2009, 6(2): 209-237. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.209

Mathematical modelling of tuberculosis epidemics

1. 

School of Science and Technology, Universidad Metropolitana, San Juan 00928-1150, Puerto Rico

2. 

School of Human Evolution and Social Change, PO Box 872402 Tempe, AZ 85287-2402

Received  February 2008 Revised  November 2008 Published  March 2009

The strengths and limitations of using homogeneous mixing and heterogeneous mixing epidemic models are explored in the context of the transmission dynamics of tuberculosis. The focus is on three types of models: a standard incidence homogeneous mixing model, a non-homogeneous mixing model that incorporates 'household' contacts, and an age-structured model. The models are parameterized using demographic and epidemiological data and the patterns generated from these models are compared. Furthermore, the effects of population growth, stochasticity, clustering of contacts, and age structure on disease dynamics are explored. This framework is used to asses the possible causes for the observed historical decline of tuberculosis notifications.
Citation: Juan Pablo Aparicio, Carlos Castillo-Chávez. Mathematical modelling of tuberculosis epidemics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2009, 6 (2) : 209-237. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.209
[1]

Alexandre N. Carvalho, José A. Langa, James C. Robinson. Non-autonomous dynamical systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (3) : 703-747. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.703

[2]

Abiti Adili, Bixiang Wang. Random attractors for stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo systems driven by deterministic non-autonomous forcing. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (3) : 643-666. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.643

[3]

Zhaojuan Wang, Shengfan Zhou. Existence and upper semicontinuity of attractors for non-autonomous stochastic lattice systems with random coupled coefficients. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2016, 15 (6) : 2221-2245. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2016035

[4]

Abiti Adili, Bixiang Wang. Random attractors for non-autonomous stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo systems with multiplicative noise. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 1-10. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.1

[5]

Yiju Chen, Xiaohu Wang. Asymptotic behavior of non-autonomous fractional stochastic lattice systems with multiplicative noise. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021271

[6]

Joaquim P. Mateus, Paulo Rebelo, Silvério Rosa, César M. Silva, Delfim F. M. Torres. Optimal control of non-autonomous SEIRS models with vaccination and treatment. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (6) : 1179-1199. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018067

[7]

Yanan Li, Zhijian Yang, Na Feng. Uniform attractors and their continuity for the non-autonomous Kirchhoff wave models. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (12) : 6267-6284. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021018

[8]

Pablo G. Barrientos, Abbas Fakhari. Ergodicity of non-autonomous discrete systems with non-uniform expansion. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (4) : 1361-1382. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019231

[9]

Bixiang Wang. Random attractors for non-autonomous stochastic wave equations with multiplicative noise. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (1) : 269-300. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.269

[10]

Aniello Buonocore, Luigia Caputo, Enrica Pirozzi, Amelia G. Nobile. A non-autonomous stochastic predator-prey model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (2) : 167-188. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.167

[11]

Pengyu Chen, Xuping Zhang. Approximate controllability of nonlocal problem for non-autonomous stochastic evolution equations. Evolution Equations and Control Theory, 2021, 10 (3) : 471-489. doi: 10.3934/eect.2020076

[12]

Xinyuan Liao, Caidi Zhao, Shengfan Zhou. Compact uniform attractors for dissipative non-autonomous lattice dynamical systems. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2007, 6 (4) : 1087-1111. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2007.6.1087

[13]

Flank D. M. Bezerra, Vera L. Carbone, Marcelo J. D. Nascimento, Karina Schiabel. Pullback attractors for a class of non-autonomous thermoelastic plate systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2018, 23 (9) : 3553-3571. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017214

[14]

Grzegorz Łukaszewicz, James C. Robinson. Invariant measures for non-autonomous dissipative dynamical systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2014, 34 (10) : 4211-4222. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4211

[15]

Michael Zgurovsky, Mark Gluzman, Nataliia Gorban, Pavlo Kasyanov, Liliia Paliichuk, Olha Khomenko. Uniform global attractors for non-autonomous dissipative dynamical systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (5) : 2053-2065. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017120

[16]

Mahesh G. Nerurkar. Spectral and stability questions concerning evolution of non-autonomous linear systems. Conference Publications, 2001, 2001 (Special) : 270-275. doi: 10.3934/proc.2001.2001.270

[17]

Ming-Chia Li, Ming-Jiea Lyu. Topological conjugacy for Lipschitz perturbations of non-autonomous systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (9) : 5011-5024. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016017

[18]

Everaldo de Mello Bonotto, Daniela Paula Demuner. Stability and forward attractors for non-autonomous impulsive semidynamical systems. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (4) : 1979-1996. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020087

[19]

Michael Dellnitz, Christian Horenkamp. The efficient approximation of coherent pairs in non-autonomous dynamical systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (9) : 3029-3042. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.3029

[20]

Ahmed Y. Abdallah, Rania T. Wannan. Second order non-autonomous lattice systems and their uniform attractors. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (4) : 1827-1846. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019085

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (316)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (47)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]