American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
2010, 7(3): 641-656. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.641

A mathematical study of a syntrophic relationship of a model of anaerobic digestion process

Miled El Hajji 1, , Frédéric Mazenc 1, and  Jérôme Harmand 2,

1. 

UMR Analyses des Systèmes et Biométrie, INRA 02 Place, INRA-INRIA MERE research team, Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France, France
2. 

LBE-INRA, UR050, Avenue des Étangs, 11100 Narbonne & INRA-INRIA MERE research team, UMR Analyses des Systèmes et Biométrie, INRA 02 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France

Received  October 2009 Revised  March 2010 Published  June 2010

A mathematical model involving the syntrophic relationship of two major populations of bacteria (acetogens and methanogens), each responsible for a stage of the methane fermentation process is proposed. A detailed qualitative analysis is carried out. The local and global stability analyses of the equilibria are performed. We demonstrate, under general assumptions of monotonicity, relevant from an applied point of view, the global asymptotic stability of a positive equilibrium point which corresponds to the coexistence of acetogenic and methanogenic bacteria.
Keywords: Syntrophic relationship, Mathematical modelling, Anaerobic digestion, Coexistence., Asymptotic stability.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 92B05, 92D25; Secondary: 34A34, 34D2.
Citation: Miled El Hajji, Frédéric Mazenc, Jérôme Harmand. A mathematical study of a syntrophic relationship of a model of anaerobic digestion process. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2010, 7 (3) : 641-656. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.641
[1]

Tewfik Sari, Miled El Hajji, Jérôme Harmand. The mathematical analysis of a syntrophic relationship between two microbial species in a chemostat. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2012, 9 (3) : 627-645. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.627
[2]

Marion Weedermann. Analysis of a model for the effects of an external toxin on anaerobic digestion. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2012, 9 (2) : 445-459. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.445
[3]

S. Ouchtout, Z. Mghazli, J. Harmand, A. Rapaport, Z. Belhachmi. Analysis of an anaerobic digestion model in landfill with mortality term. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (4) : 2333-2346. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020101
[4]

Wei Feng, Michael T. Cowen, Xin Lu. Coexistence and asymptotic stability in stage-structured predator-prey models. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (4) : 823-839. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.823
[5]

Juan Pablo Aparicio, Carlos Castillo-Chávez. Mathematical modelling of tuberculosis epidemics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2009, 6 (2) : 209-237. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.209
[6]

Telma Silva, Adélia Sequeira, Rafael F. Santos, Jorge Tiago. Existence, uniqueness, stability and asymptotic behavior of solutions for a mathematical model of atherosclerosis. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (1) : 343-362. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016.9.343
[7]

Geoffrey Beck, Sebastien Imperiale, Patrick Joly. Mathematical modelling of multi conductor cables. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (3) : 521-546. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.521
[8]

Nirav Dalal, David Greenhalgh, Xuerong Mao. Mathematical modelling of internal HIV dynamics. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2009, 12 (2) : 305-321. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2009.12.305
[9]

Oliver Penrose, John W. Cahn. On the mathematical modelling of cellular (discontinuous) precipitation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (2) : 963-982. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017040
[10]

Alexander V. Budyansky, Kurt Frischmuth, Vyacheslav G. Tsybulin. Cosymmetry approach and mathematical modeling of species coexistence in a heterogeneous habitat. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2019, 24 (2) : 547-561. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018196
[11]

Liumei Wu, Baojun Song, Wen Du, Jie Lou. Mathematical modelling and control of echinococcus in Qinghai province, China. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (2) : 425-444. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.425
[12]

Roderick Melnik, B. Lassen, L. C Lew Yan Voon, M. Willatzen, C. Galeriu. Accounting for nonlinearities in mathematical modelling of quantum dot molecules. Conference Publications, 2005, 2005 (Special) : 642-651. doi: 10.3934/proc.2005.2005.642
[13]

Luis L. Bonilla, Vincenzo Capasso, Mariano Alvaro, Manuel Carretero, Filippo Terragni. On the mathematical modelling of tumor-induced angiogenesis. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (1) : 45-66. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017004
[14]

M.A.J Chaplain, G. Lolas. Mathematical modelling of cancer invasion of tissue: dynamic heterogeneity. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2006, 1 (3) : 399-439. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.399
[15]

Luigi Barletti, Giovanni Nastasi, Claudia Negulescu, Vittorio Romano. Mathematical modelling of charge transport in graphene heterojunctions. Kinetic and Related Models, 2021, 14 (3) : 407-427. doi: 10.3934/krm.2021010
[16]

Aditya S. Khanna, Dobromir T. Dimitrov, Steven M. Goodreau. What can mathematical models tell us about the relationship between circular migrations and HIV transmission dynamics?. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (5) : 1065-1090. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.1065
[17]

Christos V. Nikolopoulos. Mathematical modelling of a mushy region formation during sulphation of calcium carbonate. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2014, 9 (4) : 635-654. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2014.9.635
[18]

Alexandre Cornet. Mathematical modelling of cardiac pulse wave reflections due to arterial irregularities. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (5) : 1055-1076. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018047
[19]

José Antonio Carrillo, Martin Parisot, Zuzanna Szymańska. Mathematical modelling of collagen fibres rearrangement during the tendon healing process. Kinetic and Related Models, 2021, 14 (2) : 283-301. doi: 10.3934/krm.2021005
[20]

Mostafa Adimy, Laurent Pujo-Menjouet. Asymptotic behavior of a singular transport equation modelling cell division. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2003, 3 (3) : 439-456. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2003.3.439

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (151)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (16)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy