American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
2016, 13(3): 569-578. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016008

A model based rule for selecting spiking thresholds in neuron models

Frederik Riis Mikkelsen 1,

1. 

Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark

Received  February 2015 Revised  November 2015 Published  January 2016

Determining excitability thresholds in neuronal models is of high interest due to its applicability in separating spiking from non-spiking phases of neuronal membrane potential processes. However, excitability thresholds are known to depend on various auxiliary variables, including any conductance or gating variables. Such dependences pose as a double-edged sword; they are natural consequences of the complexity of the model, but proves difficult to apply in practice, since gating variables are rarely measured.
    In this paper a technique for finding excitability thresholds, based on the local behaviour of the flow in dynamical systems, is presented. The technique incorporates the dynamics of the auxiliary variables, yet only produces thresholds for the membrane potential. The method is applied to several classical neuron models and the threshold's dependence upon external parameters is studied, along with a general evaluation of the technique.
Keywords: spiking, Hodgkin-Huxley, neuron modelling, excitability, threshold selection., Dynamical systems.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37C10, 65L05; Secondary: 92C2.
Citation: Frederik Riis Mikkelsen. A model based rule for selecting spiking thresholds in neuron models. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (3) : 569-578. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016008
References:
[1]

L. Abbott and T. Kepler, Model neurons: From Hodgkin-Huxley to Hopfield, Lect. Notes Phys., 368 (1990), p5. Google Scholar

[2]

J. A. Connor and C. F. Stevens, Prediction of repetitive firing behaviour from voltage clamp data on an isolated neurone soma, J. Physiol., 213 (1971), 31-53. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009366.  Google Scholar

[3]

P. Dayan and L. Abbott, Theoretical Neuroscience - Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems, Computational Neuroscience, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. Desroches, M. Krupa and S. Rodrigues, Inflection, canards and excitability threshold in neuronal models, J. Math. Biol., 67 (2012), 989-1017. doi: 10.1007/s00285-012-0576-z.  Google Scholar

[5]

S. Ditlevsen and P. Greenwood, The morris-lecar neuron model embeds a leaky integrate-and-fire model, J. Math. Biol., 67 (2013), 239-259. doi: 10.1007/s00285-012-0552-7.  Google Scholar

[6]

R. Fitzhugh, Impulses and physiological states in theoretical models of nerve membrane, Biophys. J., 1 (1961), 445-466. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(61)86902-6.  Google Scholar

[7]

J. Ginoux and B. Rossetto, Differential geometry and mechanics: Applications to chaotic dynamical systems, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 16 (2006), 887-910. doi: 10.1142/S0218127406015192.  Google Scholar

[8]

A. Hodgkin and A. Huxley, A quantitative description of the membrane current and application to conduction and excitation in nerve, J. Physiol., 117 (1952), 500-544. Google Scholar

[9]

E. Izhikevich, Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting, The MIT Press, 2007.  Google Scholar

[10]

T. Kepler, L. Abbott and E. Marder, Membranes with the same ion channel populations but different excitabilities, Biol. Cybern., 66 (1992), p381. Google Scholar

[11]

V. I. Krinsky and Yu. M. Kokoz, Analysis of equations of excitable membranes I. Reduction of the Hodgkin-Huxley equations to a second order system, Biofizika, 18 (1973), p506. Google Scholar

[12]

C. Meunier, Two and three dimensional reductions of the Hodgkin-Huxley system: Separation of time scales and bifurcations, Biol. Cybern., 67 (1992), 461-468. doi: 10.1007/BF00200990.  Google Scholar

[13]

C. Morris and H. Lecar, Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber, Biophys. J., 35 (1981), 193-213. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84782-0.  Google Scholar

[14]

J. Nagumo, S. Arimoto and S. Yoshizawa, An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon, Proc. IRE, 50 (1962), 2061-2070. doi: 10.1109/JRPROC.1962.288235.  Google Scholar

[15]

M. Okuda, New method of nonlinear analysis for shaping and threshold actions, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 41 (1976), 1815-1816. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.41.1815.  Google Scholar

[16]

B. Peng, V. Gaspar and K. Showalter, False bifurcations in chemical systems: Canards, Phil. Trans. R Soc. Lond. A, 337 (1991), 275-289. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1991.0123.  Google Scholar

[17]

L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, $3^{rd}$ edition, Texts in Applied Mathematics, 7, Springer, 2000. Google Scholar

[18]

J. Platkiewicz and R. Brette, A threshold equation for action potential initiation, PLoS Comput. Biol., 6 (2010), e1000850, 16 pp. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000850.  Google Scholar

[19]

M. Sekerli, C. Del Negro, R. Lee and R. Butera, Estimating action potential thresholds from neuronal time-series: New metrics and evaluation of methodologies, IEEE T. Bio. Med. Eng., 51 (2004), 1665-1672. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2004.827531.  Google Scholar

[20]

A. Tonnelier, Threshold curve for the excitability of bidimensional spiking neurons, Phys. Rev. E, 90 (2014), 022701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.022701.  Google Scholar

[21]

M. Wechselberge, J. Mitry and J. Rinzel, Canard theory and excitability, in Nonautonomous Dynamical Systems in the Life Sciences, Lecture Nones in Math., 2102, Springer, 2013, 89-132. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03080-7_3.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

L. Abbott and T. Kepler, Model neurons: From Hodgkin-Huxley to Hopfield, Lect. Notes Phys., 368 (1990), p5. Google Scholar

[2]

J. A. Connor and C. F. Stevens, Prediction of repetitive firing behaviour from voltage clamp data on an isolated neurone soma, J. Physiol., 213 (1971), 31-53. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009366.  Google Scholar

[3]

P. Dayan and L. Abbott, Theoretical Neuroscience - Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems, Computational Neuroscience, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001.  Google Scholar

[4]

M. Desroches, M. Krupa and S. Rodrigues, Inflection, canards and excitability threshold in neuronal models, J. Math. Biol., 67 (2012), 989-1017. doi: 10.1007/s00285-012-0576-z.  Google Scholar

[5]

S. Ditlevsen and P. Greenwood, The morris-lecar neuron model embeds a leaky integrate-and-fire model, J. Math. Biol., 67 (2013), 239-259. doi: 10.1007/s00285-012-0552-7.  Google Scholar

[6]

R. Fitzhugh, Impulses and physiological states in theoretical models of nerve membrane, Biophys. J., 1 (1961), 445-466. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(61)86902-6.  Google Scholar

[7]

J. Ginoux and B. Rossetto, Differential geometry and mechanics: Applications to chaotic dynamical systems, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 16 (2006), 887-910. doi: 10.1142/S0218127406015192.  Google Scholar

[8]

A. Hodgkin and A. Huxley, A quantitative description of the membrane current and application to conduction and excitation in nerve, J. Physiol., 117 (1952), 500-544. Google Scholar

[9]

E. Izhikevich, Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting, The MIT Press, 2007.  Google Scholar

[10]

T. Kepler, L. Abbott and E. Marder, Membranes with the same ion channel populations but different excitabilities, Biol. Cybern., 66 (1992), p381. Google Scholar

[11]

V. I. Krinsky and Yu. M. Kokoz, Analysis of equations of excitable membranes I. Reduction of the Hodgkin-Huxley equations to a second order system, Biofizika, 18 (1973), p506. Google Scholar

[12]

C. Meunier, Two and three dimensional reductions of the Hodgkin-Huxley system: Separation of time scales and bifurcations, Biol. Cybern., 67 (1992), 461-468. doi: 10.1007/BF00200990.  Google Scholar

[13]

C. Morris and H. Lecar, Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber, Biophys. J., 35 (1981), 193-213. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84782-0.  Google Scholar

[14]

J. Nagumo, S. Arimoto and S. Yoshizawa, An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon, Proc. IRE, 50 (1962), 2061-2070. doi: 10.1109/JRPROC.1962.288235.  Google Scholar

[15]

M. Okuda, New method of nonlinear analysis for shaping and threshold actions, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 41 (1976), 1815-1816. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.41.1815.  Google Scholar

[16]

B. Peng, V. Gaspar and K. Showalter, False bifurcations in chemical systems: Canards, Phil. Trans. R Soc. Lond. A, 337 (1991), 275-289. doi: 10.1098/rsta.1991.0123.  Google Scholar

[17]

L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, $3^{rd}$ edition, Texts in Applied Mathematics, 7, Springer, 2000. Google Scholar

[18]

J. Platkiewicz and R. Brette, A threshold equation for action potential initiation, PLoS Comput. Biol., 6 (2010), e1000850, 16 pp. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000850.  Google Scholar

[19]

M. Sekerli, C. Del Negro, R. Lee and R. Butera, Estimating action potential thresholds from neuronal time-series: New metrics and evaluation of methodologies, IEEE T. Bio. Med. Eng., 51 (2004), 1665-1672. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2004.827531.  Google Scholar

[20]

A. Tonnelier, Threshold curve for the excitability of bidimensional spiking neurons, Phys. Rev. E, 90 (2014), 022701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.022701.  Google Scholar

[21]

M. Wechselberge, J. Mitry and J. Rinzel, Canard theory and excitability, in Nonautonomous Dynamical Systems in the Life Sciences, Lecture Nones in Math., 2102, Springer, 2013, 89-132. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03080-7_3.  Google Scholar

[1]

Aymen Balti, Valentina Lanza, Moulay Aziz-Alaoui. A multi-base harmonic balance method applied to Hodgkin-Huxley model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2018, 15 (3) : 807-825. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018036
[2]

Qingyun Wang, Xia Shi, Guanrong Chen. Delay-induced synchronization transition in small-world Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal networks with channel blocking. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (2) : 607-621. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.607
[3]

Cecilia Cavaterra, Denis Enăchescu, Gabriela Marinoschi. Sliding mode control of the Hodgkin–Huxley mathematical model. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2019, 8 (4) : 883-902. doi: 10.3934/eect.2019043
[4]

Hiroyuki Torikai. Basic spike-train properties of a digital spiking neuron. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2008, 9 (1) : 183-198. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.9.183
[5]

Kseniia Kravchuk, Alexander Vidybida. Non-Markovian spiking statistics of a neuron with delayed feedback in presence of refractoriness. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2014, 11 (1) : 81-104. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.81
[6]

Xianjun Wang, Huaguang Gu, Bo Lu. Big homoclinic orbit bifurcation underlying post-inhibitory rebound spike and a novel threshold curve of a neuron. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29 (5) : 2987-3015. doi: 10.3934/era.2021023
[7]

Massimiliano Tamborrino. Approximation of the first passage time density of a Wiener process to an exponentially decaying boundary by two-piecewise linear threshold. Application to neuronal spiking activity. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2016, 13 (3) : 613-629. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016011
[8]

El Houcein El Abdalaoui, Sylvain Bonnot, Ali Messaoudi, Olivier Sester. On the Fibonacci complex dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (5) : 2449-2471. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.2449
[9]

Lianfa He, Hongwen Zheng, Yujun Zhu. Shadowing in random dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2005, 12 (2) : 355-362. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2005.12.355
[10]

Mauricio Achigar. Extensions of expansive dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (7) : 3093-3108. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020399
[11]

Fritz Colonius, Marco Spadini. Fundamental semigroups for dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2006, 14 (3) : 447-463. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2006.14.447
[12]

John Erik Fornæss. Sustainable dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2003, 9 (6) : 1361-1386. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2003.9.1361
[13]

Vieri Benci, C. Bonanno, Stefano Galatolo, G. Menconi, M. Virgilio. Dynamical systems and computable information. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (4) : 935-960. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.935
[14]

Mădălina Roxana Buneci. Morphisms of discrete dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 29 (1) : 91-107. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.29.91
[15]

Josiney A. Souza, Tiago A. Pacifico, Hélio V. M. Tozatti. A note on parallelizable dynamical systems. Electronic Research Announcements, 2017, 24: 64-67. doi: 10.3934/era.2017.24.007
[16]

Philippe Marie, Jérôme Rousseau. Recurrence for random dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 30 (1) : 1-16. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.1
[17]

Tobias Wichtrey. Harmonic limits of dynamical systems. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 1432-1439. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.1432
[18]

Patrizia Pucci, Maria Cesarina Salvatori. On an initial value problem modeling evolution and selection in living systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2014, 7 (4) : 807-821. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2014.7.807
[19]

Rui Dilão, András Volford. Excitability in a model with a saddle-node homoclinic bifurcation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2004, 4 (2) : 419-434. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2004.4.419
[20]

Xiangying Meng, Gemma Huguet, John Rinzel. Type III excitability, slope sensitivity and coincidence detection. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2012, 32 (8) : 2729-2757. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2012.32.2729

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (223)
  • HTML views (0)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy