# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

March  2011, 4(1): 361-384. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.361

## Non-Newtonian Couette-Poiseuille flow of a dilute gas

 1 Département de Physique, Université Moulay Ismaïl, Meknès, Morocco 2 Departamento de Física, Universidad de Extremadura, E-06071 Badajoz, Spain

Received  September 2010 Revised  October 2010 Published  January 2011

The steady state of a dilute gas enclosed between two infinite parallel plates in relative motion and under the action of a uniform body force parallel to the plates is considered. The Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook model kinetic equation is analytically solved for this Couette-Poiseuille flow to first order in the force and for arbitrary values of the Knudsen number associated with the shear rate. This allows us to investigate the influence of the external force on the non-Newtonian properties of the Couette flow. Moreover, the Couette-Poiseuille flow is analyzed when the shear-rate Knudsen number and the scaled force are of the same order and terms up to second order are retained. In this way, the transition from the bimodal temperature profile characteristic of the pure force-driven Poiseuille flow to the parabolic profile characteristic of the pure Couette flow through several intermediate stages in the Couette-Poiseuille flow are described. A critical comparison with the Navier-Stokes solution of the problem is carried out.
Citation: Mohamed Tij, Andrés Santos. Non-Newtonian Couette-Poiseuille flow of a dilute gas. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (1) : 361-384. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.361
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
 [1] Changli Yuan, Mojdeh Delshad, Mary F. Wheeler. Modeling multiphase non-Newtonian polymer flow in IPARS parallel framework. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2010, 5 (3) : 583-602. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.583 [2] M. Bulíček, F. Ettwein, P. Kaplický, Dalibor Pražák. The dimension of the attractor for the 3D flow of a non-Newtonian fluid. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2009, 8 (5) : 1503-1520. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2009.8.1503 [3] Muhammad Mansha Ghalib, Azhar Ali Zafar, Zakia Hammouch, Muhammad Bilal Riaz, Khurram Shabbir. Analytical results on the unsteady rotational flow of fractional-order non-Newtonian fluids with shear stress on the boundary. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 683-693. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020037 [4] Hong Zhou, M. Gregory Forest. Anchoring distortions coupled with plane Couette & Poiseuille flows of nematic polymers in viscous solvents: Morphology in molecular orientation, stress & flow. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (2) : 407-425. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.407 [5] Igor Chueshov, Tamara Fastovska. On interaction of circular cylindrical shells with a Poiseuille type flow. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2016, 5 (4) : 605-629. doi: 10.3934/eect.2016021 [6] Liudmila A. Pozhar. Poiseuille flow of nanofluids confined in slit nanopores. Conference Publications, 2001, 2001 (Special) : 319-326. doi: 10.3934/proc.2001.2001.319 [7] Leif Arkeryd, Raffaele Esposito, Rossana Marra, Anne Nouri. Ghost effect by curvature in planar Couette flow. Kinetic & Related Models, 2011, 4 (1) : 109-138. doi: 10.3934/krm.2011.4.109 [8] Lars Diening, Michael Růžička. An existence result for non-Newtonian fluids in non-regular domains. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2010, 3 (2) : 255-268. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2010.3.255 [9] Oleksiy V. Kapustyan, Pavlo O. Kasyanov, José Valero, Michael Z. Zgurovsky. Strong attractors for vanishing viscosity approximations of non-Newtonian suspension flows. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (3) : 1155-1176. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018146 [10] Jan Sokołowski, Jan Stebel. Shape optimization for non-Newtonian fluids in time-dependent domains. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2014, 3 (2) : 331-348. doi: 10.3934/eect.2014.3.331 [11] Aneta Wróblewska-Kamińska. Unsteady flows of non-Newtonian fluids in generalized Orlicz spaces. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (6) : 2565-2592. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.2565 [12] Emil Novruzov. On existence and nonexistence of the positive solutions of non-newtonian filtration equation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (2) : 719-730. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.719 [13] Linfang Liu, Tomás Caraballo, Xianlong Fu. Exponential stability of an incompressible non-Newtonian fluid with delay. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (10) : 4285-4303. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018138 [14] Hafedh Bousbih. Global weak solutions for a coupled chemotaxis non-Newtonian fluid. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (2) : 907-929. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018212 [15] Bum Ja Jin, Kyungkeun Kang. Caccioppoli type inequality for non-Newtonian Stokes system and a local energy inequality of non-Newtonian Navier-Stokes equations without pressure. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (9) : 4815-4834. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017207 [16] Leif Arkeryd, Raffaele Esposito, Rossana Marra, Anne Nouri. Erratum to: Ghost effect by curvature in planar Couette flow [1]. Kinetic & Related Models, 2012, 5 (3) : 669-672. doi: 10.3934/krm.2012.5.669 [17] María Anguiano, Francisco Javier Suárez-Grau. Newtonian fluid flow in a thin porous medium with non-homogeneous slip boundary conditions. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2019, 14 (2) : 289-316. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2019012 [18] Veronika Schleper. A hybrid model for traffic flow and crowd dynamics with random individual properties. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (2) : 393-413. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.393 [19] Asim Aziz, Wasim Jamshed. Unsteady MHD slip flow of non Newtonian power-law nanofluid over a moving surface with temperature dependent thermal conductivity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (4) : 617-630. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018036 [20] Jong Yeoul Park, Jae Ug Jeong. Pullback attractors for a $2D$-non-autonomous incompressible non-Newtonian fluid with variable delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (8) : 2687-2702. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016068

2018 Impact Factor: 1.38