\`x^2+y_1+z_12^34\`
Advanced Search
Article Contents
Article Contents

A novel linear transport model with distinct scattering mechanisms for direction and speed

  • *Corresponding author: Martina Conte

    *Corresponding author: Martina Conte 
Abstract / Introduction Full Text(HTML) Figure(4) / Table(1) Related Papers Cited by
  • We introduce a novel linear transport equation that models the evolution of a one-particle distribution subject to free transport and two distinct scattering mechanisms: one affecting the particle's speed, and the other its direction. These scattering processes occur at different time scales and with different intensities, leading to a kinetic equation where the total scattering operator is the sum of two separate operators. Each of them depends not only on the kernel characterizing the corresponding scattering mechanism, but also explicitly on the marginal distribution of either the speed or the direction. Therefore, unlike classical settings, the gain terms in our operators are not tied to a fixed equilibrium distribution, but evolve in time through the marginals. As a result, typical analytical tools from kinetic theory, such as equilibrium characterization, entropy methods, spectral analysis in Hilbert spaces, and Fredholm theory, are not applicable in a standard fashion. In this work, we rigorously analyze the properties of this new class of scattering operators, including the structure of their non-standard pseudo-inverses and their asymptotic behavior. We also derive macroscopic (hydrodynamic) limits under different regimes of scattering frequencies, revealing new effective equations and highlighting the interplay between speed and directional relaxation.

    Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 35Q20, 35Q70, 35Q84.

    Citation:

    \begin{equation} \\ \end{equation}
  • 加载中
  • Figure 1.  Graphical representation of the stochastic trajectories

    Figure 2.  Test 1. Evolution of the macroscopic density $ \rho $ in the three cases (K1), (K2), and (K3) at time $ T = 1.88 $ and starting from the initial distribution defined in (134)

    Figure 3.  Test 2.1. Evolution of the macroscopic density $ \rho $ in the settings (M1), (M2), (M3), and (M4). Precisely, (M1) and (M2) are shown at time $ T = 1.25 $, (M3) at time $ T = 4.69 $, and (M4) at time $ T = 0.47 $. For all the simulations, we set $ \mu = \tilde{\mu} = \hat{\mu} = 1 $

    Figure 4.  Test 2.2. Evolution of the macroscopic density $ \rho $ in the settings (M1), (M2), (M3), and (M4). Precisely, (M1) and (M2) are shown at time $ T = 1.875 $, (M3) at time $ T = 5.94 $, and (M4) at time $ T = 0.1875 $. For all the simulations, we set $ \mu = \tilde{\mu} = \hat{\mu} = 1 $

    Table 1.  Summary of the main symbols used throughout the manuscript

    Symbol Meaning
    $ \tilde{v} $ Speed of motion.
    $ \hat{v} $ Direction of motion.
    $ v := \tilde{v} \hat{v} $ Velocity vector with magnitude $ \tilde{v} $ and direction $ \hat{v} $.
    $ f(t,x, \tilde{v}, \hat{v}) $ Joint probability density function of $ ( \tilde{v}, \hat{v}) $ at $ (t,x)\in\mathbb{R}_+\times\mathbb{R}^d $.
    $ \tilde{f}(t,x, \tilde{v}) $ Marginal distribution with respect to the speed $ \tilde{v} $.
    $ \hat{f}(t,x, \hat{v}) $ Marginal distribution with respect to the direction $ \hat{v} $.
    $ \tilde{\mu} $ Frequency associated with the speed–jump process.
    $ \hat{\mu} $ Frequency associated with the direction–jump process.
    $ \psi( \tilde{v}| \hat{v}) $ Conditional transition probability density of the speed–jump process given direction $ \hat{v} $.
    $ q( \hat{v}) $ Transition probability density of the direction–jump process.
    $ \psi_q( \tilde{v}) $ Marginal equilibrium distribution of the speed, defined in (51).
    $ \psi_q^c( \tilde{v}| \hat{v}) $ Conditional stationary distribution of the speed given direction $ \hat{v} $, defined in (50).
    $ T( \tilde{v}, \hat{v}) $ Transition probability density defining the equilibrium of $ \mathcal{L} $ in (31).
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
  • [1] W. Alt, Biased random walk models for chemotaxis and related diffusion approximations, J. Math. Biol., 9 (1980), 147-177.  doi: 10.1007/BF00275919.
    [2] M. BisiJ. A. Canizo and B. Lods, Entropy dissipation estimates for the linear Boltzmann operator, J. Funct. Anal., 269 (2015), 1028-1069.  doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2015.05.002.
    [3] E. Bouin and V. Calvez, A kinetic eikonal equation, C. R. Math., 350 (2012), 243-248.  doi: 10.1016/j.crma.2012.03.009.
    [4] E. BouinV. Calvez and G. Nadin, Propagation in a kinetic reaction-transport equation: Travelling waves and accelerating fronts, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 217 (2015), 571-617.  doi: 10.1007/s00205-014-0837-7.
    [5] L. J. Brooks, M. P. Clements, J. J. Burden, D. Kocher, L. Richards, S. Devesa, L. Zakka, M. Woodberry, M. Ellis, Z. Jaunmuktane and et al., The white matter is a pro-differentiative niche for glioblastoma, Nat. Commun., 12 (2021), Article number: 2184. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22225-w.
    [6] V. CalvezG. Raoul and C. Schmeiser, Confinement by biased velocity jumps: Aggregation of escherichia coli, Kinet. Relat. Mod., 8 (2015), 651-666.  doi: 10.3934/krm.2015.8.651.
    [7] J. A. CañizoC. CaoJ. Evans and H. Yoldaş, Hypocoercivity of linear kinetic equations via Harris's Theorem, Kinet. Relat. Models, 13 (2020), 97-128.  doi: 10.3934/krm.2020004.
    [8] C. Cercignani, The Boltzmann Equation and its Applications, Springer, New York, 1987.
    [9] G. Charras and E. Sahai, Physical influences of the extracellular environment on cell migration, Nat. Rev., 15 (2014), 813-824.  doi: 10.1038/nrm3897.
    [10] N. CóndorC. MarkR. C. GerumN. C. GrummelA. BauerJ. García-Aznar and B. Fabry, Breast cancer cells adapt contractile forces to overcome steric hindrance, Biophys. J., 116 (2019), 1305-1312.  doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.02.029.
    [11] M. Conte, L. Gerardo-Giorda and M. Groppi, Glioma invasion and its interplay with nervous tissue and therapy: A multiscale model, J. Theor. Biol., 486 (2020), 110088, 17 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.110088.
    [12] M. Conte and N. Loy, Multi-cue kinetic model with non-local sensing for cell migration on a fiber network with chemotaxis, Bull. Math. Biol., 84 (2022), Paper No. 42, 46 pp. doi: 10.1007/s11538-021-00978-1.
    [13] M. Conte and N. Loy, A non-local kinetic model for cell migration: A study of the interplay between contact guidance and steric hindrance, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 84 (2024), S429–S451. doi: 10.1137/22M1506389.
    [14] R. Dautray and J. Lions, Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology: volume 1 Physical Origins and Classical Methods, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
    [15] P. DegondT. Goudon and F. Poupaud, Diffusion limit for non homogeneous and non-micro-reversible processes, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 49 (2000), 1175-1198.  doi: 10.1512/iumj.2000.49.1936.
    [16] L. Desvillettes, Hypocoercivity: The example of linear transport, Contemp. Math., Recent Trends in Partial Differential Equations, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 409 (2006), 33-53.
    [17] P. G. Doucet and G. A. Dunn, Distinction between kinesis and taxis in terms of system theory, in Biological Motion: Proceedings of a Workshop Held in Königswinter, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, Springer, 89 (1990), 498-525. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-51664-1_34.
    [18] K.-J. Engel and R. Nagel, One-parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations, Grad. Texts in Math., 194, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.
    [19] F. FilbetP. Laurencot and B. Perthame, Derivation of hyperbolic models for chemosensitive movement, J. Math. Biol., 50 (2005), 189-207.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-004-0286-2.
    [20] C. Gardiner, Stochastic Methods (Vol. 4)., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
    [21] T. Hillen, $M^5$ mesoscopic and macroscopic models for mesenchymal motion, J. Math. Biol., 53 (2006), 585-616.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-006-0017-y.
    [22] T. Hillen and H. G. Othmer, The diffusion limit of transport equations derived from velocity-jump processes, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 61 (2000), 751-775.  doi: 10.1137/S0036139999358167.
    [23] N. LangK. SkodzekS. HurstA. MainkaJ. SteinwachsJ. SchneiderK. Aifantis and B. Fabry, Biphasic response of cell invasion to matrix stiffness in three-dimensional biopolymer networks, Acta Biomater., 13 (2015), 61-67.  doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.11.003.
    [24] B. Lods and G. Toscani, Dissipative linear Boltzmann equation for hard spheres, J. Stat. Phys., 117 (2004), 635-664.  doi: 10.1007/s10955-004-2267-7.
    [25] T. Lorenzi, N. Loy and C. Villa, Phenotype-structuring of non-local kinetic models of cell migration driven by environmental sensing, Multiscale Modeling and Simulation, In Press.
    [26] N. Loy and L. Preziosi, Kinetic models with non-local sensing determining cell polarization and speed according to independent cues, J. Math. Biol., 80 (2020), 373-421.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-019-01411-x.
    [27] A. MelletS. Mischler and C. Mouhot, Fractional diffusion limit for collisional kinetic equations, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 199 (2011), 493-525.  doi: 10.1007/s00205-010-0354-2.
    [28] L. Pareschi and  G. ToscaniInteracting Multiagent Systems: Kinetic Equations and Monte Carlo Methods, Oxford University Press, 2013. 
    [29] B. Perthame, F. Salvarani and S. Yasuda, Multiscale analysis of a kinetic equation for mechanotaxis, https://arXiv.org/abs/2601.05532.
    [30] R. Pettersson, Existence theorems for the linear, space-inhomogeneous transport equation, IMA J. Appl. Math., 30 (1983), 81-105.  doi: 10.1093/imamat/30.1.81.
    [31] R. Pettersson, On convergence to equilibrium for solutions to the linear, space-inhomogeneous Boltzmann equation, Nucl. Sc. Eng., 112 (1992), 375-382.  doi: 10.13182/NSE92-A23986.
    [32] R. Pettersson, On weak and strong convergence to equilibrium for solutions to the linear Boltzmann equation, J. Stat. Phys., 72 (1993), 355-380.  doi: 10.1007/BF01048054.
    [33] P. Provenzano, K. Eliceir, J. Campbell, D. Inman, J. White and P. Keely, Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion, BMC medicine, 4 (2006), article number 38. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-38.
    [34] P. Provenzano, D. Inman, K. Eliceiri, J. Knittel, L. Yan, C. Rueden, J. White and P. Keely, Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression, BMC medicine, 6 (2008), article number 11, 15 pp. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-6-11.
    [35] G. PuppoM. SempliceA. Tosin and G. Visconti, Kinetic models for traffic flow resulting in a reduced space of microscopic velocities, Kinet. Relat. Models, 10 (2017), 823-854.  doi: 10.3934/krm.2017033.
    [36] H. Risken, Fokker-planck Equation, Methods of solution and applications. Second edition. Springer Ser. Synergetics, 18, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-61544-3_4.
    [37] A. Sklar, Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges, Publications de l'Institut de Statistique de l'Université de Paris, 8 (1959), 229-231. 
    [38] D. W. Stroock, Some stochastic processes which arise from a model of the motion of a bacterium, Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete, 28 (1974), 303-315.  doi: 10.1007/BF00532948.
    [39] P. Taufalele, J. Vanderburgh, A. Munoz, M. Zanotelli and C. Reinhart-King, Fiber alignment drives changes in architectural and mechanical features in collagen matrices, PLoS One, 14 (2019), e0216537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216537.
    [40] G. ViscontiM. HertyG. Puppo and A. Tosin, Multivalued fundamental diagrams of traffic flow in the kinetic Fokker–Planck limit, Multiscale Model. Sim., 15 (2017), 1267-1293.  doi: 10.1137/16M1087035.
    [41] K. M. Yamada, J. W. Collins, D. A. Cruz Walma, A. D. Doyle, S. Morales, J. Lu, K. Matsumoto, S. S. Nazari, R. Sekiguchi, Y. Shinsato and et al., Extracellular matrix dynamics in cell migration, invasion and tissue morphogenesis, Int. J. Exp. Pathol., 100 (2019), 144-152. doi: 10.1111/iep.12329.
  • 加载中

Figures(4)

Tables(1)

SHARE

Article Metrics

HTML views(288) PDF downloads(11) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return