American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
June  2017, 14(3): 673-694. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017038

Moments of von mises and fisher distributions and applications

Thomas Hillen 1,, , Kevin J. Painter 2, , Amanda C. Swan 1, and  Albert D. Murtha 3,

1. 

University of Alberta, Centre for Mathematical Biology, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G2G1, Canada
2. 

Department of Mathematics, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS, UK
3. 

Cross Cancer Institute, 11560-University Ave NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada

* Corresponding author: Thomas Hillen

Received  May 09, 2016 Accepted  November 22, 2016 Published  December 2016

The von Mises and Fisher distributions are spherical analogues to theNormal distribution on the unit circle and unit sphere, respectively. The computation of their moments, and in particular the second moment, usually involves solving tedious trigonometric integrals. Here we present a new method to compute the moments of spherical distributions, based on the divergence theorem. This method allows a clear derivation of the second moments and can be easily generalized to higher dimensions. In particular we note that, to our knowledge, the variance-covariance matrix of the three dimensional Fisher distribution has not previously been explicitly computed. While the emphasis of this paper lies in calculating the moments of spherical distributions, their usefulness is motivated by their relationship to population statistics in animal/cell movement models and demonstrated in applications to the modelling of sea turtle navigation, wolf movement and brain tumour growth.

Keywords: Von Mises distribution, Fisher distribution, spherical distributions, moments, biological applications.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 35Q92; Secondary: 62E15, 92B05.
Citation: Thomas Hillen, Kevin J. Painter, Amanda C. Swan, Albert D. Murtha. Moments of von mises and fisher distributions and applications. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2017, 14 (3) : 673-694. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017038
References:
[1]

wikipedia. com, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VonMises%E2%80%93Fisher_distribution, last accessed on 11/22/2016. Google Scholar

[2]

A. Banerjee, I. S. Dhillon, J. Ghosh and S. Sra, Clustering on the unit hypersphere using von Mises-Fisher distributions, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6 (2005), 1345-1382.   Google Scholar

[3] E. Batschelet, Circular Statistics in Biology, Academic Press, London, 1981.   Google Scholar
[4]

C. Beaulieu, The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system -a technical review, NMR Biomed., 15 (2002), 435-455.   Google Scholar

[5]

R. Bleck, An oceanic general circulation model framed in hybrid isopycnic-cartesian coordinates, Ocean Mod., 4 (2002), 55-88.   Google Scholar

[6]

E. A. Codling, N. Bearon and G. J. Thorn, Thorn, Diffusion about the mean drift location in a biased random walk, Ecology, 91 (2010), 3106-3113.   Google Scholar

[7]

E. A. Codling, M. J. Plank and S. Benhamou, Random walk models in biology, J. Roy. Soc. Interface, 5 (2008), 813-834.   Google Scholar

[8]

C. Darwin, Perception in the lower animals, Nature, 7 (1873), 360.   Google Scholar

[9]

C. Engwer, T. Hillen, M. Knappitsch and C. Surulescu, Glioma follow white matter tracts: A multiscale DTI-based model, J. Math. Biol., 71 (2015), 551-582.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-014-0822-7.  Google Scholar

[10] N. I. Fisher, Statistical Analysis of Circular Data, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511564345.  Google Scholar
[11]

A. Giese, L. Kluwe, B. Laube, H. Meissner, M. E. Berens and M. Westphal, Migration of human glioma cells on myelin, Neurosurgery, 38 (1996), 755-764.   Google Scholar

[12]

P. G. Gritsenko, O. Ilina and P. Friedl, Interstitial guidance of cancer invasion, Journal or Pathology, 226 (2012), 185-199.   Google Scholar

[13]

H. Hatzikirou, A. Deutsch, C. Schaller, M. Simaon and K. Swanson, Mathematical modelling of glioblastoma tumour development: A review, Math. Models Meth. Appl. Sci., 15 (2005), 1779-1794.  doi: 10.1142/S0218202505000960.  Google Scholar

[14]

T. Hillen, ${M}^5$ mesoscopic and macroscopic models for mesenchymal motion, J. Math. Biol., 53 (2006), 585-616.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-006-0017-y.  Google Scholar

[15]

T. Hillen, E. Leonard and H. van Roessel, Partial Differential Equations; Theory and Completely Solved Problems, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2012.  Google Scholar

[16]

T. Hillen and K. Painter, Transport and anisotropic diffusion models for movement in oriented habitats, In: Lewis, M., Maini, P., Petrovskii, S. (Eds.), Dispersal, Individual Movement and Spatial Ecology: A Mathematical Perspective, Springer, Heidelberg, 2071 (2013), 177-222. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-35497-7_7.  Google Scholar

[17]

T. Hillen, On the $L^2$-moment closure of transport equations: The general case, Discr.Cont.Dyn.Systems, Series B, 5 (2005), 299-318.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.299.  Google Scholar

[18]

A. R. C. James and A. K. Stuart-Smith, Distribution of caribou and wolves in relation to linear corridors, The Journal of Wildlife Management, 64 (2000), 154-159.   Google Scholar

[19]

A. Jbabdi, E. Mandonnet, H. Duffau, L. Capelle, K. Swanson, M. Pelegrini-Issac, R. Guillevin and H. Benali, Simulation of anisotropic growth of low-grade gliomas using diffusion tensor imaging, Mang. Res. Med., 54 (2005), 616-624.   Google Scholar

[20]

J. Kent, The Fisher-Bingham Distribution on the Sphere, J. Royal. Stat. Soc., 1982. Google Scholar

[21]

E. Konukoglu, O. Clatz, P. Bondiau, H. Delignette and N. Ayache, Extrapolation glioma invasion margin in brain magnetic resonance images: Suggesting new irradiation margins, Medical Image Analysis, 14 (2010), 111-125.   Google Scholar

[22]

K. V. Mardia and P. E. Jupp, Directional Statistics, Wiley, New York, 2000.  Google Scholar

[23]

H. McKenzie, E. Merrill, R. Spiteri and M. Lewis, How linear features alter predator movement and the functional response, Royal Society Interface, 2 (2012), 205-216.   Google Scholar

[24] P. Moorcroft and M. A. Lewis, Mechanistic Home Range Analysis, Princeton University Press, USA, 2006.   Google Scholar
[25]

J. A. Mortimer and A. Carr, Reproduction and migrations of the Ascension Island green turtle (chelonia mydas), Copeia, 1987 (1987), 103-113.   Google Scholar

[26]

P. Mosayebi, D. Cobzas, A. Murtha and M. Jagersand, Tumor invasion margin on the Riemannian space of brain fibers, Medical Image Analysis, 16 (2011), 361-373.   Google Scholar

[27]

A. Okubo and S. Levin, Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Modern Perspectives, Second edition. Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, 14. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4978-6.  Google Scholar

[28]

H. Othmer, S. Dunbar and W. Alt, Models of dispersal in biological systems, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 26 (1988), 263-298.  doi: 10.1007/BF00277392.  Google Scholar

[29]

K. Painter, Modelling migration strategies in the extracellular matrix, J. Math. Biol., 58 (2009), 511-543.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-008-0217-8.  Google Scholar

[30]

K. Painter and T. Hillen, Mathematical modelling of glioma growth: The use of diffusion tensor imaging DTI data to predict the anisotropic pathways of cancer invasion, J. Theor. Biol., 323 (2013), 25-39.  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.01.014.  Google Scholar

[31]

K. Painter and T. Hillen, Navigating the flow: Individual and continuum models for homing in flowing environments, Royal Society Interface, 12 (2015), 20150,647.   Google Scholar

[32]

K. J. Painter, Multiscale models for movement in oriented environments and their application to hilltopping in butterflies, Theor. Ecol., 7 (2014), 53-75.   Google Scholar

[33]

J. Rao, Molecular mechanisms of glioma invasiveness: The role of proteases, Nature Reviews Cancer, 3 (2003), 489-501.   Google Scholar

[34]

A. Swan, T. Hillen, J. Bowman and A. Murtha, A patient-specific anisotropic diffusion model for brain tumor spread, Bull. Math. Biol., to appear (2017). Google Scholar

[35]

K. Swanson, E. A. Jr and J. Murray, A quantitative model for differential motility of gliomas in grey and white matter, Cell Proliferation, 33 (2000), 317-329.   Google Scholar

[36]

K. Swanson, R. Rostomily and E. Alvord Jr, Predicting survival of patients with glioblastoma by combining a mathematical model and pre-operative MR imaging characteristics: A proof of principle, British Journal of Cancer, 98 (2008), 113-119.   Google Scholar

[37]

P. Turchin, Quantitative Analysis of Movement, Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, 1998. Google Scholar

[38]

C. Xue and H. Othmer, Multiscale models of taxis-driven patterning in bacterial populations, SIAM Journal for Applied Mathematics, 70 (2009), 133-167.  doi: 10.1137/070711505.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

wikipedia. com, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VonMises%E2%80%93Fisher_distribution, last accessed on 11/22/2016. Google Scholar

[2]

A. Banerjee, I. S. Dhillon, J. Ghosh and S. Sra, Clustering on the unit hypersphere using von Mises-Fisher distributions, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6 (2005), 1345-1382.   Google Scholar

[3] E. Batschelet, Circular Statistics in Biology, Academic Press, London, 1981.   Google Scholar
[4]

C. Beaulieu, The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system -a technical review, NMR Biomed., 15 (2002), 435-455.   Google Scholar

[5]

R. Bleck, An oceanic general circulation model framed in hybrid isopycnic-cartesian coordinates, Ocean Mod., 4 (2002), 55-88.   Google Scholar

[6]

E. A. Codling, N. Bearon and G. J. Thorn, Thorn, Diffusion about the mean drift location in a biased random walk, Ecology, 91 (2010), 3106-3113.   Google Scholar

[7]

E. A. Codling, M. J. Plank and S. Benhamou, Random walk models in biology, J. Roy. Soc. Interface, 5 (2008), 813-834.   Google Scholar

[8]

C. Darwin, Perception in the lower animals, Nature, 7 (1873), 360.   Google Scholar

[9]

C. Engwer, T. Hillen, M. Knappitsch and C. Surulescu, Glioma follow white matter tracts: A multiscale DTI-based model, J. Math. Biol., 71 (2015), 551-582.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-014-0822-7.  Google Scholar

[10] N. I. Fisher, Statistical Analysis of Circular Data, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511564345.  Google Scholar
[11]

A. Giese, L. Kluwe, B. Laube, H. Meissner, M. E. Berens and M. Westphal, Migration of human glioma cells on myelin, Neurosurgery, 38 (1996), 755-764.   Google Scholar

[12]

P. G. Gritsenko, O. Ilina and P. Friedl, Interstitial guidance of cancer invasion, Journal or Pathology, 226 (2012), 185-199.   Google Scholar

[13]

H. Hatzikirou, A. Deutsch, C. Schaller, M. Simaon and K. Swanson, Mathematical modelling of glioblastoma tumour development: A review, Math. Models Meth. Appl. Sci., 15 (2005), 1779-1794.  doi: 10.1142/S0218202505000960.  Google Scholar

[14]

T. Hillen, ${M}^5$ mesoscopic and macroscopic models for mesenchymal motion, J. Math. Biol., 53 (2006), 585-616.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-006-0017-y.  Google Scholar

[15]

T. Hillen, E. Leonard and H. van Roessel, Partial Differential Equations; Theory and Completely Solved Problems, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2012.  Google Scholar

[16]

T. Hillen and K. Painter, Transport and anisotropic diffusion models for movement in oriented habitats, In: Lewis, M., Maini, P., Petrovskii, S. (Eds.), Dispersal, Individual Movement and Spatial Ecology: A Mathematical Perspective, Springer, Heidelberg, 2071 (2013), 177-222. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-35497-7_7.  Google Scholar

[17]

T. Hillen, On the $L^2$-moment closure of transport equations: The general case, Discr.Cont.Dyn.Systems, Series B, 5 (2005), 299-318.  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2005.5.299.  Google Scholar

[18]

A. R. C. James and A. K. Stuart-Smith, Distribution of caribou and wolves in relation to linear corridors, The Journal of Wildlife Management, 64 (2000), 154-159.   Google Scholar

[19]

A. Jbabdi, E. Mandonnet, H. Duffau, L. Capelle, K. Swanson, M. Pelegrini-Issac, R. Guillevin and H. Benali, Simulation of anisotropic growth of low-grade gliomas using diffusion tensor imaging, Mang. Res. Med., 54 (2005), 616-624.   Google Scholar

[20]

J. Kent, The Fisher-Bingham Distribution on the Sphere, J. Royal. Stat. Soc., 1982. Google Scholar

[21]

E. Konukoglu, O. Clatz, P. Bondiau, H. Delignette and N. Ayache, Extrapolation glioma invasion margin in brain magnetic resonance images: Suggesting new irradiation margins, Medical Image Analysis, 14 (2010), 111-125.   Google Scholar

[22]

K. V. Mardia and P. E. Jupp, Directional Statistics, Wiley, New York, 2000.  Google Scholar

[23]

H. McKenzie, E. Merrill, R. Spiteri and M. Lewis, How linear features alter predator movement and the functional response, Royal Society Interface, 2 (2012), 205-216.   Google Scholar

[24] P. Moorcroft and M. A. Lewis, Mechanistic Home Range Analysis, Princeton University Press, USA, 2006.   Google Scholar
[25]

J. A. Mortimer and A. Carr, Reproduction and migrations of the Ascension Island green turtle (chelonia mydas), Copeia, 1987 (1987), 103-113.   Google Scholar

[26]

P. Mosayebi, D. Cobzas, A. Murtha and M. Jagersand, Tumor invasion margin on the Riemannian space of brain fibers, Medical Image Analysis, 16 (2011), 361-373.   Google Scholar

[27]

A. Okubo and S. Levin, Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Modern Perspectives, Second edition. Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, 14. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4978-6.  Google Scholar

[28]

H. Othmer, S. Dunbar and W. Alt, Models of dispersal in biological systems, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 26 (1988), 263-298.  doi: 10.1007/BF00277392.  Google Scholar

[29]

K. Painter, Modelling migration strategies in the extracellular matrix, J. Math. Biol., 58 (2009), 511-543.  doi: 10.1007/s00285-008-0217-8.  Google Scholar

[30]

K. Painter and T. Hillen, Mathematical modelling of glioma growth: The use of diffusion tensor imaging DTI data to predict the anisotropic pathways of cancer invasion, J. Theor. Biol., 323 (2013), 25-39.  doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.01.014.  Google Scholar

[31]

K. Painter and T. Hillen, Navigating the flow: Individual and continuum models for homing in flowing environments, Royal Society Interface, 12 (2015), 20150,647.   Google Scholar

[32]

K. J. Painter, Multiscale models for movement in oriented environments and their application to hilltopping in butterflies, Theor. Ecol., 7 (2014), 53-75.   Google Scholar

[33]

J. Rao, Molecular mechanisms of glioma invasiveness: The role of proteases, Nature Reviews Cancer, 3 (2003), 489-501.   Google Scholar

[34]

A. Swan, T. Hillen, J. Bowman and A. Murtha, A patient-specific anisotropic diffusion model for brain tumor spread, Bull. Math. Biol., to appear (2017). Google Scholar

[35]

K. Swanson, E. A. Jr and J. Murray, A quantitative model for differential motility of gliomas in grey and white matter, Cell Proliferation, 33 (2000), 317-329.   Google Scholar

[36]

K. Swanson, R. Rostomily and E. Alvord Jr, Predicting survival of patients with glioblastoma by combining a mathematical model and pre-operative MR imaging characteristics: A proof of principle, British Journal of Cancer, 98 (2008), 113-119.   Google Scholar

[37]

P. Turchin, Quantitative Analysis of Movement, Sinauer Assoc., Sunderland, 1998. Google Scholar

[38]

C. Xue and H. Othmer, Multiscale models of taxis-driven patterning in bacterial populations, SIAM Journal for Applied Mathematics, 70 (2009), 133-167.  doi: 10.1137/070711505.  Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Left: The unimodal von Mises distribution as a function of ${{\bf n}} \in \mathbb{S}^1$ with a peak at $(1,0)^T$. Right: The bimodal von Mises distribution as a function of ${{\bf n}} \in \mathbb{S}^1 $ with peaks at ${{\bf n}}=\pm (1,0)^T$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  The Fisher distribution on the unit sphere. From left to right we plot the distribution for increasing values of concentration parameter $k$. In each case, the dominant direction is taken as ${\bf u} = (1/2,1/2,\sqrt{2}/2)$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Coefficients $a(k), b(k), c(k), d(k)$ from (33) as functions of $k$
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  Comparison between simulations of the stochastic velocity-jump model and the fundamental solution of (6), equation (9) in two dimensions. Results shown at times $t=50$ (left) and $t=200$ (right). Red lines indicate contours of the average distribution for the particle position, generated through repeated simulations of the stochastic velocity-jump (VJ) model, while blue lines indicate contours of the fundamental solution (FS), equation (9); contours are shown here for $c({\bf x},t) = 10^{-4}$ and $10^{-2}$. For the stochastic simulations we initialize the individual at $(0,0)$ and compute the random walk path using the von Mises distribution for $q$ (with $\phi = \pi/4$ and $\kappa = 10$), $s = 10$ and $\lambda = 100$. ${\bf a}$ and $D$ for (9) are subsequently determined using (10) and (11)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  Comparison between simulations of the stochastic velocity-jump model and the fundamental solution of (6) in three dimensions. All plots are generated at time $t = 50$. In (a)-(b) we plot the three dimensional contour surface at the fixed density $c({\bf x},t)=10^{-5}$ for (a) the fundamental solution given by equation (9) and (b) the particle probability distribution generated from multiple simulations (200000) of the 3D velocity-jump model. In (c-d) we illustrate the quantitative match by plotting contour lines of fixed density $c({\bf x},t)=10^{-4}$ (solid line) and $c({\bf x},t)=10^{-6}$ (dashed line) for projections onto the (c) $x-z$ plane (fixing $y=50$) and (d) $y-z$ plane (fixing $x=460$). For the simulations we initialise the individual at $(0,0,0)$ and compute the random walk path using the Fisher distribution (2) for $q$ (with ${\bf u} = (1,0,0)$) and $\kappa = 10$) along with $s = 10$ and $\lambda = 100$. ${\bf a}$ and $D$ for equation (9) are subsequently determined by equations (25) and (26)
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

31] for full details. We consider (a) weak navigators and (b) strong navigators, showing in each case (top row) the individual-based model and (bottom row) the macroscopic model. For the IBM turtle positions (white circles) are shown at the indicated times, superimposed on ocean currents as illustrated by its direction (arrows) and magnitude (arrow length/density map), while for the macroscopic model (6) the population density is indicated by the density map, where the scale indicates the number/km$^2$ and white regions represent a density below $10^{-5}$. Simulations start on 1st of January 2014 and turtles swim with mean fixed swimming speed of 40 km/day and make turns once per hour. Ocean currents are obtained from a standard ocean forecasting model (HYCOM, [5])">Figure 6.  Simulations of green sea turtle navigation towards Ascension island: we refer to [31] for full details. We consider (a) weak navigators and (b) strong navigators, showing in each case (top row) the individual-based model and (bottom row) the macroscopic model. For the IBM turtle positions (white circles) are shown at the indicated times, superimposed on ocean currents as illustrated by its direction (arrows) and magnitude (arrow length/density map), while for the macroscopic model (6) the population density is indicated by the density map, where the scale indicates the number/km$^2$ and white regions represent a density below $10^{-5}$. Simulations start on 1st of January 2014 and turtles swim with mean fixed swimming speed of 40 km/day and make turns once per hour. Ocean currents are obtained from a standard ocean forecasting model (HYCOM, [5])
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Population density distributions describing the different responses of a population to linear landscape features such as seismic lines. In each case we solve (6), where ${\bf a}$ and $D$ are calculated using the moments of the bimodal von Mises distribution, i.e. equations (23-24). In (a) we impose a regular array of criss-crossing seismic lines: the population density distribution is either (a1) raised or (a2) decreased along the seismic lines according to whether they tend to (a1) follow along the paths or (a2) move directly off of them. In (b) an identical set of simulations is conducted for a genuine landscape, based on an aerial photograph of a Northern Alberta landscape
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

34] for details. These are test cases to show the effect of changing the concentration parameter. (a) shows the fractional anisotropy for a two-dimensional axial slice of a real patient brain. Yellow indicates high fractional anisotropy, and thus high alignment, while blue indicates isotropic tissue. The initial condition for the brain tumour simulation is indicated by a black dot. (b)-(e) show two artificial tumours generated using real patient DTI data for two different values of $\kappa$, and thus $k$. (b) and (c) use $\kappa=0.5$, and (d) and (e) use $\kappa=15$. (b) and (d) represent a two-dimensional slice of the cell density (where dark blue = low cancer cell density, yellow = high cancer cell density), while (c) and (e) represent an isosurface corresponding to $c(x,t)=0.16$. It has been estimated that this is the cell-denstity that shows up on T2-MRI images, thus the isosurfaces in (c) and (e) can be thought of as the visible tumour boundaries">Figure 8.  Simulations of brain tumour growth using real patient data: see [34] for details. These are test cases to show the effect of changing the concentration parameter. (a) shows the fractional anisotropy for a two-dimensional axial slice of a real patient brain. Yellow indicates high fractional anisotropy, and thus high alignment, while blue indicates isotropic tissue. The initial condition for the brain tumour simulation is indicated by a black dot. (b)-(e) show two artificial tumours generated using real patient DTI data for two different values of $\kappa$, and thus $k$. (b) and (c) use $\kappa=0.5$, and (d) and (e) use $\kappa=15$. (b) and (d) represent a two-dimensional slice of the cell density (where dark blue = low cancer cell density, yellow = high cancer cell density), while (c) and (e) represent an isosurface corresponding to $c(x,t)=0.16$. It has been estimated that this is the cell-denstity that shows up on T2-MRI images, thus the isosurfaces in (c) and (e) can be thought of as the visible tumour boundaries
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

[1]

Axel Heim, Vladimir Sidorenko, Uli Sorger. Computation of distributions and their moments in the trellis. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2008, 2 (4) : 373-391. doi: 10.3934/amc.2008.2.373
[2]

Kevin Ford. The distribution of totients. Electronic Research Announcements, 1998, 4: 27-34.

[3]

Lanqiang Li, Shixin Zhu, Li Liu. The weight distribution of a class of p-ary cyclic codes and their applications. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2019, 13 (1) : 137-156. doi: 10.3934/amc.2019008
[4]

King-Yeung Lam, Daniel Munther. Invading the ideal free distribution. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (10) : 3219-3244. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.3219
[5]

Katrin Gelfert, Christian Wolf. On the distribution of periodic orbits. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 26 (3) : 949-966. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.949
[6]

Victor Berdichevsky. Distribution of minimum values of stochastic functionals. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3 (3) : 437-460. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.437
[7]

I-Lin Wang, Ju-Chun Lin. A compaction scheme and generator for distribution networks. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (1) : 117-140. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.117
[8]

Yvo Desmedt, Niels Duif, Henk van Tilborg, Huaxiong Wang. Bounds and constructions for key distribution schemes. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2009, 3 (3) : 273-293. doi: 10.3934/amc.2009.3.273
[9]

Alexander Barg, Arya Mazumdar, Gilles Zémor. Weight distribution and decoding of codes on hypergraphs. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2008, 2 (4) : 433-450. doi: 10.3934/amc.2008.2.433
[10]

Ginestra Bianconi, Riccardo Zecchina. Viable flux distribution in metabolic networks. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3 (2) : 361-369. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.361
[11]

Robert Stephen Cantrell, Chris Cosner, Yuan Lou. Evolution of dispersal and the ideal free distribution. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2010, 7 (1) : 17-36. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.17
[12]

Pieter Moree. On the distribution of the order over residue classes. Electronic Research Announcements, 2006, 12: 121-128.

[13]

R.L. Sheu, M.J. Ting, I.L. Wang. Maximum flow problem in the distribution network. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2006, 2 (3) : 237-254. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2006.2.237
[14]

Shaobo Lin, Xingping Sun, Zongben Xu. Discretizing spherical integrals and its applications. Conference Publications, 2013, 2013 (special) : 499-514. doi: 10.3934/proc.2013.2013.499
[15]

Ross Callister, Duc-Son Pham, Mihai Lazarescu. Using distribution analysis for parameter selection in repstream. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2019, 2 (3) : 215-250. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2019015
[16]

Erika Asano, Louis J. Gross, Suzanne Lenhart, Leslie A. Real. Optimal control of vaccine distribution in a rabies metapopulation model. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2008, 5 (2) : 219-238. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.219
[17]

Richard Miles, Thomas Ward. A directional uniformity of periodic point distribution and mixing. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2011, 30 (4) : 1181-1189. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2011.30.1181
[18]

Michal Málek, Peter Raith. Stability of the distribution function for piecewise monotonic maps on the interval. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (5) : 2527-2539. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018105
[19]

Feng Jiao, Jian Ren, Jianshe Yu. Analytical formula and dynamic profile of mRNA distribution. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2020, 25 (1) : 241-257. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019180
[20]

Bum Il Hong, Nahmwoo Hahm, Sun-Ho Choi. SIR Rumor spreading model with trust rate distribution. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13 (3) : 515-530. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018023

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (172)
  • HTML views (109)
  • Cited by (11)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences