
-
Previous Article
Impact of cap-and-trade regulation on coordinating perishable products supply chain with cost learning
- JIMO Home
- This Issue
-
Next Article
Maxillofacial surgical simulation system with haptic feedback
Identifying and determining crowdsourcing service strategies: An empirical study on a crowdsourcing platform in China
1. | School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China |
2. | Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32611, USA |
The crowdsourcing platforms, as mediators and service providers, play a critical role in crowdsourcing initiatives. The service quality of a platform has a direct impact on solver satisfaction, and ultimately affects the platform's continuous operation. Service quality can be measured by service quality attributes (SQAs). Thus, identifying and quantifying SQAs are crucial to enhance solver satisfaction. Besides, choosing pertinent strategies and determining priorities for the SQAs are another core issue. To address these issues, this study proposes a novel decision framework that combines the Fuzzy Analytical Kano (FAK) and the Importance-performance analysis (IPA) models. Firstly, 24 related SQAs are identified from five dimensions of service quality. Secondly, we quantify these SQAs into a polar form representation scheme in accordance with the FAK model. In addition, the pertinent service strategies and priorities of the SQAs are confirmed by using the IPA model and Kano categories. Finally, decision priority rules for corresponding strategies and priorities of SQAs are constructed. An empirical study is presented to demonstrate our proposed decision framework on ZBJ platform, which is one of the most widely used online crowdsourcing platform in China.
References:
[1] |
S. À. Campo, V. J. Khan, K. Papangelis and P. Markopoulos,
Community heuristics for user interface evaluation of crowdsourcing platforms, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 95 (2019), 775-789.
doi: 10.1016/j.future.2018.02.028. |
[2] |
R. Alharthi, E. Aloufi, I. Alrashd, A. Alqazzaz and J. Rrushi, Protecting location privacy for crowd workers in spatial crowdsourcing using a novel dummy-based mechanism, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 114608-114622. Google Scholar |
[3] |
E. W. Anderson and V. Mittal,
Strengthening the satisfaction-profit chain, J. Serv. Res., 3 (2000), 107-120.
doi: 10.1177/109467050032001. |
[4] |
N. Archak, Money, Glory and Cheap Talk: Analyzing Strategic Behavior of Contestants in Simultaneous Crowdsourcing Contests on TopCoder. com, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, North Carolina, 2010.
doi: 10.1145/1772690.1772694. |
[5] |
S. Balasubramanian, P. Konana and N. M. Menon,
Customer satisfaction in virtual environments: A study of online investing, Manag. Sci., 49 (2003), 871-889.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.7.871.16385. |
[6] |
B. L. Bayus,
Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community, Manag. Sci., 59 (2012), 226-244.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1599. |
[7] |
C. Berger, R. Blauth and D. Boger, Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality, Cent. Qual. Manag., 2 (1993), 3-36. Google Scholar |
[8] |
D. C. Brabham, Moving the crowd at iStockphoto: The composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application, First Monday, 13 (2008).
doi: 10.5210/fm. v13i6.2159. |
[9] |
D. C. Brabham,
Moving the crowd at threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application, Inf. Commun. Soc., 13 (2010), 1122-1145.
doi: 10.1080/13691181003624090. |
[10] |
J. Chen, R. Mo, J. Chu, S. Yu and F. Cheng,
Research on the optimal combination and scheduling method of crowdsourcing members in a cloud design platform, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 233 (2019), 2196-2209.
doi: 10.1177/0954405419855874. |
[11] |
X. Cheng, Q. Gou, J. Yue and Y. Zhang,
Equilibrium decisions for an innovation crowdsourcing platform, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 125 (2019), 241-260.
doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.006. |
[12] |
H. Cho, M. Chen and S. Chung,
Testing an integrative theoretical model of knowledge-sharing behavior in the context of Wikipedia, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci Technol., 61 (2010), 1198-1212.
doi: 10.1002/asi.21316. |
[13] |
R. K. S. Chu and T. Choi,
An importance-performance analysis of hotel selection factors in the Hong Kong hotel industry: A comparison of business and leisure travellers, Tour Manag., 21 (2000), 363-377.
doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00070-9. |
[14] |
X. N. Deng, K. D. Joshi and R. D. Galliers, An importance-performance analysis of hotel selection factors in the Hong Kong hotel industry: A comparison of business and leisure travellers, MIS Q., 40 (2016), 279-302. Google Scholar |
[15] |
B. Gong, X. Chen and C. Hu,
Fuzzy entropy clustering approach to evaluate the reliability of emergency logistics system, Energy Procedia., 16 (2012), 278-283.
doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.01.046. |
[16] |
J. Howe, The rise of crowdsourcing, Wired Mag., 14 (2006), 1-4. Google Scholar |
[17] |
J. Howe, Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business, 1$^st$ edition, Crown Publishing Group, New York, 2008. Google Scholar |
[18] |
J. C. Huang, Application of Kano model and IPA on improvement of service quality of mobile healthcare, Int. J. Mob. Commun., 16 (2018), 227-246. Google Scholar |
[19] |
L. C. Huang, W. L. Shiau and Y. H. Lin,
What factors satisfy e-book store customers? Development of a model to evaluate e-book user behavior and satisfaction, Internet Res., 27 (2017), 563-585.
doi: 10.1108/IntR-05-2016-0142. |
[20] |
Y. Huang, P. V. Singh and K. Srinivasan, Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning, Manag. Sci., 60 (2014), 2138-2159. Google Scholar |
[21] |
Y. Ilbahar and S. Cebi,
Classification of design parameters for e-commerce websites: A novel fuzzy Kano approach, Telematics and Inform., 34 (2017), 1814-1825.
doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.004. |
[22] |
L. C. Irani and M. S. Silberman, Turkopticon: Interrupting Worker Invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, 2013.
doi: 10.1145/2470654.2470742. |
[23] |
S. L. Jarvenpaa and V. K. Tuunainen, How finnair socialized customers for service co-creation with social media, MIS Q Exec., 14 (2013), 125-136. Google Scholar |
[24] |
N. Kano, N. Seraku, F. Takashi and S. Tsuji, Attribute quality and must-be quality, J. Jpn. Soc. Qual. Control, 14 (1984), 39-48. Google Scholar |
[25] |
S. H. Khodadad Hosseini and L. Behboudi, Brand trust and image: Effects on customer satisfaction, Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur., 30 (2017), 580-590. Google Scholar |
[26] |
Y. F. Kuo, J. Y. Chen and W. J. Deng,
IPA-Kano model: A new tool for categorising and diagnosing service quality attributes, Total Qual. Manag. Bus., 23 (2012), 731-748.
doi: 10.1080/14783363.2011.637811. |
[27] |
A. R. Kurup and G. P. Sajeev, Task Personalization for Inexpertise Workers in Incentive Based Crowdsourcing Platforms, 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, Bangalore, INDIA, 2018.
doi: 10.1109/ICACCI. 2018.8554475. |
[28] |
D. M. Lambert and A. Sharma,
A customer-based competitive analysis for logistics decisions, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., 20 (1990), 17-24.
doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000000350. |
[29] |
T. D. Latoza and V. D. H. Andre,
Crowdsourcing in software engineering: Models, motivations, and challenges, IEEE Software, 33 (2015), 74-80.
doi: 10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2019.00043. |
[30] |
Y. C. Lee and S. Y. Huang,
A new fuzzy concept approach for Kano's model, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009), 4479-4484.
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.034. |
[31] |
B. Li, Y. Cheng, Y. Yuan, G. Wang and L. Chen, Three-Dimensional Stable Matching Problem for Spatial Crowdsourcing Platforms, The 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference, ACM, 2019.
doi: 10.1145/3292500.3330879. |
[32] |
S. Li and Q. Xiao,
Classification and improvement strategy for design features of mobile tourist guide application: A Kano-IPA approach, Mobile Inf. Syst., 20 (2020), 1-9.
doi: 10.1155/2020/8816130. |
[33] |
W. Li, W. J. Wu, H. M. Wang, X. Q. Cheng, H. J. Chen, Z. H. Zhou and R. Ding,
Crowd intelligence in AI 2.0 era, Front Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng., 18 (2017), 15-43.
doi: 10.1631/FITEE.1601859. |
[34] |
C. Liang, Y. Hong and B. Gu, Effects of IT-enabled monitoring systems in online labor markets, Social Science Research Network, 2016 International Conference on Information Systems, 36, Dublin, Ireland, 2016. Google Scholar |
[35] |
T. X. Liu, J Yang, L. A. Adamic and Y. Chen, Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on Taskcn, Manag Sci, 60 (2014a), 2020-2037. Google Scholar |
[36] |
J. A. Martilla and J. C. James, Importance-performance analysis, J. Mark, 41 (1977), 77-79. Google Scholar |
[37] |
J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978. Google Scholar |
[38] |
M. R. Ogiela and L. Ogiela,
Cognitive cryptography techniques for intelligent information management, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 40 (2018), 21-27.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.011. |
[39] |
S. Oreg and N. Oded,
Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values, Comput. Hum. Behav., 24 (2008), 2055-2073.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.09.007. |
[40] |
F. Y. Pai, T. M. Yeh and C. Y. Tang,
Classifying restaurant service quality attributes by using Kano model and IPA approach, Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell., 29 (2018), 301-328.
doi: 10.1080/14783363.2016.1184082. |
[41] |
A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml and A. Malhotra,
E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality, J. Serv. Res., 7 (2005), 213-233.
doi: 10.1177/1094670504271156. |
[42] |
N. B. Peddibhotla and M. R. Subramani,
Contributing to public document repositories: A critical mass theory perspective, Organ. Stud., 28 (2007), 327-346.
doi: 10.1177/0170840607076002. |
[43] |
M. K. Poetz and M. Schreier,
The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas?, J. Prod. Innov. Manag., 29 (2012), 245-256.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00893.x. |
[44] |
P. Prasarnphanich and C. Wagner, The role of wiki technology and altruism in collaborative knowledge creation, Data Process Better Bus. Educ., 49 (2009), 33-41. Google Scholar |
[45] |
L. Qian, Construction and Evaluation of Customer Satisfaction Index System in E-Shopping, 2015 Fifth International Conference on Instrumentation & Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control, 2015.
doi: 10.1109/IMCCC. 2015.71. |
[46] |
M. Ramezani, M. Bashiri and R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,
A new multi-objective stochastic model for a forward/reverse logistic network design with responsiveness and quality level, Appl. Math. Model, 37 (2013), 328-344.
doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.032. |
[47] |
S. Sarker, M. A. Razzaque, M. Mehedi, A. Almogren and M. Zhou,
Optimal selection of crowdsourcing workers balancing their utilities and platform profit, IEEE Internet Things J., 6 (2019), 8602-8614.
doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2921234. |
[48] |
L. Shun and X. Quan, Classification and improvement strategy for design features of mobile tourist guide application: A Kano-IPA approach, Mob. Inf. Syst., 20 (2020), 1-9. Google Scholar |
[49] |
N. Subramanian, A. Gunasekaran, J. Yu, J. Cheng and K. Ning,
Customer satisfaction and competitiveness in the Chinese E-retailing: Structural equation modeling (SEM) approach to identify the role of quality factors, Expert Syst. Appl., 41 (2014), 69-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.012. |
[50] |
Y. Sun, Y. Fang and K. H. Lim,
Understanding sustained participation in transactional virtual communities, Decis. Support Syst., 53 (2012), 12-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.006. |
[51] |
B. Veloso, F. Leal, B. Malheiro and F. Moreira,
Distributed trust & reputation models using blockchain technologies for tourism crowdsourcing platforms, Procedia. Comput. Sci., 160 (2019), 457-460.
doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.065. |
[52] |
Z. Wen and L. Lin,
Optimal fee structures of crowdsourcing platforms: Optimal fee structures of crowdsourcing platforms, Decis. Sci., 47 (2016), 820-850.
doi: 10.1111/deci.12201. |
[53] |
B. Xu and D. Li,
An empirical study of the motivations for content contribution and community participation in Wikipedia, Inf. Manage., 52 (2015), 275-286.
doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.12.003. |
[54] |
Q. Xu, R. J. Jiao, X. Yang and M. Helander,
An analytical Kano model for customer need analysis, Des. Stud., 30 (2009), 87-110.
doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2008.07.001. |
[55] |
V. Xuan Tran, H. Tsuji and R. Masuda,
A new QoS ontology and its QoS-based ranking algorithm for Web services, Simul. Model Pract. Theory, 17 (2009), 1378-1398.
doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2009.06.010. |
[56] |
Q. Yang, L. Cui, M. Zheng, S. Liu and Q. Li, LBTask: A Benchmark for Spatial Crowdsourcing Platforms, The 3rd International Conference, Singapore, 2018.
doi: 10.1145/3265689.3265716. |
[57] |
K. Yang, K. Zhang, J. Ren and X. Shen,
Security and privacy in mobile crowdsourcing networks: Challenges and opportunities, IEEE Commun. Mag., 53 (2015), 75-81.
doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2015.7180511. |
[58] |
H. Ye and A. Kankanhalli,
Solvers' participation in crowdsourcing platforms: Examining the impacts of trust, and benefit and cost factors, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 26 (2017), 101-117.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2017.02.001. |
[59] |
V. Yilmaz and E. Ari,
The effects of service quality, image, and customer satisfaction on customer complaints and loyalty in high-speed rail service in Turkey: A proposal of the structural equation model, Transp. Transp. Sci., 13 (2017), 67-90.
doi: 10.1080/23249935.2016.1209255. |
[60] |
L. A. Zadeh,
Fuzzy sets, Inform. and Control, 8 (1965), 338-353.
doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X. |
[61] |
Y. Zhao and Q. Zhu, Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on participation in crowdsourcing contest a perspective of self-determination theory, Online Inf. Rev., 38 (2014), 896-917. Google Scholar |
[62] |
H. Zheng, D. Li and W. Hou,
Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests, Int. J. Electron Commer., 15 (2011a), 57-88.
doi: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415150402. |
show all references
References:
[1] |
S. À. Campo, V. J. Khan, K. Papangelis and P. Markopoulos,
Community heuristics for user interface evaluation of crowdsourcing platforms, Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 95 (2019), 775-789.
doi: 10.1016/j.future.2018.02.028. |
[2] |
R. Alharthi, E. Aloufi, I. Alrashd, A. Alqazzaz and J. Rrushi, Protecting location privacy for crowd workers in spatial crowdsourcing using a novel dummy-based mechanism, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 114608-114622. Google Scholar |
[3] |
E. W. Anderson and V. Mittal,
Strengthening the satisfaction-profit chain, J. Serv. Res., 3 (2000), 107-120.
doi: 10.1177/109467050032001. |
[4] |
N. Archak, Money, Glory and Cheap Talk: Analyzing Strategic Behavior of Contestants in Simultaneous Crowdsourcing Contests on TopCoder. com, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, North Carolina, 2010.
doi: 10.1145/1772690.1772694. |
[5] |
S. Balasubramanian, P. Konana and N. M. Menon,
Customer satisfaction in virtual environments: A study of online investing, Manag. Sci., 49 (2003), 871-889.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.7.871.16385. |
[6] |
B. L. Bayus,
Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community, Manag. Sci., 59 (2012), 226-244.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1599. |
[7] |
C. Berger, R. Blauth and D. Boger, Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality, Cent. Qual. Manag., 2 (1993), 3-36. Google Scholar |
[8] |
D. C. Brabham, Moving the crowd at iStockphoto: The composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application, First Monday, 13 (2008).
doi: 10.5210/fm. v13i6.2159. |
[9] |
D. C. Brabham,
Moving the crowd at threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application, Inf. Commun. Soc., 13 (2010), 1122-1145.
doi: 10.1080/13691181003624090. |
[10] |
J. Chen, R. Mo, J. Chu, S. Yu and F. Cheng,
Research on the optimal combination and scheduling method of crowdsourcing members in a cloud design platform, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 233 (2019), 2196-2209.
doi: 10.1177/0954405419855874. |
[11] |
X. Cheng, Q. Gou, J. Yue and Y. Zhang,
Equilibrium decisions for an innovation crowdsourcing platform, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 125 (2019), 241-260.
doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.006. |
[12] |
H. Cho, M. Chen and S. Chung,
Testing an integrative theoretical model of knowledge-sharing behavior in the context of Wikipedia, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci Technol., 61 (2010), 1198-1212.
doi: 10.1002/asi.21316. |
[13] |
R. K. S. Chu and T. Choi,
An importance-performance analysis of hotel selection factors in the Hong Kong hotel industry: A comparison of business and leisure travellers, Tour Manag., 21 (2000), 363-377.
doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00070-9. |
[14] |
X. N. Deng, K. D. Joshi and R. D. Galliers, An importance-performance analysis of hotel selection factors in the Hong Kong hotel industry: A comparison of business and leisure travellers, MIS Q., 40 (2016), 279-302. Google Scholar |
[15] |
B. Gong, X. Chen and C. Hu,
Fuzzy entropy clustering approach to evaluate the reliability of emergency logistics system, Energy Procedia., 16 (2012), 278-283.
doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.01.046. |
[16] |
J. Howe, The rise of crowdsourcing, Wired Mag., 14 (2006), 1-4. Google Scholar |
[17] |
J. Howe, Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business, 1$^st$ edition, Crown Publishing Group, New York, 2008. Google Scholar |
[18] |
J. C. Huang, Application of Kano model and IPA on improvement of service quality of mobile healthcare, Int. J. Mob. Commun., 16 (2018), 227-246. Google Scholar |
[19] |
L. C. Huang, W. L. Shiau and Y. H. Lin,
What factors satisfy e-book store customers? Development of a model to evaluate e-book user behavior and satisfaction, Internet Res., 27 (2017), 563-585.
doi: 10.1108/IntR-05-2016-0142. |
[20] |
Y. Huang, P. V. Singh and K. Srinivasan, Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning, Manag. Sci., 60 (2014), 2138-2159. Google Scholar |
[21] |
Y. Ilbahar and S. Cebi,
Classification of design parameters for e-commerce websites: A novel fuzzy Kano approach, Telematics and Inform., 34 (2017), 1814-1825.
doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.004. |
[22] |
L. C. Irani and M. S. Silberman, Turkopticon: Interrupting Worker Invisibility in Amazon Mechanical Turk, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, 2013.
doi: 10.1145/2470654.2470742. |
[23] |
S. L. Jarvenpaa and V. K. Tuunainen, How finnair socialized customers for service co-creation with social media, MIS Q Exec., 14 (2013), 125-136. Google Scholar |
[24] |
N. Kano, N. Seraku, F. Takashi and S. Tsuji, Attribute quality and must-be quality, J. Jpn. Soc. Qual. Control, 14 (1984), 39-48. Google Scholar |
[25] |
S. H. Khodadad Hosseini and L. Behboudi, Brand trust and image: Effects on customer satisfaction, Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur., 30 (2017), 580-590. Google Scholar |
[26] |
Y. F. Kuo, J. Y. Chen and W. J. Deng,
IPA-Kano model: A new tool for categorising and diagnosing service quality attributes, Total Qual. Manag. Bus., 23 (2012), 731-748.
doi: 10.1080/14783363.2011.637811. |
[27] |
A. R. Kurup and G. P. Sajeev, Task Personalization for Inexpertise Workers in Incentive Based Crowdsourcing Platforms, 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, Bangalore, INDIA, 2018.
doi: 10.1109/ICACCI. 2018.8554475. |
[28] |
D. M. Lambert and A. Sharma,
A customer-based competitive analysis for logistics decisions, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag., 20 (1990), 17-24.
doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000000350. |
[29] |
T. D. Latoza and V. D. H. Andre,
Crowdsourcing in software engineering: Models, motivations, and challenges, IEEE Software, 33 (2015), 74-80.
doi: 10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2019.00043. |
[30] |
Y. C. Lee and S. Y. Huang,
A new fuzzy concept approach for Kano's model, Expert Syst. Appl., 36 (2009), 4479-4484.
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.034. |
[31] |
B. Li, Y. Cheng, Y. Yuan, G. Wang and L. Chen, Three-Dimensional Stable Matching Problem for Spatial Crowdsourcing Platforms, The 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference, ACM, 2019.
doi: 10.1145/3292500.3330879. |
[32] |
S. Li and Q. Xiao,
Classification and improvement strategy for design features of mobile tourist guide application: A Kano-IPA approach, Mobile Inf. Syst., 20 (2020), 1-9.
doi: 10.1155/2020/8816130. |
[33] |
W. Li, W. J. Wu, H. M. Wang, X. Q. Cheng, H. J. Chen, Z. H. Zhou and R. Ding,
Crowd intelligence in AI 2.0 era, Front Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng., 18 (2017), 15-43.
doi: 10.1631/FITEE.1601859. |
[34] |
C. Liang, Y. Hong and B. Gu, Effects of IT-enabled monitoring systems in online labor markets, Social Science Research Network, 2016 International Conference on Information Systems, 36, Dublin, Ireland, 2016. Google Scholar |
[35] |
T. X. Liu, J Yang, L. A. Adamic and Y. Chen, Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on Taskcn, Manag Sci, 60 (2014a), 2020-2037. Google Scholar |
[36] |
J. A. Martilla and J. C. James, Importance-performance analysis, J. Mark, 41 (1977), 77-79. Google Scholar |
[37] |
J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978. Google Scholar |
[38] |
M. R. Ogiela and L. Ogiela,
Cognitive cryptography techniques for intelligent information management, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 40 (2018), 21-27.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.011. |
[39] |
S. Oreg and N. Oded,
Exploring motivations for contributing to open source initiatives: The roles of contribution context and personal values, Comput. Hum. Behav., 24 (2008), 2055-2073.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.09.007. |
[40] |
F. Y. Pai, T. M. Yeh and C. Y. Tang,
Classifying restaurant service quality attributes by using Kano model and IPA approach, Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell., 29 (2018), 301-328.
doi: 10.1080/14783363.2016.1184082. |
[41] |
A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml and A. Malhotra,
E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality, J. Serv. Res., 7 (2005), 213-233.
doi: 10.1177/1094670504271156. |
[42] |
N. B. Peddibhotla and M. R. Subramani,
Contributing to public document repositories: A critical mass theory perspective, Organ. Stud., 28 (2007), 327-346.
doi: 10.1177/0170840607076002. |
[43] |
M. K. Poetz and M. Schreier,
The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas?, J. Prod. Innov. Manag., 29 (2012), 245-256.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00893.x. |
[44] |
P. Prasarnphanich and C. Wagner, The role of wiki technology and altruism in collaborative knowledge creation, Data Process Better Bus. Educ., 49 (2009), 33-41. Google Scholar |
[45] |
L. Qian, Construction and Evaluation of Customer Satisfaction Index System in E-Shopping, 2015 Fifth International Conference on Instrumentation & Measurement, Computer, Communication and Control, 2015.
doi: 10.1109/IMCCC. 2015.71. |
[46] |
M. Ramezani, M. Bashiri and R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,
A new multi-objective stochastic model for a forward/reverse logistic network design with responsiveness and quality level, Appl. Math. Model, 37 (2013), 328-344.
doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.032. |
[47] |
S. Sarker, M. A. Razzaque, M. Mehedi, A. Almogren and M. Zhou,
Optimal selection of crowdsourcing workers balancing their utilities and platform profit, IEEE Internet Things J., 6 (2019), 8602-8614.
doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2921234. |
[48] |
L. Shun and X. Quan, Classification and improvement strategy for design features of mobile tourist guide application: A Kano-IPA approach, Mob. Inf. Syst., 20 (2020), 1-9. Google Scholar |
[49] |
N. Subramanian, A. Gunasekaran, J. Yu, J. Cheng and K. Ning,
Customer satisfaction and competitiveness in the Chinese E-retailing: Structural equation modeling (SEM) approach to identify the role of quality factors, Expert Syst. Appl., 41 (2014), 69-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.012. |
[50] |
Y. Sun, Y. Fang and K. H. Lim,
Understanding sustained participation in transactional virtual communities, Decis. Support Syst., 53 (2012), 12-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.006. |
[51] |
B. Veloso, F. Leal, B. Malheiro and F. Moreira,
Distributed trust & reputation models using blockchain technologies for tourism crowdsourcing platforms, Procedia. Comput. Sci., 160 (2019), 457-460.
doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.065. |
[52] |
Z. Wen and L. Lin,
Optimal fee structures of crowdsourcing platforms: Optimal fee structures of crowdsourcing platforms, Decis. Sci., 47 (2016), 820-850.
doi: 10.1111/deci.12201. |
[53] |
B. Xu and D. Li,
An empirical study of the motivations for content contribution and community participation in Wikipedia, Inf. Manage., 52 (2015), 275-286.
doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.12.003. |
[54] |
Q. Xu, R. J. Jiao, X. Yang and M. Helander,
An analytical Kano model for customer need analysis, Des. Stud., 30 (2009), 87-110.
doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2008.07.001. |
[55] |
V. Xuan Tran, H. Tsuji and R. Masuda,
A new QoS ontology and its QoS-based ranking algorithm for Web services, Simul. Model Pract. Theory, 17 (2009), 1378-1398.
doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2009.06.010. |
[56] |
Q. Yang, L. Cui, M. Zheng, S. Liu and Q. Li, LBTask: A Benchmark for Spatial Crowdsourcing Platforms, The 3rd International Conference, Singapore, 2018.
doi: 10.1145/3265689.3265716. |
[57] |
K. Yang, K. Zhang, J. Ren and X. Shen,
Security and privacy in mobile crowdsourcing networks: Challenges and opportunities, IEEE Commun. Mag., 53 (2015), 75-81.
doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2015.7180511. |
[58] |
H. Ye and A. Kankanhalli,
Solvers' participation in crowdsourcing platforms: Examining the impacts of trust, and benefit and cost factors, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 26 (2017), 101-117.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2017.02.001. |
[59] |
V. Yilmaz and E. Ari,
The effects of service quality, image, and customer satisfaction on customer complaints and loyalty in high-speed rail service in Turkey: A proposal of the structural equation model, Transp. Transp. Sci., 13 (2017), 67-90.
doi: 10.1080/23249935.2016.1209255. |
[60] |
L. A. Zadeh,
Fuzzy sets, Inform. and Control, 8 (1965), 338-353.
doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X. |
[61] |
Y. Zhao and Q. Zhu, Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on participation in crowdsourcing contest a perspective of self-determination theory, Online Inf. Rev., 38 (2014), 896-917. Google Scholar |
[62] |
H. Zheng, D. Li and W. Hou,
Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests, Int. J. Electron Commer., 15 (2011a), 57-88.
doi: 10.2753/JEC1086-4415150402. |






Regulation | Content |
The regulation of service providers on information dissemination or sale |
...ZBJ platform has the responsibility to maintain the normal operations of the crowdsourcing platform and properly store the information submitted by the solvers...delete the information that defies the relevant rules of ZBJ platform... ...the information provided by the solvers must be checked by ZBJ platform before posting... |
The regulation on use of communication tools | ...ZBJ platform has the right to examine and supervise information in official communication tools in accordance with laws and regulations. |
The regulation on handling disputes with ZBJ platform | To maintain order, ZBJ platform will fairly handle disputes among solvers... |
The evaluation regulation | The trading evaluation entrance will stay open so that seekers and solversare able to evaluate each other... within 30 daysafter the completion of a transaction. ZBJ platform has the right to shield and delete abnormal trading evaluations... |
The service regulation of ZBJ Mall | Solvers are able to use Pig Coins at the ZBJ Mall. |
The reward distribution regulation | ZBJ platform has the right to charge 2%-20% of rewards as technical service fees from service providers according to different membership levels... collect 20% of reward as technical service fees from non-member solvers... |
The handling infringement rule | ZBJ platform has the obligation to receive complaints and investigate alleged infringements... ZBJ platform has the right to warnings, rectification within a time limit, deletion of the infringing content, deduction of credit value, and retreat in unilateral infringement... |
The management regulation of service providers | According to the business circumstance, ZBJ platform will formulate corresponding incentive policies to help solvers sustain development...30-day turnover conversion rate as a performance indicator. If 30-day turnover conversion rate is higher than the average value, they will be rewarded withPig Coins. |
The service agreement | ZBJ platform has the obligation to ensure the normal operation of the crowdsourcing platform on the basis of the existing technical level, avoid service interruptions, resume service as soon as possible, and ensure that solvers' online communication activities run smoothly. ZBJ platform will not sell or lend personal or corporate information to anyone unless the solver has prior permission to do so. |
Source: https://cms.zbj.com/rules-28 |
Regulation | Content |
The regulation of service providers on information dissemination or sale |
...ZBJ platform has the responsibility to maintain the normal operations of the crowdsourcing platform and properly store the information submitted by the solvers...delete the information that defies the relevant rules of ZBJ platform... ...the information provided by the solvers must be checked by ZBJ platform before posting... |
The regulation on use of communication tools | ...ZBJ platform has the right to examine and supervise information in official communication tools in accordance with laws and regulations. |
The regulation on handling disputes with ZBJ platform | To maintain order, ZBJ platform will fairly handle disputes among solvers... |
The evaluation regulation | The trading evaluation entrance will stay open so that seekers and solversare able to evaluate each other... within 30 daysafter the completion of a transaction. ZBJ platform has the right to shield and delete abnormal trading evaluations... |
The service regulation of ZBJ Mall | Solvers are able to use Pig Coins at the ZBJ Mall. |
The reward distribution regulation | ZBJ platform has the right to charge 2%-20% of rewards as technical service fees from service providers according to different membership levels... collect 20% of reward as technical service fees from non-member solvers... |
The handling infringement rule | ZBJ platform has the obligation to receive complaints and investigate alleged infringements... ZBJ platform has the right to warnings, rectification within a time limit, deletion of the infringing content, deduction of credit value, and retreat in unilateral infringement... |
The management regulation of service providers | According to the business circumstance, ZBJ platform will formulate corresponding incentive policies to help solvers sustain development...30-day turnover conversion rate as a performance indicator. If 30-day turnover conversion rate is higher than the average value, they will be rewarded withPig Coins. |
The service agreement | ZBJ platform has the obligation to ensure the normal operation of the crowdsourcing platform on the basis of the existing technical level, avoid service interruptions, resume service as soon as possible, and ensure that solvers' online communication activities run smoothly. ZBJ platform will not sell or lend personal or corporate information to anyone unless the solver has prior permission to do so. |
Source: https://cms.zbj.com/rules-28 |
Category | Explanation |
Must-be quality attribute (M) | Customers become extremely unsatisfied by the non-fulfillment of this attribute, however, when the attribute is provided or fulfilled, the degree of customer dissatisfaction will be alleviated, but not promoted to satisfaction. |
One-dimensional quality attribute (O) | Customer satisfaction has a linear and positive relationship with those attributes. When this quality attribute is absent, customer satisfaction will proportionally decrease. |
Attractive quality attribute (A) | Customer satisfaction soars sharply as these attributes increase but the absence of an attribute would be unlikely to lead to customer dissatisfaction. |
Indifferent quality attribute (I) | Customer satisfaction would not be influenced by this set of attributes regardless of fulfillment. |
Reverse quality attribute (R) | Increasing these attributes would lead to more customer dissatisfaction. |
Category | Explanation |
Must-be quality attribute (M) | Customers become extremely unsatisfied by the non-fulfillment of this attribute, however, when the attribute is provided or fulfilled, the degree of customer dissatisfaction will be alleviated, but not promoted to satisfaction. |
One-dimensional quality attribute (O) | Customer satisfaction has a linear and positive relationship with those attributes. When this quality attribute is absent, customer satisfaction will proportionally decrease. |
Attractive quality attribute (A) | Customer satisfaction soars sharply as these attributes increase but the absence of an attribute would be unlikely to lead to customer dissatisfaction. |
Indifferent quality attribute (I) | Customer satisfaction would not be influenced by this set of attributes regardless of fulfillment. |
Reverse quality attribute (R) | Increasing these attributes would lead to more customer dissatisfaction. |
Dimen–sion | No. | SQA | Explanation | Ref |
Effici–ency | 1 | The speed of overall crowdsourcing | The speed of completing the overall crowdsourcing process. | [41] |
2 | Ease of use | The platform is simple to use | [41] | |
3 | Platform layout | The layout and architecture of the platform are clear and well organized. | [41] | |
4 | Information collection and feedback | The capability of information collection and feedback of crowdsoucing platform. | [15] | |
Availa–bility | 5 | Usage scenarios | There are several ways, such as websites, apps, and WeChat Subscriptions, to use crowdsourcing platforms. | [19] |
6 | Classification retrieval systems | This system offers a tool for solvers to search for what they need. | [45] | |
7 | IT-based monitoring systems | This system supervises false or invalid documents and illegal information, etc. | [55] | |
8 | Solver reputation systems | This system offers a comprehensive score according to solvers' service attitudes, service speed scores, etc. | [22] | |
9 | Recommendation systems | This system recommends appropriate tasks for solvers and service providers for seekers. | [1] | |
10 | Incentive mechanism | The means by which the platform encourages solvers to participate in crowdsourcing initiatives, such as Pig Coins. | [62] | |
Fulfill–ment | 11 | Platform's Image | The impressions that solvers have of the platform. | [19] |
12 | Service fulfillment | The platform makes accurate promises about their service. | [41] | |
13 | Service credibility | The platform provides genuine service. | [5] | |
14 | Real-time service | The platform provides real-time services. | [19] | |
Responsi–veness | 15 | Finding problems | If a problem, such as a website crash or hacker attack, occurs, the platform is able to find it immediately. | [41] |
16 | The time of recovering platform | The time taken by the platform to recover normal operations. | [49] | |
17 | The efficiency of handling complaints | The time taken to handle complaints and disputes. | [59] | |
18 | The attitude of handling complaints | The attitude of the platform toward handing complaints and disputes. | [59] | |
19 | Finding new requirements | The platform is able to find the requirements of customers in a timely manner. | [49] | |
20 | Fulfilling new requirements | The platform is able to satisfy the requirements of customers in a timely manner. | [49] | |
Privacy | 21 | The protection of solver information | The platform protects the information, such as individual and transaction information, of the solvers. | [41] |
22 | The security of payment means | The payment means of the platform is secure. | [45] | |
23 | Solutions protection | The platform protects solutions and does not let them be used by or leaked to others. | [35] | |
24 | Intellectual property protection | The platform provides clear intellectual property agreements. | [46] |
Dimen–sion | No. | SQA | Explanation | Ref |
Effici–ency | 1 | The speed of overall crowdsourcing | The speed of completing the overall crowdsourcing process. | [41] |
2 | Ease of use | The platform is simple to use | [41] | |
3 | Platform layout | The layout and architecture of the platform are clear and well organized. | [41] | |
4 | Information collection and feedback | The capability of information collection and feedback of crowdsoucing platform. | [15] | |
Availa–bility | 5 | Usage scenarios | There are several ways, such as websites, apps, and WeChat Subscriptions, to use crowdsourcing platforms. | [19] |
6 | Classification retrieval systems | This system offers a tool for solvers to search for what they need. | [45] | |
7 | IT-based monitoring systems | This system supervises false or invalid documents and illegal information, etc. | [55] | |
8 | Solver reputation systems | This system offers a comprehensive score according to solvers' service attitudes, service speed scores, etc. | [22] | |
9 | Recommendation systems | This system recommends appropriate tasks for solvers and service providers for seekers. | [1] | |
10 | Incentive mechanism | The means by which the platform encourages solvers to participate in crowdsourcing initiatives, such as Pig Coins. | [62] | |
Fulfill–ment | 11 | Platform's Image | The impressions that solvers have of the platform. | [19] |
12 | Service fulfillment | The platform makes accurate promises about their service. | [41] | |
13 | Service credibility | The platform provides genuine service. | [5] | |
14 | Real-time service | The platform provides real-time services. | [19] | |
Responsi–veness | 15 | Finding problems | If a problem, such as a website crash or hacker attack, occurs, the platform is able to find it immediately. | [41] |
16 | The time of recovering platform | The time taken by the platform to recover normal operations. | [49] | |
17 | The efficiency of handling complaints | The time taken to handle complaints and disputes. | [59] | |
18 | The attitude of handling complaints | The attitude of the platform toward handing complaints and disputes. | [59] | |
19 | Finding new requirements | The platform is able to find the requirements of customers in a timely manner. | [49] | |
20 | Fulfilling new requirements | The platform is able to satisfy the requirements of customers in a timely manner. | [49] | |
Privacy | 21 | The protection of solver information | The platform protects the information, such as individual and transaction information, of the solvers. | [41] |
22 | The security of payment means | The payment means of the platform is secure. | [45] | |
23 | Solutions protection | The platform protects solutions and does not let them be used by or leaked to others. | [35] | |
24 | Intellectual property protection | The platform provides clear intellectual property agreements. | [46] |
(Dys)-functional Question | Like | Must-be | Neutral | Live-with | Dislike |
Functional Question | |||||
Dysfunctional Question |
(Dys)-functional Question | Like | Must-be | Neutral | Live-with | Dislike |
Functional Question | |||||
Dysfunctional Question |
Answers to the Kano question | Functional form of the question | Dysfunctional form of the question |
I like it that way | 1 | -0.5 |
It must be that way | 0.5 | -0.25 |
I am neutral | 0 | 0 |
I can live with it that way | -0.25 | 0.5 |
I dislike it that way | -0.5 | 1 |
Answers to the Kano question | Functional form of the question | Dysfunctional form of the question |
I like it that way | 1 | -0.5 |
It must be that way | 0.5 | -0.25 |
I am neutral | 0 | 0 |
I can live with it that way | -0.25 | 0.5 |
I dislike it that way | -0.5 | 1 |
Not important | Somewhat important | Important | Very important important | Extremely important |
0.......0.1.......0.2......0.3.......0.4........0.5........0.6.......0.7.......0.8.......0.9.......1 |
Not important | Somewhat important | Important | Very important important | Extremely important |
0.......0.1.......0.2......0.3.......0.4........0.5........0.6.......0.7.......0.8.......0.9.......1 |
Answers of Dysfunctional Questions | ||||||
Like | Must-be | Neutral | Live-with | Dislike | ||
Answers of Functional Questions | Like | Q | A | A | A | O |
Must-be | R | I | I | I | M | |
Neutral | R | I | I | I | M | |
Live-with | R | I | I | I | M | |
Dislike | R | R | R | R | Q |
Answers of Dysfunctional Questions | ||||||
Like | Must-be | Neutral | Live-with | Dislike | ||
Answers of Functional Questions | Like | Q | A | A | A | O |
Must-be | R | I | I | I | M | |
Neutral | R | I | I | I | M | |
Live-with | R | I | I | I | M | |
Dislike | R | R | R | R | Q |
Quadrant | Category | Decision priority rule Keep | Improve |
Quadrant One | Q1-M | 1 | — |
Q1-O | 2 | — | |
Q1-A | 3 | — | |
Quadrant Two | Q2-M | — | 1 |
Q2-O | — | 2 | |
Q2-A | — | 3 | |
Quadrant Three | Q3-M | — | 4 |
Q3-O | — | 5 | |
Q3-A | — | 6 | |
Quadrant Four | Q4-M | 4 | — |
Q4-O | 5 | — | |
Q4-A | 6 | — |
Quadrant | Category | Decision priority rule Keep | Improve |
Quadrant One | Q1-M | 1 | — |
Q1-O | 2 | — | |
Q1-A | 3 | — | |
Quadrant Two | Q2-M | — | 1 |
Q2-O | — | 2 | |
Q2-A | — | 3 | |
Quadrant Three | Q3-M | — | 4 |
Q3-O | — | 5 | |
Q3-A | — | 6 | |
Quadrant Four | Q4-M | 4 | — |
Q4-O | 5 | — | |
Q4-A | 6 | — |
SQA | SQA | ||||||||
S1 | 0.284 | 0.283 | 0.402 | 0.786 | S13 | 0.362 | 0.462 | 0.587 | 0.664 |
S2 | 0.333 | 0.383 | 0.508 | 0.714 | S14 | 0.279 | 0.353 | 0.45 | 0.669 |
S3 | 0.35 | 0.346 | 0.492 | 0.79 | S15 | 0.235 | 0.377 | 0.445 | 0.557 |
S4 | 0.176 | 0.307 | 0.354 | 0.521 | S16 | 0.251 | 0.351 | 0.431 | 0.621 |
S5 | 0.31 | 0.289 | 0.424 | 0.819 | S17 | 0.262 | 0.345 | 0.434 | 0.649 |
S6 | 0.339 | 0.261 | 0.428 | 0.915 | S18 | 0.2885 | 0.377 | 0.475 | 0.652 |
S7 | 0.276 | 0.316 | 0.42 | 0.718 | S19 | 0.347 | 0.334 | 0.482 | 0.804 |
S8 | 0.259 | 0.229 | 0.346 | 0.845 | S20 | 0.266 | 0.273 | 0.381 | 0.773 |
S9 | 0.318 | 0.353 | 0.476 | 0.733 | S21 | 0.372 | 0.462 | 0.594 | 0.677 |
S10 | 0.285 | 0.32 | 0.429 | 0.728 | S22 | 0.436 | 0.497 | 0.661 | 0.72 |
S11 | 0.308 | 0.3 | 0.43 | 0.797 | S23 | 0.364 | 0.421 | 0.557 | 0.711 |
S12 | 0.271 | 0.41 | 0.492 | 0.583 | S24 | 0.288 | 0.363 | 0.464 | 0.671 |
SQA | SQA | ||||||||
S1 | 0.284 | 0.283 | 0.402 | 0.786 | S13 | 0.362 | 0.462 | 0.587 | 0.664 |
S2 | 0.333 | 0.383 | 0.508 | 0.714 | S14 | 0.279 | 0.353 | 0.45 | 0.669 |
S3 | 0.35 | 0.346 | 0.492 | 0.79 | S15 | 0.235 | 0.377 | 0.445 | 0.557 |
S4 | 0.176 | 0.307 | 0.354 | 0.521 | S16 | 0.251 | 0.351 | 0.431 | 0.621 |
S5 | 0.31 | 0.289 | 0.424 | 0.819 | S17 | 0.262 | 0.345 | 0.434 | 0.649 |
S6 | 0.339 | 0.261 | 0.428 | 0.915 | S18 | 0.2885 | 0.377 | 0.475 | 0.652 |
S7 | 0.276 | 0.316 | 0.42 | 0.718 | S19 | 0.347 | 0.334 | 0.482 | 0.804 |
S8 | 0.259 | 0.229 | 0.346 | 0.845 | S20 | 0.266 | 0.273 | 0.381 | 0.773 |
S9 | 0.318 | 0.353 | 0.476 | 0.733 | S21 | 0.372 | 0.462 | 0.594 | 0.677 |
S10 | 0.285 | 0.32 | 0.429 | 0.728 | S22 | 0.436 | 0.497 | 0.661 | 0.72 |
S11 | 0.308 | 0.3 | 0.43 | 0.797 | S23 | 0.364 | 0.421 | 0.557 | 0.711 |
S12 | 0.271 | 0.41 | 0.492 | 0.583 | S24 | 0.288 | 0.363 | 0.464 | 0.671 |
SQA | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 |
Kano result | I | M | I | M | I | I | M | I |
SQA | S9 | S10 | S11 | S12 | S13 | S14 | S15 | S16 |
Kano result | I | I | M | M | O | I | M | I |
SQA | S17 | S18 | S19 | S20 | S21 | S22 | S23 | S24 |
Kano result | A | A | A | A | M | M | M | M |
Notes: α = 0.1. |
SQA | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 |
Kano result | I | M | I | M | I | I | M | I |
SQA | S9 | S10 | S11 | S12 | S13 | S14 | S15 | S16 |
Kano result | I | I | M | M | O | I | M | I |
SQA | S17 | S18 | S19 | S20 | S21 | S22 | S23 | S24 |
Kano result | A | A | A | A | M | M | M | M |
Notes: α = 0.1. |
SQA | Category | Priority | SQA | Category | Priority | ||
Keep | Improve | Keep | Improve | ||||
S1 | Q4-I | —— | —— | S13 | Q2-O | —— | 2 |
S2 | Q1-M | 1 | —— | S14 | Q3-I | —— | —— |
S3 | Q1-I | —— | —— | S15 | Q3-M | —— | 4 |
S4 | Q3-M | —— | 4 | S16 | Q3-I | —— | —— |
S5 | Q4-I | —— | —— | S17 | Q3-A | —— | 6 |
S6 | Q4-I | —— | —— | S18 | Q2-A | —— | 3 |
S7 | Q4-M | 4 | —— | S19 | Q1-A | 3 | —— |
S8 | Q4-I | —— | —— | S20 | Q4-A | 6 | —— |
S9 | Q1-I | —— | —— | S21 | Q2-M | —— | 1 |
S10 | Q4-I | —— | —— | S22 | Q1-M | 1 | —— |
S11 | Q4-M | 4 | —— | S23 | Q2-M | —— | 1 |
S12 | Q2-M | —— | 1 | S24 | Q3-M | —— | 4 |
Notes: Q1 is Quadrant One for short. |
SQA | Category | Priority | SQA | Category | Priority | ||
Keep | Improve | Keep | Improve | ||||
S1 | Q4-I | —— | —— | S13 | Q2-O | —— | 2 |
S2 | Q1-M | 1 | —— | S14 | Q3-I | —— | —— |
S3 | Q1-I | —— | —— | S15 | Q3-M | —— | 4 |
S4 | Q3-M | —— | 4 | S16 | Q3-I | —— | —— |
S5 | Q4-I | —— | —— | S17 | Q3-A | —— | 6 |
S6 | Q4-I | —— | —— | S18 | Q2-A | —— | 3 |
S7 | Q4-M | 4 | —— | S19 | Q1-A | 3 | —— |
S8 | Q4-I | —— | —— | S20 | Q4-A | 6 | —— |
S9 | Q1-I | —— | —— | S21 | Q2-M | —— | 1 |
S10 | Q4-I | —— | —— | S22 | Q1-M | 1 | —— |
S11 | Q4-M | 4 | —— | S23 | Q2-M | —— | 1 |
S12 | Q2-M | —— | 1 | S24 | Q3-M | —— | 4 |
Notes: Q1 is Quadrant One for short. |
[1] |
Cheng-Kai Hu, Fung-Bao Liu, Hong-Ming Chen, Cheng-Feng Hu. Network data envelopment analysis with fuzzy non-discretionary factors. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1795-1807. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020046 |
[2] |
Peng Tong, Xiaogang Ma. Design of differentiated warranty coverage that considers usage rate and service option of consumers under 2D warranty policy. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1577-1591. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020035 |
[3] |
Wenjuan Zhao, Shunfu Jin, Wuyi Yue. A stochastic model and social optimization of a blockchain system based on a general limited batch service queue. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1845-1861. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020049 |
[4] |
Jinsen Guo, Yongwu Zhou, Baixun Li. The optimal pricing and service strategies of a dual-channel retailer under free riding. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021056 |
[5] |
Jun Tu, Zijiao Sun, Min Huang. Supply chain coordination considering e-tailer's promotion effort and logistics provider's service effort. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021062 |
[6] |
Xiaoyi Zhou, Tong Ye, Tony T. Lee. Designing and analysis of a Wi-Fi data offloading strategy catering for the preference of mobile users. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021038 |
[7] |
İsmail Özcan, Sirma Zeynep Alparslan Gök. On cooperative fuzzy bubbly games. Journal of Dynamics & Games, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jdg.2021010 |
[8] |
Amit Goswami, Sushila Rathore, Jagdev Singh, Devendra Kumar. Analytical study of fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with harmonic oscillator. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021021 |
[9] |
Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, Rajesh Kumar Singh, Subhas Khajanchi, Yun Kang, Arvind Kumar Misra. A mathematical model to restore water quality in urban lakes using Phoslock. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (6) : 3143-3175. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020223 |
[10] |
Assia Boubidi, Sihem Kechida, Hicham Tebbikh. Analytical study of resonance regions for second kind commensurate fractional systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (7) : 3579-3594. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020247 |
[11] |
Haripriya Barman, Magfura Pervin, Sankar Kumar Roy, Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber. Back-ordered inventory model with inflation in a cloudy-fuzzy environment. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1913-1941. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020052 |
[12] |
Lars Grüne, Luca Mechelli, Simon Pirkelmann, Stefan Volkwein. Performance estimates for economic model predictive control and their application in proper orthogonal decomposition-based implementations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021 doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021013 |
[13] |
Kai Kang, Taotao Lu, Jing Zhang. Financing strategy selection and coordination considering risk aversion in a capital-constrained supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021042 |
[14] |
Saeed Assani, Muhammad Salman Mansoor, Faisal Asghar, Yongjun Li, Feng Yang. Efficiency, RTS, and marginal returns from salary on the performance of the NBA players: A parallel DEA network with shared inputs. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021053 |
[15] |
Muberra Allahverdi, Harun Aydilek, Asiye Aydilek, Ali Allahverdi. A better dominance relation and heuristics for Two-Machine No-Wait Flowshops with Maximum Lateness Performance Measure. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1973-1991. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020054 |
[16] |
Wei Wang, Yang Shen, Linyi Qian, Zhixin Yang. Hedging strategy for unit-linked life insurance contracts with self-exciting jump clustering. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021072 |
[17] |
Sumon Sarkar, Bibhas C. Giri. Optimal lot-sizing policy for a failure prone production system with investment in process quality improvement and lead time variance reduction. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021048 |
[18] |
Mostafa Ghelichi, A. M. Goltabar, H. R. Tavakoli, A. Karamodin. Neuro-fuzzy active control optimized by Tug of war optimization method for seismically excited benchmark highway bridge. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (3) : 333-351. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020029 |
[19] |
Jan Prüss, Laurent Pujo-Menjouet, G.F. Webb, Rico Zacher. Analysis of a model for the dynamics of prions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (1) : 225-235. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.225 |
[20] |
Sohana Jahan. Discriminant analysis of regularized multidimensional scaling. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (2) : 255-267. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020024 |
2019 Impact Factor: 1.366
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]