American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020169

On the convexity for the range set of two quadratic functions

Huu-Quang Nguyen 1,2, , Ya-Chi Chu 2, and  Ruey-Lin Sheu 2,,

1. 

Institute of Natural Science Education, Vinh University, Vinh, Nghe An, Vietnam
2. 

Department of Mathematics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

* Corresponding author: Ruey-Lin Sheu

In memory of Professor Hang-Chin Lai for his life contribution in Mathematics and Optimization

Received  July 2020 Revised  September 2020 Published  November 2020

Fund Project: Huu-Quang, Nguyen's research work was supported by Taiwan MOST 108-2811-M-006-537 and Ruey-Lin Sheu's research work was sponsored by Taiwan MOST 107-2115-M-006-011-MY2

Given $ n\times n $ symmetric matrices $ A $ and $ B, $ Dines in 1941 proved that the joint range set $ \{(x^TAx, x^TBx)|\; x\in\mathbb{R}^n\} $ is always convex. Our paper is concerned with non-homogeneous extension of the Dines theorem for the range set $ \mathbf{R}(f, g) = \{\left(f(x), g(x)\right)|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \}, $ $ f(x) = x^T A x + 2a^T x + a_0 $ and $ g(x) = x^T B x + 2b^T x + b_0. $ We show that $ \mathbf{R}(f, g) $ is convex if, and only if, any pair of level sets, $ \{x\in\mathbb{R}^n|f(x) = \alpha\} $ and $ \{x\in\mathbb{R}^n|g(x) = \beta\} $, do not separate each other. With the novel geometric concept about separation, we provide a polynomial-time procedure to practically check whether a given $ \mathbf{R}(f, g) $ is convex or not.

Keywords: Non-convex quadratic optimization, joint numerical range, hidden convexity, separation of quadratic level sets, S-lemma.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 90C20; Secondary: 90C22, 90C26.
Citation: Huu-Quang Nguyen, Ya-Chi Chu, Ruey-Lin Sheu. On the convexity for the range set of two quadratic functions. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020169
References:
[1]

L. Brickmen, On the field of values of a matrix, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 12 (1961), 61-66.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1961-0122827-1.  Google Scholar

[2]

K. Derinkuyu and M. Ç. Plnar, On the S-procedure and some variants, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 64 (2006), 55-77.  doi: 10.1007/s00186-006-0070-8.  Google Scholar

[3]

L. L. Dines, On the mapping of quadratic forms, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 47 (1941), 494-498.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9904-1941-07494-X.  Google Scholar

[4]

S.-C. Fang, D. Y. Gao, G.-X. Lin, R.-L. Sheu and W. Xing, Double well potential function and its optimization in the n-dimensional real space–Part I, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 13 (2017), 1291-1305.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016073.  Google Scholar

[5]

F. Flores-Bazán and F. Opazo, Characterizing the convexity of joint-range for a pair of inhomogeneous quadratic functions and strong duality, Minimax Theory Appl, 1 (2016), 257-290.   Google Scholar

[6]

H. Q. Nguyen, R. L. Sheu and Y. Xia, Solving a new type of quadratic optimization problem having a joint numerical range constraint, 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23830.98887. Google Scholar

[7]

H.-Q. Nguyen and R.-L. Sheu, Geometric properties for level sets of quadratic functions, Journal of Global Optimization, 73 (2019), 349-369.  doi: 10.1007/s10898-018-0706-2.  Google Scholar

[8]

H.-Q. Nguyen and R.-L. Sheu, Separation properties of quadratic functions, 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18518.88647. Google Scholar

[9]

I. Pólik and T. Terlaky, A survey of the S-lemma, SIAM Review, 49 (2007), 371-418.  doi: 10.1137/S003614450444614X.  Google Scholar

[10]

B. T. Polyak, Convexity of quadratic transformations and its use in control and optimization, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 99 (1998), 553-583.  doi: 10.1023/A:1021798932766.  Google Scholar

[11]

M. Ramana and A. J. Goldman, Quadratic maps with convex images, Submitted to Math of OR. Google Scholar

[12]

H. Tuy and H. D. Tuan, Generalized S-lemma and strong duality in nonconvex quadratic programming, Journal of Global Optimization, 56 (2013), 1045-1072.  doi: 10.1007/s10898-012-9917-0.  Google Scholar

[13]

Y. Xia, S. Wang and R.-L. Sheu, S-lemma with equality and its applications, Mathematical Programming, 156 (2016), 513-547.  doi: 10.1007/s10107-015-0907-0.  Google Scholar

[14]

Y. Xia, R.-L. Sheu, S.-C. Fang and W. Xing, Double well potential function and its optimization in the n-dimensional real space–Part II, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 13 (2017), 1307-1328.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016074.  Google Scholar

[15]

V. A. Yakubovich, The S-procedure in nolinear control theory, Vestnik Leninggradskogo Universiteta, Ser. Matematika, (1971), 62–77.  Google Scholar

[16]

Y. Ye and S. Zhang, New results on quadratic minimization, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 14 (2003), 245-267.  doi: 10.1137/S105262340139001X.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

L. Brickmen, On the field of values of a matrix, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 12 (1961), 61-66.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1961-0122827-1.  Google Scholar

[2]

K. Derinkuyu and M. Ç. Plnar, On the S-procedure and some variants, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 64 (2006), 55-77.  doi: 10.1007/s00186-006-0070-8.  Google Scholar

[3]

L. L. Dines, On the mapping of quadratic forms, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 47 (1941), 494-498.  doi: 10.1090/S0002-9904-1941-07494-X.  Google Scholar

[4]

S.-C. Fang, D. Y. Gao, G.-X. Lin, R.-L. Sheu and W. Xing, Double well potential function and its optimization in the n-dimensional real space–Part I, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 13 (2017), 1291-1305.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016073.  Google Scholar

[5]

F. Flores-Bazán and F. Opazo, Characterizing the convexity of joint-range for a pair of inhomogeneous quadratic functions and strong duality, Minimax Theory Appl, 1 (2016), 257-290.   Google Scholar

[6]

H. Q. Nguyen, R. L. Sheu and Y. Xia, Solving a new type of quadratic optimization problem having a joint numerical range constraint, 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23830.98887. Google Scholar

[7]

H.-Q. Nguyen and R.-L. Sheu, Geometric properties for level sets of quadratic functions, Journal of Global Optimization, 73 (2019), 349-369.  doi: 10.1007/s10898-018-0706-2.  Google Scholar

[8]

H.-Q. Nguyen and R.-L. Sheu, Separation properties of quadratic functions, 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18518.88647. Google Scholar

[9]

I. Pólik and T. Terlaky, A survey of the S-lemma, SIAM Review, 49 (2007), 371-418.  doi: 10.1137/S003614450444614X.  Google Scholar

[10]

B. T. Polyak, Convexity of quadratic transformations and its use in control and optimization, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 99 (1998), 553-583.  doi: 10.1023/A:1021798932766.  Google Scholar

[11]

M. Ramana and A. J. Goldman, Quadratic maps with convex images, Submitted to Math of OR. Google Scholar

[12]

H. Tuy and H. D. Tuan, Generalized S-lemma and strong duality in nonconvex quadratic programming, Journal of Global Optimization, 56 (2013), 1045-1072.  doi: 10.1007/s10898-012-9917-0.  Google Scholar

[13]

Y. Xia, S. Wang and R.-L. Sheu, S-lemma with equality and its applications, Mathematical Programming, 156 (2016), 513-547.  doi: 10.1007/s10107-015-0907-0.  Google Scholar

[14]

Y. Xia, R.-L. Sheu, S.-C. Fang and W. Xing, Double well potential function and its optimization in the n-dimensional real space–Part II, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 13 (2017), 1307-1328.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016074.  Google Scholar

[15]

V. A. Yakubovich, The S-procedure in nolinear control theory, Vestnik Leninggradskogo Universiteta, Ser. Matematika, (1971), 62–77.  Google Scholar

[16]

Y. Ye and S. Zhang, New results on quadratic minimization, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 14 (2003), 245-267.  doi: 10.1137/S105262340139001X.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  The graph corresponds to Example 1
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Let $ f(x, y, z) = x^2+y^2 $ and $ g(x, y, z) = -x^2+y^2+z $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  For remark (c) and remark (e). Let $f(x, y) = -x^2 + 4 y^2$ and $g(x, y) = 2x-y$. The level set $\{g = 0\}$ separates $\{f<0\}, $ while $\{g = 0\}$ does not separate $\{f = 0\}$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  For remark (d). Let $f(x, y) = -x^2 + 4 y^2 - 1$ and $g(x, y) = x-5y$. The level set $\{g = 0\}$ separates $\{f = 0\}$ while $\{g = 0\}$ does not separate $\{f<0\}.$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  For remark (f) in which $ f(x, y) = -x^2 + 4 y^2 + 1 $ and $ g(x, y) = -(x-1)^2+4y^2+1 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  Graph for Proof of Theorem 3.1
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  For Example 2. Let $ f(x, y) = -\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} x^2 + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} y^2 + x - \frac{1}{2} y $ and $ g(x, y) = \frac{1}{2} x^2 - \frac{1}{2} y^2 + \sqrt{3} x - \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} y $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  The joint numerical range $ \mathbf{R}(f, g) $ in Example 3
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Chronological list of notable results related to problem (P)
1941
(Dines [3])		 (Dines Theorem)
$ \left\{ \left. \left( x^T A x, x^T B x \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $
is convex. Moreover, if $ x^T A x $ and $ x^T B x $ has no common zero except for $ x=0 $, then $ \left\{ \left. \left( x^T A x, x^T B x \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $ is either $ \mathbb{R}^2 $ or an angular sector of angle less than $ \pi $.
1961
(Brickmen [1])		 $ \mathbf{K}_{A, B} = \left\{ \left. \left( x^T A x, x^T B x \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n\; , \; \|x\|=1 \right\} $
is convex if $ n \geq 3 $.
1995
(Ramana & Goldman [11])
Unpublished		 $ \mathbf{R}(f, g) = \left\{ \left. \left( f(x), g(x) \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $
is convex if and only if $ \mathbf{R}(f, g) = \mathbf{R}(f_H, g_H) + \mathbf{R}(f, g) $, where $ f_H(x) = x^T A x $ and $ g_H(x) = x^T B x $.
$ \mathbf{R}(f, g) = \left\{ \left. \left( f(x), g(x) \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $
is convex if $ n \geq 2 $ and $ \exists\; \alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{R} $ such that $ \alpha A + \beta B \succ 0 $.
1998
(Polyak [10])		 $ \left\{ \left. \left( x^T A x, x^T B x, x^T C x \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $
is convex if $ n \geq 3 $ and $ \exists\; \alpha, \beta, \gamma \in \mathbb{R} $ such that $ \alpha A + \beta B + \gamma C \succ 0 $.
$ \left\{ \left. \left( x^T A_1 x, \cdots, x^T A_m x \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $
is convex if $ A_1, \cdots, A_m $ commute.
2016
(Bazán & Opazo [5])		 $ \mathbf{R}(f, g) = \left\{ \left. \left( f(x), g(x) \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $
is convex if and only if $ \exists\; d=(d_1, d_2) \in \mathbb{R}^2 $, $ d \neq 0 $, such that the following four conditions hold:
$ \bf{(C1):} $ $ F_L \left( \mathcal{N}(A) \cap \mathcal{N}(B) \right) = \{0\} $
$ \bf{(C2):} $ $ d_2 A = d_1 B $
$ \bf{(C3):} $ $ -d \in \mathbf{R}(f_H, g_H) $
$ \bf{(C4):} $ $ F_H(u) = -d \implies \langle F_L(u), d_{\perp}\rangle \neq 0 $
where $ \mathcal{N}(A) $ and $ \mathcal{N}(B) $ denote the null space of $ A $ and $ B $ respectively, $ F_H(x) = \left( f_H(x), g_H(x) \right) = \left( x^T A x , x^T B x \right) $, $ F_L(x) = \left( a^T x , b^T x \right) $, and $ d_{\perp} = (-d_2, d_1) $.
Table Options

Download as excel

1941
(Dines [3])		 (Dines Theorem)
$ \left\{ \left. \left( x^T A x, x^T B x \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $
is convex. Moreover, if $ x^T A x $ and $ x^T B x $ has no common zero except for $ x=0 $, then $ \left\{ \left. \left( x^T A x, x^T B x \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $ is either $ \mathbb{R}^2 $ or an angular sector of angle less than $ \pi $.
1961
(Brickmen [1])		 $ \mathbf{K}_{A, B} = \left\{ \left. \left( x^T A x, x^T B x \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n\; , \; \|x\|=1 \right\} $
is convex if $ n \geq 3 $.
1995
(Ramana & Goldman [11])
Unpublished		 $ \mathbf{R}(f, g) = \left\{ \left. \left( f(x), g(x) \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $
is convex if and only if $ \mathbf{R}(f, g) = \mathbf{R}(f_H, g_H) + \mathbf{R}(f, g) $, where $ f_H(x) = x^T A x $ and $ g_H(x) = x^T B x $.
$ \mathbf{R}(f, g) = \left\{ \left. \left( f(x), g(x) \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $
is convex if $ n \geq 2 $ and $ \exists\; \alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{R} $ such that $ \alpha A + \beta B \succ 0 $.
1998
(Polyak [10])		 $ \left\{ \left. \left( x^T A x, x^T B x, x^T C x \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $
is convex if $ n \geq 3 $ and $ \exists\; \alpha, \beta, \gamma \in \mathbb{R} $ such that $ \alpha A + \beta B + \gamma C \succ 0 $.
$ \left\{ \left. \left( x^T A_1 x, \cdots, x^T A_m x \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $
is convex if $ A_1, \cdots, A_m $ commute.
2016
(Bazán & Opazo [5])		 $ \mathbf{R}(f, g) = \left\{ \left. \left( f(x), g(x) \right) \; \right|\; x \in \mathbb{R}^n \right\} $
is convex if and only if $ \exists\; d=(d_1, d_2) \in \mathbb{R}^2 $, $ d \neq 0 $, such that the following four conditions hold:
$ \bf{(C1):} $ $ F_L \left( \mathcal{N}(A) \cap \mathcal{N}(B) \right) = \{0\} $
$ \bf{(C2):} $ $ d_2 A = d_1 B $
$ \bf{(C3):} $ $ -d \in \mathbf{R}(f_H, g_H) $
$ \bf{(C4):} $ $ F_H(u) = -d \implies \langle F_L(u), d_{\perp}\rangle \neq 0 $
where $ \mathcal{N}(A) $ and $ \mathcal{N}(B) $ denote the null space of $ A $ and $ B $ respectively, $ F_H(x) = \left( f_H(x), g_H(x) \right) = \left( x^T A x , x^T B x \right) $, $ F_L(x) = \left( a^T x , b^T x \right) $, and $ d_{\perp} = (-d_2, d_1) $.
[1]

Dan Zhu, Rosemary A. Renaut, Hongwei Li, Tianyou Liu. Fast non-convex low-rank matrix decomposition for separation of potential field data using minimal memory. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020076
[2]

Peng Luo. Comparison theorem for diagonally quadratic BSDEs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020374
[3]

Djamel Aaid, Amel Noui, Özen Özer. Piecewise quadratic bounding functions for finding real roots of polynomials. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (1) : 63-73. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020015
[4]

Wolfgang Riedl, Robert Baier, Matthias Gerdts. Optimization-based subdivision algorithm for reachable sets. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2021, 8 (1) : 99-130. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2021005
[5]

Héctor Barge. Čech cohomology, homoclinic trajectories and robustness of non-saddle sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020381
[6]

Lingfeng Li, Shousheng Luo, Xue-Cheng Tai, Jiang Yang. A new variational approach based on level-set function for convex hull problem with outliers. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020070
[7]

Marion Darbas, Jérémy Heleine, Stephanie Lohrengel. Numerical resolution by the quasi-reversibility method of a data completion problem for Maxwell's equations. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (6) : 1107-1133. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020056
[8]

Haodong Yu, Jie Sun. Robust stochastic optimization with convex risk measures: A discretized subgradient scheme. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 81-99. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019100
[9]

Vieri Benci, Marco Cococcioni. The algorithmic numbers in non-archimedean numerical computing environments. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020449
[10]

Riccarda Rossi, Ulisse Stefanelli, Marita Thomas. Rate-independent evolution of sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 89-119. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020304
[11]

Yi-Hsuan Lin, Gen Nakamura, Roland Potthast, Haibing Wang. Duality between range and no-response tests and its application for inverse problems. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020072
[12]

George W. Patrick. The geometry of convergence in numerical analysis. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2021, 8 (1) : 33-58. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2021003
[13]

Helmut Abels, Johannes Kampmann. Existence of weak solutions for a sharp interface model for phase separation on biological membranes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 331-351. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020325
[14]

Wenbin Li, Jianliang Qian. Simultaneously recovering both domain and varying density in inverse gravimetry by efficient level-set methods. Inverse Problems & Imaging, , () : -. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020073
[15]

Chao Wang, Qihuai Liu, Zhiguo Wang. Periodic bouncing solutions for Hill's type sub-linear oscillators with obstacles. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2021, 20 (1) : 281-300. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020266
[16]

Min Xi, Wenyu Sun, Jun Chen. Survey of derivative-free optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020, 10 (4) : 537-555. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020050
[17]

Predrag S. Stanimirović, Branislav Ivanov, Haifeng Ma, Dijana Mosić. A survey of gradient methods for solving nonlinear optimization. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1573-1624. doi: 10.3934/era.2020115
[18]

Xinpeng Wang, Bingo Wing-Kuen Ling, Wei-Chao Kuang, Zhijing Yang. Orthogonal intrinsic mode functions via optimization approach. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 51-66. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019098
[19]

Martin Heida, Stefan Neukamm, Mario Varga. Stochastic homogenization of $ \Lambda $-convex gradient flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (1) : 427-453. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020328
[20]

Zexuan Liu, Zhiyuan Sun, Jerry Zhijian Yang. A numerical study of superconvergence of the discontinuous Galerkin method by patch reconstruction. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (4) : 1487-1501. doi: 10.3934/era.2020078

2019 Impact Factor: 1.366

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (10)
  • HTML views (48)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences