American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
January  2008, 2(1): 139-185. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2008.2.139

Explicit Jenkins-Strebel representatives of all strata of Abelian and quadratic differentials

Anton Zorich 1,

1. 

IRMAR, Université Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes cedex, France

Received  October 2007 Revised  November 2007 Published  November 2007

Moduli spaces of Abelian and quadratic differentials are stratified by multiplicities of zeroes; connected components of the strata correspond to ergodic components of the Teichmüller geodesic flow. It is known that the strata are not necessarily connected; the connected components were recently classified by M. Kontsevich and the author and by E. Lanneau. The strata can be also viewed as families of flat metrics with conical singularities and with $\mathbb Z$/$2 \mathbb Z$-holonomy.
    For every connected component of each stratum of Abelian and quadratic differentials we construct an explicit representative which is a Jenkins–Strebel differential with a single cylinder. By an elementary variation of this construction we represent almost every Abelian (quadratic) differential in the corresponding connected component of the stratum as a polygon with identified pairs of edges, where combinatorics of identifications is explicitly described.
    Specifically, the combinatorics is expressed in terms of a generalized permutation. For any component of any stratum of Abelian and quadratic differentials we construct a generalized permutation in the corresponding extended Rauzy class.
Keywords: Teichmüller geodesic flow, interval-exchange transformation, Jenkins-Strebel differential, moduli space of quadratic differentials, Rauzy class., spin structure.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 32G15, 30F30, 30F60, 37E05, 37E35, 37G9.
Citation: Anton Zorich. Explicit Jenkins-Strebel representatives of all strata of Abelian and quadratic differentials. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2008, 2 (1) : 139-185. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2008.2.139
[1]

Corentin Boissy. Classification of Rauzy classes in the moduli space of Abelian and quadratic differentials. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (10) : 3433-3457. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.3433
[2]

Giovanni Forni. On the Brin Prize work of Artur Avila in Teichmüller dynamics and interval-exchange transformations. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2012, 6 (2) : 139-182. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2012.6.139
[3]

Dawei Chen. Strata of abelian differentials and the Teichmüller dynamics. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2013, 7 (1) : 135-152. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2013.7.135
[4]

Giovanni Forni, Carlos Matheus. Introduction to Teichmüller theory and its applications to dynamics of interval exchange transformations, flows on surfaces and billiards. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2014, 8 (3&4) : 271-436. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2014.8.271
[5]

Christopher F. Novak. Discontinuity-growth of interval-exchange maps. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2009, 3 (3) : 379-405. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2009.3.379
[6]

Luca Marchese. The Khinchin Theorem for interval-exchange transformations. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2011, 5 (1) : 123-183. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2011.5.123
[7]

Ursula Hamenstädt. Bowen's construction for the Teichmüller flow. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2013, 7 (4) : 489-526. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2013.7.489
[8]

Ursula Hamenstädt. Dynamics of the Teichmüller flow on compact invariant sets. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2010, 4 (2) : 393-418. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2010.4.393
[9]

Jonathan Chaika, Yitwah Cheung, Howard Masur. Winning games for bounded geodesics in moduli spaces of quadratic differentials. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2013, 7 (3) : 395-427. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2013.7.395
[10]

Jon Chaika, David Damanik, Helge Krüger. Schrödinger operators defined by interval-exchange transformations. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2009, 3 (2) : 253-270. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2009.3.253
[11]

Martin Möller. Shimura and Teichmüller curves. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2011, 5 (1) : 1-32. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2011.5.1
[12]

Fei Yu, Kang Zuo. Weierstrass filtration on Teichmüller curves and Lyapunov exponents. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2013, 7 (2) : 209-237. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2013.7.209
[13]

Alex Eskin, Maryam Mirzakhani. Counting closed geodesics in moduli space. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2011, 5 (1) : 71-105. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2011.5.71
[14]

Ivan Dynnikov, Alexandra Skripchenko. Minimality of interval exchange transformations with restrictions. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2017, 11: 219-248. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2017010
[15]

Guizhen Cui, Yunping Jiang, Anthony Quas. Scaling functions and Gibbs measures and Teichmüller spaces of circle endomorphisms. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 1999, 5 (3) : 535-552. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1999.5.535
[16]

Chi Po Choi, Xianfeng Gu, Lok Ming Lui. Subdivision connectivity remeshing via Teichmüller extremal map. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2017, 11 (5) : 825-855. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2017039
[17]

Matteo Costantini, André Kappes. The equation of the Kenyon-Smillie (2, 3, 4)-Teichmüller curve. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2017, 11: 17-41. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2017002
[18]

Jon Chaika. Hausdorff dimension for ergodic measures of interval exchange transformations. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2008, 2 (3) : 457-464. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2008.2.457
[19]

Sébastien Ferenczi, Pascal Hubert. Rigidity of square-tiled interval exchange transformations. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2019, 14: 153-177. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2019006
[20]

Yuan Guo, Xiaofei Gao, Desheng Li. Structure of the set of bounded solutions for a class of nonautonomous second order differential equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2010, 9 (6) : 1607-1616. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2010.9.1607

2018 Impact Factor: 0.295

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (10)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (5)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences