American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
March  2017, 10(1): 193-213. doi: 10.3934/krm.2017008

Self-organized hydrodynamics with density-dependent velocity

Pierre Degond 1,, , Silke Henkes 2, and  Hui Yu 3,

1. 

Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
2. 

Institute for Complex Systems and Mathematical Biology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, United Kingdom
3. 

Institut für Geometrie und Praktische Mathematik, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, 52062, Germany

* Corresponding author: Pierre Degond

This paper entilted "Self-organized hydrodynamics with density-dependent velocity" is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.

Received  February 2016 Revised  May 2016 Published  November 2016

Motivated by recent experimental and computational results that show a motility-induced clustering transition in self-propelled particle systems, we study an individual model and its corresponding Self-Organized Hydrodynamic model for collective behaviour that incorporates a density-dependent velocity, as well as inter-particle alignment. The modal analysis of the hydrodynamic model elucidates the relationship between the stability of the equilibria and the changing velocity, and the formation of clusters. We find, in agreement with earlier results for non-aligning particles, that the key criterion for stability is $(ρ v(ρ))'≥q 0$, i.e. a nondecreasing mass flux $ρ v(ρ)$ with respect to the density. Numerical simulation for both the individual and hydrodynamic models with a velocity function inspired by experiment demonstrates the validity of the theoretical results.

Keywords: Collective dynamics, active matter, self-organization, hydrodynamic limit, alignment interaction, motility induced phase separation, density-dependent velocity, relaxation model, clustering.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 35L60, 35L65, 35P10, 35Q70, 82C22, 82C70, 82C80, 92D50.
Citation: Pierre Degond, Silke Henkes, Hui Yu. Self-organized hydrodynamics with density-dependent velocity. Kinetic & Related Models, 2017, 10 (1) : 193-213. doi: 10.3934/krm.2017008
References:
[1]

M. Bruan and S. J. Chapman, Excluded-volume effects in the diffusion of hard spheres, Phys. Rev. E, 85 (2012), 011103.  doi: 10.1137/100783674.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. Burger, M. Di Francesco, J. Pietschmann and B. Schlake, Nonlinear Cross-Diffusion with Size Exclusion, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 42 (2010), 2842-2871.  doi: 10.1137/100783674.  Google Scholar

[3]

M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, When are active Brownian particles and run-and-tumble particles equivalent? Consequences for motility-induced phase separation, Europhysics Letters, 101 (2013), 20010.  doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/101/20010.  Google Scholar

[4]

P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky, Principles of Condensed Matter Physics Cambridge University Press, 1995. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511813467.  Google Scholar

[5]

H. Chaté, F. Ginelli, G. Grégoire and F. Raynaud, Collective motion of self-propelled particles interacting without cohesion, Phys. Rev., E77 (2008), 046113.   Google Scholar

[6]

H. Chaté, F. Ginelli, G. Grégoire, F. Peruani and F. Raynaud, Modeling collective motion: Variations on the Vicsek model, Eur. Phys. J. B, 64 (2008), 451-456.   Google Scholar

[7]

A. Creppy, F. Plouraboué, O. Praud, H. Druart, S. Cazin, H. Yu and P. Degond, Symmetry-breaking phase-transitions in highly concentrated semen, Interface, 13 (2016), 20160575.  doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0575.  Google Scholar

[8]

A. Czirok and T. Vicsek, Collective behavior of interacting self-propelled particles, Physica A, 281 (2000), 17-29.  doi: 10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00013-3.  Google Scholar

[9]

P. Degond, J-G. Liu, S. Motsch and V. Panferov, Hydrodynamic models of self-organized dynamics: Derivation and existence theory, Methods Appl. Anal., 20 (2013), 89-114.  doi: 10.4310/MAA.2013.v20.n2.a1.  Google Scholar

[10]

P. Degond, G. Dimarco, T. B. N. Mac and N. Wang, Macroscopic models of collective motion with repulsion, Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 13 (2015), 1615-1638.  doi: 10.4310/CMS.2015.v13.n6.a12.  Google Scholar

[11]

P. Degond and J. Hua, Self-organized hydrodynamics with congestion and path formation in crowds, Journal of Computational Physics, 237 (2013), 299-319.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.11.033.  Google Scholar

[12]

P. Degond and S. Motsch, Continuum limit of self-driven particles with orientation interaction, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 18 (2008), 1193-1215.  doi: 10.1142/S0218202508003005.  Google Scholar

[13]

P. Degond, P. Peyrard, G. Russo and P. Villedieu, Polynomial upwind schemes for hyperbolic systems, Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences -Series Ⅰ -Mathematics, 328 (1999), 479-483.  doi: 10.1016/S0764-4442(99)80194-3.  Google Scholar

[14]

P. Degond and H. Yu, Self-Organized Hydrodynamics models with repulsion force in an annular domain, In preparation, 2016. Google Scholar

[15]

F. D. C. Farrell, M. C. Marchetti, D. Marenduzzo and J. Tailleur, Pattern formation in self-propelled particles with density-dependent motility, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108 (2012), 248101.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.248101.  Google Scholar

[16]

Y. Fily, A. Baskaran and M. F. Hagan, Dynamics of self-propelled particles under strong confinement, Soft Mater, 10 (2014), 5609-5617.  doi: 10.1039/C4SM00975D.  Google Scholar

[17]

Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Athermal phase separation of self-propelled particles with no allignment, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108 (2012), 235702.   Google Scholar

[18]

A. Frouvelle, A continuum model for alignment of self-propelled particles with anisotropy and density-dependent parameters Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 22 (2012), 1250011, 40pp. doi: 10.1142/S021820251250011X.  Google Scholar

[19]

S. Henkes, Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Active jamming: Self-propelled soft particles at high density, Phys. Rev. E, 84 (2011), 040301.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.040301.  Google Scholar

[20]

S. Motsch and L. Navoret, Numerical simulations of a nonconvervative hyperbolic system with geometric constraints describing swarming behavior, Multiscale Model. Simul., 9 (2011), 1253-1275.  doi: 10.1137/100794067.  Google Scholar

[21]

J. Palacci, S. Sacanna, A. P. Steinberg, D. J. Pine and P. M. Chaikin, Living crystals of light-activated colloidal surfers, Science, 339 (2013), 936-940.  doi: 10.1126/science.1230020.  Google Scholar

[22]

A. Peshkov, S. Ngo, E. Bertin, H. Chaté and F. Ginelli, Continuous theory of active matter systems with metric-free interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109 (2012), 098101.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.098101.  Google Scholar

[23]

G. S. Redner, M. F. Hagan and A. Baskaran, Structure and Dynamics of a Phase-Separating Active Colloidal Fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110 (2013), 055701.   Google Scholar

[24]

A. Schadschneider and A. Seyfried, Empirical results for pedestrian dynamics and their implications for modeling, Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 6 (2011), 545-560.  doi: 10.3934/nhm.2011.6.545.  Google Scholar

[25]

A. Seyfried, B. Steffen, M. Klingsch and M. Boltes, The fundamental diagram of pedestrian movement revisited, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10 (2005), P10002.  doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2005/10/P10002.  Google Scholar

[26]

B. Szabó, M. E. Szöllösi, B. Gönci, Zs. Jurányi, D. Selmeczi and T. Vicsek, Phase transition in the collective migration of tissue cells: Experiment and model, Phys. Rev. E, 74 (2006), 061908.   Google Scholar

[27]

J. Tailleur and M. E. Cates, Statistical mechanics of interacting run-and-tumble bacteria, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100 (2008), 218103.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.218103.  Google Scholar

[28]

J. Toner, Y. Tu and S. Ramaswamy, Hydrodynamics and phases of flocks, Annals of Physics, 318 (2005), 170-244.  doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2005.04.011.  Google Scholar

[29]

T. Vicsek, A. Czirók, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen and O. Shochet, Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75 (1995), 1226-1229.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1226.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

M. Bruan and S. J. Chapman, Excluded-volume effects in the diffusion of hard spheres, Phys. Rev. E, 85 (2012), 011103.  doi: 10.1137/100783674.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. Burger, M. Di Francesco, J. Pietschmann and B. Schlake, Nonlinear Cross-Diffusion with Size Exclusion, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 42 (2010), 2842-2871.  doi: 10.1137/100783674.  Google Scholar

[3]

M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, When are active Brownian particles and run-and-tumble particles equivalent? Consequences for motility-induced phase separation, Europhysics Letters, 101 (2013), 20010.  doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/101/20010.  Google Scholar

[4]

P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky, Principles of Condensed Matter Physics Cambridge University Press, 1995. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511813467.  Google Scholar

[5]

H. Chaté, F. Ginelli, G. Grégoire and F. Raynaud, Collective motion of self-propelled particles interacting without cohesion, Phys. Rev., E77 (2008), 046113.   Google Scholar

[6]

H. Chaté, F. Ginelli, G. Grégoire, F. Peruani and F. Raynaud, Modeling collective motion: Variations on the Vicsek model, Eur. Phys. J. B, 64 (2008), 451-456.   Google Scholar

[7]

A. Creppy, F. Plouraboué, O. Praud, H. Druart, S. Cazin, H. Yu and P. Degond, Symmetry-breaking phase-transitions in highly concentrated semen, Interface, 13 (2016), 20160575.  doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0575.  Google Scholar

[8]

A. Czirok and T. Vicsek, Collective behavior of interacting self-propelled particles, Physica A, 281 (2000), 17-29.  doi: 10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00013-3.  Google Scholar

[9]

P. Degond, J-G. Liu, S. Motsch and V. Panferov, Hydrodynamic models of self-organized dynamics: Derivation and existence theory, Methods Appl. Anal., 20 (2013), 89-114.  doi: 10.4310/MAA.2013.v20.n2.a1.  Google Scholar

[10]

P. Degond, G. Dimarco, T. B. N. Mac and N. Wang, Macroscopic models of collective motion with repulsion, Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 13 (2015), 1615-1638.  doi: 10.4310/CMS.2015.v13.n6.a12.  Google Scholar

[11]

P. Degond and J. Hua, Self-organized hydrodynamics with congestion and path formation in crowds, Journal of Computational Physics, 237 (2013), 299-319.  doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.11.033.  Google Scholar

[12]

P. Degond and S. Motsch, Continuum limit of self-driven particles with orientation interaction, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 18 (2008), 1193-1215.  doi: 10.1142/S0218202508003005.  Google Scholar

[13]

P. Degond, P. Peyrard, G. Russo and P. Villedieu, Polynomial upwind schemes for hyperbolic systems, Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences -Series Ⅰ -Mathematics, 328 (1999), 479-483.  doi: 10.1016/S0764-4442(99)80194-3.  Google Scholar

[14]

P. Degond and H. Yu, Self-Organized Hydrodynamics models with repulsion force in an annular domain, In preparation, 2016. Google Scholar

[15]

F. D. C. Farrell, M. C. Marchetti, D. Marenduzzo and J. Tailleur, Pattern formation in self-propelled particles with density-dependent motility, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108 (2012), 248101.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.248101.  Google Scholar

[16]

Y. Fily, A. Baskaran and M. F. Hagan, Dynamics of self-propelled particles under strong confinement, Soft Mater, 10 (2014), 5609-5617.  doi: 10.1039/C4SM00975D.  Google Scholar

[17]

Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Athermal phase separation of self-propelled particles with no allignment, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108 (2012), 235702.   Google Scholar

[18]

A. Frouvelle, A continuum model for alignment of self-propelled particles with anisotropy and density-dependent parameters Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 22 (2012), 1250011, 40pp. doi: 10.1142/S021820251250011X.  Google Scholar

[19]

S. Henkes, Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Active jamming: Self-propelled soft particles at high density, Phys. Rev. E, 84 (2011), 040301.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.040301.  Google Scholar

[20]

S. Motsch and L. Navoret, Numerical simulations of a nonconvervative hyperbolic system with geometric constraints describing swarming behavior, Multiscale Model. Simul., 9 (2011), 1253-1275.  doi: 10.1137/100794067.  Google Scholar

[21]

J. Palacci, S. Sacanna, A. P. Steinberg, D. J. Pine and P. M. Chaikin, Living crystals of light-activated colloidal surfers, Science, 339 (2013), 936-940.  doi: 10.1126/science.1230020.  Google Scholar

[22]

A. Peshkov, S. Ngo, E. Bertin, H. Chaté and F. Ginelli, Continuous theory of active matter systems with metric-free interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109 (2012), 098101.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.098101.  Google Scholar

[23]

G. S. Redner, M. F. Hagan and A. Baskaran, Structure and Dynamics of a Phase-Separating Active Colloidal Fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110 (2013), 055701.   Google Scholar

[24]

A. Schadschneider and A. Seyfried, Empirical results for pedestrian dynamics and their implications for modeling, Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 6 (2011), 545-560.  doi: 10.3934/nhm.2011.6.545.  Google Scholar

[25]

A. Seyfried, B. Steffen, M. Klingsch and M. Boltes, The fundamental diagram of pedestrian movement revisited, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10 (2005), P10002.  doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2005/10/P10002.  Google Scholar

[26]

B. Szabó, M. E. Szöllösi, B. Gönci, Zs. Jurányi, D. Selmeczi and T. Vicsek, Phase transition in the collective migration of tissue cells: Experiment and model, Phys. Rev. E, 74 (2006), 061908.   Google Scholar

[27]

J. Tailleur and M. E. Cates, Statistical mechanics of interacting run-and-tumble bacteria, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100 (2008), 218103.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.218103.  Google Scholar

[28]

J. Toner, Y. Tu and S. Ramaswamy, Hydrodynamics and phases of flocks, Annals of Physics, 318 (2005), 170-244.  doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2005.04.011.  Google Scholar

[29]

T. Vicsek, A. Czirók, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen and O. Shochet, Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75 (1995), 1226-1229.  doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1226.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  The accuracy test at $t=1$ shows that the splitting scheme is of first order. The initial data is given by $\rho_0 = \rho_s(1+0.1\sin(\pi x)), \theta_0 = \theta_s(1+0.1\sin(\pi x))$ with $(\rho_s, \theta_s) = (0.01, \frac{\pi}{4})$ and the mesh sizes are iteratively $N_x = N_y = 32, 64,128,256$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  Comparison between the particle (left) and SOH models (right). For the particle model, $N = 10^5, \nu = 100, D = 10, R_1 = R_2 = 0.1$. The result is the average of 40 simulations. For the SOH model, $N_x = N_y = 100$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Stability test of the SOH model with $\gamma = 0$ and $\sigma = 0.1$. The profiles show the RMSF of $\rho$ and $\theta$ in $\log$-scale with respect to time $t$. The numerical solutions evolves from the steady states, and locally high concentrations develop
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Stability test of the SOH model with $d = 0.5$, $\sigma = 0.01$ and $\rho^* = 0.02$. RMSF of the density and angle are decreasing with time
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Stability test of the SOH model with $d = 0.5$, $\sigma = 0.01$ and $\rho^* = 0.005$. The RMSF of the numerical solutions grows gradually and high local concentrations develop. The linear scaling of the $\log$ of RMSF implies an exponential growth of the perturbation as a function of time $t$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6.  Growth rate of the perturbation $\rho_\sigma$. The parameters are $c_1 = 0.975, c_2 = 0.925, d = 0.05$ and $k_0 = 0.125$. The three parameters for $v(\rho)$ are chosen as $(\rho^*, \alpha, \beta) = (0.005, 2, 5)$. The steady state for the density is fixed at $\rho_s = 0.01$ and the final time is $t = 1$. (a) is computed using the fomula (11). In order to obtain (b), we compute the numerical solutions of the SOH model and perform a simple linear regression on the Discrete Fourier transform of the perturbed part, i.e. $\rho_\sigma = \rho - \rho_s$. The growth rate is interpreted as the slope of the function $t \to \hat\rho_\sigma(\xi, t)$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Growth rate of the perturbation $\rho_\sigma$ given by the particle model with $N = 10^5$. The parameters are $\nu = 100, D = 5, R_1 = R_2 = 0.1$. The three parameters for $v(\rho)$ are chosen as $(\rho^*, \alpha, \beta) = (0.005, 2, 5)$. For each $\theta_s$, the growth rate is computed using the average of $10$ simulations, in order to reduce the effects of noise
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

Razvan C. Fetecau, Beril Zhang. Self-organization on Riemannian manifolds. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2019, 11 (3) : 397-426. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2019020
[2]

Jishan Fan, Tohru Ozawa. An approximation model for the density-dependent magnetohydrodynamic equations. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 207-216. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.207
[3]

Leonid Berlyand, Mykhailo Potomkin, Volodymyr Rybalko. Sharp interface limit in a phase field model of cell motility. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12 (4) : 551-590. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017023
[4]

Moon-Jin Kang, Seung-Yeal Ha, Jeongho Kim, Woojoo Shim. Hydrodynamic limit of the kinetic thermomechanical Cucker-Smale model in a strong local alignment regime. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (3) : 1233-1256. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020057
[5]

Xin Jiang, Zhikun She, Shigui Ruan. Global dynamics of a predator-prey system with density-dependent mortality and ratio-dependent functional response. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020041
[6]

Kelei Wang. The singular limit problem in a phase separation model with different diffusion rates $^*$. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2015, 35 (1) : 483-512. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.483
[7]

Jianwei Yang, Peng Cheng, Yudong Wang. Asymptotic limit of a Navier-Stokes-Korteweg system with density-dependent viscosity. Electronic Research Announcements, 2015, 22: 20-31. doi: 10.3934/era.2015.22.20
[8]

Ezio Di Costanzo, Marta Menci, Eleonora Messina, Roberto Natalini, Antonia Vecchio. A hybrid model of collective motion of discrete particles under alignment and continuum chemotaxis. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (1) : 443-472. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019189
[9]

Jian Zu, Miaolei Li, Yuexi Gu, Shuting Fu. Modelling the evolutionary dynamics of host resistance-related traits in a susceptible-infected community with density-dependent mortality. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (8) : 3049-3086. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020051
[10]

Jacques A. L. Silva, Flávia T. Giordani. Density-dependent dispersal in multiple species metapopulations. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2008, 5 (4) : 843-857. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.843
[11]

Tianyuan Xu, Shanming Ji, Chunhua Jin, Ming Mei, Jingxue Yin. Early and late stage profiles for a chemotaxis model with density-dependent jump probability. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (6) : 1345-1385. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018062
[12]

Jishan Fan, Tohru Ozawa. Global Cauchy problem of an ideal density-dependent MHD-$\alpha$ model. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 400-409. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.400
[13]

Chuangxia Huang, Hua Zhang, Lihong Huang. Almost periodicity analysis for a delayed Nicholson's blowflies model with nonlinear density-dependent mortality term. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (6) : 3337-3349. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019150
[14]

Tracy L. Stepien, Erica M. Rutter, Yang Kuang. A data-motivated density-dependent diffusion model of in vitro glioblastoma growth. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (6) : 1157-1172. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.1157
[15]

Kaigang Huang, Yongli Cai, Feng Rao, Shengmao Fu, Weiming Wang. Positive steady states of a density-dependent predator-prey model with diffusion. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (8) : 3087-3107. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017209
[16]

Jiang Xu, Wen-An Yong. Zero-relaxation limit of non-isentropic hydrodynamic models for semiconductors. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 25 (4) : 1319-1332. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.25.1319
[17]

J. X. Velasco-Hernández, M. Núñez-López, G. Ramírez-Santiago, M. Hernández-Rosales. On carrying-capacity construction, metapopulations and density-dependent mortality. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (3) : 1099-1110. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017054
[18]

Baojun Song, Wen Du, Jie Lou. Different types of backward bifurcations due to density-dependent treatments. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (5&6) : 1651-1668. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1651
[19]

Pierre Degond, Angelika Manhart, Hui Yu. A continuum model for nematic alignment of self-propelled particles. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (4) : 1295-1327. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017063
[20]

Pavel Krejčí, Songmu Zheng. Pointwise asymptotic convergence of solutions for a phase separation model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 16 (1) : 1-18. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.16.1

2019 Impact Factor: 1.311

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (100)
  • HTML views (1079)
  • Cited by (1)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2020 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences