American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
July  2009, 3(3): 379-405. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2009.3.379

Discontinuity-growth of interval-exchange maps

Christopher F. Novak 1,

1. 

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Michigan - Dearborn, 4901 Evergreen Rd., Dearborn,MI 48128, United States

Received  November 2008 Revised  May 2009 Published  August 2009

For an interval-exchange map $f$, the number of discontinuities $d(f^n)$ either exhibits linear growth or is bounded independently of $n$. This dichotomy is used to prove that the group $\mathcal{E}$ of interval-exchanges does not contain distortion elements, giving examples of groups that do not act faithfully via interval-exchanges. As a further application of this dichotomy, a classification of centralizers in $\mathcal{E}$ is given. This classification is used to show that $\text{Aut}(\mathcal{E}) \cong \mathcal{E}$ ⋊ $\mathbb{Z}$/$ 2 \mathbb{Z}$.
Keywords: distortion elements, automorphism group., centralizers, discontinuity-growth, group actions, Interval-exchange transformation.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37E05; Secondary: 37C85, 20F2.
Citation: Christopher F. Novak. Discontinuity-growth of interval-exchange maps. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2009, 3 (3) : 379-405. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2009.3.379
[1]

Van Cyr, John Franks, Bryna Kra, Samuel Petite. Distortion and the automorphism group of a shift. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2018, 13: 147-161. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2018015
[2]

Van Cyr, Bryna Kra. The automorphism group of a minimal shift of stretched exponential growth. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2016, 10: 483-495. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2016.10.483
[3]

Luca Marchese. The Khinchin Theorem for interval-exchange transformations. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2011, 5 (1) : 123-183. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2011.5.123
[4]

Jon Chaika, David Damanik, Helge Krüger. Schrödinger operators defined by interval-exchange transformations. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2009, 3 (2) : 253-270. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2009.3.253
[5]

Dongmei Zheng, Ercai Chen, Jiahong Yang. On large deviations for amenable group actions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (12) : 7191-7206. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016113
[6]

Franz W. Kamber and Peter W. Michor. Completing Lie algebra actions to Lie group actions. Electronic Research Announcements, 2004, 10: 1-10.

[7]

Sze-Bi Hsu, Bernold Fiedler, Hsiu-Hau Lin. Classification of potential flows under renormalization group transformation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (2) : 437-446. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.437
[8]

Mohamed Baouch, Juan Antonio López-Ramos, Blas Torrecillas, Reto Schnyder. An active attack on a distributed Group Key Exchange system. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2017, 11 (4) : 715-717. doi: 10.3934/amc.2017052
[9]

Giovanni Forni. On the Brin Prize work of Artur Avila in Teichmüller dynamics and interval-exchange transformations. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2012, 6 (2) : 139-182. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2012.6.139
[10]

A. Katok and R. J. Spatzier. Nonstationary normal forms and rigidity of group actions. Electronic Research Announcements, 1996, 2: 124-133.

[11]

Xiaojun Huang, Jinsong Liu, Changrong Zhu. The Katok's entropy formula for amenable group actions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (9) : 4467-4482. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018195
[12]

Jan J. Sławianowski, Vasyl Kovalchuk, Agnieszka Martens, Barbara Gołubowska, Ewa E. Rożko. Essential nonlinearity implied by symmetry group. Problems of affine invariance in mechanics and physics. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (2) : 699-733. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.699
[13]

Dariusz Skrenty. Absolutely continuous spectrum of some group extensions of Gaussian actions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 26 (1) : 365-378. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.365
[14]

Jean-Pierre Conze, Y. Guivarc'h. Ergodicity of group actions and spectral gap, applications to random walks and Markov shifts. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (9) : 4239-4269. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.4239
[15]

Jean-Paul Thouvenot. The work of Lewis Bowen on the entropy theory of non-amenable group actions. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2019, 15: 133-141. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2019016
[16]

François Gay-Balmaz, Cesare Tronci, Cornelia Vizman. Geometric dynamics on the automorphism group of principal bundles: Geodesic flows, dual pairs and chromomorphism groups. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2013, 5 (1) : 39-84. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2013.5.39
[17]

Gülden Gün Polat, Teoman Özer. On group analysis of optimal control problems in economic growth models. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020215
[18]

Xiankun Ren. Periodic measures are dense in invariant measures for residually finite amenable group actions with specification. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (4) : 1657-1667. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018068
[19]

Yoshikazu Katayama, Colin E. Sutherland and Masamichi Takesaki. The intrinsic invariant of an approximately finite dimensional factor and the cocycle conjugacy of discrete amenable group actions. Electronic Research Announcements, 1995, 1: 43-47.

[20]

Kengo Matsumoto. K-groups of the full group actions on one-sided topological Markov shifts. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (8) : 3753-3765. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.3753

2018 Impact Factor: 0.295

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (13)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (9)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2019 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences