American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021011
Online First

Online First articles are published articles within a journal that have not yet been assigned to a formal issue. This means they do not yet have a volume number, issue number, or page numbers assigned to them, however, they can still be found and cited using their DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Online First publication benefits the research community by making new scientific discoveries known as quickly as possible.

Readers can access Online First articles via the “Online First” tab for the selected journal.

Robust control in green production management

Jian-Xin Guo 1,, and  Xing-Long Qu 2,

1. 

Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2. 

The Research Center of Information Technology & Social and Economic Development, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China

* Corresponding author: Jian-Xin Guo, guojianxin@casisd.cn

Received  February 2020 Revised  October 2020 Early access December 2020

Fund Project: Support from National Key R&D Program of China, 2018YFC1509008; National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant No. 71801212 and 71701058.

This study proposes a robust control model for a production management problem related to dynamic pricing and green investment. Contaminants produced during the production process contribute to the accumulation of pollution stochastically. We derive optimal robust controls and identify conditions under which some concerns about model misspecification are discussed. We observe that optimal price and investment control decrease in the degree of robustness. We also examine the cost of robustness and the relevant importance of contributions in the overall value function. The theoretical results are applied to a calibrated model regarding production management. Finally, we compare robust choices with those in the benchmark stochastic model. Numerical simulations show that robust decision-making can indeed adjust investment decisions based on the level of uncertainty.

Keywords: Robust control, model misspecification, pollution accumulation, green production.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 93E20; Secondary: 49L05.
Citation: Jian-Xin Guo, Xing-Long Qu. Robust control in green production management. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021011
References:
[1]

S. Athanassoglou and A. Xepapadeas, Pollution control with uncertain stock dynamics: When, and how, to be precautious, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63 (2012), 304-320.   Google Scholar

[2]

H. Barman, M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G. W. Weber, Back-ordered inventory model with inflation in a cloudy-fuzzy environment, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 13 (2020), Sourced from Microsoft Academic - https://academic.microsoft.com/paper/3009545728. Google Scholar

[3]

W. A. Brock, A. Xepapadeas and A. N. Yannacopoulos, Robust control and hot spots in spatiotemporal economic systems, Dyn. Games Appl., 4 (2014), 257-289.  doi: 10.1007/s13235-014-0109-z.  Google Scholar

[4]

S. H. Chung, R. D. Weaver and T. L. Friesz, Strategic response to pollution taxes in supply chain networks: Dynamic, spatial, and organizational dimensions, European J. Oper. Res., 231 (2013), 314-327.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.05.036.  Google Scholar

[5]

C. Dong, B. Shen, P.-S. Chow, L. Yang and C. T. Ng, Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation, Ann. Oper. Res., 240 (2016), 509-531.  doi: 10.1007/s10479-013-1514-1.  Google Scholar

[6]

F. El Ouardighi, H. Benchekroun and D. Grass, Controlling pollution and environmental absorption capacity, Ann. Oper. Res., 220 (2014), 111-133.  doi: 10.1007/s10479-011-0982-4.  Google Scholar

[7]

F. El Ouardighi, J. E. Sim and B. Kim, Pollution accumulation and abatement policy in a supply chain, European J. Oper. Res., 248 (2016), 982-996.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.009.  Google Scholar

[8]

M. Funke and M. Paetz, Environmental policy under model uncertainty: A robust optimal control approach, Climatic Change, 107 (2011), 225-239.   Google Scholar

[9]

I. Gilboa and D. Schmeidler, Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior, J. Math. Econom., 18 (1989), 141-151.  doi: 10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9.  Google Scholar

[10]

H. Golpira and E. B. Tirkolaee, Stable maintenance tasks scheduling: A bi-objective robust optimization model, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137 (2019), Sourced from Microsoft Academic - https://academic.microsoft.com/paper/2964639183. Google Scholar

[11]

L. P. Hansen and T. J. Sargent, Robustness and ambiguity in continuous time, J. Econom. Theory, 146 (2011), 1195-1223.  doi: 10.1016/j.jet.2011.01.004.  Google Scholar

[12]

L. P. Hansen and T. J. Sargent, Robust control of forward-looking models, Journal of monetary Economics, 50 (2003), 581-604.   Google Scholar

[13]

L. P. Hansen, T. J. Sargent, G. Turmuhambetova and N. Williams, Robust control and model misspecification, J. Econom. Theory, 128 (2006), 45-90.  doi: 10.1016/j.jet.2004.12.006.  Google Scholar

[14]

N. Jaakkola and F. van der Ploeg, Non-cooperative and cooperative climate policies with anticipated breakthrough technology, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 97 (2019), 42-66.   Google Scholar

[15]

K. Jiang, R. Merrill, D. You, P. Pan and Z. Li, Optimal control for transboundary pollution under ecological compensation: A stochastic differential game approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 241 (2019), 118391. Google Scholar

[16]

S. Jørgensen and G. Zaccour, Incentive equilibrium strategies and welfare allocation in a dynamic game of pollution control, Automatica J. IFAC, 37 (2001), 29-36.  doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(00)00119-9.  Google Scholar

[17]

E. Keeler, M. Spence and R. Zeckhauser, The Optimal Control of Pollution, Taylor & Francis Oxford, 1971. Google Scholar

[18]

K. Kogan, F. El Ouardighi and A Herbon, Production with learning and forgetting in a competitive environment, International Journal of Production Economics, 189 (2017), 52-62.   Google Scholar

[19]

N. Masoudi, M. Santugini and G. Zaccour, A dynamic game of emissions pollution with uncertainty and learning, Environmental and Resource Economics, 64 (2016), 349-372.   Google Scholar

[20]

N. Masoudi and G. Zaccour, Emissions control policies under uncertainty and rational learning in a linear-state dynamic model, Automatica J. IFAC, 50 (2014), 719-726.  doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.11.040.  Google Scholar

[21]

J. Miao and A. Rivera, Robust contracts in continuous time, Econometrica, 84 (2016), 1405-1440.  doi: 10.3982/ECTA13127.  Google Scholar

[22]

M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G.-W. Weber, Analysis of inventory control model with shortage under time-dependent demand and time-varying holding cost including stochastic deterioration, Ann. Oper. Res., 260 (2018), 437-460.  doi: 10.1007/s10479-016-2355-5.  Google Scholar

[23]

M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G. W. Weber, An integrated vendor-buyer model with quadratic demand under inspection policy and preservation technology, Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 49 (2020), 1168-1189. Google Scholar

[24]

M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G. W.Weber, An integrated inventory model with variable holding cost under two levels of trade-credit policy, Numer. Algebra Control Optim., 8 (2018), 169-191.  doi: 10.3934/naco.2018010.  Google Scholar

[25]

M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G. W. Weber, Deteriorating inventory with preservation technology under price-and stock-sensitive demand, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 16 (2020), 1585-1612.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019019.  Google Scholar

[26]

M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G. W. Weber, Multi-item deteriorating two-echelon inventory model with price-and stock-dependent demand: A trade-credit policy, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 15 (2019), 1345-1373.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018098.  Google Scholar

[27]

M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G. W. Weber, A Two-echelon inventory model with stock-dependent demand and variable holding cost for deteriorating items, Numer. Algebra Control Optim., 7 (2017), 21-50.  doi: 10.3934/naco.2017002.  Google Scholar

[28]

C. Roseta-Palma and A. Xepapadeas, Robust control in water management, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 29 (2004), 21-34.   Google Scholar

[29]

S. K. Roy, M. Pervin and G. W. Weber, Imperfection with inspection policy and variable demand under trade-credit: A deteriorating inventory model, Numer. Algebra Control Optim., 10 (2020), 45-74.  doi: 10.3934/naco.2019032.  Google Scholar

[30]

S. K. Roy, M. Pervin and G. W. Weber, A two-warehouse probabilistic model with price discount on backorders under two levels of trade-credit policy, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 16 (2020), 553-578.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018167.  Google Scholar

[31]

A. K. Sangaiah, E. B. Tirkolaee, A. Goli and S. Dehnavi-Arani, Robust optimization and mixed-integer linear programming model for LNG supply chain planning problem, Soft Computing, 24 (2020), 7885-7905.   Google Scholar

[32]

E. B. Tirkolaee, S. Hadian, G.-W. Weber and I. Mahdavi, A robust green traffic-based routing problem for perishable products distribution, Computational Intelligence, 36 (2020), 80-101.   Google Scholar

[33]

E. B. Tirkolaee, I. Mahdavi, M. M. S. Esfahani and G.-W. Weber, A robust green location-allocation-inventory problem to design an urban waste management system under uncertainty, Waste Management, 102 (2020), 340-350.   Google Scholar

[34]

G. Vardas and A. Xepapadeas, Model uncertainty, ambiguity and the precautionary principle: implications for biodiversity management, Environmental and Resource Economics, 45 (2010), 379-404.   Google Scholar

[35]

A. Yenipazarli, To collaborate or not to collaborate: Prompting upstream eco-efficient innovation in a supply chain, European J. Oper. Res., 260 (2017), 571-587.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.12.035.  Google Scholar

[36]

J. Yu and M. L. Mallory, An optimal hybrid emission control system in a multiple compliance period model, Resource and Energy Economics, 39 (2015), 16-28.   Google Scholar

[37]

Q. Zhang, W. Tang and J. Zhang, Green supply chain performance with cost learning and operational inefficiency effects, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112 (2016), 3267-3284.   Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

S. Athanassoglou and A. Xepapadeas, Pollution control with uncertain stock dynamics: When, and how, to be precautious, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63 (2012), 304-320.   Google Scholar

[2]

H. Barman, M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G. W. Weber, Back-ordered inventory model with inflation in a cloudy-fuzzy environment, Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 13 (2020), Sourced from Microsoft Academic - https://academic.microsoft.com/paper/3009545728. Google Scholar

[3]

W. A. Brock, A. Xepapadeas and A. N. Yannacopoulos, Robust control and hot spots in spatiotemporal economic systems, Dyn. Games Appl., 4 (2014), 257-289.  doi: 10.1007/s13235-014-0109-z.  Google Scholar

[4]

S. H. Chung, R. D. Weaver and T. L. Friesz, Strategic response to pollution taxes in supply chain networks: Dynamic, spatial, and organizational dimensions, European J. Oper. Res., 231 (2013), 314-327.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.05.036.  Google Scholar

[5]

C. Dong, B. Shen, P.-S. Chow, L. Yang and C. T. Ng, Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation, Ann. Oper. Res., 240 (2016), 509-531.  doi: 10.1007/s10479-013-1514-1.  Google Scholar

[6]

F. El Ouardighi, H. Benchekroun and D. Grass, Controlling pollution and environmental absorption capacity, Ann. Oper. Res., 220 (2014), 111-133.  doi: 10.1007/s10479-011-0982-4.  Google Scholar

[7]

F. El Ouardighi, J. E. Sim and B. Kim, Pollution accumulation and abatement policy in a supply chain, European J. Oper. Res., 248 (2016), 982-996.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.009.  Google Scholar

[8]

M. Funke and M. Paetz, Environmental policy under model uncertainty: A robust optimal control approach, Climatic Change, 107 (2011), 225-239.   Google Scholar

[9]

I. Gilboa and D. Schmeidler, Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior, J. Math. Econom., 18 (1989), 141-151.  doi: 10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9.  Google Scholar

[10]

H. Golpira and E. B. Tirkolaee, Stable maintenance tasks scheduling: A bi-objective robust optimization model, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137 (2019), Sourced from Microsoft Academic - https://academic.microsoft.com/paper/2964639183. Google Scholar

[11]

L. P. Hansen and T. J. Sargent, Robustness and ambiguity in continuous time, J. Econom. Theory, 146 (2011), 1195-1223.  doi: 10.1016/j.jet.2011.01.004.  Google Scholar

[12]

L. P. Hansen and T. J. Sargent, Robust control of forward-looking models, Journal of monetary Economics, 50 (2003), 581-604.   Google Scholar

[13]

L. P. Hansen, T. J. Sargent, G. Turmuhambetova and N. Williams, Robust control and model misspecification, J. Econom. Theory, 128 (2006), 45-90.  doi: 10.1016/j.jet.2004.12.006.  Google Scholar

[14]

N. Jaakkola and F. van der Ploeg, Non-cooperative and cooperative climate policies with anticipated breakthrough technology, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 97 (2019), 42-66.   Google Scholar

[15]

K. Jiang, R. Merrill, D. You, P. Pan and Z. Li, Optimal control for transboundary pollution under ecological compensation: A stochastic differential game approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 241 (2019), 118391. Google Scholar

[16]

S. Jørgensen and G. Zaccour, Incentive equilibrium strategies and welfare allocation in a dynamic game of pollution control, Automatica J. IFAC, 37 (2001), 29-36.  doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(00)00119-9.  Google Scholar

[17]

E. Keeler, M. Spence and R. Zeckhauser, The Optimal Control of Pollution, Taylor & Francis Oxford, 1971. Google Scholar

[18]

K. Kogan, F. El Ouardighi and A Herbon, Production with learning and forgetting in a competitive environment, International Journal of Production Economics, 189 (2017), 52-62.   Google Scholar

[19]

N. Masoudi, M. Santugini and G. Zaccour, A dynamic game of emissions pollution with uncertainty and learning, Environmental and Resource Economics, 64 (2016), 349-372.   Google Scholar

[20]

N. Masoudi and G. Zaccour, Emissions control policies under uncertainty and rational learning in a linear-state dynamic model, Automatica J. IFAC, 50 (2014), 719-726.  doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.11.040.  Google Scholar

[21]

J. Miao and A. Rivera, Robust contracts in continuous time, Econometrica, 84 (2016), 1405-1440.  doi: 10.3982/ECTA13127.  Google Scholar

[22]

M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G.-W. Weber, Analysis of inventory control model with shortage under time-dependent demand and time-varying holding cost including stochastic deterioration, Ann. Oper. Res., 260 (2018), 437-460.  doi: 10.1007/s10479-016-2355-5.  Google Scholar

[23]

M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G. W. Weber, An integrated vendor-buyer model with quadratic demand under inspection policy and preservation technology, Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 49 (2020), 1168-1189. Google Scholar

[24]

M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G. W.Weber, An integrated inventory model with variable holding cost under two levels of trade-credit policy, Numer. Algebra Control Optim., 8 (2018), 169-191.  doi: 10.3934/naco.2018010.  Google Scholar

[25]

M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G. W. Weber, Deteriorating inventory with preservation technology under price-and stock-sensitive demand, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 16 (2020), 1585-1612.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019019.  Google Scholar

[26]

M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G. W. Weber, Multi-item deteriorating two-echelon inventory model with price-and stock-dependent demand: A trade-credit policy, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 15 (2019), 1345-1373.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018098.  Google Scholar

[27]

M. Pervin, S. K. Roy and G. W. Weber, A Two-echelon inventory model with stock-dependent demand and variable holding cost for deteriorating items, Numer. Algebra Control Optim., 7 (2017), 21-50.  doi: 10.3934/naco.2017002.  Google Scholar

[28]

C. Roseta-Palma and A. Xepapadeas, Robust control in water management, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 29 (2004), 21-34.   Google Scholar

[29]

S. K. Roy, M. Pervin and G. W. Weber, Imperfection with inspection policy and variable demand under trade-credit: A deteriorating inventory model, Numer. Algebra Control Optim., 10 (2020), 45-74.  doi: 10.3934/naco.2019032.  Google Scholar

[30]

S. K. Roy, M. Pervin and G. W. Weber, A two-warehouse probabilistic model with price discount on backorders under two levels of trade-credit policy, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 16 (2020), 553-578.  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018167.  Google Scholar

[31]

A. K. Sangaiah, E. B. Tirkolaee, A. Goli and S. Dehnavi-Arani, Robust optimization and mixed-integer linear programming model for LNG supply chain planning problem, Soft Computing, 24 (2020), 7885-7905.   Google Scholar

[32]

E. B. Tirkolaee, S. Hadian, G.-W. Weber and I. Mahdavi, A robust green traffic-based routing problem for perishable products distribution, Computational Intelligence, 36 (2020), 80-101.   Google Scholar

[33]

E. B. Tirkolaee, I. Mahdavi, M. M. S. Esfahani and G.-W. Weber, A robust green location-allocation-inventory problem to design an urban waste management system under uncertainty, Waste Management, 102 (2020), 340-350.   Google Scholar

[34]

G. Vardas and A. Xepapadeas, Model uncertainty, ambiguity and the precautionary principle: implications for biodiversity management, Environmental and Resource Economics, 45 (2010), 379-404.   Google Scholar

[35]

A. Yenipazarli, To collaborate or not to collaborate: Prompting upstream eco-efficient innovation in a supply chain, European J. Oper. Res., 260 (2017), 571-587.  doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.12.035.  Google Scholar

[36]

J. Yu and M. L. Mallory, An optimal hybrid emission control system in a multiple compliance period model, Resource and Energy Economics, 39 (2015), 16-28.   Google Scholar

[37]

Q. Zhang, W. Tang and J. Zhang, Green supply chain performance with cost learning and operational inefficiency effects, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112 (2016), 3267-3284.   Google Scholar

Figure 1.  $ p^{*}(S) $ with different levels of robustness
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  $ e^{*}(S) $ with different levels of model robustness
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Price $ p_t $ sensitivity analysis: the left image is $ k_p = k_p(s, \theta) $, and the right image is $ b_p = b_p(s, \theta) $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Abatement effort $ e_t $ sensitivity analysis: the left image is $ k_e = k_e(s, \theta) $, and the right image is $ b_e = b_e(s, \theta) $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Demand $ d_t $ sensitivity analysis: the left image is $ k_d = k_d(s, \theta) $, and the right image is $ b_d = b_d(s, \theta) $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  Model parameters used in the simulation
Parameter Description Value
$ T $ Time Duration 20
$ S_0 $ Pollution stock in the initial year 100
$ r $ Compound Rate 5%
$ \alpha $ Potential market size 1001
$ \beta $ Coefficient in the demand function associated with the sales price 11
$ s $ Co-benefit of the abatement effort 0.12
$ \tau $ Coefficient of environmental damage caused by accumulation of pollution 0.53
$ c $ Cost coefficient associated with firm's pollution abatement effort 14
$ \delta $ Pollution decay rate 0.13
$ \sigma $ Volatility parameter in $ S_t $ 105
$ \theta $ Robust parameter depends
1 Parameters in the demand function mainly refer to the relevant literature [38, 5, 7] and are corrected. The special relative relationship must be kept reasonable.
2 This parameter mainly refers to [5], whose magnitude corresponds to $\alpha, \beta$.
3 This parameter mainly refers to [17] and is adjusted.
4 This parameter mainly refers to [7] and is adjusted.
5 This parameter mainly refers to [29] and is adjusted.
Table Options

Download as excel

Parameter Description Value
$ T $ Time Duration 20
$ S_0 $ Pollution stock in the initial year 100
$ r $ Compound Rate 5%
$ \alpha $ Potential market size 1001
$ \beta $ Coefficient in the demand function associated with the sales price 11
$ s $ Co-benefit of the abatement effort 0.12
$ \tau $ Coefficient of environmental damage caused by accumulation of pollution 0.53
$ c $ Cost coefficient associated with firm's pollution abatement effort 14
$ \delta $ Pollution decay rate 0.13
$ \sigma $ Volatility parameter in $ S_t $ 105
$ \theta $ Robust parameter depends
1 Parameters in the demand function mainly refer to the relevant literature [38, 5, 7] and are corrected. The special relative relationship must be kept reasonable.
2 This parameter mainly refers to [5], whose magnitude corresponds to $\alpha, \beta$.
3 This parameter mainly refers to [17] and is adjusted.
4 This parameter mainly refers to [7] and is adjusted.
5 This parameter mainly refers to [29] and is adjusted.
Table 2.  Model parameters with different levels of robustness
$ l $ $ m $ $ n $ $ \Delta_m $ $ \Delta_n $
$ \theta $=200 106304.82 -258.15 0.27 -138.15 0.11
$ \theta $=500 81176.12 -153.22 0.16 -33.22 0.03
$ \theta $=800 77749.76 -138.88 0.15 -18.88 0.02
$ \theta=\infty $ 73244.95 -120.0 0.13 0 0
Table Options

Download as excel

$ l $ $ m $ $ n $ $ \Delta_m $ $ \Delta_n $
$ \theta $=200 106304.82 -258.15 0.27 -138.15 0.11
$ \theta $=500 81176.12 -153.22 0.16 -33.22 0.03
$ \theta $=800 77749.76 -138.88 0.15 -18.88 0.02
$ \theta=\infty $ 73244.95 -120.0 0.13 0 0
Table 3.  Control processes with different levels of robustness
$ h_t $ $ p_t $ $ e_t $
$ \theta $=200 -0.03$ S $ + 12.90 -0.28$ S $ + 185.34 -0.25$ S $ + 125.43
$ \theta $=500 -0.006$ S $ + 3.06 -0.16$ S $ + 130.38 -0.15$ S $ + 75.46
$ \theta $=800 -0.003$ S $ + 1.73 -0.15$ S $ + 122.87 -0.14$ S $ + 68.63
$ \theta=\infty $ 0 -0.13$ S $ + 112.98 -0.12$ S $ + 59.64
Table Options

Download as excel

$ h_t $ $ p_t $ $ e_t $
$ \theta $=200 -0.03$ S $ + 12.90 -0.28$ S $ + 185.34 -0.25$ S $ + 125.43
$ \theta $=500 -0.006$ S $ + 3.06 -0.16$ S $ + 130.38 -0.15$ S $ + 75.46
$ \theta $=800 -0.003$ S $ + 1.73 -0.15$ S $ + 122.87 -0.14$ S $ + 68.63
$ \theta=\infty $ 0 -0.13$ S $ + 112.98 -0.12$ S $ + 59.64
[1]

Ellina Grigorieva, Evgenii Khailov. Optimal control of pollution stock. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 578-588. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.578
[2]

Maedeh Agahgolnezhad Gerdrodbari, Fatemeh Harsej, Mahboubeh Sadeghpour, Mohammad Molani Aghdam. A robust multi-objective model for managing the distribution of perishable products within a green closed-loop supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021107
[3]

Roberta Ghezzi, Benedetto Piccoli. Optimal control of a multi-level dynamic model for biofuel production. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (2) : 235-257. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017008
[4]

T. Tachim Medjo. Robust control of a Cahn-Hilliard-Navier-Stokes model. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (6) : 2075-2101. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016028
[5]

Yuepeng Wang, Yue Cheng, I. Michael Navon, Yuanhong Guan. Parameter identification techniques applied to an environmental pollution model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (2) : 817-831. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017077
[6]

Caojin Zhang, George Yin, Qing Zhang, Le Yi Wang. Pollution control for switching diffusion models: Approximation methods and numerical results. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (8) : 3667-3687. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018310
[7]

Lino J. Alvarez-Vázquez, Néstor García-Chan, Aurea Martínez, Miguel E. Vázquez-Méndez. Optimal control of urban air pollution related to traffic flow in road networks. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (1) : 177-193. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018008
[8]

A Voutilainen, Jari P. Kaipio. Model reduction and pollution source identification from remote sensing data. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2009, 3 (4) : 711-730. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2009.3.711
[9]

Gregory Zitelli, Seddik M. Djouadi, Judy D. Day. Combining robust state estimation with nonlinear model predictive control to regulate the acute inflammatory response to pathogen. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (5) : 1127-1139. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.1127
[10]

Pasquale Palumbo, Pierdomenico Pepe, Simona Panunzi, Andrea De Gaetano. Robust closed-loop control of plasma glycemia: A discrete-delay model approach. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 12 (2) : 455-468. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.455
[11]

T. Tachim Medjo, Louis Tcheugoue Tebou. Robust control problems in fluid flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2005, 12 (3) : 437-463. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.12.437
[12]

Lingshuang Kong, Changjun Yu, Kok Lay Teo, Chunhua Yang. Robust real-time optimization for blending operation of alumina production. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (3) : 1149-1167. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016066
[13]

Michela Eleuteri, Jana Kopfov, Pavel Krej?. Fatigue accumulation in an oscillating plate. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (4) : 909-923. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.909
[14]

Simone Göttlich, Patrick Schindler. Optimal inflow control of production systems with finite buffers. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (1) : 107-127. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.107
[15]

T. Tachim Medjo. On the Newton method in robust control of fluid flow. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (5) : 1201-1222. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.1201
[16]

T. Tachim Medjo. Robust control problems for primitive equations of the ocean. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 15 (3) : 769-788. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.15.769
[17]

Magdi S. Mahmoud, Omar Al-Buraiki. Robust control design of autonomous bicycle kinematics. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2014, 4 (3) : 181-191. doi: 10.3934/naco.2014.4.181
[18]

Xavier Litrico, Vincent Fromion, Gérard Scorletti. Robust feedforward boundary control of hyperbolic conservation laws. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2007, 2 (4) : 717-731. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2007.2.717
[19]

Faker Ben Belgacem. Uniqueness for an ill-posed reaction-dispersion model. Application to organic pollution in stream-waters. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2012, 6 (2) : 163-181. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2012.6.163
[20]

Gabriel Soler López. Accumulation points of flows on the Klein bottle. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (2) : 497-503. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.497

2020 Impact Factor: 1.801

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy