Impulsive Ecological Control Of A Stage-Structured Pest Management System

Previous Article
Thresholds for Epidemic Outbreaks in Finite Scale-Free Networks
MBE Home
This Issue
Next Article
Two-Species Competition with High Dispersal: The Winning Strategy

2005, 2(2): 329-344. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.329

Impulsive Ecological Control Of A Stage-Structured Pest Management System

Guirong Jiang ^1, , Qishao Lu ^2, and Linping Peng ^2,

1.	Department of Computational Science and Mathematics, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
2.	School of Science, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China

Received July 2004 Revised March 2005 Published March 2005

Abstract
Related Papers

The dynamics of a stage-structured pest management system is studied by means of autonomous piecewise linear systems with impulses governed by state feedback control. The sufficient conditions of existence and stability of periodic solutions are obtained by means of the sequence convergence rule and the analogue of the Poincaré criterion. The attractive region of periodic solutions is investigated theoretically by qualitative analysis. The bifurcation diagrams of periodic solutions are obtained by using the Poincaré map, as well as the chaotic solution generated via a cascade of period-doubling bifurcations. The superiority of the state feedback control strategy is also discussed.

Keywords: bifurcation., autonomous systems with impulses, prey-predator.

Mathematics Subject Classification: 34A37, 92D2.

Citation: Guirong Jiang, Qishao Lu, Linping Peng. Impulsive Ecological Control Of A Stage-Structured Pest Management System. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2005, 2 (2) : 329-344. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.329

[1]	Na Min, Mingxin Wang. Hopf bifurcation and steady-state bifurcation for a Leslie-Gower prey-predator model with strong Allee effect in prey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2019, 39 (2) : 1071-1099. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019045
[2]	J. Gani, R. J. Swift. Prey-predator models with infected prey and predators. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2013, 33 (11&12) : 5059-5066. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.5059
[3]	Shanshan Chen, Jianshe Yu. Stability and bifurcation on predator-prey systems with nonlocal prey competition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2018, 38 (1) : 43-62. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018002
[4]	Sampurna Sengupta, Pritha Das, Debasis Mukherjee. Stochastic non-autonomous Holling type-Ⅲ prey-predator model with predator's intra-specific competition. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (8) : 3275-3296. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018244
[5]	Isam Al-Darabsah, Xianhua Tang, Yuan Yuan. A prey-predator model with migrations and delays. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (3) : 737-761. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016.21.737
[6]	Jian Zu, Wendi Wang, Bo Zu. Evolutionary dynamics of prey-predator systems with Holling type II functional response. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2007, 4 (2) : 221-237. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2007.4.221
[7]	Juan C. Jara, Felipe Rivero. Asymptotic behaviour for prey-predator systems and logistic equations with unbounded time-dependent coefficients. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (10) : 4127-4137. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4127
[8]	R. P. Gupta, Peeyush Chandra, Malay Banerjee. Dynamical complexity of a prey-predator model with nonlinear predator harvesting. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (2) : 423-443. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.423
[9]	Guirong Jiang, Qishao Lu. The dynamics of a Prey-Predator model with impulsive state feedback control. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (6) : 1301-1320. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.1301
[10]	Xinfu Chen, Yuanwei Qi, Mingxin Wang. Steady states of a strongly coupled prey-predator model. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 173-180. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.173
[11]	Kousuke Kuto, Yoshio Yamada. Coexistence states for a prey-predator model with cross-diffusion. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 536-545. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.536
[12]	H. Malchow, F.M. Hilker, S.V. Petrovskii. Noise and productivity dependence of spatiotemporal pattern formation in a prey-predator system. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (3) : 705-711. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.705
[13]	Mingxin Wang, Peter Y. H. Pang. Qualitative analysis of a diffusive variable-territory prey-predator model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2009, 23 (3) : 1061-1072. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.1061
[14]	Yang Lu, Xia Wang, Shengqiang Liu. A non-autonomous predator-prey model with infected prey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (9) : 3817-3836. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018082
[15]	Komi Messan, Yun Kang. A two patch prey-predator model with multiple foraging strategies in predator: Applications to insects. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (3) : 947-976. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017048
[16]	Yun Kang, Sourav Kumar Sasmal, Komi Messan. A two-patch prey-predator model with predator dispersal driven by the predation strength. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (4) : 843-880. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017046
[17]	Na Min, Mingxin Wang. Dynamics of a diffusive prey-predator system with strong Allee effect growth rate and a protection zone for the prey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (4) : 1721-1737. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018073
[18]	Wenjie Ni, Mingxin Wang. Dynamical properties of a Leslie-Gower prey-predator model with strong Allee effect in prey. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (9) : 3409-3420. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017172
[19]	Safia Slimani, Paul Raynaud de Fitte, Islam Boussaada. Dynamics of a prey-predator system with modified Leslie-Gower and Holling type Ⅱ schemes incorporating a prey refuge. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (11) : 1-37. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019042
[20]	Aniello Buonocore, Luigia Caputo, Enrica Pirozzi, Amelia G. Nobile. A non-autonomous stochastic predator-prey model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (2) : 167-188. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.167

2017 Impact Factor: 1.23

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences