# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

• Previous Article
Stochastic comparisons of series-parallel and parallel-series systems with dependence between components and also of subsystems
• JIMO Home
• This Issue
• Next Article
A dynamic analysis of a monopolist's quality improvement, process innovation and goodwill
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022063
Online First

Online First articles are published articles within a journal that have not yet been assigned to a formal issue. This means they do not yet have a volume number, issue number, or page numbers assigned to them, however, they can still be found and cited using their DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Online First publication benefits the research community by making new scientific discoveries known as quickly as possible.

Readers can access Online First articles via the “Online First” tab for the selected journal.

## Collaborative optimization for energy saving and service composition in multi-granularity heavy-duty equipment cloud manufacturing environment

 1 School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China 2 Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-making, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230009, China

*Corresponding author: Xiaonong Lu

Received  May 2021 Revised  February 2022 Early access April 2022

Efficient service scheduling is an important technique supporting collaborative manufacturing platforms such as cloud manufacturing. To achieve a more efficient task execution, heavy-duty equipment manufacturing, an important field of cloud manufacturing, must be explored beyond parameters of cost and time. The manufacturing service composition problem of heavy-duty equipment has the characteristics of task complexity, high process energy consumption, and multi-granularity nature of service (MGNoS). In the manufacturing process of heavy-duty equipment, the energy consumption of required logistics accounts for 30% the total energy consumption. However, to date, research has investigated the problem almost always from the task level, and MGNoS has received little attentions, which may lead to redundant energy consumption in logistics during manufacturing execution. In this paper, the problem of manufacturing service scheduling with integrating energy saving and service composition in cloud manufacturing is considered. Based on the mathematical description, a cross-granularity task chain reconfiguration algorithm is presented for mitigating the adverse effects of MGNoS and developing the adaptive non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm Ⅲ for solving the service composition scheme to generate optimal scheduling solutions. The effectiveness and efficiency performances of typical optimization algorithms are compared with the proposed approach. The results show that the proposed method achieves significant energy savings for all tasks in different scenarios.

Citation: Hao Song, Xiaonong Lu, Xu Zhang, Xiaoan Tang, Qiang Zhang. Collaborative optimization for energy saving and service composition in multi-granularity heavy-duty equipment cloud manufacturing environment. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022063
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Illustration of CMfg
The reciprocating path of manufacturing logistics caused by FbRS
Flow chart of the proposed adaptive non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm Ⅲ (A-NSGA-Ⅲ)
An example of encoding the service composition problem
YH98 series forging presses equipment
Optimal solution for YH28 manufacturing task
The number of ST reduced by CTRA for tasks of different scales
The number of MVs reduced by CTRA for tasks of different scales
Carbon emissions with and without CTRA obtained by CPA
Difference in carbon emissions between CPA with and without CTRA
Comparison performance between CPA and other energy-aware service composition algorithms
Summary of notations
 Symbol Description $M{V_u}$ The $u$th Manufacturing vendor $u = 1, 2, \ldots , U$ $C{S_{n, u}}$ The nth CS uploaded by uth manufacturing vendor, $n = 1, 2, \ldots , N$ $S{T_j}$ The $j$th subtask, $j = 1, 2, \ldots , J$ $CS_{n, u}^j$ Before CTRA and after clustering, the $n$th CS of the $u$th MV belongs to $j$th subtask ${\Lambda _N}\left( {M{V_u}} \right)$ the set of N CS provided by $u$th manufacturing vendor $CS{T_j}$ The $j$th concrete subtask $AS{T_m}$ After CTRA, the $m$th abstract subtask, $m = 1, 2, \ldots , M$ $ACS_{n, u}^m$ After CTRA, the $n$th CS of the $u$th MV belongs to $m$th AST ${Q_k}(A_{n, u}^m)$ The $k$th QoS attribute of $ACS_{n, u}^m$, $k = 1, 2, \ldots , K$ ${Q_{co}}(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ The cost QoS attribute of $ACS_{n, u}^m$ ${Q_{ti}}(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ The time QoS attribute of $ACS_{n, u}^m$ ${Q_{av}}(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ The reliability QoS attribute of $ACS_{n, u}^m$ ${Q_{EC}}(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ The energy consumption QoS attribute of $ACS_{n, u}^m$ $L(A_{n, u}^m, A_{n', u'}^{m + 1})$ Logistics transportation distance from $ACS_{n, u}^m$ to $ACS_{n', u'}^{m + 1}$ $\Delta Ltt$ Difference between the latitudes of $ACS_{n, u}^m$ and $ACS_{n', u'}^{m + 1}$ $\Delta Lgt$ Difference between the Longitude of $ACS_{n, u}^m$ and $ACS_{n', u'}^{m + 1}$ $Prc$ Unit price of logistics transportation $PrcA$ Price per unit of aviation kerosene $PrcH$ Price per unit of heavy diesel fuel $PrcL$ Price per unit of light diesel fuel ${C_{exp}}$ Expected cost from MSD $MLT$ Maximum threshold for the logistics transport distance $\Theta$ Punctuality rate of land transportation $Av$ Punctuality rate of air transport relative to land $Mar$ Punctuality rate of sea transport relative to land $R{L_{exp}}$ Expected reliability from MSD $MTTF$ Mean time to failure $MTBF$ Mean operating time between failures $ECS(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ Energy consumption during the setup stage $ECT(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ Energy consumption during the material transportation stage $ECI(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ Energy consumption during the machine idle stage $CEL$ Carbon emissions unit liter of aviation kerosene $CEA$ Carbon emissions unit liter of heavy diesel fuel $CEH$ Carbon emissions unit liter of light diesel fuel $E{C_{exp}}$ Expected cost from service demander ${E_{quota}}$ Government policy restrictions
 Symbol Description $M{V_u}$ The $u$th Manufacturing vendor $u = 1, 2, \ldots , U$ $C{S_{n, u}}$ The nth CS uploaded by uth manufacturing vendor, $n = 1, 2, \ldots , N$ $S{T_j}$ The $j$th subtask, $j = 1, 2, \ldots , J$ $CS_{n, u}^j$ Before CTRA and after clustering, the $n$th CS of the $u$th MV belongs to $j$th subtask ${\Lambda _N}\left( {M{V_u}} \right)$ the set of N CS provided by $u$th manufacturing vendor $CS{T_j}$ The $j$th concrete subtask $AS{T_m}$ After CTRA, the $m$th abstract subtask, $m = 1, 2, \ldots , M$ $ACS_{n, u}^m$ After CTRA, the $n$th CS of the $u$th MV belongs to $m$th AST ${Q_k}(A_{n, u}^m)$ The $k$th QoS attribute of $ACS_{n, u}^m$, $k = 1, 2, \ldots , K$ ${Q_{co}}(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ The cost QoS attribute of $ACS_{n, u}^m$ ${Q_{ti}}(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ The time QoS attribute of $ACS_{n, u}^m$ ${Q_{av}}(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ The reliability QoS attribute of $ACS_{n, u}^m$ ${Q_{EC}}(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ The energy consumption QoS attribute of $ACS_{n, u}^m$ $L(A_{n, u}^m, A_{n', u'}^{m + 1})$ Logistics transportation distance from $ACS_{n, u}^m$ to $ACS_{n', u'}^{m + 1}$ $\Delta Ltt$ Difference between the latitudes of $ACS_{n, u}^m$ and $ACS_{n', u'}^{m + 1}$ $\Delta Lgt$ Difference between the Longitude of $ACS_{n, u}^m$ and $ACS_{n', u'}^{m + 1}$ $Prc$ Unit price of logistics transportation $PrcA$ Price per unit of aviation kerosene $PrcH$ Price per unit of heavy diesel fuel $PrcL$ Price per unit of light diesel fuel ${C_{exp}}$ Expected cost from MSD $MLT$ Maximum threshold for the logistics transport distance $\Theta$ Punctuality rate of land transportation $Av$ Punctuality rate of air transport relative to land $Mar$ Punctuality rate of sea transport relative to land $R{L_{exp}}$ Expected reliability from MSD $MTTF$ Mean time to failure $MTBF$ Mean operating time between failures $ECS(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ Energy consumption during the setup stage $ECT(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ Energy consumption during the material transportation stage $ECI(ACS_{n, u}^m)$ Energy consumption during the machine idle stage $CEL$ Carbon emissions unit liter of aviation kerosene $CEA$ Carbon emissions unit liter of heavy diesel fuel $CEH$ Carbon emissions unit liter of light diesel fuel $E{C_{exp}}$ Expected cost from service demander ${E_{quota}}$ Government policy restrictions
Part of the sample data of MV
 Task Chain Structures Sequential model Parallel model Selective model Circular model $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {{Q_{co}}}$ $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {{Q_{co}}}$ $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {\left( {{Q_{co}} * P{r_m}} \right)}$ $h * {Q_{co}}$ $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {{Q_{ti}}}$ $\max _{m = 1}^M{Q_{ti}}$ $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {\left( {{Q_{ti}}*P{r_m}} \right)}$ $h*{Q_{ti}}$ $\prod\nolimits_{m{\rm{ = 1}}}^M {{Q_{re}}}$ $\prod\nolimits_{m{\rm{ = 1}}}^M {{Q_{re}}}$ $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {\left( {{Q_{re}} * P{r_m}} \right)}$ ${\left( {{Q_{re}}} \right)^h}$ $\prod\nolimits_{m{\rm{ = 1}}}^M {{Q_{av}}}$ $\prod\nolimits_{m{\rm{ = 1}}}^M {{Q_{av}}}$ $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {\left( {{Q_{av}} * P{r_m}} \right)}$] ${\left( {{Q_{av}}} \right)^h}$ NOTE: In the case of selective model Prm is probability and $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {P{r_m} = 1}$. In the case of circular model h is cycle number.
 Task Chain Structures Sequential model Parallel model Selective model Circular model $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {{Q_{co}}}$ $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {{Q_{co}}}$ $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {\left( {{Q_{co}} * P{r_m}} \right)}$ $h * {Q_{co}}$ $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {{Q_{ti}}}$ $\max _{m = 1}^M{Q_{ti}}$ $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {\left( {{Q_{ti}}*P{r_m}} \right)}$ $h*{Q_{ti}}$ $\prod\nolimits_{m{\rm{ = 1}}}^M {{Q_{re}}}$ $\prod\nolimits_{m{\rm{ = 1}}}^M {{Q_{re}}}$ $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {\left( {{Q_{re}} * P{r_m}} \right)}$ ${\left( {{Q_{re}}} \right)^h}$ $\prod\nolimits_{m{\rm{ = 1}}}^M {{Q_{av}}}$ $\prod\nolimits_{m{\rm{ = 1}}}^M {{Q_{av}}}$ $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {\left( {{Q_{av}} * P{r_m}} \right)}$] ${\left( {{Q_{av}}} \right)^h}$ NOTE: In the case of selective model Prm is probability and $\sum\nolimits_{m = 1}^M {P{r_m} = 1}$. In the case of circular model h is cycle number.
Part of the sample data of MV
 ID Candidate Service Set N Location ${\rm{M}}{{\rm{V}}_{\rm{1}}}$ $\left\{ {C{S_{{\rm{1, 1}}}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{{\rm{2, 1}}}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{{\rm{3, 1}}}}} \right\}$ 3 $N28^\circ 17'7.81, {\rm{ }}E120^\circ 13'48.09$ ${\rm{M}}{{\rm{V}}_{\rm{2}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 2}}} \right\}$ 1 $N32^\circ 09'32.76, {\rm{ }}E107^\circ 08' 2.51$ ${\rm{M}}{{\rm{V}}_{\rm{3}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 3}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{2, 3}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{{\rm{3}}{\rm{3}}}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{4, 3}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{5, 3}}} \right\}$ 5 $N27^\circ 37'4.48, {\rm{ }}E109^\circ 43'36.35$ ${\rm{M}}{{\rm{V}}_{\rm{4}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 4}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{2, 4}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{3, 4}}} \right\}$ 3 $N39^\circ 18' 59.17, {\rm{ }}E112^\circ 52'1.13$ ${\rm{M}}{{\rm{V}}_{\rm{5}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 5}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{2, 5}}} \right\}$ 2 $N23^\circ 13'25.30, {\rm{ }}E113^\circ 02'8.07$ ${\rm{M}}{{\rm{V}}_{\rm{6}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 6}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{2, 6}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{3, 6}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{4, 6}}} \right\}$ 4 $N29^\circ 29'8.31, {\rm{ }}E121^\circ 43'27.43$ $\ldots$
 ID Candidate Service Set N Location ${\rm{M}}{{\rm{V}}_{\rm{1}}}$ $\left\{ {C{S_{{\rm{1, 1}}}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{{\rm{2, 1}}}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{{\rm{3, 1}}}}} \right\}$ 3 $N28^\circ 17'7.81, {\rm{ }}E120^\circ 13'48.09$ ${\rm{M}}{{\rm{V}}_{\rm{2}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 2}}} \right\}$ 1 $N32^\circ 09'32.76, {\rm{ }}E107^\circ 08' 2.51$ ${\rm{M}}{{\rm{V}}_{\rm{3}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 3}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{2, 3}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{{\rm{3}}{\rm{3}}}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{4, 3}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{5, 3}}} \right\}$ 5 $N27^\circ 37'4.48, {\rm{ }}E109^\circ 43'36.35$ ${\rm{M}}{{\rm{V}}_{\rm{4}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 4}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{2, 4}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{3, 4}}} \right\}$ 3 $N39^\circ 18' 59.17, {\rm{ }}E112^\circ 52'1.13$ ${\rm{M}}{{\rm{V}}_{\rm{5}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 5}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{2, 5}}} \right\}$ 2 $N23^\circ 13'25.30, {\rm{ }}E113^\circ 02'8.07$ ${\rm{M}}{{\rm{V}}_{\rm{6}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 6}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{2, 6}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{3, 6}}, {\rm{ C}}{{\rm{S}}_{4, 6}}} \right\}$ 4 $N29^\circ 29'8.31, {\rm{ }}E121^\circ 43'27.43$ $\ldots$
Part of the sample data of QoS of CS
 ID QoS co ti re av EC (CNY) (Day) (%) (%) (Level) ${\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{{\rm{2, 1}}}}$ 320k 23 73 54 C ${\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 2}}$ 1.9k 11 87 76 D ${\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{2, 3}}$ 640k 57 77 89 E ${\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{2, 4}}$ 275k 100 81 84 C ${\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 5}}$ 33k 68 65 71 C ${\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{3, 6}}$ 835k 32 92 76 B $\ldots$
 ID QoS co ti re av EC (CNY) (Day) (%) (%) (Level) ${\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{{\rm{2, 1}}}}$ 320k 23 73 54 C ${\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 2}}$ 1.9k 11 87 76 D ${\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{2, 3}}$ 640k 57 77 89 E ${\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{2, 4}}$ 275k 100 81 84 C ${\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{1, 5}}$ 33k 68 65 71 C ${\rm{C}}{{\rm{S}}_{3, 6}}$ 835k 32 92 76 B $\ldots$
 ID Manufacturing function ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{1}}}$ C'shaped rack ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{2}}}$ Vertical perforation system ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{3}}}$ Side frame ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{4}}}$ Electrical control system ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{5}}}$ Combined movable beam ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{6}}}$ Main working cylinder ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{7}}}$ Return cylinder ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{8}}}$ Synchronous balance cylinder ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{9}}}$ Guide rod ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{10}}}$ Mobile workbench ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{11}}}$ Base ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{12}}}$ Combined fixed lower beam ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{13}}}$ Step up beam ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{14}}}$ Upper beam ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{15}}}$ Filling valve ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{16}}}$ Hydraulic station ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{17}}}$ Photoelectric safety protection device ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{18}}}$ Movable beam safety device ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{19}}}$ Automatic feeding device ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{20}}}$ Servo buffer system
 ID Manufacturing function ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{1}}}$ C'shaped rack ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{2}}}$ Vertical perforation system ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{3}}}$ Side frame ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{4}}}$ Electrical control system ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{5}}}$ Combined movable beam ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{6}}}$ Main working cylinder ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{7}}}$ Return cylinder ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{8}}}$ Synchronous balance cylinder ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{9}}}$ Guide rod ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{10}}}$ Mobile workbench ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{11}}}$ Base ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{12}}}$ Combined fixed lower beam ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{13}}}$ Step up beam ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{14}}}$ Upper beam ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{15}}}$ Filling valve ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{16}}}$ Hydraulic station ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{17}}}$ Photoelectric safety protection device ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{18}}}$ Movable beam safety device ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{19}}}$ Automatic feeding device ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{20}}}$ Servo buffer system
MVs involved in the for YH28 manufacturing task
 ID CS set ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{1}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}{{_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{1}}}_{{\rm{, 1}}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 1}}}^{\rm{2}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 1}}}^{\rm{3}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{2}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 2}}}^{{\rm{15}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 2}^{16}{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 2}^{17}{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 2}^{18}{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 2}^{19}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{3}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 3}^2{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 3}^3{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 3}^4{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 3}^5{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 3}^6{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 3}^7{\rm{, CS}}_{7, 3}^8{\rm{, CS}}_{8, 3}^9} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{4}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 4}^1{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 4}^5{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 4}^6{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 4}^7{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 4}^8{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 4}^9{\rm{, CS}}_{7, 4}^{11}{\rm{, CS}}_{8, 4}^{12}{\rm{, CS}}_{9, 4}^{13}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{5}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 5}^7{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 5}^8} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{6}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}{}_{1, 6}^{17}{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 6}^{18}{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 6}^{19}{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 6}^{20}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{7}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 7}^6{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 7}^7{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 7}^8{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 7}^9{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 7}^{10}{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 7}^{11}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{8}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 8}^{11}{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 8}^{12}{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 8}^{13}{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 8}^{14}{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 8}^{15}{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 8}^{16}{\rm{, CS}}_{7, 8}^{17}{\rm{, CS}}_{8, 8}^{18}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{9}}}$ $$$\left\{ \begin{array}{l} {\rm{CS}}_{1, 9}^3{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 9}^4{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 9}^5{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 9}^6{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 9}^7{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 9}^8{\rm{, CS}}_{7, 9}^9{\rm{, }}\\{\rm{CS}}_{8, 9}^{10}{\rm{, CS}}_{9, 9}^{11}{\rm{, CS}}_{10, 9}^{12}{\rm{, CS}}_{11, 9}^{13}{\rm{, CS}}_{12, 9}^{14} \end{array} \right\}$$$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{10}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 10}^1{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 10}^2{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 10}^3{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 10}^{11}{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 10}^{12}{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 10}^{13}{\rm{, CS}}_{7, 10}^{14}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{11}}}$ $$$\left\{ \begin{array}{l} {\rm{CS}}_{1, 11}^1{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 11}^2{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 11}^3{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{4, 11}}}^{\rm{4}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{5, 11}}}^5{\rm{, }}\\{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{6, 11}}}^{14}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{7, 11}}}^{15}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{8, 11}}}^{{\rm{16}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{9, 11}^{{\rm{19}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{10, 11}^{20} \end{array} \right\}$$$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{12}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 12}}}^{\rm{1}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 12}}}^{\rm{2}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 12}}}^{\rm{3}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{4, 12}}}^{11}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{5, 12}}}^{12}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{6, 12}}}^{{\rm{13}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{7, 12}}}^{{\rm{14}}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{13}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 13}^8{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 13}^9{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 13}^{10}{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 13}^{11}{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 13}^{12}{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 13}^{17}{\rm{, CS}}_{7, 13}^{18}{\rm{, CS}}_{8, 13}^{19}{\rm{, CS}}_{9, 13}^{20}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{14}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 14}}}^{\rm{1}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 14}}}^2{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 14}}}^{\rm{3}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{4, 14}}}^{\rm{4}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{5}}, 14}^{\rm{6}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{6, 14}}}^{\rm{7}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{7}}, 14}^{\rm{8}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{8, 14}}}^{\rm{9}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{15}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{6, 15}^{{\rm{17}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{7, 15}}}^{{\rm{18}}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{16}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{6, 16}^{{\rm{17}}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{17}}}$ $$$\left\{ \begin{array}{l} {\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 17}}}^{\rm{1}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 17}}}^{\rm{2}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 17}}}^{\rm{3}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{4, 17}}}^{\rm{4}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{5, 17}}}^{\rm{5}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{6, 17}}}^{\rm{6}}{\rm{, }}\\{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{7, 17}}}^7{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{8, 17}}}^{\rm{9}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{9, 17}}}^{{\rm{10}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{10, 17}}}^{{\rm{11}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{11, 17}}}^{{\rm{12}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{12, 17}}}^{{\rm{13}}} \end{array} \right\}$$$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{18}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 18}}}^{\rm{9}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 18}}}^{{\rm{10}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 18}}}^{{\rm{11}}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{19}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 19}}}^{{\rm{11}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 19}}}^{{\rm{12}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 19}}}^{{\rm{13}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{4, 19}}}^{{\rm{14}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{5, 19}}}^{{\rm{15}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{6, 19}}}^{{\rm{18}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{7, 19}}}^{{\rm{19}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{8, 19}}}^{{\rm{20}}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{20}}}$ $$$\left\{ \begin{array}{l} {\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 20}}}^{{\rm{10}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 20}}}^{{\rm{11}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 20}}}^{{\rm{12}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{4, 20}}}^{{\rm{13}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{5, 20}}}^{{\rm{14}}}{\rm{, }}\\{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{6, 20}}}^{{\rm{15}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{7, 20}}}^{{\rm{16}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{8, 20}}}^{{\rm{17}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{9, 20}}}^{{\rm{19}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{10, 20}}}^{{\rm{20}}} \end{array} \right\}$$$
 ID CS set ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{1}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}{{_{\rm{1}}^{\rm{1}}}_{{\rm{, 1}}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 1}}}^{\rm{2}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 1}}}^{\rm{3}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{2}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 2}}}^{{\rm{15}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 2}^{16}{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 2}^{17}{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 2}^{18}{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 2}^{19}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{3}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 3}^2{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 3}^3{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 3}^4{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 3}^5{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 3}^6{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 3}^7{\rm{, CS}}_{7, 3}^8{\rm{, CS}}_{8, 3}^9} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{4}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 4}^1{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 4}^5{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 4}^6{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 4}^7{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 4}^8{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 4}^9{\rm{, CS}}_{7, 4}^{11}{\rm{, CS}}_{8, 4}^{12}{\rm{, CS}}_{9, 4}^{13}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{5}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 5}^7{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 5}^8} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{6}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}{}_{1, 6}^{17}{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 6}^{18}{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 6}^{19}{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 6}^{20}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{7}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 7}^6{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 7}^7{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 7}^8{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 7}^9{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 7}^{10}{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 7}^{11}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{8}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 8}^{11}{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 8}^{12}{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 8}^{13}{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 8}^{14}{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 8}^{15}{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 8}^{16}{\rm{, CS}}_{7, 8}^{17}{\rm{, CS}}_{8, 8}^{18}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{9}}}$ $$$\left\{ \begin{array}{l} {\rm{CS}}_{1, 9}^3{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 9}^4{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 9}^5{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 9}^6{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 9}^7{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 9}^8{\rm{, CS}}_{7, 9}^9{\rm{, }}\\{\rm{CS}}_{8, 9}^{10}{\rm{, CS}}_{9, 9}^{11}{\rm{, CS}}_{10, 9}^{12}{\rm{, CS}}_{11, 9}^{13}{\rm{, CS}}_{12, 9}^{14} \end{array} \right\}$$$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{10}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 10}^1{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 10}^2{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 10}^3{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 10}^{11}{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 10}^{12}{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 10}^{13}{\rm{, CS}}_{7, 10}^{14}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{11}}}$ $$$\left\{ \begin{array}{l} {\rm{CS}}_{1, 11}^1{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 11}^2{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 11}^3{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{4, 11}}}^{\rm{4}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{5, 11}}}^5{\rm{, }}\\{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{6, 11}}}^{14}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{7, 11}}}^{15}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{8, 11}}}^{{\rm{16}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{9, 11}^{{\rm{19}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{10, 11}^{20} \end{array} \right\}$$$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{12}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 12}}}^{\rm{1}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 12}}}^{\rm{2}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 12}}}^{\rm{3}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{4, 12}}}^{11}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{5, 12}}}^{12}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{6, 12}}}^{{\rm{13}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{7, 12}}}^{{\rm{14}}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{13}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{1, 13}^8{\rm{, CS}}_{2, 13}^9{\rm{, CS}}_{3, 13}^{10}{\rm{, CS}}_{4, 13}^{11}{\rm{, CS}}_{5, 13}^{12}{\rm{, CS}}_{6, 13}^{17}{\rm{, CS}}_{7, 13}^{18}{\rm{, CS}}_{8, 13}^{19}{\rm{, CS}}_{9, 13}^{20}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{14}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 14}}}^{\rm{1}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 14}}}^2{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 14}}}^{\rm{3}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{4, 14}}}^{\rm{4}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{5}}, 14}^{\rm{6}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{6, 14}}}^{\rm{7}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{7}}, 14}^{\rm{8}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{8, 14}}}^{\rm{9}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{15}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{6, 15}^{{\rm{17}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{7, 15}}}^{{\rm{18}}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{16}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{6, 16}^{{\rm{17}}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{17}}}$ $$$\left\{ \begin{array}{l} {\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 17}}}^{\rm{1}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 17}}}^{\rm{2}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 17}}}^{\rm{3}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{4, 17}}}^{\rm{4}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{5, 17}}}^{\rm{5}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{6, 17}}}^{\rm{6}}{\rm{, }}\\{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{7, 17}}}^7{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{8, 17}}}^{\rm{9}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{9, 17}}}^{{\rm{10}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{10, 17}}}^{{\rm{11}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{11, 17}}}^{{\rm{12}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{12, 17}}}^{{\rm{13}}} \end{array} \right\}$$$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{18}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 18}}}^{\rm{9}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 18}}}^{{\rm{10}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 18}}}^{{\rm{11}}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{19}}}$ $\left\{ {{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 19}}}^{{\rm{11}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 19}}}^{{\rm{12}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 19}}}^{{\rm{13}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{4, 19}}}^{{\rm{14}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{5, 19}}}^{{\rm{15}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{6, 19}}}^{{\rm{18}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{7, 19}}}^{{\rm{19}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{8, 19}}}^{{\rm{20}}}} \right\}$ ${\rm{S}}{{\rm{T}}_{\rm{20}}}$ $$$\left\{ \begin{array}{l} {\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{1, 20}}}^{{\rm{10}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{2, 20}}}^{{\rm{11}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{3, 20}}}^{{\rm{12}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{4, 20}}}^{{\rm{13}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{5, 20}}}^{{\rm{14}}}{\rm{, }}\\{\rm{CS}}_{{\rm{6, 20}}}^{{\rm{15}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{7, 20}}}^{{\rm{16}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{8, 20}}}^{{\rm{17}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{9, 20}}}^{{\rm{19}}}{\rm{, CS}}_{{\rm{10, 20}}}^{{\rm{20}}} \end{array} \right\}$$$
Quality of service (QoS) constraint for YH28 manufacturing task
 Parameters Cost Reliability EC Reputation Constraint < 10 >50 >D good
 Parameters Cost Reliability EC Reputation Constraint < 10 >50 >D good
Number of ST and number of MV after CTRA
 Group 90 180 270 360 Group 90 180 270 360 $\left| {{\bf{ST}}} \right|$ 20 11 12 12 12 $\left| {{\bf{MV}}} \right|$ 20 49 103 128 129 30 17 16 17 17 30 65 123 155 213 40 21 19 21 21 40 66 135 195 255 50 25 25 25 26 50 76 138 210 278 60 28 29 29 29 60 80 153 220 282
 Group 90 180 270 360 Group 90 180 270 360 $\left| {{\bf{ST}}} \right|$ 20 11 12 12 12 $\left| {{\bf{MV}}} \right|$ 20 49 103 128 129 30 17 16 17 17 30 65 123 155 213 40 21 19 21 21 40 66 135 195 255 50 25 25 25 26 50 76 138 210 278 60 28 29 29 29 60 80 153 220 282
Parameter settings of CPA, NSGA-Ⅲ, FGA and AMOSA
 Parameters CPA NSGA-Ⅲ FGA Parameters AMOSA PoC 0.5 0.75 0.96 MaxVoT 200 PoM 0.1 1/n 0.02 MinVoT 10 DIC Self-adaption 30 30 NoIT 500 DIM 20 20 20 HCN 20 Cooling rate 0.8 NOTE:PoC denotes probability of crossover; PoM denotes probability of mutation; DIC denotes Distribution index for crossover; DIM denotes Distribution index for mutation; MaxVoT denotes Maximum value of the temperature; MinVoT denotes Minimum value of the temperature; NoIT denotes Number of iterations per temperature; HCN denotes hill-climb number.
 Parameters CPA NSGA-Ⅲ FGA Parameters AMOSA PoC 0.5 0.75 0.96 MaxVoT 200 PoM 0.1 1/n 0.02 MinVoT 10 DIC Self-adaption 30 30 NoIT 500 DIM 20 20 20 HCN 20 Cooling rate 0.8 NOTE:PoC denotes probability of crossover; PoM denotes probability of mutation; DIC denotes Distribution index for crossover; DIM denotes Distribution index for mutation; MaxVoT denotes Maximum value of the temperature; MinVoT denotes Minimum value of the temperature; NoIT denotes Number of iterations per temperature; HCN denotes hill-climb number.
Comparison performance of the small scale
 Algorithm Groups Groups in service composition Running time Haul ditance Carbon emission CPA (20, 100) (11, 50) 3.8 304 3.2 (20, 120) (12, 70) 4.6 287 3 (20, 140) (12, 95) 4.6 261 2.9 NSGA-Ⅲ (20, 100) (20, 100) 5.1 598 4.6 (20, 120) (20, 120) 5.2 378 4.3 (20, 140) (20, 140) 5.4 449 4.5 FGA (20, 100) (20, 90) 8.7 673 4.2 (20, 120) (20, 105) 9.1 682 4.2 (20, 140) (20, 115) 11.5 594 3.9 AMOSA (20, 100) (20, 100) 29.8 482 4.1 (20, 120) (20, 120) 30.5 507 4.3 (20, 140) (20, 140) 30.3 413 4.4
 Algorithm Groups Groups in service composition Running time Haul ditance Carbon emission CPA (20, 100) (11, 50) 3.8 304 3.2 (20, 120) (12, 70) 4.6 287 3 (20, 140) (12, 95) 4.6 261 2.9 NSGA-Ⅲ (20, 100) (20, 100) 5.1 598 4.6 (20, 120) (20, 120) 5.2 378 4.3 (20, 140) (20, 140) 5.4 449 4.5 FGA (20, 100) (20, 90) 8.7 673 4.2 (20, 120) (20, 105) 9.1 682 4.2 (20, 140) (20, 115) 11.5 594 3.9 AMOSA (20, 100) (20, 100) 29.8 482 4.1 (20, 120) (20, 120) 30.5 507 4.3 (20, 140) (20, 140) 30.3 413 4.4
 [1] Tinghai Ren, Kaifu Yuan, Dafei Wang, Nengmin Zeng. Effect of service quality on software sales and coordination mechanism in IT service supply chain. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021165 [2] Fei Cheng, Shanlin Yang, Ram Akella, Xiaoting Tang. An integrated approach for selection of service vendors in service supply chain. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (4) : 907-925. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.907 [3] Suresh P. Sethi, Houmin Yan, Hanqin Zhang, Jing Zhou. Information Updated Supply Chain with Service-Level Constraints. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (4) : 513-531. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.513 [4] Xiaohui Ren, Daofang Chang, Jin Shen. Optimization of the product service supply chain under the influence of presale services. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021130 [5] Ziyuan Zhang, Liying Yu. Research on optimal pricing decisions of the service supply chain oriented to strategic consumers. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022096 [6] Wei Chen, Jianchang Fan, Hongyan Du, Pingsi Zhong. Investment strategy for renewable energy and electricity service quality under different power structures. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022006 [7] Qiang Lin, Ying Peng, Ying Hu. Supplier financing service decisions for a capital-constrained supply chain: Trade credit vs. combined credit financing. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2020, 16 (4) : 1731-1752. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019026 [8] Jing Shi, Tiaojun Xiao. Service investment and consumer returns policy in a vendor-managed inventory supply chain. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (2) : 439-459. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.439 [9] Bin Dan, Huali Gao, Yang Zhang, Ru Liu, Songxuan Ma. Integrated order acceptance and scheduling decision making in product service supply chain with hard time windows constraints. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (1) : 165-182. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017041 [10] Dingzhong Feng, Xiaofeng Zhang, Ye Zhang. Collection decisions and coordination in a closed-loop supply chain under recovery price and service competition. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021117 [11] Weihua Liu, Xinran Shen, Di Wang, Jingkun Wang. Order allocation model in logistics service supply chain with demand updating and inequity aversion: A perspective of two option contracts comparison. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (6) : 3269-3295. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020118 [12] Zonghong Cao, Jie Min. Selection and impact of decision mode of encroachment and retail service in a dual-channel supply chain. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022, 18 (1) : 541-560. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020167 [13] Han Zhao, Bangdong Sun, Hui Wang, Shiji Song, Yuli Zhang, Liejun Wang. Optimization and coordination in a service-constrained supply chain with the bidirectional option contract under conditional value-at-risk. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2022  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2022021 [14] Jun Tu, Zijiao Sun, Min Huang. Supply chain coordination considering e-tailer's promotion effort and logistics provider's service effort. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022, 18 (3) : 2191-2220. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021062 [15] Yongtao Peng, Dan Xu, Eleonora Veglianti, Elisabetta Magnaghi. A product service supply chain network equilibrium considering risk management in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022094 [16] Michael Herrmann, Antonio Segatti. Infinite harmonic chain with heavy mass. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (1) : 61-75. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.61 [17] Dong-Sheng Ma, Hua-Ming Song. Behavior-based pricing in service differentiated industries. Journal of Dynamics and Games, 2020, 7 (4) : 351-364. doi: 10.3934/jdg.2020027 [18] Jun Wu, Shouyang Wang, Wuyi Yue. Supply contract model with service level constraint. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (3) : 275-287. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.275 [19] Hengyu Li, Junwu Chai. Strategic service investment by retailers confronted by manufacturer encroachment. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022086 [20] Tao Jiang, Liwei Liu. Analysis of a batch service multi-server polling system with dynamic service control. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (2) : 743-757. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017073

2021 Impact Factor: 1.411