios, Georgios Alkis Tsiatsios, Maria Livada, Stavros Tsipras, Konstantinos Lefcaditis, Panagiota Sargenti, Aleka Sargenti. Systems theory and analysis of the implementation of non pharmaceutical policies for the mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jdg.2021004 [12] M. Mahalingam, Parag Ravindran, U. Saravanan, K. R. Rajagopal. Two boundary value problems involving an inhomogeneous viscoelastic solid. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (6) : 1351-1373. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017072 [13] Marcelo Messias. Periodic perturbation of quadratic systems with two infinite heteroclinic cycles. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (5) : 1881-1899. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.1881 [14] Alina Chertock, Alexander Kurganov, Mária Lukáčová-Medvi${\rm{\check{d}}}$ová, Șeyma Nur Özcan. An asymptotic preserving scheme for kinetic chemotaxis models in two space dimensions. Kinetic & Related Models, 2019, 12 (1) : 195-216. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019009 [15] Olena Naboka. On synchronization of oscillations of two coupled Berger plates with nonlinear interior damping. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (6) : 1933-1956. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.1933 [16] Zhigang Pan, Chanh Kieu, Quan Wang. Hopf bifurcations and transitions of two-dimensional Quasi-Geostrophic flows. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2021025 [17] Rongchang Liu, Jiangyuan Li, Duokui Yan. New periodic orbits in the planar equal-mass three-body problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (4) : 2187-2206. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018090 [18] Lunji Song, Wenya Qi, Kaifang Liu, Qingxian Gu. A new over-penalized weak galerkin finite element method. Part Ⅱ: Elliptic interface problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2581-2598. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020196 [19] Kaifang Liu, Lunji Song, Shan Zhao. A new over-penalized weak galerkin method. Part Ⅰ: Second-order elliptic problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2411-2428. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020184 [20] Saima Rashid, Fahd Jarad, Zakia Hammouch. Some new bounds analogous to generalized proportional fractional integral operator with respect to another function. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021020

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

## Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables