2010, 7(2): 213-236. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.213

A comparison of nonlinear filtering approaches in the context of an HIV model

1. 

Center for Research in Scientific Computation, Raleigh, NC 27695-8205, United States, United States, United States

Received  July 2009 Revised  January 2010 Published  April 2010

In this paper three different filtering methods, the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), the Gauss-Hermite Filter (GHF), and the Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF), are compared for state-only and coupled state and parameter estimation when used with log state variables of a model of the immunologic response to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in individuals. The filters are implemented to estimate model states as well as model parameters from simulated noisy data, and are compared in terms of estimation accuracy and computational time. Numerical experiments reveal that the GHF is the most computationally expensive algorithm, while the EKF is the least expensive one. In addition, computational experiments suggest that there is little difference in the estimation accuracy between the UKF and GHF. When measurements are taken as frequently as every week to two weeks, the EKF is the superior filter. When measurements are further apart, the UKF is the best choice in the problem under investigation.
Citation: H. Thomas Banks, Shuhua Hu, Zackary R. Kenz, Hien T. Tran. A comparison of nonlinear filtering approaches in the context of an HIV model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2010, 7 (2) : 213-236. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.213
[1]

Alexander Bibov, Heikki Haario, Antti Solonen. Stabilized BFGS approximate Kalman filter. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2015, 9 (4) : 1003-1024. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2015.9.1003

[2]

Russell Johnson, Carmen Núñez. The Kalman-Bucy filter revisited. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (10) : 4139-4153. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.4139

[3]

Junyoung Jang, Kihoon Jang, Hee-Dae Kwon, Jeehyun Lee. Feedback control of an HBV model based on ensemble kalman filter and differential evolution. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (3) : 667-691. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018030

[4]

Sebastian Reich, Seoleun Shin. On the consistency of ensemble transform filter formulations. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2014, 1 (1) : 177-189. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2014.1.177

[5]

Qiyu Jin, Ion Grama, Quansheng Liu. Convergence theorems for the Non-Local Means filter. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2018, 12 (4) : 853-881. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2018036

[6]

Hai Huyen Dam, Kok Lay Teo. Variable fractional delay filter design with discrete coefficients. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (3) : 819-831. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.819

[7]

Xiaoying Han, Jinglai Li, Dongbin Xiu. Error analysis for numerical formulation of particle filter. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (5) : 1337-1354. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1337

[8]

Valerii Maltsev, Michael Pokojovy. On a parabolic-hyperbolic filter for multicolor image noise reduction. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2016, 5 (2) : 251-272. doi: 10.3934/eect.2016004

[9]

Kody Law, Abhishek Shukla, Andrew Stuart. Analysis of the 3DVAR filter for the partially observed Lorenz'63 model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2014, 34 (3) : 1061-1078. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2014.34.1061

[10]

Yi Xu, Wenyu Sun. A filter successive linear programming method for nonlinear semidefinite programming problems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2012, 2 (1) : 193-206. doi: 10.3934/naco.2012.2.193

[11]

Abdel-Rahman Hedar, Alaa Fahim. Filter-based genetic algorithm for mixed variable programming. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2011, 1 (1) : 99-116. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.99

[12]

Andrea Arnold, Daniela Calvetti, Erkki Somersalo. Vectorized and parallel particle filter SMC parameter estimation for stiff ODEs. Conference Publications, 2015, 2015 (special) : 75-84. doi: 10.3934/proc.2015.0075

[13]

Jianling Li, Chunting Lu, Youfang Zeng. A smooth QP-free algorithm without a penalty function or a filter for mathematical programs with complementarity constraints. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2015, 5 (2) : 115-126. doi: 10.3934/naco.2015.5.115

[14]

Laura Martín-Fernández, Gianni Gilioli, Ettore Lanzarone, Joaquín Míguez, Sara Pasquali, Fabrizio Ruggeri, Diego P. Ruiz. A Rao-Blackwellized particle filter for joint parameter estimation and biomass tracking in a stochastic predator-prey system. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (3) : 573-597. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.573

[15]

Chunlin Hao, Xinwei Liu. A trust-region filter-SQP method for mathematical programs with linear complementarity constraints. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (4) : 1041-1055. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.1041

[16]

K. F. C. Yiu, K. Y. Chan, S. Y. Low, S. Nordholm. A multi-filter system for speech enhancement under low signal-to-noise ratios. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2009, 5 (3) : 671-682. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2009.5.671

[17]

Qifeng Cheng, Xue Han, Tingting Zhao, V S Sarma Yadavalli. Improved particle swarm optimization and neighborhood field optimization by introducing the re-sampling step of particle filter. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (1) : 177-198. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018038

[18]

Hai Huyen Dam, Wing-Kuen Ling. Optimal design of finite precision and infinite precision non-uniform cosine modulated filter bank. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (1) : 97-112. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018034

[19]

Z. G. Feng, Kok Lay Teo, N. U. Ahmed, Yulin Zhao, W. Y. Yan. Optimal fusion of sensor data for Kalman filtering. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2006, 14 (3) : 483-503. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.483

[20]

Ye Sun, Daniel B. Work. Error bounds for Kalman filters on traffic networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13 (2) : 261-295. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018012

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (5)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (0)

[Back to Top]