American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020180
Online First

Online First articles are published articles within a journal that have not yet been assigned to a formal issue. This means they do not yet have a volume number, issue number, or page numbers assigned to them, however, they can still be found and cited using their DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Online First publication benefits the research community by making new scientific discoveries known as quickly as possible.

Readers can access Online First articles via the “Online First” tab for the selected journal.

Energy management method for an unpowered landing

 School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China

* Corresponding author: Yingjing Shi (shiyingjing@uestc.edu.cn)

Received  June 2020 Revised  September 2020 Early access December 2020

Fund Project: This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant (No. 61973055), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. ZYGX2019J062) and a grant from the applied basic research programs of Sichuan province (No. 2019YJ0206).

The unpowered landing of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is a critical stage, which affects the safety of flight. To solve the problem of the unpowered landing of UAV, an energy management scheme is proposed. After the cruise is over, the aircraft shuts down the engine and begins to land. When the aircraft is in the high altitude, the dynamic pressure is too large, and it is difficult to open the speed brake. When the aircraft is in the low altitude, it is close to the runway. The method of S-turn may make the aircraft veer off the runway and may be unable to land. So two different schemes of high altitude and low altitude are designed to control energy. In the high altitude, when the energy is too high, it takes the S-turn scheme to consume excess energy. At the same time, the availability and reasonability of the S-turn scheme is demonstrated. In the low altitude, the open angle of speed brake is controlled to adjust the energy consumption. Finally, the simulation results are given to illustrate the availability of energy management.

Citation: Xiaoxiao Li, Yingjing Shi, Rui Li, Shida Cao. Energy management method for an unpowered landing. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020180
References:

show all references

References:
The full ground track of S-turn scheme
Flow chart of terminal energy management at various phase
The prediction of range in acquisition phase
The prediction of range in HAC-Turn phase
Track angle of aircraft
The judgment nominal line of aircraft in pre-approach phase
The force direction of the aircraft
The high energy change of the S-turning scheme
The range of the S-turning scheme at high energy
The low energy change of the S-turning scheme
The range of the S-turning scheme at low energy
The angle of speed brake in the nominal case
The angle of speed brake at high energy
The angle of speed brake at low energy
The resistance of closed speed brake and opened speed brake
 h(m) $\rho(kg/m^3)$ $\alpha (^\circ)$ $D_c$(N) $D_o$(N) 4500 0.7768 4.86 5541 7565 4000 0.8191 4.74 5643 7782 3500 0.8632 4.46 5769 8028 3000 0.9091 4.36 5913 8296 2500 0.9569 4.12 6071 8558 2000 1.0065 3.76 11760 14290 1500 1.0580 3.60 12290 14950 1000 1.1116 3.44 12840 15630
 h(m) $\rho(kg/m^3)$ $\alpha (^\circ)$ $D_c$(N) $D_o$(N) 4500 0.7768 4.86 5541 7565 4000 0.8191 4.74 5643 7782 3500 0.8632 4.46 5769 8028 3000 0.9091 4.36 5913 8296 2500 0.9569 4.12 6071 8558 2000 1.0065 3.76 11760 14290 1500 1.0580 3.60 12290 14950 1000 1.1116 3.44 12840 15630
The control effect of the speed brake
 Speed brake Glide angle (high/low) Touchdown velocity Closed $-9^{\circ}/-15^{\circ}/-19^{\circ}$ 293.4km/h Fully opened $-29^{\circ}/-15^{\circ}/-19^{\circ}$ 290.2km/h
 Speed brake Glide angle (high/low) Touchdown velocity Closed $-9^{\circ}/-15^{\circ}/-19^{\circ}$ 293.4km/h Fully opened $-29^{\circ}/-15^{\circ}/-19^{\circ}$ 290.2km/h
 [1] Harald Held, Gabriela Martinez, Philipp Emanuel Stelzig. Stochastic programming approach for energy management in electric microgrids. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2014, 4 (3) : 241-267. doi: 10.3934/naco.2014.4.241 [2] Shuhua Zhang, Xinyu Wang, Song Wang. Modeling and computation of energy efficiency management with emission permits trading. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (4) : 1349-1365. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018010 [3] Julien Dambrine, Morgan Pierre. Continuity with respect to the speed for optimal ship forms based on Michell's formula. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021049 [4] Ely Kerman. Displacement energy of coisotropic submanifolds and Hofer's geometry. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2008, 2 (3) : 471-497. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2008.2.471 [5] Hideaki Takagi. Extension of Littlewood's rule to the multi-period static revenue management model with standby customers. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 2181-2202. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020064 [6] Jianxun Fu, Song Zhang. A new type of non-landing exponential rays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (7) : 4179-4196. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020177 [7] Reza Lotfi, Zahra Yadegari, Seyed Hossein Hosseini, Amir Hossein Khameneh, Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber. A robust time-cost-quality-energy-environment trade-off with resource-constrained in project management: A case study for a bridge construction project. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020158 [8] Kim Dang Phung. Energy decay for Maxwell's equations with Ohm's law in partially cubic domains. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2013, 12 (5) : 2229-2266. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2013.12.2229 [9] M. H. Shavakh, B. Bidabad. Time-optimal of fixed wing UAV aircraft with input and output constraints. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/naco.2021023 [10] Yi Cui, Xintong Fang, Gaoqi Liu, Bin Li. Trajectory optimization of UAV based on Hp-adaptive Radau pseudospectral method. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021201 [11] Gafurjan Ibragimov, Askar Rakhmanov, Idham Arif Alias, Mai Zurwatul Ahlam Mohd Jaffar. The soft landing problem for an infinite system of second order differential equations. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (1) : 89-94. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017005 [12] James Walsh. Diffusive heat transport in Budyko's energy balance climate model with a dynamic ice line. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (7) : 2687-2715. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017131 [13] Yuika Kajihara, Misturu Shibayama. Variational proof of the existence of brake orbits in the planar 2-center problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (10) : 5785-5797. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019254 [14] Sanjay K. Mazumdar, Cheng-Chew Lim. A neural network based anti-skid brake system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1999, 5 (2) : 321-338. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.321 [15] B. Buffoni, F. Giannoni. Brake periodic orbits of prescribed Hamiltonian for indefinite Lagrangian systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1995, 1 (2) : 217-222. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1995.1.217 [16] Chungen Liu. Minimal period estimates for brake orbits of nonlinear symmetric Hamiltonian systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 27 (1) : 337-355. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.337 [17] Mohammed Mesk, Ali Moussaoui. On an upper bound for the spreading speed. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021210 [18] Andrew P. Sage. Risk in system of systems engineering and management. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2008, 4 (3) : 477-487. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2008.4.477 [19] Alexandre Bayen, Rinaldo M. Colombo, Paola Goatin, Benedetto Piccoli. Traffic modeling and management: Trends and perspectives. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2014, 7 (3) : i-ii. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2014.7.3i [20] Jian-Xin Guo, Xing-Long Qu. Robust control in green production management. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021011

2020 Impact Factor: 1.801