# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Optimal lot-sizing policy for a failure prone production system with investment in process quality improvement and lead time variance reduction
• JIMO Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
Two-agent integrated scheduling of production and distribution operations with fixed departure times
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020156

## Portfolio optimization for jump-diffusion risky assets with regime switching: A time-consistent approach

 1 School of Finance, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China 3 Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong

* Corresponding author: Zhibin Liang

Received  February 2019 Revised  June 2020 Published  November 2020

Fund Project: This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.12071224 and Grant No.11771079), the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (Project No. HKU17306220), the Philosophy and Social Science Foundation for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (Grant No.2020SJA0261), and the MOE Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (Grant No.19YJCZH083)

In this paper, an optimal portfolio selection problem with mean-variance utility is considered for a financial market consisting of one risk-free asset and two risky assets, whose price processes are modulated by jump-diffusion model, the two jump number processes are correlated through a common shock, and the Brownian motions are supposed to be dependent. Moreover, it is assumed that not only the risk aversion coefficient but also the market parameters such as the appreciation and volatility rates as well as the jump amplitude depend on a Markov chain with finite states. In addition, short selling is supposed to be prohibited. Using the technique of stochastic control theory and the corresponding extended Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation, the explicit expressions of the optimal strategies and value function are obtained within a game theoretic framework, and the existence and uniqueness of the solutions are proved as well. In the end, some numerical examples are presented to show the impact of the parameters on the optimal strategies, and some further discussions on the case of $n\geq 3$ risky assets are given to demonstrate the important effect of the correlation coefficient of the Brownian motions on the optimal results.

Citation: Caibin Zhang, Zhibin Liang, Kam Chuen Yuen. Portfolio optimization for jump-diffusion risky assets with regime switching: A time-consistent approach. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020156
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
The comparison of value functions with and without constraint
The comparison of optimal strategies between regime 1 and regime 2
The effect of parameter $\lambda_{01}$ on optimal strategies with regime 1
The effect of jump's parameters on optimal strategies with regime 1
The effect of risk-free rate on optimal strategies with regime 1
The value of parameters
 parameters $T$ $x$ $\gamma_{i}$ $r_0$ $r_{1i}$ $r_{2i}$ $\rho$ $\sigma_{1i}$ $\sigma_{2i}$ $\mu_{1i}$ $\mu_{2i}$ $\beta_{1i}$ $\beta_{2i}$ $\lambda_{1i}$ $\lambda_{2i}$ $\lambda_{0i}$ $e_1$(bullish) 5 2 0.5 0.3 0.60 0.30 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.055 2 0.5 1 $e_2$(bearish) 5 2 1 0.3 0.25 0.07 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.032 1 0.3 0.6
 parameters $T$ $x$ $\gamma_{i}$ $r_0$ $r_{1i}$ $r_{2i}$ $\rho$ $\sigma_{1i}$ $\sigma_{2i}$ $\mu_{1i}$ $\mu_{2i}$ $\beta_{1i}$ $\beta_{2i}$ $\lambda_{1i}$ $\lambda_{2i}$ $\lambda_{0i}$ $e_1$(bullish) 5 2 0.5 0.3 0.60 0.30 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.055 2 0.5 1 $e_2$(bearish) 5 2 1 0.3 0.25 0.07 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.032 1 0.3 0.6
The parameters-set
 parameters $T$ $x$ $\gamma_{i}$ $r_0$ $r_{1i}$ $r_{2i}$ $\rho$ $\sigma_{1i}$ $\sigma_{2i}$ $\mu_{1i}$ $\mu_{2i}$ $\beta_{1i}$ $\beta_{2i}$ $\lambda_{1i}$ $\lambda_{2i}$ $\lambda_{0i}$ $e_1$(bullish) 5 2 0.5 0.3 0.60 0.65 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.045 2 0.5 1 $e_2$(bearish) 5 2 1 0.3 0.35 0.37 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.032 1 0.3 0.6
 parameters $T$ $x$ $\gamma_{i}$ $r_0$ $r_{1i}$ $r_{2i}$ $\rho$ $\sigma_{1i}$ $\sigma_{2i}$ $\mu_{1i}$ $\mu_{2i}$ $\beta_{1i}$ $\beta_{2i}$ $\lambda_{1i}$ $\lambda_{2i}$ $\lambda_{0i}$ $e_1$(bullish) 5 2 0.5 0.3 0.60 0.65 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.045 2 0.5 1 $e_2$(bearish) 5 2 1 0.3 0.35 0.37 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.032 1 0.3 0.6
 [1] Ping Chen, Haixiang Yao. Continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection with no-shorting constraints and regime-switching. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (2) : 531-551. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018166 [2] Jean-Claude Zambrini. On the geometry of the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2009, 1 (3) : 369-387. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2009.1.369 [3] Steven Richardson, Song Wang. The viscosity approximation to the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation in optimal feedback control: Upper bounds for extended domains. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (1) : 161-175. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.161 [4] Zhuo Jin, George Yin, Hailiang Yang. Numerical methods for dividend optimization using regime-switching jump-diffusion models. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2011, 1 (1) : 21-40. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2011.1.21 [5] Chao Xu, Yinghui Dong, Zhaolu Tian, Guojing Wang. Pricing dynamic fund protection under a Regime-switching Jump-diffusion model with stochastic protection level. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (6) : 2603-2623. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019072 [6] Daniele Castorina, Annalisa Cesaroni, Luca Rossi. On a parabolic Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation degenerating at the boundary. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (4) : 1251-1263. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016.15.1251 [7] Tak Kuen Siu, Yang Shen. Risk-minimizing pricing and Esscher transform in a general non-Markovian regime-switching jump-diffusion model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (7) : 2595-2626. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017100 [8] Yan Zeng, Zhongfei Li, Jingjun Liu. Optimal strategies of benchmark and mean-variance portfolio selection problems for insurers. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (3) : 483-496. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.483 [9] Fuke Wu, George Yin, Zhuo Jin. Kolmogorov-type systems with regime-switching jump diffusion perturbations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (7) : 2293-2319. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016048 [10] Zhuo Jin, Linyi Qian. Lookback option pricing for regime-switching jump diffusion models. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2015, 5 (2) : 237-258. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2015.5.237 [11] Jiannan Zhang, Ping Chen, Zhuo Jin, Shuanming Li. Open-loop equilibrium strategy for mean-variance portfolio selection: A log-return model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (2) : 765-777. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019133 [12] Zhen Wang, Sanyang Liu. Multi-period mean-variance portfolio selection with fixed and proportional transaction costs. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2013, 9 (3) : 643-656. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2013.9.643 [13] Ning Zhang. A symmetric Gauss-Seidel based method for a class of multi-period mean-variance portfolio selection problems. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (2) : 991-1008. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018189 [14] Xianping Wu, Xun Li, Zhongfei Li. A mean-field formulation for multi-period asset-liability mean-variance portfolio selection with probability constraints. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (1) : 249-265. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017045 [15] Kehan Si, Zhenda Xu, Ka Fai Cedric Yiu, Xun Li. Open-loop solvability for mean-field stochastic linear quadratic optimal control problems of Markov regime-switching system. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021074 [16] Mohamed Assellaou, Olivier Bokanowski, Hasnaa Zidani. Error estimates for second order Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations. Approximation of probabilistic reachable sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (9) : 3933-3964. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.3933 [17] Shuang Li, Chuong Luong, Francisca Angkola, Yonghong Wu. Optimal asset portfolio with stochastic volatility under the mean-variance utility with state-dependent risk aversion. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (4) : 1521-1533. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.1521 [18] Jiaqin Wei, Zhuo Jin, Hailiang Yang. Optimal dividend policy with liability constraint under a hidden Markov regime-switching model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (4) : 1965-1993. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018132 [19] Qing-Qing Yang, Wai-Ki Ching, Wanhua He, Tak-Kuen Siu. Pricing vulnerable options under a Markov-modulated jump-diffusion model with fire sales. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (1) : 293-318. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018044 [20] Wan-Hua He, Chufang Wu, Jia-Wen Gu, Wai-Ki Ching, Chi-Wing Wong. Pricing vulnerable options under a jump-diffusion model with fast mean-reverting stochastic volatility. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021057

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366