American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
September  2010, 3(3): 501-528. doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.501

Numerical simulation of a kinetic model for chemotaxis

Nicolas Vauchelet 1,

1. 

UPMC, Univ Paris 06, UMR 7598 LJLL, Paris F-75005 France, CNRS, UMR 7598 LJLL, Paris, F-75005, France

Received  September 2009 Revised  March 2010 Published  July 2010

This paper is devoted to numerical simulations of a kinetic model describing chemotaxis. This kinetic framework has been investigated since the 80's when experimental observations have shown that the motion of bacteria is due to the alternance of 'runs and tumbles'. Since parabolic and hyperbolic models do not take into account the microscopic movement of individual cells, kinetic models have become of a great interest. Dolak and Schmeiser (2005) have then proposed a kinetic model describing the motion of bacteria responding to temporal gradients of chemoattractants along their paths. An existence result for this system is provided and a numerical scheme relying on a semi-Lagrangian method is presented and analyzed. An implementation of this scheme allows to obtain numerical simulations of the model and observe blow-up patterns that differ greatly from the case of Keller-Segel type of models.
Keywords: Kinetic equations, semi-Lagrangian method, Chemotaxis, convergence analysis..
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 92C17, 92B05; Secondary: 65M12, 82C8.
Citation: Nicolas Vauchelet. Numerical simulation of a kinetic model for chemotaxis. Kinetic and Related Models, 2010, 3 (3) : 501-528. doi: 10.3934/krm.2010.3.501
[1]

Daniel Guo, John Drake. A global semi-Lagrangian spectral model for the reformulated shallow water equations. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 375-385. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.375
[2]

Daniel Guo, John Drake. A global semi-Lagrangian spectral model of shallow water equations with time-dependent variable resolution. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 355-364. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.355
[3]

Holger Heumann, Ralf Hiptmair. Eulerian and semi-Lagrangian methods for convection-diffusion for differential forms. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 29 (4) : 1471-1495. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.1471
[4]

Guoliang Zhang, Shaoqin Zheng, Tao Xiong. A conservative semi-Lagrangian finite difference WENO scheme based on exponential integrator for one-dimensional scalar nonlinear hyperbolic equations. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 1819-1839. doi: 10.3934/era.2020093
[5]

Xiantao Xiao, Liwei Zhang, Jianzhong Zhang. On convergence of augmented Lagrangian method for inverse semi-definite quadratic programming problems. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (2) : 319-339. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.319
[6]

Elisabetta Carlini, Francisco J. Silva. A semi-Lagrangian scheme for a degenerate second order mean field game system. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (9) : 4269-4292. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.4269
[7]

Alexandre Mouton. Two-scale semi-Lagrangian simulation of a charged particle beam in a periodic focusing channel. Kinetic and Related Models, 2009, 2 (2) : 251-274. doi: 10.3934/krm.2009.2.251
[8]

Yang Li, Yonghong Ren, Yun Wang, Jian Gu. Convergence analysis of a nonlinear Lagrangian method for nonconvex semidefinite programming with subproblem inexactly solved. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2015, 11 (1) : 65-81. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2015.11.65
[9]

Jiangxing Wang. Convergence analysis of an accurate and efficient method for nonlinear Maxwell's equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (5) : 2429-2440. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020185
[10]

Hyung Ju Hwang, Hwijae Son. Lagrangian dual framework for conservative neural network solutions of kinetic equations. Kinetic and Related Models, 2022, 15 (4) : 551-568. doi: 10.3934/krm.2021046
[11]

Cheng Wang. Convergence analysis of the numerical method for the primitive equations formulated in mean vorticity on a Cartesian grid. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (4) : 1143-1172. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.1143
[12]

Yong Duan, Jian-Guo Liu. Convergence analysis of the vortex blob method for the $b$-equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (5) : 1995-2011. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.1995
[13]

Xi-Hong Yan. A new convergence proof of augmented Lagrangian-based method with full Jacobian decomposition for structured variational inequalities. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2016, 6 (1) : 45-54. doi: 10.3934/naco.2016.6.45
[14]

Shi Jin, Yingda Li. Local sensitivity analysis and spectral convergence of the stochastic Galerkin method for discrete-velocity Boltzmann equations with multi-scales and random inputs. Kinetic and Related Models, 2019, 12 (5) : 969-993. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019037
[15]

Jahnabi Chakravarty, Ashiho Athikho, Manideepa Saha. Convergence of interval AOR method for linear interval equations. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2022, 12 (2) : 293-308. doi: 10.3934/naco.2021006
[16]

Binjie Li, Xiaoping Xie, Shiquan Zhang. New convergence analysis for assumed stress hybrid quadrilateral finite element method. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (7) : 2831-2856. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017153
[17]

Hongxiu Zhong, Guoliang Chen, Xueping Guo. Semi-local convergence of the Newton-HSS method under the center Lipschitz condition. Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 2019, 9 (1) : 85-99. doi: 10.3934/naco.2019007
[18]

Jialin Hong, Lijun Miao, Liying Zhang. Convergence analysis of a symplectic semi-discretization for stochastic nls equation with quadratic potential. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (8) : 4295-4315. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019120
[19]

Yaonan Ma, Li-Zhi Liao. The Glowinski–Le Tallec splitting method revisited: A general convergence and convergence rate analysis. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1681-1711. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020040
[20]

Xiaofeng Yang. Error analysis of stabilized semi-implicit method of Allen-Cahn equation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 11 (4) : 1057-1070. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.1057

2020 Impact Factor: 1.432

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (99)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (15)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy