2005, 2(3): 527-534. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.527

On Fitting Of Mathematical Models Of Cell Signaling Pathways Using Adjoint Systems

1. 

Institute of Automatic Control, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland, Poland

2. 

Department of Statistics, Rice University, P.O. Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251, United States

Received  January 2005 Revised  June 2005 Published  August 2005

This paper concerns the problem of fitting of mathematical models of cell signaling pathways. Such models frequently take the form of a set of nonlinear ordinary differential equations. While the model is continuous-time, the performance index, used in the fitting procedure, involves measurements taken only at discrete-time moments. Adjoint sensitivity analysis is a tool that can be used for finding a gradient of a performance index in the space of the model’s parameters. The paper uses a structural formulation of sensitivity analysis, especially dedicated for hybrid, continuous/discrete-time systems. A numerical example of fitting of the mathematical model of the NF-kB regulatory module is presented.
Citation: Krzysztof Fujarewicz, Marek Kimmel, Andrzej Swierniak. On Fitting Of Mathematical Models Of Cell Signaling Pathways Using Adjoint Systems. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2005, 2 (3) : 527-534. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.527
[1]

Alessandro Corbetta, Adrian Muntean, Kiamars Vafayi. Parameter estimation of social forces in pedestrian dynamics models via a probabilistic method. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (2) : 337-356. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.337

[2]

David S. Ross, Christina Battista, Antonio Cabal, Khamir Mehta. Dynamics of bone cell signaling and PTH treatments of osteoporosis. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (6) : 2185-2200. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.2185

[3]

Sebastian Springer, Heikki Haario, Vladimir Shemyakin, Leonid Kalachev, Denis Shchepakin. Robust parameter estimation of chaotic systems. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 2019, 13 (6) : 1189-1212. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019053

[4]

Thi Tuyet Trang Chau, Pierre Ailliot, Valérie Monbet, Pierre Tandeo. Comparison of simulation-based algorithms for parameter estimation and state reconstruction in nonlinear state-space models. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2022  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2022054

[5]

Jaroslaw Smieja, Malgorzata Kardynska, Arkadiusz Jamroz. The meaning of sensitivity functions in signaling pathways analysis. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (8) : 2697-2707. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2697

[6]

Robert Azencott, Yutheeka Gadhyan. Accurate parameter estimation for coupled stochastic dynamics. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 44-53. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.44

[7]

Zhigang Ren, Shan Guo, Zhipeng Li, Zongze Wu. Adjoint-based parameter and state estimation in 1-D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow system. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (4) : 1579-1594. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018022

[8]

P. Adda, J. L. Dimi, A. Iggidir, J. C. Kamgang, G. Sallet, J. J. Tewa. General models of host-parasite systems. Global analysis. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 8 (1) : 1-17. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.8.1

[9]

Edwin Tecarro, Tung Bui, Marsida Lisi, Amy Sater, Akif Uzman. A simple model of two interacting signaling pathways in embryonic Xenopus laevis. Conference Publications, 2009, 2009 (Special) : 753-760. doi: 10.3934/proc.2009.2009.753

[10]

Gianni Gilioli, Sara Pasquali, Fabrizio Ruggeri. Nonlinear functional response parameter estimation in a stochastic predator-prey model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2012, 9 (1) : 75-96. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.75

[11]

Azmy S. Ackleh, H.T. Banks, Keng Deng, Shuhua Hu. Parameter Estimation in a Coupled System of Nonlinear Size-Structured Populations. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2005, 2 (2) : 289-315. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.289

[12]

Chongyang Liu, Meijia Han, Zhaohua Gong, Kok Lay Teo. Robust parameter estimation for constrained time-delay systems with inexact measurements. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (1) : 317-337. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2019113

[13]

Krzysztof Fujarewicz, Krzysztof Łakomiec. Parameter estimation of systems with delays via structural sensitivity analysis. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (8) : 2521-2533. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2521

[14]

Dominique Chapelle, Philippe Moireau, Patrick Le Tallec. Robust filtering for joint state-parameter estimation in distributed mechanical systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 23 (1&2) : 65-84. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.65

[15]

Pep Charusanti, Xiao Hu, Luonan Chen, Daniel Neuhauser, Joseph J. DiStefano III. A mathematical model of BCR-ABL autophosphorylation, signaling through the CRKL pathway, and Gleevec dynamics in chronic myeloid leukemia. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (1) : 99-114. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.99

[16]

Yangjin Kim, Hans G. Othmer. Hybrid models of cell and tissue dynamics in tumor growth. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2015, 12 (6) : 1141-1156. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2015.12.1141

[17]

Denis de Carvalho Braga, Luis Fernando Mello, Carmen Rocşoreanu, Mihaela Sterpu. Lyapunov coefficients for non-symmetrically coupled identical dynamical systems. Application to coupled advertising models. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 11 (3) : 785-803. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.11.785

[18]

Susanna Terracini, Juncheng Wei. DCDS-A Special Volume Qualitative properties of solutions of nonlinear elliptic equations and systems. Preface. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (6) : i-ii. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.6i

[19]

José Antonio Carrillo, Seung-Yeal Ha, Lorenzo Pareschi, Benedetto Piccoli. Special issue on mathematical models for collective dynamics. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2020, 15 (3) : i-i. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2020020

[20]

Yang Kuang, John D. Nagy, James J. Elser. Biological stoichiometry of tumor dynamics: Mathematical models and analysis. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (1) : 221-240. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.221

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (39)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (19)

[Back to Top]