Figure 1.
LAS and semi-discrete Lagrangian schemes on the left for $ N = 1 $ . Mean-velocity scheme on the right
-
Previous Article
Evolutionary game theory in mixed strategies: From microscopic interactions to kinetic equations
- KRM Home
- This Issue
-
Next Article
On two properties of the Fisher information
February
2021, 14(1): 89-113.
doi: 10.3934/krm.2020050
Superposition principle and schemes for measure differential equations
| 1. | "Sapienza" Università di Roma, Dipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate per l'Ingegneria, via Scarpa 16, I-00161 Rome, Italy |
| 2. | Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Matematica "F. Brioschi", Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milano, Italy |
| 3. | Rutgers University - Camden, Department of Mathematical Sciences, 311 N. 5th Street, Camden, NJ 08102, USA |
Measure Differential Equations (MDE) describe the evolution of probability measures driven by probability velocity fields, i.e. probability measures on the tangent bundle. They are, on one side, a measure-theoretic generalization of ordinary differential equations; on the other side, they allow to describe concentration and diffusion phenomena typical of kinetic equations. In this paper, we analyze some properties of this class of differential equations, especially highlighting their link with nonlocal continuity equations. We prove a representation result in the spirit of the Superposition Principle by Ambrosio-Gigli-Savaré, and we provide alternative schemes converging to a solution of the MDE, with a particular view to uniqueness/non-uniqueness phenomena.
Erratum: The month information has been corrected from January to February. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
Keywords:
Measure differential equations,
superposition principle,
measure-valued solution,
probability vector fields,
measure dynamics.
Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary:35S99, 28A50;Secondary:35F20, 35F25.
Citation:
Fabio Camilli, Giulia Cavagnari, Raul De Maio, Benedetto Piccoli. Superposition principle and schemes for measure differential equations. Kinetic and Related Models,
2021, 14
(1)
: 89-113.
doi: 10.3934/krm.2020050
![]()
References:
| [1] |
L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli and G. Savaré, Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures, 2$^nd$ edition, Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2008.
doi: 10.1007/b137080. |
| [2] |
M. Bongini and G. Buttazzo, Optimal control problems in transport dynamics, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 27, (2017), 427–451.
doi: 10.1142/S0218202517500063. |
| [3] |
F. Camilli, R. De Maio and A. Tosin,
Measure-valued solutions to nonlocal transport equations on networks, J. Differential Equations, 264 (2018), 7213-7241.
doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.02.015. |
| [4] |
F. Camilli, R. De Maio and A. Tosin,
Transport of measures on networks, Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 12 (2017), 191-215.
doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017008. |
| [5] |
J. A. Cañizo, J. A. Carrillo and J. Rosado,
A well-posedness theory in measures for some kinetic models of collective motion, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 21 (2011), 515-539.
doi: 10.1142/S0218202511005131. |
| [6] |
G. Cavagnari, A. Marigonda and B. Piccoli, Generalized dynamic programming principle and sparse mean-field control problems, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 481, (2020), 123437, 45 pp.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.123437. |
| [7] |
G. Cavagnari, A. Marigonda and B. Piccoli, Superposition principle for differential inclusions, in Large-Scale Scientific Computing. LSSC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (eds. I. Lirkov and S. Margenov), 10665, Springer, Cham, 2018, 201–209.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73441-5_21. |
| [8] |
E. Cristiani, B. Piccoli and A. Tosin, Multiscale Modeling of Pedestrian Dynamics, MS & A: Modeling, Simulation and Applications, Springer, Cham, Vol. 12, 2014.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-06620-2. |
| [9] |
J. Diestel and J. J. Uhl, Vector Measures, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1977.
doi: 10.1090/surv/015. |
| [10] |
F. Golse, The mean-field limit for the dynamics of large particle systems, Journées Équations aux Dérivées Partielles, Univ. Nantes, Nantes, 2003, 47 pp.
doi: 10.5802/jedp.623. |
| [11] |
P.-E. Jabin,
A review of the mean field limits for Vlasov equations, Kinetic & Related Models, 7 (2014), 661-711.
doi: 10.3934/krm.2014.7.661. |
| [12] |
C. Orrieri, Large deviations for interacting particle systems: joint mean-field and small-noise limit, Electron. J. Probab., 25 (2020) Paper No. 111, 44 pp.
doi: 10.1214/20-EJP516. |
| [13] |
B. Piccoli,
Measure differential equations, Arch Rational Mech Anal, 233 (2019), 1289-1317.
doi: 10.1007/s00205-019-01379-4. |
| [14] |
B. Piccoli and F. Rossi,
Measure dynamics with probability vector fields and sources, Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 39 (2019), 6207-6230.
doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019270. |
| [15] |
B. Piccoli and F. Rossi,
Transport equation with nonlocal velocity in Wasserstein spaces: convergence of numerical schemes, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 124 (2013), 73-105.
doi: 10.1007/s10440-012-9771-6. |
| [16] |
F. Poupaud and M. Rascle, Measure solutions to the linear multi-dimensional transport equation with non-smooth coefficients, Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 22, (1997), 225–267.
doi: 10.1080/03605309708821265. |
| [17] |
F. Santambrogio, Optimal Transport for Applied Mathematicians, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, Birkhäuser Basel, vol. 87, ed. 1 2015.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20828-2. |
| [18] |
T. Vicsek and A. Zafeiris,
Collective motion, Physics Reports, 517 (2012), 71-140.
doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.004. |
| [19] |
C. Villani, Topics in Optimal Transportation, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 58, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003.
doi: 10.1090/gsm/058. |
show all references
References:
| [1] |
L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli and G. Savaré, Gradient Flows in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures, 2$^nd$ edition, Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2008.
doi: 10.1007/b137080. |
| [2] |
M. Bongini and G. Buttazzo, Optimal control problems in transport dynamics, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 27, (2017), 427–451.
doi: 10.1142/S0218202517500063. |
| [3] |
F. Camilli, R. De Maio and A. Tosin,
Measure-valued solutions to nonlocal transport equations on networks, J. Differential Equations, 264 (2018), 7213-7241.
doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.02.015. |
| [4] |
F. Camilli, R. De Maio and A. Tosin,
Transport of measures on networks, Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 12 (2017), 191-215.
doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017008. |
| [5] |
J. A. Cañizo, J. A. Carrillo and J. Rosado,
A well-posedness theory in measures for some kinetic models of collective motion, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 21 (2011), 515-539.
doi: 10.1142/S0218202511005131. |
| [6] |
G. Cavagnari, A. Marigonda and B. Piccoli, Generalized dynamic programming principle and sparse mean-field control problems, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 481, (2020), 123437, 45 pp.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.123437. |
| [7] |
G. Cavagnari, A. Marigonda and B. Piccoli, Superposition principle for differential inclusions, in Large-Scale Scientific Computing. LSSC 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (eds. I. Lirkov and S. Margenov), 10665, Springer, Cham, 2018, 201–209.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-73441-5_21. |
| [8] |
E. Cristiani, B. Piccoli and A. Tosin, Multiscale Modeling of Pedestrian Dynamics, MS & A: Modeling, Simulation and Applications, Springer, Cham, Vol. 12, 2014.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-06620-2. |
| [9] |
J. Diestel and J. J. Uhl, Vector Measures, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1977.
doi: 10.1090/surv/015. |
| [10] |
F. Golse, The mean-field limit for the dynamics of large particle systems, Journées Équations aux Dérivées Partielles, Univ. Nantes, Nantes, 2003, 47 pp.
doi: 10.5802/jedp.623. |
| [11] |
P.-E. Jabin,
A review of the mean field limits for Vlasov equations, Kinetic & Related Models, 7 (2014), 661-711.
doi: 10.3934/krm.2014.7.661. |
| [12] |
C. Orrieri, Large deviations for interacting particle systems: joint mean-field and small-noise limit, Electron. J. Probab., 25 (2020) Paper No. 111, 44 pp.
doi: 10.1214/20-EJP516. |
| [13] |
B. Piccoli,
Measure differential equations, Arch Rational Mech Anal, 233 (2019), 1289-1317.
doi: 10.1007/s00205-019-01379-4. |
| [14] |
B. Piccoli and F. Rossi,
Measure dynamics with probability vector fields and sources, Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 39 (2019), 6207-6230.
doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019270. |
| [15] |
B. Piccoli and F. Rossi,
Transport equation with nonlocal velocity in Wasserstein spaces: convergence of numerical schemes, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, 124 (2013), 73-105.
doi: 10.1007/s10440-012-9771-6. |
| [16] |
F. Poupaud and M. Rascle, Measure solutions to the linear multi-dimensional transport equation with non-smooth coefficients, Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 22, (1997), 225–267.
doi: 10.1080/03605309708821265. |
| [17] |
F. Santambrogio, Optimal Transport for Applied Mathematicians, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, Birkhäuser Basel, vol. 87, ed. 1 2015.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20828-2. |
| [18] |
T. Vicsek and A. Zafeiris,
Collective motion, Physics Reports, 517 (2012), 71-140.
doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.004. |
| [19] |
C. Villani, Topics in Optimal Transportation, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 58, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003.
doi: 10.1090/gsm/058. |
Figure 2.
LAS and semi-discrete Lagrangian schemes on the left. Mean-velocity scheme on the right
Figure 3.
LAS scheme: for N = 1 (left) and N=2 (right)
Figure 4.
Semi-discrete Lagrangian scheme on the left. Mean-velocity scheme on the right
Figure 5.
Peano's brush referred to Example 4
Figure 6.
LAS scheme for N = 1, 2, 3
| [1] |
Benedetto Piccoli, Francesco Rossi. Measure dynamics with Probability Vector Fields and sources. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (11) : 6207-6230. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019270 |
| [2] |
Cleopatra Christoforou, Myrto Galanopoulou, Athanasios E. Tzavaras. Measure-valued solutions for the equations of polyconvex adiabatic thermoelasticity. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (11) : 6175-6206. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019269 |
| [3] |
Maria Michaela Porzio, Flavia Smarrazzo, Alberto Tesei. Radon measure-valued solutions of unsteady filtration equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2022 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2022040 |
| [4] |
Ammari Zied, Liard Quentin. On uniqueness of measure-valued solutions to Liouville's equation of Hamiltonian PDEs. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (2) : 723-748. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018032 |
| [5] |
Michiel Bertsch, Flavia Smarrazzo, Andrea Terracina, Alberto Tesei. Signed Radon measure-valued solutions of flux saturated scalar conservation laws. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (6) : 3143-3169. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020041 |
| [6] |
Azmy S. Ackleh, Vinodh K. Chellamuthu, Kazufumi Ito. Finite difference approximations for measure-valued solutions of a hierarchically size-structured population model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (2) : 233-258. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.233 |
| [7] |
Yu Liu, Ting Zhang. On weak (measure-valued)-strong uniqueness for compressible MHD system with non-monotone pressure law. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2022 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021307 |
| [8] |
Giulia Cavagnari, Antonio Marigonda. Measure-theoretic Lie brackets for nonsmooth vector fields. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (5) : 845-864. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018052 |
| [9] |
Philip Trautmann, Boris Vexler, Alexander Zlotnik. Finite element error analysis for measure-valued optimal control problems governed by a 1D wave equation with variable coefficients. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2018, 8 (2) : 411-449. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018017 |
| [10] |
Leonardi Filippo. A projection method for the computation of admissible measure valued solutions of the incompressible Euler equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (5) : 941-961. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018056 |
| [11] |
Simona Fornaro, Stefano Lisini, Giuseppe Savaré, Giuseppe Toscani. Measure valued solutions of sub-linear diffusion equations with a drift term. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (5) : 1675-1707. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.1675 |
| [12] |
Zhiyuan Wen, Meirong Zhang. On the optimization problems of the principal eigenvalues of measure differential equations with indefinite measures. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (8) : 3257-3274. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020061 |
| [13] |
Xiangfeng Yang. Stability in measure for uncertain heat equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (12) : 6533-6540. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019152 |
| [14] |
Neil S. Trudinger, Xu-Jia Wang. Quasilinear elliptic equations with signed measure. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 477-494. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.477 |
| [15] |
Fabio Camilli, Raul De Maio. Memory effects in measure transport equations. Kinetic and Related Models, 2019, 12 (6) : 1229-1245. doi: 10.3934/krm.2019047 |
| [16] |
Simon Lloyd, Edson Vargas. Critical covering maps without absolutely continuous invariant probability measure. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2019, 39 (5) : 2393-2412. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019101 |
| [17] |
Andrea Tosin, Paolo Frasca. Existence and approximation of probability measure solutions to models of collective behaviors. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2011, 6 (3) : 561-596. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2011.6.561 |
| [18] |
Mieczysław Cichoń, Bianca Satco. On the properties of solutions set for measure driven differential inclusions. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 287-296. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0287 |
| [19] |
John Cleveland. Basic stage structure measure valued evolutionary game model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (2) : 291-310. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.291 |
| [20] |
Marco Degiovanni, Michele Scaglia. A variational approach to semilinear elliptic equations with measure data. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 31 (4) : 1233-1248. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.1233 |
2020 Impact Factor: 1.432
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]