# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

2011, 8(1): 141-170. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.141

## Modeling control strategies for concurrent epidemics of seasonal and pandemic H1N1 influenza

 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, United States 2 Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States 3 Department of Mathematics, Spelman College, Atlanta, GA 30314, United States 4 School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Mathematical, Computational and Modeling Science Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, United States, United States 5 Mathematics, Computational and Modeling Sciences Center, Arizona State University, PO Box 871904, Tempe, AZ 85287

Received  June 2010 Revised  September 2010 Published  January 2011

The lessons learned from the 2009-2010 H1N1 influenza pandemic, as it moves out of the limelight, should not be under-estimated, particularly since the probability of novel influenza epidemics in the near future is not negligible and the potential consequences might be huge. Hence, as the world, particularly the industrialized world, responded to the potentially devastating effects of this novel A-H1N1 strain with substantial resources, reminders of the recurrent loss of life from a well established foe, seasonal influenza, could not be ignored. The uncertainties associated with the reported and expected levels of morbidity and mortality with this novel A-H1N1 live in a backdrop of $36,000$ deaths, over 200,000 hospitalizations, and millions of infections (20% of the population) attributed to seasonal influenza in the USA alone, each year. So, as the Northern Hemisphere braced for the possibility of a potentially "lethal" second wave of the novel A-H1N1 without a vaccine ready to mitigate its impact, questions of who should be vaccinated first if a vaccine became available, came to the forefront of the discussion. Uncertainty grew as we learned that the vaccine, once available, would be unevenly distributed around the world. Nations capable of acquiring large vaccine supplies soon became aware that those who could pay would have to compete for a limited vaccine stockpile. The challenges faced by nations dealing jointly with seasonal and novel A-H1N1 co-circulating strains under limited resources, that is, those with no access to novel A-H1N1 vaccine supplies, limited access to the seasonal influenza vaccine, and limited access to antivirals (like Tamiflu) are explored in this study. One- and two-strain models are introduced to mimic the influenza dynamics of a single and co-circulating strains, in the context of a single epidemic outbreak. Optimal control theory is used to identify and evaluate the "best" control policies. The controls account for the cost associated with social distancing and antiviral treatment policies. The optimal policies identified might have, if implemented, a substantial impact on the novel H1N1 and seasonal influenza co-circulating dynamics. Specifically, the implementation of antiviral treatment might reduce the number of influenza cases by up to 60% under a reasonable seasonal vaccination strategy, but only by up to 37% when the seasonal vaccine is not available. Optimal social distancing policies alone can be as effective as the combination of multiple policies, reducing the total number of influenza cases by more than 99% within a single outbreak, an unrealistic but theoretically possible outcome for isolated populations with limited resources.
Citation: Olivia Prosper, Omar Saucedo, Doria Thompson, Griselle Torres-Garcia, Xiaohong Wang, Carlos Castillo-Chavez. Modeling control strategies for concurrent epidemics of seasonal and pandemic H1N1 influenza. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (1) : 141-170. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.141
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
 [1] Timothy C. Reluga, Jan Medlock, Alison Galvani. The discounted reproductive number for epidemiology. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2009, 6 (2) : 377-393. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.377 [2] Oren Barnea, Rami Yaari, Guy Katriel, Lewi Stone. Modelling seasonal influenza in Israel. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (2) : 561-573. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.561 [3] Ariel Cintrón-Arias, Carlos Castillo-Chávez, Luís M. A. Bettencourt, Alun L. Lloyd, H. T. Banks. The estimation of the effective reproductive number from disease outbreak data. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2009, 6 (2) : 261-282. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.261 [4] Eunha Shim. Optimal strategies of social distancing and vaccination against seasonal influenza. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (5&6) : 1615-1634. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1615 [5] Hui Cao, Yicang Zhou. The basic reproduction number of discrete SIR and SEIS models with periodic parameters. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (1) : 37-56. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.37 [6] Sherry Towers, Katia Vogt Geisse, Chia-Chun Tsai, Qing Han, Zhilan Feng. The impact of school closures on pandemic influenza: Assessing potential repercussions using a seasonal SIR model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2012, 9 (2) : 413-430. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.413 [7] Pierre Magal, Glenn F. Webb, Yixiang Wu. Spatial spread of epidemic diseases in geographical settings: Seasonal influenza epidemics in Puerto Rico. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (11) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019223 [8] Majid Jaberi-Douraki, Seyed M. Moghadas. Optimal control of vaccination dynamics during an influenza epidemic. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (5) : 1045-1063. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.1045 [9] Ketty A. De Rezende, Mariana G. Villapouca. Discrete conley index theory for zero dimensional basic sets. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2017, 37 (3) : 1359-1387. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017056 [10] Nicolas Bacaër, Xamxinur Abdurahman, Jianli Ye, Pierre Auger. On the basic reproduction number $R_0$ in sexual activity models for HIV/AIDS epidemics: Example from Yunnan, China. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2007, 4 (4) : 595-607. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2007.4.595 [11] Michael Hochman. Lectures on dynamics, fractal geometry, and metric number theory. Journal of Modern Dynamics, 2014, 8 (3&4) : 437-497. doi: 10.3934/jmd.2014.8.437 [12] E. Muñoz Garcia, R. Pérez-Marco. Diophantine conditions in small divisors and transcendental number theory. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - A, 2003, 9 (6) : 1401-1409. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.1401 [13] Paula A. González-Parra, Sunmi Lee, Leticia Velázquez, Carlos Castillo-Chavez. A note on the use of optimal control on a discrete time model of influenza dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2011, 8 (1) : 183-197. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.183 [14] Jian-Jun Xu, Junichiro Shimizu. Asymptotic theory for disc-like crystal growth (I) --- Basic state solutions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (4) : 1091-1116. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.1091 [15] Gerardo Chowell, R. Fuentes, A. Olea, X. Aguilera, H. Nesse, J. M. Hyman. The basic reproduction number $R_0$ and effectiveness of reactive interventions during dengue epidemics: The 2002 dengue outbreak in Easter Island, Chile. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2013, 10 (5&6) : 1455-1474. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1455 [16] Antonio Fernández, Pedro L. García. Regular discretizations in optimal control theory. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2013, 5 (4) : 415-432. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2013.5.415 [17] K. Renee Fister, Jennifer Hughes Donnelly. Immunotherapy: An Optimal Control Theory Approach. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2005, 2 (3) : 499-510. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2005.2.499 [18] K.F.C. Yiu, K.L. Mak, K. L. Teo. Airfoil design via optimal control theory. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (1) : 133-148. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.133 [19] Gunog Seo, Gail S. K. Wolkowicz. Pest control by generalist parasitoids: A bifurcation theory approach. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2018, 0 (0) : 0-0. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020163 [20] Jungho Park. Dynamic bifurcation theory of Rayleigh-Bénard convection with infinite Prandtl number. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2006, 6 (3) : 591-604. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.591

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313