American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
2010, 7(3): 479-504. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.479

Impact dynamics in biped locomotion analysis: Two modelling and implementation approaches

Khalid Addi 1, and  Aleksandar D. Rodić 2,

1. 

University of La Réunion, Analyse et Ingénierie Mathématique AIM/LIM EA 2525, Parc Technologique Universitaire, Bâtiment 2, 2 rue Joseph Wetzell, 97490 Sainte-Clotilde, France
2. 

Robotics department, Mihajlo Pupin Institute, University of Belgrade, Zvezdara, Volgina 15, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia

Received  September 2009 Revised  December 2009 Published  June 2010

Stability during the biped locomotion and especially humanoid robots walking is a big challenge in robotics modelling. This paper compares the classical and novel methodologies of modelling and algorithmic implementation of the impact/contact dynamics that occurs during a biped motion. Thus, after establishing the free biped locomotion system model, a formulation using variational inequalities theory via a Linear Complementarity Problem then an impedance model are explicitly developed. Results of the numerical simulations are compared to the experimental measurements then the both approaches are discussed.
Keywords: Linear Complementarity Problem, unilateral contact, impact dynamics, Nonsmooth dynamical systems, impedance model., humanoid robots.
Mathematics Subject Classification: 90C33, 70E18, 37M0.
Citation: Khalid Addi, Aleksandar D. Rodić. Impact dynamics in biped locomotion analysis: Two modelling and implementation approaches. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2010, 7 (3) : 479-504. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.479
[1]

Andaluzia Matei, Mircea Sofonea. Dual formulation of a viscoplastic contact problem with unilateral constraint. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (6) : 1587-1598. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.1587
[2]

Sebastián Ferrer, Francisco Crespo. Parametric quartic Hamiltonian model. A unified treatment of classic integrable systems. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2014, 6 (4) : 479-502. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2014.6.479
[3]

Felix X.-F. Ye, Hong Qian. Stochastic dynamics Ⅱ: Finite random dynamical systems, linear representation, and entropy production. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (8) : 4341-4366. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019122
[4]

Mohamed Aly Tawhid. Nonsmooth generalized complementarity as unconstrained optimization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (2) : 411-423. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.411
[5]

Oanh Chau, R. Oujja, Mohamed Rochdi. A mathematical analysis of a dynamical frictional contact model in thermoviscoelasticity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2008, 1 (1) : 61-70. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2008.1.61
[6]

Zhisheng Shuai, P. van den Driessche. Impact of heterogeneity on the dynamics of an SEIR epidemic model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2012, 9 (2) : 393-411. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.393
[7]

Fengming Ma, Yiju Wang, Hongge Zhao. A potential reduction method for the generalized linear complementarity problem over a polyhedral cone. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (1) : 259-267. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.259
[8]

Jie Zhang, Yue Wu, Liwei Zhang. A class of smoothing SAA methods for a stochastic linear complementarity problem. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2012, 2 (1) : 145-156. doi: 10.3934/naco.2012.2.145
[9]

D. Motreanu, V. V. Motreanu, Nikolaos S. Papageorgiou. Nonautonomous resonant periodic systems with indefinite linear part and a nonsmooth potential. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2011, 10 (5) : 1401-1414. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2011.10.1401
[10]

Kari Astala, Jennifer L. Mueller, Lassi Päivärinta, Allan Perämäki, Samuli Siltanen. Direct electrical impedance tomography for nonsmooth conductivities. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2011, 5 (3) : 531-549. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2011.5.531
[11]

Gilles Carbou, Bernard Hanouzet. Relaxation approximation of the Kerr model for the impedance initial-boundary value problem. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 212-220. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.212
[12]

Jianquan Li, Xiaoqin Wang, Xiaolin Lin. Impact of behavioral change on the epidemic characteristics of an epidemic model without vital dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (6) : 1425-1434. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018065
[13]

Zhenyuan Guo, Lihong Huang, Xingfu Zou. Impact of discontinuous treatments on disease dynamics in an SIR epidemic model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2012, 9 (1) : 97-110. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.97
[14]

Martin Redmann, Melina A. Freitag. Balanced model order reduction for linear random dynamical systems driven by Lévy noise. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2018, 5 (1&2) : 33-59. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2018002
[15]

Huong Le Thi, Stéphane Junca, Mathias Legrand. First Return Time to the contact hyperplane for $ N $-degree-of-freedom vibro-impact systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2022, 27 (1) : 1-44. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021031
[16]

Yunan Wu, Guangya Chen, T. C. Edwin Cheng. A vector network equilibrium problem with a unilateral constraint. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2010, 6 (3) : 453-464. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2010.6.453
[17]

Li-Xia Liu, Sanyang Liu, Chun-Feng Wang. Smoothing Newton methods for symmetric cone linear complementarity problem with the Cartesian $P$/$P_0$-property. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (1) : 53-66. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.53
[18]

Ghendrih Philippe, Hauray Maxime, Anne Nouri. Derivation of a gyrokinetic model. Existence and uniqueness of specific stationary solution. Kinetic & Related Models, 2009, 2 (4) : 707-725. doi: 10.3934/krm.2009.2.707
[19]

Matthias Morzfeld, Daniel T. Kawano, Fai Ma. Characterization of damped linear dynamical systems in free motion. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2013, 3 (1) : 49-62. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.49
[20]

Elena Goncharova, Maxim Staritsyn. On BV-extension of asymptotically constrained control-affine systems and complementarity problem for measure differential equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 11 (6) : 1061-1070. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2018061

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (41)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (2)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy