American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
  • Previous Article
    On a family of finite-difference schemes with approximate transparent boundary conditions for a generalized 1D Schrödinger equation
  • KRM Home
  • This Issue
  • Next Article
    Stability of the travelling wave in a 2D weakly nonlinear Stefan problem
March  2009, 2(1): 135-149. doi: 10.3934/krm.2009.2.135

A Boltzmann-like equation for choice formation

Valeriano Comincioli 1, , Lucia Della Croce 1, and  Giuseppe Toscani 2,

1. 

Department of Mathematics at the University of Pavia, via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy, Italy
2. 

Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Pavia, via Ferrata 1, I-27100 Pavia

Received  September 2008 Revised  October 2008 Published  January 2009

We describe here a possible approach to the formation of choice in a society by methods borrowed from the kinetic theory of rarefied gases. It is shown that the evolution of the continuous density of opinions obeys a linear Boltzmann equation where the background density represents the fixed distribution of possible choices. The binary interactions between individuals are in general non-local, and take into account both the compromise propensity and the self-thinking. In particular regimes, the linear Boltzmann equation is well described by a Fokker-Planck type equation, for which in some cases the steady states (distribution of choices) can be obtained in analytical form. This Fokker-Planck type equation generalizes analogous one obtained by mean field approximation of the voter model in [27]. Numerical examples illustrate the influence of different model parameters in the description both of the shape of the distribution of choices, and in its mean value.
Keywords: linear Boltzmann equation, Fokker-Planck equation, Sociodynamics, opinion formation..
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 35B40, 91C20; Secondary: 82B21, 60K3.
Citation: Valeriano Comincioli, Lucia Della Croce, Giuseppe Toscani. A Boltzmann-like equation for choice formation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2009, 2 (1) : 135-149. doi: 10.3934/krm.2009.2.135
[1]

Giuseppe Toscani. A Rosenau-type approach to the approximation of the linear Fokker-Planck equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (4) : 697-714. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018028
[2]

Sylvain De Moor, Luis Miguel Rodrigues, Julien Vovelle. Invariant measures for a stochastic Fokker-Planck equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (2) : 357-395. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018017
[3]

Michael Herty, Christian Jörres, Albert N. Sandjo. Optimization of a model Fokker-Planck equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2012, 5 (3) : 485-503. doi: 10.3934/krm.2012.5.485
[4]

Marco Torregrossa, Giuseppe Toscani. On a Fokker-Planck equation for wealth distribution. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (2) : 337-355. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018016
[5]

José Antonio Alcántara, Simone Calogero. On a relativistic Fokker-Planck equation in kinetic theory. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (2) : 401-426. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.401
[6]

Simon Plazotta. A BDF2-approach for the non-linear Fokker-Planck equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (5) : 2893-2913. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019120
[7]

Helge Dietert, Josephine Evans, Thomas Holding. Contraction in the Wasserstein metric for the kinetic Fokker-Planck equation on the torus. Kinetic & Related Models, 2018, 11 (6) : 1427-1441. doi: 10.3934/krm.2018056
[8]

Andreas Denner, Oliver Junge, Daniel Matthes. Computing coherent sets using the Fokker-Planck equation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2016, 3 (2) : 163-177. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2016008
[9]

Ioannis Markou. Hydrodynamic limit for a Fokker-Planck equation with coefficients in Sobolev spaces. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12 (4) : 683-705. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017028
[10]

Manh Hong Duong, Yulong Lu. An operator splitting scheme for the fractional kinetic Fokker-Planck equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (10) : 5707-5727. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019250
[11]

Linjie Xiong, Tao Wang, Lusheng Wang. Global existence and decay of solutions to the Fokker-Planck-Boltzmann equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2014, 7 (1) : 169-194. doi: 10.3934/krm.2014.7.169
[12]

Ludovic Dan Lemle. $L^1(R^d,dx)$-uniqueness of weak solutions for the Fokker-Planck equation associated with a class of Dirichlet operators. Electronic Research Announcements, 2008, 15: 65-70. doi: 10.3934/era.2008.15.65
[13]

Joseph G. Conlon, André Schlichting. A non-local problem for the Fokker-Planck equation related to the Becker-Döring model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (4) : 1821-1889. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019079
[14]

Patrick Cattiaux, Elissar Nasreddine, Marjolaine Puel. Diffusion limit for kinetic Fokker-Planck equation with heavy tails equilibria: The critical case. Kinetic & Related Models, 2019, 12 (4) : 727-748. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019028
[15]

Roberta Bosi. Classical limit for linear and nonlinear quantum Fokker-Planck systems. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (3) : 845-870. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.845
[16]

Florian Schneider, Andreas Roth, Jochen Kall. First-order quarter-and mixed-moment realizability theory and Kershaw closures for a Fokker-Planck equation in two space dimensions. Kinetic & Related Models, 2017, 10 (4) : 1127-1161. doi: 10.3934/krm.2017044
[17]

Lvqiao Liu, Hao Wang. Global existence and decay of solutions for hard potentials to the fokker-planck-boltzmann equation without cut-off. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (6) : 3113-3136. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020135
[18]

Shui-Nee Chow, Wuchen Li, Haomin Zhou. Entropy dissipation of Fokker-Planck equations on graphs. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (10) : 4929-4950. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018215
[19]

Martin Burger, Ina Humpert, Jan-Frederik Pietschmann. On Fokker-Planck equations with In- and Outflow of Mass. Kinetic & Related Models, 2020, 13 (2) : 249-277. doi: 10.3934/krm.2020009
[20]

Michael Herty, Lorenzo Pareschi. Fokker-Planck asymptotics for traffic flow models. Kinetic & Related Models, 2010, 3 (1) : 165-179. doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.165

2019 Impact Factor: 1.311

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (67)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (28)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences