Smooth symmetries of \times a-invariant sets

Previous Article
Symmetry of entropy in higher rank diagonalizable actions and measure classification
JMD Home
This Volume
Next Article
Countable Markov partitions suitable for thermodynamic formalism

2018, 13: 187-197. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2018017

Smooth symmetries of $\times a$-invariant sets

Einstein Institute of Mathematics, Edmond J. Safra Campus, Givat Ram, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel

Received July 19, 2017 Revised March 18, 2018 Published December 2018

Fund Project: Supported by ERC grant 306494 and ISF grant 1702/17

We study the smooth self-maps $f$ of $× a$-invariant sets $X\subseteq[0,1]$. Under various assumptions we show that this forces $\log f'(x)/\log a∈\mathbb{Q}$ at many points in $X$. Our method combines scenery flow methods and equidistribution results in the positive entropy case, where we improve previous work of the author and Shmerkin, with a new topological variant of the scenery flow which applies in the zero-entropy case.

Keywords: Fractal geometry, measure rigidity, expanding maps, jointly invariant sets, Hausdorff dimension.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 28A80; Secondary: 11K55, 11B30, 11P70.

Citation: Michael Hochman. Smooth symmetries of $\times a$-invariant sets. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2018, 13: 187-197. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2018017

References:

[1]	D. Berend, Multi-invariant sets on tori, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 280 (1983), 509-532. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1983-0716835-6. Google Scholar
[2]	D. Berend, Multi-invariant sets on compact abelian groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 286 (1984), 505-535. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1984-0760973-X. Google Scholar
[3]	M. Einsiedler, A. Katok and E. Lindenstrauss, Invariant measures and the set of exceptions to Littlewood's conjecture, Ann. of Math. (2), 164 (2006), 513-560. doi: 10.4007/annals.2006.164.513. Google Scholar
[4]	M. Einsiedler and E. Lindenstrauss, Rigidity properties of $\Bbb Z^d$-actions on tori and solenoids, Electron. Res. Announc. Amer. Math. Soc., 9 (2003), 99-110 (electronic). doi: 10.1090/S1079-6762-03-00117-3. Google Scholar
[5]	M. Elekes, T. Keleti and A. Máthé, Self-similar and self-affine sets: Measure of the intersection of two copies, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 30 (2010), 399-440. doi: 10.1017/S0143385709000121. Google Scholar
[6]	K. J. Falconer and D. T. Marsh, On the Lipschitz equivalence of Cantor sets, Mathematika, 39 (1992), 223-233. doi: 10.1112/S0025579300014959. Google Scholar
[7]	D.-J. Feng, W. Huang and H. Rao, Affine embeddings and intersections of Cantor sets, Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 102 (2014), 1062-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.matpur.2014.03.003. Google Scholar
[8]	H. Furstenberg, Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets, and a problem in Diophantine approximation, Math. Systems Theory, 1 (1967), 1-49. doi: 10.1007/BF01692494. Google Scholar
[9]	M. Hochman, Dynamics on fractal measures, preprint, arXiv: 1008.3731, 2010.Google Scholar
[10]	M. Hochman, Geometric rigidity of $× m$ invariant measures, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 14 (2012), 1539-1563. doi: 10.4171/JEMS/340. Google Scholar
[11]	M. Hochman, On self-similar sets with overlaps and inverse theorems for entropy, Ann. of Math. (2), 180 (2014), 773-822. doi: 10.4007/annals.2014.180.2.7. Google Scholar
[12]	M. Hochman, Some problems on the boundary of fractal geometry and additive combinatorics, to appear in Proceedings of FARF 3, arXiv: 1608.02711, 2016.Google Scholar
[13]	M. Hochman and P. Shmerkin, Local entropy averages and projections of fractal measures, Ann. of Math. (2), 175 (2012), 1001-1059. doi: 10.4007/annals.2012.175.3.1. Google Scholar
[14]	M. Hochman and P. Shmerkin, Equidistribution from fractal measures, Inventiones Mathematicae, 202 (2015), 427-479. doi: 10.1007/s00222-014-0573-5. Google Scholar
[15]	B. Kalinin, A. Katok and F. Rodriguez Hertz, New progress in nonuniform measure and cocycle rigidity, Electron. Res. Announc. Math. Sci., 15 (2008), 79-92. Google Scholar
[16]	A. Katok and R. J. Spatzier, Invariant measures for higher-rank hyperbolic abelian actions, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 16 (1996), 751-778. doi: 10.1017/S0143385700009081. Google Scholar
[17]	P. Shmerkin, On Furstenberg's intersection conjecture, self-similar measures, and the $L^q$ norms of convolutions, preprint, arXiv: 1609.07802, 2016.Google Scholar
[18]	M. Wu, A proof of Furstenberg's conjecture on the intersections of $×$p and $×$q-invariant sets, preprint, arXiv: 1609.08053, 2016.Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	D. Berend, Multi-invariant sets on tori, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 280 (1983), 509-532. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1983-0716835-6. Google Scholar
[2]	D. Berend, Multi-invariant sets on compact abelian groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 286 (1984), 505-535. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1984-0760973-X. Google Scholar
[3]	M. Einsiedler, A. Katok and E. Lindenstrauss, Invariant measures and the set of exceptions to Littlewood's conjecture, Ann. of Math. (2), 164 (2006), 513-560. doi: 10.4007/annals.2006.164.513. Google Scholar
[4]	M. Einsiedler and E. Lindenstrauss, Rigidity properties of $\Bbb Z^d$-actions on tori and solenoids, Electron. Res. Announc. Amer. Math. Soc., 9 (2003), 99-110 (electronic). doi: 10.1090/S1079-6762-03-00117-3. Google Scholar
[5]	M. Elekes, T. Keleti and A. Máthé, Self-similar and self-affine sets: Measure of the intersection of two copies, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 30 (2010), 399-440. doi: 10.1017/S0143385709000121. Google Scholar
[6]	K. J. Falconer and D. T. Marsh, On the Lipschitz equivalence of Cantor sets, Mathematika, 39 (1992), 223-233. doi: 10.1112/S0025579300014959. Google Scholar
[7]	D.-J. Feng, W. Huang and H. Rao, Affine embeddings and intersections of Cantor sets, Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 102 (2014), 1062-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.matpur.2014.03.003. Google Scholar
[8]	H. Furstenberg, Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets, and a problem in Diophantine approximation, Math. Systems Theory, 1 (1967), 1-49. doi: 10.1007/BF01692494. Google Scholar
[9]	M. Hochman, Dynamics on fractal measures, preprint, arXiv: 1008.3731, 2010.Google Scholar
[10]	M. Hochman, Geometric rigidity of $× m$ invariant measures, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 14 (2012), 1539-1563. doi: 10.4171/JEMS/340. Google Scholar
[11]	M. Hochman, On self-similar sets with overlaps and inverse theorems for entropy, Ann. of Math. (2), 180 (2014), 773-822. doi: 10.4007/annals.2014.180.2.7. Google Scholar
[12]	M. Hochman, Some problems on the boundary of fractal geometry and additive combinatorics, to appear in Proceedings of FARF 3, arXiv: 1608.02711, 2016.Google Scholar
[13]	M. Hochman and P. Shmerkin, Local entropy averages and projections of fractal measures, Ann. of Math. (2), 175 (2012), 1001-1059. doi: 10.4007/annals.2012.175.3.1. Google Scholar
[14]	M. Hochman and P. Shmerkin, Equidistribution from fractal measures, Inventiones Mathematicae, 202 (2015), 427-479. doi: 10.1007/s00222-014-0573-5. Google Scholar
[15]	B. Kalinin, A. Katok and F. Rodriguez Hertz, New progress in nonuniform measure and cocycle rigidity, Electron. Res. Announc. Math. Sci., 15 (2008), 79-92. Google Scholar
[16]	A. Katok and R. J. Spatzier, Invariant measures for higher-rank hyperbolic abelian actions, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 16 (1996), 751-778. doi: 10.1017/S0143385700009081. Google Scholar
[17]	P. Shmerkin, On Furstenberg's intersection conjecture, self-similar measures, and the $L^q$ norms of convolutions, preprint, arXiv: 1609.07802, 2016.Google Scholar
[18]	M. Wu, A proof of Furstenberg's conjecture on the intersections of $×$p and $×$q-invariant sets, preprint, arXiv: 1609.08053, 2016.Google Scholar

[1]	Luis Barreira and Jorg Schmeling. Invariant sets with zero measure and full Hausdorff dimension. Electronic Research Announcements, 1997, 3: 114-118.
[2]	V. V. Chepyzhov, A. A. Ilyin. On the fractal dimension of invariant sets: Applications to Navier-Stokes equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2004, 10 (1&2) : 117-135. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2004.10.117
[3]	Krzysztof Barański. Hausdorff dimension of self-affine limit sets with an invariant direction. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2008, 21 (4) : 1015-1023. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2008.21.1015
[4]	Hiroki Sumi, Mariusz Urbański. Bowen parameter and Hausdorff dimension for expanding rational semigroups. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (7) : 2591-2606. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.2591
[5]	Joseph Squillace. Estimating the fractal dimension of sets determined by nonergodic parameters. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (11) : 5843-5859. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017254
[6]	Krzysztof Barański, Michał Wardal. On the Hausdorff dimension of the Sierpiński Julia sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (8) : 3293-3313. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.3293
[7]	Tien-Cuong Dinh, Nessim Sibony. Rigidity of Julia sets for Hénon type maps. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2014, 8 (3&4) : 499-548. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2014.8.499
[8]	Boris Kalinin, Anatole Katok. Measure rigidity beyond uniform hyperbolicity: invariant measures for cartan actions on tori. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2007, 1 (1) : 123-146. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2007.1.123
[9]	Lulu Fang, Min Wu. Hausdorff dimension of certain sets arising in Engel continued fractions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (5) : 2375-2393. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018098
[10]	Doug Hensley. Continued fractions, Cantor sets, Hausdorff dimension, and transfer operators and their analytic extension. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2012, 32 (7) : 2417-2436. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.2417
[11]	Carlos Matheus, Jacob Palis. An estimate on the Hausdorff dimension of stable sets of non-uniformly hyperbolic horseshoes. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (2) : 431-448. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018020
[12]	Weiyuan Qiu, Fei Yang, Yongcheng Yin. Quasisymmetric geometry of the Cantor circles as the Julia sets of rational maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2016, 36 (6) : 3375-3416. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.3375
[13]	Simon Lloyd, Edson Vargas. Critical covering maps without absolutely continuous invariant probability measure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (5) : 2393-2412. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019101
[14]	Umberto Mosco, Maria Agostina Vivaldi. Vanishing viscosity for fractal sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2010, 28 (3) : 1207-1235. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.28.1207
[15]	Boris Kalinin, Anatole Katok, Federico Rodriguez Hertz. Errata to "Measure rigidity beyond uniform hyperbolicity: Invariant measures for Cartan actions on tori" and "Uniqueness of large invariant measures for $\Zk$ actions with Cartan homotopy data". Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2010, 4 (1) : 207-209. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2010.4.207
[16]	Tifei Qian, Zhihong Xia. Heteroclinic orbits and chaotic invariant sets for monotone twist maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2003, 9 (1) : 69-95. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.69
[17]	Jose F. Alves; Stefano Luzzatto and Vilton Pinheiro. Markov structures for non-uniformly expanding maps on compact manifolds in arbitrary dimension. Electronic Research Announcements, 2003, 9: 26-31.
[18]	Xueting Tian, Paulo Varandas. Topological entropy of level sets of empirical measures for non-uniformly expanding maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (10) : 5407-5431. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017235
[19]	Michael L. Frankel, Victor Roytburd. Fractal dimension of attractors for a Stefan problem. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 281-287. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.281
[20]	Carlangelo Liverani. A footnote on expanding maps. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (8) : 3741-3751. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.3741

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences