American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
2010, 7(3): 719-728. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.719

A model for phenotype change in a stochastic framework

Graeme Wake 1, , Anthony Pleasants 2, , Alan Beedle 3, and  Peter Gluckman 3,

1. 

National Research Centre for Growth and Development & Institute of Information and Mathematical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102904, Albany, Auckland, New Zealand
2. 

National Research Centre for Growth and Development & AgResearch Limited, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand
3. 

National Research Centre for Growth and Development & Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand, New Zealand

Received  April 2009 Revised  February 2010 Published  June 2010

In some species, an inducible secondary phenotype will develop some time after the environmental change that evokes it. Nishimura (2006) [4] showed how an individual organism should optimize the time it takes to respond to an environmental change ("waiting time''). If the optimal waiting time is considered to act over the population, there are implications for the expected value of the mean fitness in that population. A stochastic predator-prey model is proposed in which the prey have a fixed initial energy budget. Fitness is the product of survival probability and the energy remaining for non-defensive purposes. The model is placed in the stochastic domain by assuming that the waiting time in the population is a normally distributed random variable because of biological variance inherent in mounting the response. It is found that the value of the mean waiting time that maximises fitness depends linearly on the variance of the waiting time.
Keywords: waiting time., fitness, stochasticity, inducible defence, phenotypic plasticity.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 92D15, 60G15, 65K10; Secondary: 60G40, 60K4.
Citation: Graeme Wake, Anthony Pleasants, Alan Beedle, Peter Gluckman. A model for phenotype change in a stochastic framework. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2010, 7 (3) : 719-728. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.719
[1]

Hideaki Takagi. Unified and refined analysis of the response time and waiting time in the M/M/m FCFS preemptive-resume priority queue. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (4) : 1945-1973. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017026
[2]

Yutaka Sakuma, Atsushi Inoie, Ken’ichi Kawanishi, Masakiyo Miyazawa. Tail asymptotics for waiting time distribution of an M/M/s queue with general impatient time. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2011, 7 (3) : 593-606. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2011.7.593
[3]

Andrey Shishkov. Waiting time of propagation and the backward motion of interfaces in thin-film flow theory. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 938-945. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.938
[4]

Tomáš Roubíček. Thermodynamics of perfect plasticity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (1) : 193-214. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.193
[5]

David Greenhalgh, Yanfeng Liang, Xuerong Mao. Demographic stochasticity in the SDE SIS epidemic model. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (9) : 2859-2884. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.2859
[6]

Omer Gursoy, Kamal Adli Mehr, Nail Akar. Steady-state and first passage time distributions for waiting times in the $ MAP/M/s+G $ queueing model with generally distributed patience times. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021078
[7]

Natalia L. Komarova. Spatial stochastic models of cancer: Fitness, migration, invasion. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (3) : 761-775. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.761
[8]

Mayte Pérez-Llanos, Juan Pablo Pinasco, Nicolas Saintier. Opinion fitness and convergence to consensus in homogeneous and heterogeneous populations. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16 (2) : 257-281. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021006
[9]

Fanwen Meng, Kiok Liang Teow, Chee Kheong Ooi, Bee Hoon Heng, Seow Yian Tay. Minimization of the coefficient of variation for patient waiting system governed by a generic maximum waiting policy. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (4) : 1759-1770. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2017017
[10]

Francesco Solombrino. Quasistatic evolution for plasticity with softening: The spatially homogeneous case. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 27 (3) : 1189-1217. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.1189
[11]

G. Dal Maso, Antonio DeSimone, M. G. Mora, M. Morini. Globally stable quasistatic evolution in plasticity with softening. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3 (3) : 567-614. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.567
[12]

Gilles A. Francfort, Alessandro Giacomini, Alessandro Musesti. On the Fleck and Willis homogenization procedure in strain gradient plasticity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2013, 6 (1) : 43-62. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2013.6.43
[13]

Niklas Kolbe, Nikolaos Sfakianakis, Christian Stinner, Christina Surulescu, Jonas Lenz. Modeling multiple taxis: Tumor invasion with phenotypic heterogeneity, haptotaxis, and unilateral interspecies repellence. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (1) : 443-481. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020284
[14]

Jose-Luis Roca-Gonzalez. Designing dynamical systems for security and defence network knowledge management. A case of study: Airport bird control falconers organizations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (6) : 1311-1329. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.1311
[15]

Steve Drekic, Jae-Kyung Woo, Ran Xu. A threshold-based risk process with a waiting period to pay dividends. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2018, 14 (3) : 1179-1201. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018005
[16]

Catherine Ha Ta, Qing Nie, Tian Hong. Controlling stochasticity in epithelial-mesenchymal transition through multiple intermediate cellular states. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2016, 21 (7) : 2275-2291. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2016047
[17]

Gianni Dal Maso, Francesco Solombrino. Quasistatic evolution for Cam-Clay plasticity: The spatially homogeneous case. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2010, 5 (1) : 97-132. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.97
[18]

Alessandro Giacomini. On the energetic formulation of the Gurtin and Anand model in strain gradient plasticity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2012, 17 (2) : 527-552. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2012.17.527
[19]

Christian Meyer, Stephan Walther. Optimal control of perfect plasticity part I: Stress tracking. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021  doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021022
[20]

Yun Kang, Carlos Castillo-Chávez. A simple epidemiological model for populations in the wild with Allee effects and disease-modified fitness. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (1) : 89-130. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.89

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (26)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy