
Previous Article
Erratum to: Ghost effect by curvature in planar Couette flow [1]
 KRM Home
 This Issue

Next Article
Large time behavior of solutions to the nonisentropic compressible NavierStokesPoisson system in $\mathbb{R}^{3}$
Finite element method with discrete transparent boundary conditions for the timedependent 1D Schrödinger equation
1.  Department of Mathematics at Faculty of Economics Sciences, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Myasnitskaya 20, 101000 Moscow, Russian Federation 
2.  Department of Mathematical Modelling, Moscow Power Engineering Institute, Krasnokazarmennaya 14, 111250 Moscow, Russian Federation 
References:
[1] 
X. Antoine, A. Arnold, C. Besse, M. Ehrhardt and A. Schädle, A review of transparent and artificial boundary conditions techniques for linear and nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Commun. Comp. Phys., 4 (2008), 729796. Google Scholar 
[2] 
X. Antoine and C. Besse, Unconditionally stable discretization schemes of nonreflecting boundary conditions for the onedimensional Schrödinger equation, J. Comp. Phys., 188 (2003), 157175. doi: 10.1016/S00219991(03)001591. Google Scholar 
[3] 
A. Arnold, Numerically absorbing boundary conditions for quantum evolution equations, VLSI Design, 6 (1998), 313319. Google Scholar 
[4] 
A. Arnold, M. Ehrhardt and I. Sofronov, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation: Fast calculations, approximation, and stability, Comm. Math. Sci., 1 (2003), 501556. Google Scholar 
[5] 
B. Ducomet and A. Zlotnik, On stability of the CrankNicolson scheme with approximate transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation. I, Comm. Math. Sci., 4 (2006), 741766. Google Scholar 
[6] 
B. Ducomet and A. Zlotnik, On stability of the CrankNicolson scheme with approximate transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation. II, Comm. Math. Sci., 5 (2007), 267298. Google Scholar 
[7] 
B. Ducomet, A. Zlotnik and I. Zlotnik, On a family of finitedifference schemes with approximate transparent boundary conditions for a generalized 1D Schrödinger equation, Kinetic and Related Models, 2 (2009), 151179. Google Scholar 
[8] 
M. Ehrhardt and A. Arnold, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation, Riv. Mat. Univ. Parma (6), 4 (2001), 57108. Google Scholar 
[9] 
V. A. Gordin, "Mathematical Problems in Hydrodynamical Weather Forecasting. Computational Aspects," (in Russian), "Gidrometeoizdat," Leningrad, 1987; Abridged English version: "Mathematical Problems and Methods in Hydrodynamical Weather Forecasting," Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, 2000. Google Scholar 
[10] 
R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, "Matrix Analysis," Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985. Google Scholar 
[11] 
J. Jin and X. Wu, Analysis of finite element method for onedimensional timedependent Schrödinger equation on unbounded domains, J. Comp. Appl. Math., 220 (2008), 240256. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2007.08.006. Google Scholar 
[12] 
C. A. Moyer, Numerov extension of transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation discretized in one dimension, Am. J. Phys., 72 (2004), 351358. doi: 10.1119/1.1619141. Google Scholar 
[13] 
F. Schmidt and D. Yevick, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for Schrödingertype equations, J. Comp. Phys., 134 (1997), 96107. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1997.5675. Google Scholar 
[14] 
M. Schulte and A. Arnold, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equationa compact higher order scheme, Kinetic and Related Models, 1 (2008), 101125. Google Scholar 
[15] 
G. Strang and G. Fix, "An Analysis of the Finite Element Method," PrenticeHall Series in Automatic Computation, PrenticeHall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973. Google Scholar 
[16] 
I. A. Zlotnik, Computer simulation of the tunnel effect, (in Russian), Moscow Power Engin. Inst. Bulletin, 6 (2010), 1028. Google Scholar 
[17] 
I. A. Zlotnik, A family of difference schemes with approximate transparent boundary conditions for the generalized nonstationary Schrödinger equation in a halfstrip, Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 51 (2011), 355376. doi: 10.1134/S0965542511030122. Google Scholar 
show all references
References:
[1] 
X. Antoine, A. Arnold, C. Besse, M. Ehrhardt and A. Schädle, A review of transparent and artificial boundary conditions techniques for linear and nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Commun. Comp. Phys., 4 (2008), 729796. Google Scholar 
[2] 
X. Antoine and C. Besse, Unconditionally stable discretization schemes of nonreflecting boundary conditions for the onedimensional Schrödinger equation, J. Comp. Phys., 188 (2003), 157175. doi: 10.1016/S00219991(03)001591. Google Scholar 
[3] 
A. Arnold, Numerically absorbing boundary conditions for quantum evolution equations, VLSI Design, 6 (1998), 313319. Google Scholar 
[4] 
A. Arnold, M. Ehrhardt and I. Sofronov, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation: Fast calculations, approximation, and stability, Comm. Math. Sci., 1 (2003), 501556. Google Scholar 
[5] 
B. Ducomet and A. Zlotnik, On stability of the CrankNicolson scheme with approximate transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation. I, Comm. Math. Sci., 4 (2006), 741766. Google Scholar 
[6] 
B. Ducomet and A. Zlotnik, On stability of the CrankNicolson scheme with approximate transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation. II, Comm. Math. Sci., 5 (2007), 267298. Google Scholar 
[7] 
B. Ducomet, A. Zlotnik and I. Zlotnik, On a family of finitedifference schemes with approximate transparent boundary conditions for a generalized 1D Schrödinger equation, Kinetic and Related Models, 2 (2009), 151179. Google Scholar 
[8] 
M. Ehrhardt and A. Arnold, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation, Riv. Mat. Univ. Parma (6), 4 (2001), 57108. Google Scholar 
[9] 
V. A. Gordin, "Mathematical Problems in Hydrodynamical Weather Forecasting. Computational Aspects," (in Russian), "Gidrometeoizdat," Leningrad, 1987; Abridged English version: "Mathematical Problems and Methods in Hydrodynamical Weather Forecasting," Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam, 2000. Google Scholar 
[10] 
R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, "Matrix Analysis," Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985. Google Scholar 
[11] 
J. Jin and X. Wu, Analysis of finite element method for onedimensional timedependent Schrödinger equation on unbounded domains, J. Comp. Appl. Math., 220 (2008), 240256. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2007.08.006. Google Scholar 
[12] 
C. A. Moyer, Numerov extension of transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equation discretized in one dimension, Am. J. Phys., 72 (2004), 351358. doi: 10.1119/1.1619141. Google Scholar 
[13] 
F. Schmidt and D. Yevick, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for Schrödingertype equations, J. Comp. Phys., 134 (1997), 96107. doi: 10.1006/jcph.1997.5675. Google Scholar 
[14] 
M. Schulte and A. Arnold, Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrödinger equationa compact higher order scheme, Kinetic and Related Models, 1 (2008), 101125. Google Scholar 
[15] 
G. Strang and G. Fix, "An Analysis of the Finite Element Method," PrenticeHall Series in Automatic Computation, PrenticeHall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973. Google Scholar 
[16] 
I. A. Zlotnik, Computer simulation of the tunnel effect, (in Russian), Moscow Power Engin. Inst. Bulletin, 6 (2010), 1028. Google Scholar 
[17] 
I. A. Zlotnik, A family of difference schemes with approximate transparent boundary conditions for the generalized nonstationary Schrödinger equation in a halfstrip, Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 51 (2011), 355376. doi: 10.1134/S0965542511030122. Google Scholar 
[1] 
Bernard Ducomet, Alexander Zlotnik, Ilya Zlotnik. On a family of finitedifference schemes with approximate transparent boundary conditions for a generalized 1D Schrödinger equation. Kinetic & Related Models, 2009, 2 (1) : 151179. doi: 10.3934/krm.2009.2.151 
[2] 
Maike Schulte, Anton Arnold. Discrete transparent boundary conditions for the Schrodinger equation  a compact higher order scheme. Kinetic & Related Models, 2008, 1 (1) : 101125. doi: 10.3934/krm.2008.1.101 
[3] 
Mourad Bellassoued, Oumaima Ben Fraj. Stability estimates for timedependent coefficients appearing in the magnetic Schrödinger equation from arbitrary boundary measurements. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (5) : 841865. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020039 
[4] 
Yueqiang Shang, Qihui Zhang. A subgrid stabilizing postprocessed mixed finite element method for the timedependent NavierStokes equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2021, 26 (6) : 31193142. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020222 
[5] 
Daniele Boffi, Lucia Gastaldi. Discrete models for fluidstructure interactions: The finite element Immersed Boundary Method. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2016, 9 (1) : 89107. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016.9.89 
[6] 
Kun Wang, Yinnian He, Yueqiang Shang. Fully discrete finite element method for the viscoelastic fluid motion equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2010, 13 (3) : 665684. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.665 
[7] 
Holger Teismann. The Schrödinger equation with singular timedependent potentials. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2000, 6 (3) : 705722. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2000.6.705 
[8] 
Runchang Lin, Huiqing Zhu. A discontinuous Galerkin leastsquares finite element method for solving Fisher's equation. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 489497. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.489 
[9] 
Xiu Ye, Shangyou Zhang, Peng Zhu. A weak Galerkin finite element method for nonlinear conservation laws. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (1) : 18971923. doi: 10.3934/era.2020097 
[10] 
Yue Feng, Yujie Liu, Ruishu Wang, Shangyou Zhang. A conforming discontinuous Galerkin finite element method on rectangular partitions. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (3) : 23752389. doi: 10.3934/era.2020120 
[11] 
Tetsu Mizumachi, Dmitry Pelinovsky. On the asymptotic stability of localized modes in the discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2012, 5 (5) : 971987. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2012.5.971 
[12] 
Chaoxu Pei, Mark Sussman, M. Yousuff Hussaini. A spacetime discontinuous Galerkin spectral element method for the Stefan problem. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2018, 23 (9) : 35953622. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017216 
[13] 
Abderrazak Chrifi, Mostafa Abounouh, Hassan Al Moatassime. Galerkin method of weakly damped cubic nonlinear Schrödinger with Dirac impurity, and artificial boundary condition in a halfline. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2022, 15 (1) : 7993. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021030 
[14] 
Yavar Kian, Alexander Tetlow. Hölderstable recovery of timedependent electromagnetic potentials appearing in a dynamical anisotropic Schrödinger equation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2020, 14 (5) : 819839. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2020038 
[15] 
Hristo Genev, George Venkov. Soliton and blowup solutions to the timedependent SchrödingerHartree equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  S, 2012, 5 (5) : 903923. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2012.5.903 
[16] 
Leilei Wei, Yinnian He. A fully discrete local discontinuous Galerkin method with the generalized numerical flux to solve the tempered fractional reactiondiffusion equation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2021, 26 (9) : 49074926. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020319 
[17] 
Zhanyuan Hou. Geometric method for global stability of discrete population models. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2020, 25 (9) : 33053334. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020063 
[18] 
Z.G. Feng, K.L. Teo, Y. Zhao. Branch and bound method for sensor scheduling in discrete time. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (4) : 499512. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.499 
[19] 
Alexander Zlotnik. The NumerovCrankNicolson scheme on a nonuniform mesh for the timedependent Schrödinger equation on the halfaxis. Kinetic & Related Models, 2015, 8 (3) : 587613. doi: 10.3934/krm.2015.8.587 
[20] 
Lunji Song, Wenya Qi, Kaifang Liu, Qingxian Gu. A new overpenalized weak galerkin finite element method. Part Ⅱ: Elliptic interface problems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems  B, 2021, 26 (5) : 25812598. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020196 
2020 Impact Factor: 1.432
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]